Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 23.8 (23.1, 24.5) N/A 1,019 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 29.4 (29.3, 29.5) N/A 57,125 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Wilson County 6 27.0 (22.2, 32.5) 12 (1, 41) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.1)
Williamson County 6 29.4 (25.4, 33.9) 4 (1, 27) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
White County 6 18.0 (10.6, 29.5) 50 (4, 56) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.0, 2.5)
Weakley County 6 29.0 (18.9, 42.6) 7 (1, 54) 6
*
*
Washington County 6 19.7 (15.6, 24.7) 40 (13, 55) 17 falling falling trend -24.6 (-42.8, -0.6)
Warren County 6 19.9 (13.0, 29.5) 38 (3, 56) 6
*
*
Tipton County 6 19.2 (13.3, 26.8) 44 (8, 56) 7 stable stable trend 7.1 (-15.4, 35.6)
Sumner County 6 22.7 (19.0, 27.1) 28 (7, 49) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Sullivan County 6 21.4 (17.7, 25.7) 33 (11, 52) 26 falling falling trend -8.6 (-15.2, -1.4)
Shelby County 6 28.4 (26.4, 30.6) 8 (3, 20) 159 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Sevier County 6 23.3 (18.3, 29.3) 25 (4, 51) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.3)
Rutherford County 6 23.7 (20.4, 27.3) 24 (7, 44) 38 stable stable trend -13.4 (-25.3, 0.3)
Robertson County 6 26.5 (19.8, 34.8) 13 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Roane County 6 27.1 (19.4, 37.0) 11 (1, 51) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.7)
Rhea County 6 23.1 (14.8, 34.8) 26 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.3, 6.6)
Putnam County 6 18.5 (13.1, 25.3) 48 (10, 56) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.1, 5.1)
Obion County 6 19.4 (11.9, 30.4) 42 (2, 56) 5
*
*
Morgan County 6 24.2 (13.6, 40.6) 21 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Montgomery County 6 18.0 (14.3, 22.4) 49 (21, 56) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
Monroe County 6 19.7 (13.3, 28.4) 41 (4, 56) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.7)
McNairy County 6 17.7 (9.8, 30.1) 51 (2, 56) 3
*
*
McMinn County 6 20.4 (14.3, 28.5) 37 (4, 56) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.3, 3.8)
Maury County 6 29.2 (23.1, 36.5) 5 (1, 39) 17 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 4.7)
Marshall County 6 24.7 (16.2, 36.5) 19 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.7)
Madison County 6 21.0 (16.0, 27.1) 35 (7, 55) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Loudon County 6 25.1 (18.9, 33.2) 18 (1, 51) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 4.5)
Lincoln County 6 14.3 (7.7, 24.4) 56 (13, 56) 3
*
*
Lawrence County 6 16.2 (10.3, 24.4) 54 (12, 56) 5
*
*
Knox County 6 27.8 (25.1, 30.8) 10 (2, 26) 78 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.4)
Jefferson County 6 26.2 (19.2, 35.1) 14 (1, 52) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Henry County 6 31.6 (21.2, 45.6) 3 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 4.7)
Henderson County 6 17.3 (9.7, 29.0) 52 (3, 56) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.3, 3.7)
Hawkins County 6 21.7 (15.9, 29.4) 32 (4, 55) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.1)
Hardin County 6 25.2 (14.9, 40.3) 17 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 6 22.6 (19.9, 25.6) 29 (12, 45) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Hamblen County 6 23.9 (17.5, 32.1) 23 (1, 54) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.4)
Greene County 6 22.8 (16.9, 30.2) 27 (2, 54) 11 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.5, 7.9)
Grainger County 6 21.8 (12.4, 36.3) 31 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Gibson County 6 18.5 (12.2, 27.0) 47 (7, 56) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.1, 6.5)
Franklin County 6 24.5 (17.1, 34.6) 20 (1, 55) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.7)
Fayette County 6 25.6 (17.2, 37.0) 16 (1, 54) 7 rising rising trend 38.1 (2.6, 85.9)
Dyer County 6 32.5 (22.8, 45.0) 2 (1, 44) 8 rising rising trend 6.0 (0.7, 11.5)
Dickson County 6 22.5 (15.9, 31.1) 30 (2, 55) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.8)
Davidson County 6 25.7 (23.4, 28.1) 15 (6, 31) 97 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Cumberland County 6 24.1 (17.8, 32.3) 22 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 3.9)
Coffee County 6 20.4 (14.3, 28.5) 36 (4, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 4.2)
Cocke County 6 28.1 (19.6, 39.7) 9 (1, 52) 8 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.8, 8.7)
Claiborne County 6 15.7 (8.8, 26.3) 55 (7, 56) 3
*
*
Cheatham County 6 21.3 (13.7, 31.7) 34 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.2)
Carter County 6 19.8 (14.0, 27.5) 39 (7, 56) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Carroll County 6 17.0 (9.5, 28.6) 53 (4, 56) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 5.9)
Campbell County 6 19.3 (13.0, 28.3) 43 (4, 56) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.0, 5.6)
Bradley County 6 18.8 (14.3, 24.3) 45 (14, 56) 13 falling falling trend -8.8 (-14.0, -3.3)
Blount County 6 32.6 (27.5, 38.6) 1 (1, 21) 31 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.4)
Bedford County 6 29.0 (20.7, 39.6) 6 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.1, 3.8)
Anderson County 6 18.5 (13.6, 24.8) 46 (12, 56) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.0)
Benton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/06/2023 10:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Benton, Bledsoe, Cannon, Chester, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Fentress, Giles, Grundy, Hancock, Hardeman, Haywood, Hickman, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lauderdale, Lewis, Macon, Marion, Meigs, Moore, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top