Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 *** 19.5 (19.0, 19.9) N/A 1,554 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.8, 2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Anderson County 6 *** 18.7 (14.9, 23.1) 56 (14, 82) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Bedford County 6 *** 19.7 (14.7, 26.0) 52 (5, 83) 11 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.3, 8.3)
Benton County 6 *** 18.6 (10.8, 30.1) 57 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Bledsoe County 6 *** 17.6 (10.3, 28.9) 67 (2, 84) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-4.4, 9.5)
Blount County 6 *** 20.5 (17.6, 23.9) 42 (13, 75) 36 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Bradley County 6 *** 16.9 (13.8, 20.6) 72 (24, 83) 22 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.7, 6.6)
Campbell County 6 *** 21.2 (16.1, 27.6) 34 (4, 81) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.1)
Carroll County 6 *** 29.7 (21.5, 40.1) 2 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.4)
Carter County 6 *** 18.5 (14.2, 23.8) 59 (12, 83) 14 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.2, 8.4)
Cheatham County 6 *** 22.6 (16.9, 29.8) 27 (2, 80) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 4.7)
Chester County 6 *** 24.2 (15.4, 36.4) 16 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.9, 7.7)
Claiborne County 6 *** 20.7 (14.5, 28.8) 40 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 7.9)
Clay County 6 *** 26.7 (14.9, 45.9) 6 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Cocke County 6 *** 18.3 (12.9, 25.4) 61 (6, 84) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.4, 6.0)
Coffee County 6 *** 16.9 (12.7, 22.2) 71 (17, 84) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.2, 4.8)
Crockett County 6 *** 20.1 (12.0, 32.1) 45 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 9.9)
Cumberland County 6 *** 16.4 (12.8, 21.0) 77 (22, 84) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 4.7)
Davidson County 6 *** 17.2 (15.8, 18.7) 70 (44, 78) 118 stable stable trend -2.8 (-10.9, 6.0)
DeKalb County 6 *** 11.4 (6.4, 19.3) 84 (30, 84) 3
*
*
Decatur County 6 *** 29.2 (18.4, 44.7) 3 (1, 81) 5 rising rising trend 8.5 (2.9, 14.5)
Dickson County 6 *** 25.4 (20.2, 31.7) 11 (1, 65) 17 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 7.0)
Dyer County 6 *** 19.8 (14.5, 26.6) 49 (5, 83) 10 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 6.5)
Fayette County 6 *** 24.8 (19.0, 32.0) 14 (1, 72) 14 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 7.8)
Fentress County 6 *** 21.1 (13.3, 32.1) 37 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.5, 9.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 16.7 (12.2, 22.6) 74 (14, 84) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 4.9)
Gibson County 6 *** 20.5 (15.7, 26.4) 43 (5, 81) 13 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 6.4)
Giles County 6 *** 14.8 (10.1, 21.3) 79 (21, 84) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Grainger County 6 *** 22.9 (15.8, 32.5) 24 (1, 83) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.1, 7.9)
Greene County 6 *** 18.5 (14.8, 23.1) 58 (15, 82) 18 stable stable trend 4.0 (0.0, 8.1)
Hamblen County 6 *** 21.1 (16.7, 26.3) 36 (6, 79) 17 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 6.0)
Hamilton County 6 *** 18.8 (17.0, 20.7) 55 (29, 75) 85 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.1)
Hardeman County 6 *** 23.6 (16.8, 32.5) 22 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.8)
Hardin County 6 *** 20.9 (14.7, 29.2) 39 (3, 84) 8 stable stable trend -12.7 (-27.7, 5.3)
Hawkins County 6 *** 18.4 (14.2, 23.5) 60 (11, 83) 14 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 7.4)
Haywood County 6 *** 23.7 (15.4, 35.1) 20 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.5)
Henderson County 6 *** 23.3 (16.5, 32.1) 23 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 6.5)
Henry County 6 *** 17.5 (12.2, 24.5) 69 (8, 84) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.9)
Hickman County 6 *** 21.1 (14.5, 29.9) 35 (2, 83) 7
*
*
Humphreys County 6 *** 22.7 (15.1, 33.2) 26 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 5.0)
Jefferson County 6 *** 19.8 (15.2, 25.4) 50 (8, 82) 14
*
*
Johnson County 6 *** 14.7 (8.7, 23.8) 80 (12, 84) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.5, 8.9)
Knox County 6 *** 18.1 (16.5, 19.9) 63 (35, 76) 95 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Lauderdale County 6 *** 19.8 (13.4, 28.4) 48 (3, 84) 6 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.1, 9.3)
Lawrence County 6 *** 22.6 (17.3, 29.2) 28 (3, 79) 13 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 5.7)
Lewis County 6 *** 23.7 (14.3, 37.8) 19 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 *** 12.7 (8.2, 19.0) 83 (31, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-4.1, 8.7)
Loudon County 6 *** 23.7 (18.6, 30.0) 18 (2, 75) 18 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.1)
Macon County 6 *** 27.7 (19.4, 38.5) 4 (1, 77) 8
*
*
Madison County 6 *** 19.8 (16.2, 23.9) 51 (12, 80) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Marion County 6 *** 23.7 (16.8, 32.5) 21 (1, 81) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.5, 8.9)
Marshall County 6 *** 21.4 (15.2, 29.5) 32 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.8, 7.6)
Maury County 6 *** 22.3 (18.4, 26.8) 29 (6, 72) 24 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.2, 6.1)
McMinn County 6 *** 17.7 (13.5, 22.8) 66 (13, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.6)
McNairy County 6 *** 26.2 (19.0, 35.5) 7 (1, 76) 9 rising rising trend 7.3 (3.6, 11.1)
Meigs County 6 *** 35.7 (23.1, 53.2) 1 (1, 70) 6
*
*
Monroe County 6 *** 20.0 (15.0, 26.3) 46 (5, 82) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 4.7)
Montgomery County 6 *** 19.4 (16.4, 22.7) 54 (16, 78) 31 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.1, 5.7)
Morgan County 6 *** 20.7 (13.4, 30.7) 41 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.1)
Obion County 6 *** 24.3 (18.0, 32.4) 15 (1, 79) 11 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.2, 9.9)
Overton County 6 *** 18.1 (11.7, 27.2) 62 (4, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.6, 6.8)
Polk County 6 *** 22.8 (14.9, 33.8) 25 (1, 84) 6
*
*
Putnam County 6 *** 17.6 (13.8, 22.1) 68 (18, 83) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.2)
Rhea County 6 *** 19.5 (13.9, 26.7) 53 (4, 84) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.3, 6.2)
Roane County 6 *** 14.6 (11.1, 19.1) 81 (35, 84) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.9)
Robertson County 6 *** 21.9 (17.5, 27.0) 30 (5, 76) 18 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.0, 6.3)
Rutherford County 6 *** 20.5 (18.1, 23.0) 44 (16, 69) 58 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.1)
Scott County 6 *** 26.0 (17.8, 36.7) 8 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 *** 25.2 (16.3, 37.9) 13 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Sevier County 6 *** 16.9 (13.8, 20.5) 73 (26, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.7)
Shelby County 6 *** 21.7 (20.4, 23.1) 31 (17, 49) 216 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.5, 3.8)
Smith County 6 *** 21.3 (13.1, 32.9) 33 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 7.7)
Stewart County 6 *** 25.7 (16.4, 39.1) 9 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Sullivan County 6 *** 19.9 (17.2, 23.0) 47 (16, 75) 43 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.3, 5.7)
Sumner County 6 *** 17.9 (15.4, 20.8) 65 (28, 80) 38 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Tipton County 6 *** 27.6 (22.2, 33.9) 5 (1, 50) 19 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.3, 8.4)
Unicoi County 6 *** 13.2 (7.7, 21.8) 82 (19, 84) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.6)
Union County 6 *** 23.9 (15.4, 35.5) 17 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.3, 8.6)
Warren County 6 *** 16.6 (11.8, 22.7) 76 (14, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.0)
Washington County 6 *** 18.1 (15.2, 21.4) 64 (23, 81) 29 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 4.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 25.4 (16.5, 37.7) 12 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Weakley County 6 *** 21.0 (14.9, 29.0) 38 (2, 83) 8 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 7.9)
White County 6 *** 25.6 (18.0, 35.4) 10 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 4.6 (-1.0, 10.5)
Williamson County 6 *** 15.2 (13.0, 17.7) 78 (48, 83) 35 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.3)
Wilson County 6 *** 16.6 (13.9, 19.8) 75 (33, 83) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Cannon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/30/2022 12:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cannon, Grundy, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Lake, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Trousdale, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top