Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 76.8 (75.9, 77.7) 5,653 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 62.4 (62.3, 62.6) 214,614 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Shelby County 6,10 67.3 (64.8, 69.8) 587 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.6)
Davidson County 6,10 72.0 (68.9, 75.2) 424 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Knox County 6,10 73.8 (70.3, 77.3) 357 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.3, -0.3)
Hamilton County 6,10 68.4 (64.8, 72.1) 286 stable stable trend -2.6 (-12.4, 8.4)
Sullivan County 6,10 75.7 (70.7, 81.0) 174 stable stable trend -3.9 (-13.8, 7.1)
Rutherford County 6,10 68.5 (63.4, 73.9) 144 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.9, 7.1)
Blount County 6,10 79.0 (72.9, 85.4) 130 stable stable trend -3.5 (-10.2, 3.7)
Sumner County 6,10 65.9 (60.6, 71.5) 121 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.5)
Washington County 6,10 71.6 (65.6, 77.9) 110 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.6, 1.0)
Montgomery County 6,10 84.3 (77.1, 91.9) 106 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.1)
Sevier County 6,10 83.5 (76.1, 91.4) 99 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.7, -3.0)
Wilson County 6,10 76.5 (69.7, 83.9) 98 stable stable trend -5.8 (-14.7, 3.9)
Bradley County 6,10 81.0 (73.8, 88.6) 97 stable stable trend -0.8 (-13.7, 14.1)
Greene County 6,10 96.4 (87.7, 105.9) 94 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.7, 2.7)
Cumberland County 6,10 79.8 (71.7, 88.7) 80 stable stable trend -5.9 (-18.7, 8.9)
Hawkins County 6,10 102.7 (92.6, 113.7) 79 stable stable trend 1.5 (-6.2, 9.8)
Madison County 6,10 70.7 (63.8, 78.2) 78 stable stable trend -1.2 (-11.6, 10.5)
Williamson County 6,10 46.6 (41.9, 51.7) 77 stable stable trend -4.2 (-12.0, 4.3)
Anderson County 6,10 71.1 (63.9, 78.8) 75 stable stable trend -5.5 (-13.6, 3.4)
Roane County 6,10 88.6 (79.6, 98.6) 72 stable stable trend -6.5 (-17.3, 5.7)
Maury County 6,10 73.5 (65.8, 81.9) 69 stable stable trend 1.3 (-17.9, 25.0)
Hamblen County 6,10 77.9 (69.5, 87.1) 64 stable stable trend 1.9 (-13.5, 19.9)
Carter County 6,10 78.3 (69.7, 87.7) 63 stable stable trend 1.8 (-11.2, 16.6)
Putnam County 6,10 71.6 (63.8, 80.2) 62 stable stable trend 4.9 (-16.1, 31.2)
Campbell County 6,10 105.9 (94.0, 118.9) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-18.7, 21.5)
Tipton County 6,10 94.6 (83.9, 106.2) 60 stable stable trend -3.9 (-13.7, 7.1)
Monroe County 6,10 98.6 (87.4, 110.9) 60 stable stable trend -3.5 (-26.9, 27.3)
McMinn County 6,10 81.4 (72.3, 91.5) 59 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.3, -2.2)
Robertson County 6,10 83.2 (73.7, 93.5) 59 stable stable trend -0.6 (-23.3, 28.8)
Loudon County 6,10 69.2 (61.2, 78.2) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-18.9, 24.2)
Coffee County 6,10 84.4 (74.8, 95.0) 57 stable stable trend -3.1 (-18.7, 15.3)
Gibson County 6,10 80.5 (70.9, 91.0) 52 stable stable trend -5.5 (-21.8, 14.2)
Cocke County 6,10 96.9 (85.0, 110.2) 50 stable stable trend 4.2 (-5.1, 14.5)
Dickson County 6,10 87.9 (77.2, 99.8) 50 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.4, 8.1)
Jefferson County 6,10 68.9 (60.3, 78.4) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-18.4, 21.0)
Claiborne County 6,10 107.7 (94.0, 122.9) 47 stable stable trend 3.1 (-5.7, 12.7)
Henry County 6,10 88.4 (77.0, 101.2) 45 stable stable trend -6.4 (-19.7, 8.9)
Lawrence County 6,10 78.2 (68.0, 89.6) 43 stable stable trend 4.5 (-8.6, 19.4)
Warren County 6,10 84.7 (73.5, 97.3) 42 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.5, 9.3)
Franklin County 6,10 70.6 (61.2, 81.3) 41 stable stable trend -5.3 (-10.8, 0.6)
Rhea County 6,10 99.0 (85.6, 114.1) 41 stable stable trend -4.9 (-16.3, 8.0)
Marion County 6,10 102.9 (88.8, 118.8) 40 stable stable trend 4.6 (-19.7, 36.3)
Cheatham County 6,10 92.3 (79.0, 107.2) 38 stable stable trend 2.4 (-12.3, 19.5)
Dyer County 6,10 77.9 (66.8, 90.3) 37 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.6, 11.0)
Bedford County 6,10 69.4 (59.4, 80.6) 35 stable stable trend -3.8 (-29.5, 31.3)
Hardin County 6,10 85.9 (73.1, 100.6) 33 stable stable trend 6.0 (-10.3, 25.3)
Giles County 6,10 82.1 (69.9, 96.1) 33 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.3, 22.4)
Marshall County 6,10 91.6 (77.9, 107.1) 33 falling falling trend -8.4 (-16.0, -0.1)
McNairy County 6,10 89.5 (76.2, 104.8) 33 stable stable trend 5.5 (-5.7, 18.2)
White County 6,10 89.7 (76.3, 105.1) 33 stable stable trend 9.7 (-4.1, 25.5)
Carroll County 6,10 80.0 (68.0, 93.8) 32 stable stable trend 6.2 (-25.7, 51.9)
Henderson County 6,10 93.4 (79.2, 109.5) 32 stable stable trend -3.9 (-35.1, 42.3)
Overton County 6,10 98.2 (83.2, 115.5) 32 stable stable trend -8.0 (-26.9, 15.9)
Hardeman County 6,10 94.2 (79.7, 110.6) 31 stable stable trend -3.7 (-18.5, 13.8)
Obion County 6,10 72.6 (61.4, 85.3) 31 falling falling trend -16.9 (-27.5, -4.9)
Fayette County 6,10 58.7 (49.6, 69.3) 31 stable stable trend -5.3 (-21.7, 14.5)
Weakley County 6,10 72.4 (61.2, 85.2) 31 stable stable trend -3.0 (-23.3, 22.8)
Lincoln County 6,10 64.3 (54.3, 75.8) 30 stable stable trend -6.8 (-18.3, 6.3)
Scott County 6,10 109.2 (91.8, 129.0) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-14.0, 15.1)
Lauderdale County 6,10 92.9 (77.9, 110.0) 28 stable stable trend -13.0 (-26.8, 3.4)
Polk County 6,10 116.0 (97.1, 137.9) 28 stable stable trend -3.4 (-28.4, 30.3)
Hickman County 6,10 91.5 (76.5, 108.7) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-10.4, 12.9)
Macon County 6,10 100.4 (83.9, 119.2) 27 stable stable trend -8.8 (-22.1, 6.8)
Benton County 6,10 104.7 (87.1, 125.2) 26 stable stable trend 4.8 (-13.9, 27.6)
Grainger County 6,10 82.2 (68.4, 98.3) 26 stable stable trend 8.8 (-12.8, 35.7)
Humphreys County 6,10 99.2 (82.7, 118.4) 26 stable stable trend -2.4 (-24.2, 25.6)
Morgan County 6,10 94.3 (78.4, 112.7) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-7.7, 9.5)
Unicoi County 6,10 89.3 (74.1, 107.1) 25 stable stable trend -6.5 (-20.2, 9.5)
Fentress County 6,10 92.7 (76.4, 112.0) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-14.5, 13.8)
Union County 6,10 100.7 (83.0, 121.3) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-18.9, 26.5)
Johnson County 6,10 88.0 (72.4, 106.4) 23 stable stable trend 17.3 (-7.5, 48.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 91.3 (74.7, 110.7) 22 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.2, 22.2)
Smith County 6,10 92.7 (75.4, 113.0) 21 stable stable trend -3.0 (-22.7, 21.8)
Lewis County 6,10 116.1 (93.6, 142.9) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-24.5, 35.7)
Grundy County 6,10 96.1 (77.2, 118.8) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-27.4, 32.4)
Sequatchie County 6,10 96.8 (77.5, 119.9) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-16.2, 19.6)
Haywood County 6,10 80.4 (64.3, 99.4) 18 stable stable trend -7.5 (-38.2, 38.4)
Wayne County 6,10 79.1 (63.3, 98.0) 18 stable stable trend -10.7 (-35.4, 23.4)
Jackson County 6,10 102.8 (81.8, 128.4) 18 stable stable trend -9.7 (-32.1, 20.1)
Stewart County 6,10 90.8 (72.1, 113.3) 17 stable stable trend 2.9 (-23.6, 38.6)
Decatur County 6,10 87.4 (69.0, 110.0) 16 stable stable trend 9.0 (-10.5, 32.7)
Chester County 6,10 76.7 (60.5, 96.1) 16 rising rising trend 9.1 (5.5, 12.8)
Meigs County 6,10 83.7 (65.3, 106.6) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.0, 10.5)
Bledsoe County 6,10 85.2 (66.3, 108.4) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-15.4, 23.1)
Crockett County 6,10 64.6 (49.1, 83.8) 12 stable stable trend -6.8 (-20.9, 9.9)
Houston County 6,10 96.8 (72.9, 126.9) 11 stable stable trend -6.6 (-22.2, 12.1)
Perry County 6,10 93.8 (70.7, 123.3) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.4, 16.1)
Cannon County 6,10 59.7 (44.8, 78.5) 11 stable stable trend -9.1 (-29.1, 16.6)
Trousdale County 6,10 101.4 (74.0, 136.0) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-22.4, 35.4)
Clay County 6,10 76.1 (54.9, 104.1) 9 stable stable trend 4.0 (-3.1, 11.7)
Hancock County 6,10 83.1 (59.9, 113.8) 9 stable stable trend 7.5 (-24.4, 52.7)
Lake County 6,10 96.8 (69.8, 131.6) 9 stable stable trend 25.4 (-14.3, 83.5)
Pickett County 6,10 94.8 (66.3, 133.9) 8 stable stable trend 6.6 (-37.0, 80.2)
Moore County 6,10 63.5 (42.5, 92.9) 6 stable stable trend -3.1 (-35.9, 46.5)
Van Buren County 6,10 55.8 (34.2, 87.8) 4 stable stable trend -14.3 (-49.5, 45.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/30/2016 3:22 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top