Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 36.6 (35.7, 37.4) 1,443 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Unicoi County 6,10 25.1 (15.3, 40.7) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-31.4, 43.8)
Loudon County 6,10 25.7 (18.7, 34.7) 10 stable stable trend -11.4 (-30.1, 12.1)
Morgan County 6,10 27.3 (16.0, 44.5) 4 stable stable trend 6.9 (-41.9, 96.6)
Williamson County 6,10 28.3 (23.7, 33.5) 29 stable stable trend 7.7 (-14.8, 36.0)
Sumner County 6,10 29.1 (24.5, 34.4) 29 stable stable trend 2.3 (-16.7, 25.7)
Monroe County 6,10 29.3 (21.1, 39.8) 9 stable stable trend -11.1 (-27.8, 9.4)
Carter County 6,10 29.3 (22.0, 38.5) 12 stable stable trend 3.0 (-15.6, 25.7)
Campbell County 6,10 30.5 (22.2, 41.3) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-23.1, 28.2)
McNairy County 6,10 31.3 (21.0, 45.5) 6 stable stable trend 8.1 (-67.9, 263.9)
Weakley County 6,10 31.4 (22.1, 43.8) 8 stable stable trend -16.9 (-35.7, 7.5)
Bradley County 6,10 32.5 (26.6, 39.5) 21 stable stable trend -13.4 (-28.6, 5.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 32.7 (27.0, 39.3) 24 stable stable trend -12.8 (-32.6, 12.7)
Lincoln County 6,10 33.1 (23.6, 45.5) 8 stable stable trend -13.1 (-41.3, 28.8)
Decatur County 6,10 33.3 (18.9, 56.7) 3
*
*
Knox County 6,10 33.3 (30.2, 36.6) 89 stable stable trend -3.5 (-11.6, 5.3)
Washington County 6,10 33.3 (27.9, 39.6) 27 stable stable trend -2.7 (-22.5, 22.1)
Claiborne County 6,10 33.3 (23.2, 46.8) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-33.7, 46.1)
Cumberland County 6,10 33.3 (25.7, 42.8) 16 stable stable trend 7.0 (-16.9, 37.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 33.5 (25.3, 43.8) 12 stable stable trend -6.2 (-21.0, 11.4)
Scott County 6,10 33.6 (20.9, 51.6) 4 stable stable trend -9.0 (-21.3, 5.2)
Sullivan County 6,10 34.0 (29.4, 39.3) 41 stable stable trend -3.5 (-24.1, 22.9)
Hamilton County 6,10 34.3 (30.9, 38.0) 79 stable stable trend -2.8 (-13.5, 9.2)
McMinn County 6,10 34.7 (26.3, 45.0) 12 stable stable trend 14.9 (-7.5, 42.7)
Bedford County 6,10 34.7 (25.4, 46.5) 9 stable stable trend 19.6 (-43.0, 151.1)
Lawrence County 6,10 34.9 (25.6, 46.8) 10 stable stable trend -11.3 (-43.8, 40.0)
Sevier County 6,10 35.0 (28.3, 42.8) 20 stable stable trend -3.4 (-39.0, 52.9)
Greene County 6,10 35.0 (27.9, 43.7) 17 stable stable trend -2.7 (-13.1, 9.0)
Hardin County 6,10 35.3 (24.1, 50.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-36.7, 54.2)
Maury County 6,10 35.4 (28.4, 43.7) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-22.5, 25.1)
Chester County 6,10 35.4 (21.3, 56.1) 4 falling falling trend -29.4 (-43.0, -12.5)
Blount County 6,10 35.4 (29.8, 41.9) 30 stable stable trend 2.5 (-13.2, 20.9)
White County 6,10 35.5 (24.3, 50.6) 7 stable stable trend 4.6 (-33.8, 65.3)
Polk County 6,10 35.7 (21.0, 57.5) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-35.9, 56.8)
Carroll County 6,10 35.8 (24.7, 50.6) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-15.9, 22.2)
Anderson County 6,10 35.9 (29.2, 44.0) 21 stable stable trend -2.2 (-12.7, 9.6)
Madison County 6,10 36.2 (29.6, 43.9) 22 stable stable trend 2.6 (-21.0, 33.2)
Macon County 6,10 36.6 (23.6, 54.7) 5 stable stable trend 7.7 (-31.8, 70.2)
Dyer County 6,10 36.6 (26.6, 49.4) 9 stable stable trend -14.4 (-32.1, 7.9)
Cocke County 6,10 36.7 (26.6, 49.7) 9 stable stable trend -4.6 (-27.7, 25.8)
Wilson County 6,10 37.0 (30.6, 44.3) 25 stable stable trend -15.1 (-31.9, 5.8)
Hawkins County 6,10 37.0 (28.9, 47.0) 15 stable stable trend -10.8 (-32.9, 18.5)
Union County 6,10 37.5 (23.3, 57.7) 4 stable stable trend -18.4 (-38.5, 8.3)
Davidson County 6,10 37.8 (34.9, 40.9) 126 stable stable trend -5.3 (-17.1, 8.3)
Rutherford County 6,10 38.3 (33.4, 43.7) 46 stable stable trend -3.8 (-19.3, 14.8)
Shelby County 6,10 38.4 (36.0, 40.9) 197 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.8, 1.2)
Hickman County 6,10 38.9 (26.1, 56.4) 6 stable stable trend -19.6 (-36.2, 1.3)
Rhea County 6,10 39.0 (27.6, 53.8) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-13.4, 9.2)
Putnam County 6,10 39.2 (31.4, 48.5) 18 stable stable trend -5.8 (-28.4, 24.0)
Franklin County 6,10 39.2 (29.5, 51.5) 12 stable stable trend 15.8 (-6.1, 42.8)
Grainger County 6,10 39.3 (26.0, 57.8) 6 stable stable trend 7.6 (-12.8, 32.8)
Fentress County 6,10 39.4 (25.0, 59.8) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-46.3, 75.5)
Bledsoe County 6,10 39.5 (22.2, 66.5) 3
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10 40.2 (26.5, 59.6) 6 stable stable trend -8.9 (-42.7, 44.8)
Cannon County 6,10 40.8 (24.7, 64.8) 4 stable stable trend -6.2 (-32.9, 31.2)
Hamblen County 6,10 40.9 (32.4, 51.1) 17 stable stable trend -3.6 (-26.8, 27.1)
Obion County 6,10 41.3 (29.9, 56.0) 9 stable stable trend -8.9 (-33.1, 24.1)
Coffee County 6,10 41.3 (32.4, 52.2) 15 stable stable trend 18.5 (-11.4, 58.5)
Jackson County 6,10 41.3 (23.2, 69.7) 3
*
*
Tipton County 6,10 41.5 (32.2, 52.7) 14 stable stable trend -7.6 (-29.0, 20.3)
Benton County 6,10 41.5 (27.9, 61.3) 6 stable stable trend 10.5 (-18.4, 49.8)
Warren County 6,10 42.1 (31.6, 55.2) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-25.1, 27.4)
Roane County 6,10 42.1 (33.4, 52.8) 17 stable stable trend -0.0 (-28.2, 39.2)
Marshall County 6,10 42.2 (29.8, 58.3) 8 stable stable trend 24.9 (-4.7, 63.7)
Robertson County 6,10 42.9 (33.8, 53.7) 16 stable stable trend -3.6 (-32.1, 37.0)
Marion County 6,10 43.0 (30.4, 59.5) 8 stable stable trend -5.9 (-27.9, 22.9)
Stewart County 6,10 43.2 (25.9, 68.9) 4 stable stable trend -5.1 (-70.1, 202.0)
Gibson County 6,10 43.3 (34.2, 54.4) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-19.4, 22.5)
Henry County 6,10 44.4 (32.9, 59.1) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-30.8, 41.1)
Johnson County 6,10 45.4 (30.6, 66.4) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-6.5, 16.0)
Henderson County 6,10 45.4 (32.3, 62.4) 8 stable stable trend 10.7 (-6.8, 31.3)
Overton County 6,10 46.3 (31.9, 65.5) 7 stable stable trend 6.5 (-15.1, 33.5)
Grundy County 6,10 46.4 (28.0, 73.3) 4 stable stable trend 16.7 (-28.4, 89.9)
Meigs County 6,10 46.5 (26.7, 76.4) 3
*
*
Lewis County 6,10 47.1 (27.4, 76.4) 4 stable stable trend -19.4 (-64.6, 83.6)
Smith County 6,10 47.5 (31.0, 70.0) 5 stable stable trend 8.8 (-22.2, 52.0)
Hardeman County 6,10 48.0 (34.0, 66.3) 8 stable stable trend -6.6 (-45.5, 60.2)
Fayette County 6,10 48.6 (36.6, 63.5) 12 stable stable trend -13.2 (-25.5, 1.1)
Wayne County 6,10 48.6 (32.4, 71.5) 6 stable stable trend 5.2 (-28.5, 55.0)
Dickson County 6,10 48.7 (38.1, 61.4) 15 stable stable trend 6.0 (-4.0, 17.0)
Cheatham County 6,10 49.3 (36.4, 65.4) 10 stable stable trend -15.2 (-31.4, 4.8)
Haywood County 6,10 49.7 (33.4, 71.6) 6 stable stable trend 5.9 (-24.9, 49.4)
DeKalb County 6,10 51.1 (34.3, 73.8) 6 rising rising trend 19.8 (1.9, 40.8)
Giles County 6,10 52.6 (38.9, 69.9) 10 stable stable trend -8.7 (-40.5, 40.1)
Lauderdale County 6,10 58.9 (42.9, 79.2) 9 stable stable trend 13.1 (-11.4, 44.4)
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/27/2016 10:53 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top