Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate†
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 23.1 (22.4, 23.8) N/A 999 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 28.7 (28.6, 28.8) N/A 55,346 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.8, -0.2)
Shelby County 6 28.6 (26.6, 30.7) 6 (3, 19) 160 falling falling trend -2.1 (-11.0, -0.1)
Davidson County 6 24.7 (22.5, 27.1) 16 (8, 34) 94 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Knox County 6 27.7 (24.9, 30.7) 8 (2, 25) 79 falling falling trend -2.9 (-8.4, -0.3)
Hamilton County 6 22.6 (19.9, 25.6) 26 (11, 43) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Williamson County 6 30.3 (26.2, 34.8) 3 (1, 21) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.9)
Rutherford County 6 22.5 (19.4, 26.0) 27 (10, 45) 38 falling falling trend -13.4 (-25.7, -1.4)
Blount County 6 33.4 (28.2, 39.5) 2 (1, 17) 32 stable stable trend -2.6 (-13.8, 0.3)
Sumner County 6 21.3 (17.7, 25.5) 32 (11, 50) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.3)
Wilson County 6 27.6 (22.9, 33.1) 9 (1, 36) 25 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.4)
Sullivan County 6 18.5 (15.1, 22.6) 46 (19, 55) 23 falling falling trend -8.3 (-18.0, -3.2)
Maury County 6 29.0 (23.0, 36.1) 5 (1, 38) 18 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.9)
Montgomery County 6 18.2 (14.6, 22.5) 48 (19, 55) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-17.5, 2.5)
Sevier County 6 23.2 (18.2, 29.3) 24 (3, 51) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.8)
Cumberland County 6 27.3 (20.4, 36.0) 10 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 4.3)
Washington County 6 17.3 (13.4, 22.1) 49 (20, 56) 15 falling falling trend -24.6 (-34.2, -15.8)
Loudon County 6 27.1 (20.5, 35.8) 11 (1, 47) 13 stable stable trend -3.3 (-19.6, 1.4)
Madison County 6 19.9 (15.1, 25.9) 37 (9, 55) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.4)
Bradley County 6 16.9 (12.7, 22.1) 50 (18, 56) 12 falling falling trend -8.8 (-20.5, -4.3)
Greene County 6 22.0 (16.2, 29.4) 30 (3, 54) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-12.7, 5.4)
Anderson County 6 19.5 (14.3, 26.0) 41 (8, 56) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.9)
Hamblen County 6 23.4 (17.1, 31.3) 21 (2, 53) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.7, 6.9)
Jefferson County 6 23.9 (17.3, 32.4) 19 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.9)
Hawkins County 6 20.7 (15.1, 28.1) 35 (5, 55) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 4.3)
Robertson County 6 21.8 (15.8, 29.3) 31 (3, 55) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.5)
Tipton County 6 23.2 (16.5, 31.8) 23 (2, 54) 8 stable stable trend 7.1 (-16.7, 29.5)
Henry County 6 35.8 (24.5, 50.7) 1 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 4.8)
Putnam County 6 16.2 (11.3, 22.6) 51 (17, 56) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.3, 6.9)
Roane County 6 22.3 (15.3, 31.6) 28 (2, 55) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.6)
Dickson County 6 20.7 (14.5, 28.9) 34 (4, 56) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 5.0)
Franklin County 6 25.6 (17.7, 36.2) 14 (1, 54) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 3.3)
Bedford County 6 24.6 (17.1, 34.4) 17 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.7, 6.2)
Cocke County 6 23.0 (15.9, 33.0) 25 (2, 55) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.3, 9.2)
Fayette County 6 25.8 (17.3, 37.1) 13 (1, 54) 7 rising rising trend 38.1 (16.8, 72.3)
Coffee County 6 19.6 (13.4, 27.7) 40 (5, 56) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 5.6)
Lawrence County 6 23.2 (15.9, 32.9) 22 (1, 55) 7
*
*
Monroe County 6 19.7 (13.3, 28.4) 39 (4, 56) 7 falling falling trend -5.9 (-19.5, -1.6)
Carter County 6 14.9 (9.9, 21.8) 54 (22, 56) 7 falling falling trend -20.6 (-43.9, -0.1)
McMinn County 6 15.6 (10.5, 22.6) 53 (18, 56) 6 stable stable trend -5.2 (-41.3, 3.1)
Dyer County 6 24.4 (16.4, 35.3) 18 (1, 55) 6 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.1, 12.2)
Weakley County 6 29.0 (19.2, 42.4) 4 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Gibson County 6 18.7 (12.4, 27.3) 43 (5, 56) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.3, 9.5)
Rhea County 6 25.4 (16.8, 37.3) 15 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-5.3, 11.3)
Warren County 6 18.5 (11.9, 27.8) 47 (5, 56) 5
*
*
Marshall County 6 22.2 (14.2, 33.4) 29 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.1, 5.9)
Cheatham County 6 19.0 (11.9, 29.0) 42 (3, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.4)
Campbell County 6 13.9 (8.7, 21.7) 55 (23, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.4, 7.7)
Hardin County 6 23.9 (14.4, 37.8) 20 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Grainger County 6 25.8 (15.6, 41.0) 12 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Carroll County 6 18.6 (10.7, 30.5) 45 (2, 56) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-7.1, 9.6)
Morgan County 6 28.0 (16.3, 45.6) 7 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Claiborne County 6 16.0 (9.2, 26.3) 52 (7, 56) 4
*
*
Obion County 6 13.2 (7.8, 21.9) 56 (21, 56) 4
*
*
White County 6 18.7 (10.8, 30.7) 44 (2, 56) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.3, 5.6)
Hardeman County 6 21.2 (11.9, 35.6) 33 (1, 56) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.2, 5.5)
McNairy County 6 19.9 (11.2, 33.1) 38 (2, 56) 3
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 20.1 (11.2, 33.8) 36 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Benton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/24/2023 4:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Benton, Bledsoe, Cannon, Chester, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Fentress, Giles, Grundy, Hancock, Haywood, Henderson, Hickman, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lewis, Lincoln, Macon, Marion, Meigs, Moore, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top