Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6,10 Yes 36.4 (35.5, 37.3) 1,461 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.8 (34.7, 34.9) 66,668 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Unicoi County 6,10 Yes 24.4 (14.6, 40.0) 4 stable stable trend -12.4 (-24.1, 1.2)
Loudon County 6,10 Yes 26.3 (19.1, 35.6) 10 stable stable trend -4.2 (-30.9, 32.8)
Williamson County 6,10 Yes 26.8 (22.5, 31.8) 28 stable stable trend -6.2 (-33.7, 32.8)
Campbell County 6,10 Yes 27.6 (19.8, 37.8) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-25.5, 33.6)
Lincoln County 6,10 Yes 27.8 (19.3, 39.3) 7 stable stable trend -4.9 (-36.2, 41.8)
Lawrence County 6,10 Yes 29.4 (21.2, 40.0) 9 stable stable trend -11.5 (-46.0, 45.2)
Weakley County 6,10 Yes 29.8 (20.7, 42.0) 7 stable stable trend -13.5 (-34.1, 13.5)
Monroe County 6,10 Yes 30.9 (22.5, 41.7) 9 stable stable trend -3.2 (-28.3, 30.8)
Sequatchie County 6,10 Yes 31.2 (17.4, 52.7) 3
*
*
Sumner County 6,10 Yes 31.6 (26.9, 36.9) 33 stable stable trend 3.1 (-14.3, 24.0)
Cumberland County 6,10 Yes 31.7 (24.2, 41.2) 15 stable stable trend 3.5 (-36.5, 68.8)
Greene County 6,10 Yes 32.1 (25.3, 40.4) 16 stable stable trend -10.3 (-25.1, 7.3)
Knox County 6,10 Yes 32.8 (29.7, 36.0) 89 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 7.6)
Washington County 6,10 Yes 32.8 (27.5, 39.0) 27 stable stable trend -5.4 (-23.1, 16.4)
Montgomery County 6,10 Yes 33.2 (27.4, 39.7) 24 stable stable trend -7.9 (-30.9, 22.7)
Carroll County 6,10 Yes 33.7 (22.9, 48.3) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-21.9, 26.7)
Bradley County 6,10 Yes 33.8 (27.8, 40.9) 22 stable stable trend -4.8 (-26.4, 23.0)
Polk County 6,10 Yes 34.1 (19.4, 56.1) 3
*
*
Anderson County 6,10 Yes 34.2 (27.6, 42.1) 20 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.0, 10.5)
Wilson County 6,10 Yes 34.3 (28.5, 41.1) 25 stable stable trend -6.2 (-28.0, 22.3)
Humphreys County 6,10 Yes 34.5 (22.3, 52.3) 5 stable stable trend 13.6 (-20.2, 61.8)
Sullivan County 6,10 Yes 34.5 (29.9, 39.8) 43 stable stable trend -8.5 (-17.7, 1.8)
Hamilton County 6,10 Yes 34.6 (31.2, 38.3) 80 stable stable trend -5.0 (-10.2, 0.5)
Union County 6,10 Yes 34.8 (21.0, 54.8) 4 stable stable trend -19.2 (-37.5, 4.4)
Carter County 6,10 Yes 34.9 (26.9, 44.8) 14 stable stable trend 8.7 (-12.9, 35.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 Yes 35.1 (26.8, 45.4) 13 stable stable trend 4.2 (-16.7, 30.5)
Blount County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (29.6, 41.6) 30 stable stable trend -4.8 (-17.8, 10.1)
Davidson County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (32.4, 38.2) 120 stable stable trend -2.2 (-13.2, 10.2)
Hawkins County 6,10 Yes 35.2 (27.3, 45.0) 14 stable stable trend 4.2 (-21.7, 38.7)
Sevier County 6,10 Yes 35.3 (28.7, 43.1) 21 stable stable trend -12.4 (-36.5, 21.0)
Claiborne County 6,10 Yes 35.3 (24.7, 49.3) 8 stable stable trend 6.9 (-26.6, 55.6)
McMinn County 6,10 Yes 35.4 (27.0, 45.7) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-25.9, 33.4)
Marion County 6,10 Yes 35.4 (24.5, 50.0) 7 stable stable trend -8.3 (-36.2, 31.6)
Hickman County 6,10 Yes 35.4 (23.4, 52.1) 6 stable stable trend -5.8 (-32.5, 31.4)
Scott County 6,10 Yes 35.7 (22.7, 53.9) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-20.9, 30.2)
Cannon County 6,10 Yes 36.2 (20.7, 59.9) 3
*
*
Madison County 6,10 Yes 37.2 (30.7, 44.8) 23 stable stable trend 6.7 (-14.0, 32.5)
Shelby County 6,10 Yes 37.3 (35.0, 39.8) 194 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.7, 2.0)
Wayne County 6,10 Yes 37.4 (23.6, 58.1) 5
*
*
Rutherford County 6,10 Yes 37.5 (32.8, 42.8) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-16.8, 18.3)
Putnam County 6,10 Yes 37.6 (30.0, 46.6) 18 stable stable trend -3.1 (-26.2, 27.2)
Morgan County 6,10 Yes 37.8 (24.2, 57.1) 5 stable stable trend 17.8 (-21.5, 76.9)
Hardin County 6,10 Yes 38.1 (26.8, 53.3) 8 stable stable trend -3.1 (-29.8, 33.9)
Maury County 6,10 Yes 38.3 (31.0, 46.8) 20 stable stable trend -3.0 (-17.1, 13.3)
Cocke County 6,10 Yes 38.4 (27.9, 51.8) 9 stable stable trend 3.9 (-23.6, 41.2)
Obion County 6,10 Yes 38.5 (27.6, 52.7) 9 stable stable trend -6.5 (-31.5, 27.6)
Fentress County 6,10 Yes 39.1 (24.8, 59.5) 5 stable stable trend -15.5 (-48.7, 39.4)
Bedford County 6,10 Yes 39.2 (29.2, 51.6) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-44.2, 88.3)
Cheatham County 6,10 No 40.0 (28.6, 54.5) 9 stable stable trend -23.6 (-42.1, 0.7)
Warren County 6,10 No 40.1 (29.6, 53.3) 10 stable stable trend 4.5 (-11.1, 22.8)
Tipton County 6,10 No 40.3 (31.2, 51.2) 14 stable stable trend 2.5 (-24.1, 38.4)
McNairy County 6,10 No 40.3 (28.5, 56.0) 8 stable stable trend -0.0 (-46.6, 87.3)
Hamblen County 6,10 No 40.5 (32.3, 50.4) 18 stable stable trend 14.4 (-1.8, 33.2)
White County 6,10 No 40.6 (28.5, 56.6) 8 stable stable trend 8.3 (-29.5, 66.6)
Dyer County 6,10 No 40.8 (30.1, 54.4) 10 stable stable trend 6.6 (-29.5, 61.4)
Lewis County 6,10 No 41.4 (23.1, 69.3) 3
*
*
Macon County 6,10 No 42.1 (28.3, 60.7) 6 stable stable trend 8.5 (-25.9, 58.7)
Gibson County 6,10 No 42.3 (33.4, 53.1) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-17.1, 25.0)
Chester County 6,10 No 42.8 (26.7, 65.4) 5 stable stable trend 17.1 (-31.8, 100.9)
Bledsoe County 6,10 No 42.9 (25.0, 70.3) 4 stable stable trend 5.3 (-34.4, 69.0)
Coffee County 6,10 No 43.1 (34.1, 54.0) 16 stable stable trend 12.0 (-22.4, 61.8)
Henry County 6,10 No 43.9 (32.5, 58.5) 11 stable stable trend 8.5 (-21.9, 50.8)
Robertson County 6,10 No 44.2 (35.1, 55.0) 17 stable stable trend 6.8 (-24.9, 51.8)
Roane County 6,10 No 44.5 (35.5, 55.4) 18 stable stable trend -6.6 (-20.1, 9.3)
Meigs County 6,10 No 44.5 (24.8, 74.7) 3
*
*
Grainger County 6,10 No 44.7 (30.5, 63.8) 7 stable stable trend 7.9 (-9.1, 28.0)
Decatur County 6,10 No 44.8 (26.8, 72.1) 4 rising rising trend 47.0 (16.7, 85.1)
Smith County 6,10 No 45.4 (29.3, 67.5) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-38.3, 56.5)
Henderson County 6,10 No 45.7 (32.8, 62.3) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-18.6, 28.2)
Jackson County 6,10 No 46.1 (26.2, 76.6) 4 stable stable trend 10.5 (-40.7, 106.0)
Dickson County 6,10 No 46.3 (36.0, 58.8) 14 stable stable trend -4.2 (-25.6, 23.2)
Benton County 6,10 No 47.2 (32.1, 68.6) 7 stable stable trend 7.4 (-18.5, 41.5)
Franklin County 6,10 No 47.2 (36.5, 60.5) 14 stable stable trend 17.0 (0.0, 36.9)
Rhea County 6,10 No 47.2 (34.4, 63.5) 9 stable stable trend 13.8 (-17.5, 57.1)
Marshall County 6,10 No 47.3 (34.1, 64.0) 9 stable stable trend 13.7 (-18.4, 58.4)
Fayette County 6,10 No 47.3 (35.8, 61.6) 12 stable stable trend -9.7 (-24.3, 7.7)
Stewart County 6,10 No 47.8 (29.8, 74.0) 5 stable stable trend -18.6 (-56.0, 50.4)
Hardeman County 6,10 No 48.5 (34.3, 67.1) 8 stable stable trend -13.7 (-43.3, 31.3)
Johnson County 6,10 No 48.5 (33.1, 70.2) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.1)
Haywood County 6,10 No 49.5 (33.2, 71.4) 6 stable stable trend -6.5 (-34.0, 32.6)
Grundy County 6,10 No 51.1 (31.6, 79.0) 5 stable stable trend 17.0 (-28.2, 90.6)
Giles County 6,10 No 51.4 (37.8, 68.7) 10 stable stable trend -15.4 (-39.5, 18.3)
DeKalb County 6,10 No 52.5 (35.5, 75.4) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-23.8, 40.3)
Overton County 6,10 No 53.8 (38.0, 74.5) 8 stable stable trend 21.2 (-3.3, 52.0)
Lauderdale County 6,10 No 59.9 (43.6, 80.6) 9 stable stable trend -3.4 (-21.9, 19.6)
Clay County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2017 7:01 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top