Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban ascending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 10.7 (10.3, 11.0) N/A 789 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.9, 13.0) N/A 44,379 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Anderson County 6 Urban 9.1 (6.2, 12.7) 46 (12, 55) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-36.6, 2.2)
Blount County 6 Urban 13.8 (11.2, 16.8) 12 (2, 37) 22 stable stable trend -3.9 (-29.6, 1.0)
Bradley County 6 Urban 12.4 (9.6, 15.7) 22 (3, 48) 15 stable stable trend -12.7 (-46.0, 2.6)
Campbell County 6 Urban 12.4 (8.3, 18.0) 21 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.9, 3.3)
Carter County 6 Urban 17.5 (12.9, 23.3) 1 (1, 32) 11 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.7, 8.2)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 11.2 (7.0, 16.9) 28 (1, 55) 5 falling falling trend -5.0 (-15.3, -0.8)
Davidson County 6 Urban 9.6 (8.6, 10.7) 41 (26, 50) 72 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.8, -1.9)
Dickson County 6 Urban 11.4 (7.7, 16.3) 27 (2, 55) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.3)
Fayette County 6 Urban 9.9 (6.1, 15.2) 39 (4, 55) 5
*
*
Gibson County 6 Urban 8.0 (4.9, 12.4) 54 (12, 55) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.9, 7.8)
Grainger County 6 Urban 10.8 (5.8, 18.5) 31 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 7.6)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 13.0 (9.3, 17.7) 17 (1, 51) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.2, 8.2)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 9.1 (7.8, 10.6) 45 (26, 53) 37 stable stable trend -2.8 (-13.2, 0.0)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 13.0 (9.0, 18.1) 18 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Hickman County 6 Urban 10.7 (6.1, 17.8) 33 (1, 55) 3 falling falling trend -35.2 (-57.0, -3.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 13.1 (9.2, 18.1) 16 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.7)
Knox County 6 Urban 12.0 (10.6, 13.5) 23 (11, 39) 61 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.4, 0.7)
Loudon County 6 Urban 9.6 (6.2, 14.2) 42 (6, 55) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-6.6, 9.5)
Macon County 6 Urban 15.3 (9.4, 23.5) 7 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban 8.9 (6.5, 12.0) 48 (16, 55) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 8.9)
Marion County 6 Urban 11.8 (6.8, 19.0) 25 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend 3.9 (-15.3, 31.2)
Maury County 6 Urban 11.9 (9.1, 15.3) 24 (4, 51) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-12.7, 1.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.1, 11.1) 47 (22, 55) 17 falling falling trend -5.6 (-12.7, -3.3)
Roane County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.4, 12.9) 49 (10, 55) 5 falling falling trend -14.8 (-33.8, -5.9)
Robertson County 6 Urban 9.5 (6.6, 13.2) 43 (11, 55) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.6)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 10.4 (8.9, 12.1) 34 (17, 50) 35 falling falling trend -9.6 (-20.2, -4.1)
Shelby County 6 Urban 8.0 (7.2, 8.9) 53 (39, 55) 76 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 16.0 (13.4, 19.1) 5 (1, 25) 29 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 6.7)
Sumner County 6 Urban 11.6 (9.6, 13.9) 26 (9, 47) 25 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -1.8)
Tipton County 6 Urban 14.3 (10.4, 19.3) 10 (1, 47) 9 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.6, 13.4)
Unicoi County 6 Urban 16.2 (9.1, 27.0) 4 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 Urban 14.6 (11.7, 17.9) 9 (1, 35) 20 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 5.5)
Williamson County 6 Urban 14.3 (12.2, 16.7) 11 (2, 29) 35 falling falling trend -7.2 (-18.9, -1.1)
Wilson County 6 Urban 10.8 (8.6, 13.5) 30 (10, 52) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Bedford County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.6, 15.0) 36 (4, 55) 5
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural 15.2 (9.3, 23.5) 8 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural 12.8 (8.1, 19.3) 20 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Cocke County 6 Rural 12.9 (8.4, 19.0) 19 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.9, 7.2)
Coffee County 6 Rural 9.3 (6.1, 13.4) 44 (9, 55) 6 falling falling trend -13.9 (-33.4, -5.2)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 10.8 (7.1, 15.6) 32 (3, 55) 7 rising rising trend 38.6 (10.7, 65.5)
Dyer County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.0, 12.1) 55 (15, 55) 3
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 16.4 (11.3, 22.9) 3 (1, 44) 8 stable stable trend -3.7 (-37.4, 4.0)
Giles County 6 Rural 8.3 (4.5, 14.2) 51 (6, 55) 3
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural 13.4 (9.8, 18.0) 14 (1, 50) 11 rising rising trend 6.2 (1.9, 11.8)
Henry County 6 Rural 9.7 (5.6, 15.7) 40 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural 13.7 (9.1, 19.7) 13 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.8, 4.9)
McMinn County 6 Rural 10.3 (6.8, 14.8) 35 (5, 55) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.3, 6.4)
Monroe County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.4, 15.3) 37 (4, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 3.7)
Obion County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.0, 20.5) 15 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural 9.9 (7.0, 13.7) 38 (8, 55) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Rhea County 6 Rural 8.1 (4.4, 13.6) 52 (7, 55) 3
*
*
Sevier County 6 Rural 15.9 (12.4, 20.0) 6 (1, 31) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-12.0, 2.8)
Warren County 6 Rural 8.5 (4.9, 13.6) 50 (6, 55) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.5, 2.6)
Weakley County 6 Rural 11.0 (6.5, 17.5) 29 (1, 55) 4
*
*
White County 6 Rural 17.2 (10.7, 26.2) 2 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 9.0)
Benton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McNairy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 4:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Benton, Bledsoe, Cannon, Chester, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Fentress, Grundy, Hancock, Hardeman, Hardin, Haywood, Henderson, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lauderdale, Lewis, Lincoln, Marshall, McNairy, Meigs, Moore, Morgan, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Union, Van Buren, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top