Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 61.2 (60.1, 62.3) 2,466 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 53.4 (53.2, 53.5) 100,643 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Anderson County 6,10 58.5 (49.8, 68.4) 34 stable stable trend -11.0 (-21.7, 1.2)
Bedford County 6,10 55.1 (43.2, 69.4) 15 stable stable trend -3.3 (-43.6, 65.8)
Benton County 6,10 76.7 (56.6, 103.0) 10 stable stable trend 3.9 (-12.5, 23.4)
Bledsoe County 6,10 61.1 (38.9, 92.9) 5 stable stable trend 12.4 (-40.7, 112.8)
Blount County 6,10 64.2 (56.9, 72.3) 57 stable stable trend -5.8 (-18.0, 8.3)
Bradley County 6,10 66.6 (58.0, 76.2) 44 stable stable trend -3.9 (-12.7, 5.8)
Campbell County 6,10 82.6 (68.5, 99.1) 25 stable stable trend -1.5 (-22.8, 25.7)
Cannon County 6,10 50.4 (32.4, 76.1) 5 stable stable trend -11.4 (-28.0, 9.1)
Carroll County 6,10 65.2 (50.6, 83.3) 14 rising rising trend 18.1 (2.9, 35.4)
Carter County 6,10 70.3 (59.5, 82.8) 31 stable stable trend 2.4 (-17.7, 27.3)
Cheatham County 6,10 76.6 (60.6, 95.6) 17 stable stable trend 2.0 (-19.3, 28.9)
Chester County 6,10 53.9 (36.0, 78.1) 6 stable stable trend 7.7 (-28.3, 61.8)
Claiborne County 6,10 76.7 (61.3, 95.2) 18 rising rising trend 15.1 (4.1, 27.4)
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cocke County 6,10 76.5 (62.2, 93.7) 20 stable stable trend 2.7 (-11.1, 18.6)
Coffee County 6,10 69.4 (57.7, 83.1) 25 stable stable trend -6.1 (-26.1, 19.2)
Crockett County 6,10 37.6 (22.3, 60.2) 4
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 62.9 (53.2, 74.2) 35 stable stable trend -7.9 (-28.5, 18.7)
Davidson County 6,10 58.6 (54.9, 62.5) 196 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 64.9 (45.9, 89.9) 8 stable stable trend -9.3 (-26.2, 11.5)
Decatur County 6,10 55.4 (35.9, 84.0) 5 stable stable trend 5.4 (-31.6, 62.4)
Dickson County 6,10 75.0 (61.9, 90.2) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-27.8, 36.8)
Dyer County 6,10 63.0 (49.9, 78.8) 16 stable stable trend 4.4 (-5.8, 15.6)
Fayette County 6,10 48.7 (37.3, 62.8) 13 stable stable trend -11.1 (-33.0, 17.9)
Fentress County 6,10 56.8 (40.4, 78.9) 8 stable stable trend -8.0 (-37.1, 34.5)
Franklin County 6,10 55.6 (44.4, 69.1) 17 stable stable trend -4.8 (-11.6, 2.5)
Gibson County 6,10 57.9 (47.2, 70.6) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-27.8, 34.7)
Giles County 6,10 53.1 (40.3, 69.4) 12 stable stable trend -11.5 (-33.6, 18.0)
Grainger County 6,10 66.8 (50.0, 88.2) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-10.1, 15.2)
Greene County 6,10 84.4 (73.3, 96.9) 43 stable stable trend -5.0 (-23.0, 17.3)
Grundy County 6,10 91.5 (66.8, 123.6) 10 stable stable trend 16.5 (-21.5, 72.7)
Hamblen County 6,10 66.5 (56.1, 78.6) 29 stable stable trend 2.0 (-19.2, 28.9)
Hamilton County 6,10 55.5 (51.3, 60.1) 129 stable stable trend 2.5 (-12.4, 19.9)
Hancock County 6,10 84.7 (53.5, 131.4) 5 stable stable trend 26.7 (-15.7, 90.4)
Hardeman County 6,10 73.0 (55.7, 94.6) 12 stable stable trend -4.1 (-15.1, 8.3)
Hardin County 6,10 60.5 (45.7, 79.1) 12 stable stable trend 19.5 (-3.0, 47.4)
Hawkins County 6,10 78.8 (67.1, 92.3) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-11.8, 10.6)
Haywood County 6,10 60.1 (42.1, 83.8) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-46.6, 77.4)
Henderson County 6,10 73.3 (56.8, 93.5) 14 stable stable trend -6.4 (-52.6, 84.5)
Henry County 6,10 72.4 (58.6, 89.0) 20 stable stable trend 3.7 (-16.4, 28.6)
Hickman County 6,10 74.4 (56.4, 96.9) 12 stable stable trend 10.7 (-20.1, 53.3)
Houston County 6,10 68.8 (42.1, 108.4) 4 stable stable trend -16.7 (-37.8, 11.5)
Humphreys County 6,10 87.7 (66.8, 113.9) 12 stable stable trend -8.1 (-29.9, 20.4)
Jackson County 6,10 85.6 (59.8, 120.6) 8 stable stable trend -20.7 (-48.5, 22.2)
Jefferson County 6,10 52.7 (42.6, 64.7) 20 stable stable trend 4.7 (-20.2, 37.2)
Johnson County 6,10 68.4 (49.7, 93.3) 9 stable stable trend 18.1 (-15.8, 65.5)
Knox County 6,10 61.6 (57.5, 66.0) 166 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.7)
Lake County 6,10 81.6 (46.4, 136.4) 3
*
*
Lauderdale County 6,10 79.0 (60.3, 101.9) 12 falling falling trend -23.8 (-31.7, -14.9)
Lawrence County 6,10 51.9 (40.9, 65.2) 16 stable stable trend 2.3 (-6.5, 11.8)
Lewis County 6,10 109.9 (80.7, 147.6) 10 stable stable trend 14.1 (-23.6, 70.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 44.8 (33.8, 58.7) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-16.7, 15.3)
Loudon County 6,10 58.8 (48.7, 70.8) 26 stable stable trend 3.3 (-19.0, 31.8)
Macon County 6,10 83.8 (63.5, 108.9) 12 stable stable trend -6.4 (-25.7, 18.0)
Madison County 6,10 46.8 (39.3, 55.3) 28 stable stable trend 2.3 (-17.8, 27.1)
Marion County 6,10 74.9 (58.9, 94.5) 16 stable stable trend 7.4 (-39.0, 88.8)
Marshall County 6,10 58.1 (43.7, 76.1) 11 stable stable trend -5.2 (-18.4, 10.2)
Maury County 6,10 59.7 (50.5, 70.3) 30 stable stable trend 2.9 (-22.8, 37.0)
McMinn County 6,10 64.4 (53.5, 77.1) 25 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.4, 1.1)
McNairy County 6,10 66.7 (51.2, 86.0) 13 stable stable trend 7.3 (-21.1, 46.1)
Meigs County 6,10 55.6 (36.2, 83.9) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-18.3, 28.1)
Monroe County 6,10 76.8 (63.5, 92.2) 25 stable stable trend 2.0 (-30.8, 50.6)
Montgomery County 6,10 66.4 (58.1, 75.6) 47 stable stable trend 2.3 (-12.0, 19.0)
Moore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6,10 73.7 (54.6, 98.2) 10 stable stable trend 4.5 (-14.8, 28.2)
Obion County 6,10 55.0 (41.9, 71.2) 13 falling falling trend -15.7 (-26.8, -3.1)
Overton County 6,10 60.6 (45.0, 80.7) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (-26.5, 47.8)
Perry County 6,10 98.3 (66.9, 142.6) 6 stable stable trend 13.3 (-6.4, 37.2)
Pickett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6,10 90.7 (68.4, 119.2) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-34.3, 57.2)
Putnam County 6,10 53.5 (44.4, 64.1) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-26.6, 37.2)
Rhea County 6,10 70.6 (55.6, 88.8) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-24.0, 28.0)
Roane County 6,10 79.8 (68.1, 93.3) 34 stable stable trend -3.4 (-22.1, 19.7)
Robertson County 6,10 72.9 (61.0, 86.4) 27 stable stable trend 6.6 (-23.5, 48.5)
Rutherford County 6,10 57.6 (51.4, 64.3) 66 stable stable trend 2.3 (-18.0, 27.6)
Scott County 6,10 89.0 (67.9, 115.0) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-31.4, 46.7)
Sequatchie County 6,10 82.8 (58.6, 114.4) 8 stable stable trend 9.5 (-29.8, 70.9)
Sevier County 6,10 66.4 (57.6, 76.3) 42 stable stable trend -6.9 (-13.5, 0.2)
Shelby County 6,10 53.0 (50.1, 56.0) 268 stable stable trend 0.7 (-6.1, 8.1)
Smith County 6,10 63.3 (44.7, 87.5) 8 stable stable trend -14.5 (-49.2, 44.0)
Stewart County 6,10 66.2 (45.0, 95.3) 6 stable stable trend 8.0 (-39.5, 92.7)
Sullivan County 6,10 66.8 (60.4, 73.8) 83 falling falling trend -6.3 (-11.4, -0.8)
Sumner County 6,10 53.8 (47.5, 60.8) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-10.6, 13.7)
Tipton County 6,10 67.2 (55.5, 80.8) 24 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.6, 2.8)
Trousdale County 6,10 88.6 (53.8, 138.3) 4 stable stable trend 15.1 (-31.5, 93.4)
Unicoi County 6,10 89.7 (68.8, 116.1) 13 stable stable trend -11.6 (-24.0, 2.8)
Union County 6,10 90.1 (67.5, 118.4) 11 stable stable trend 4.5 (-16.0, 30.0)
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6,10 69.8 (56.1, 86.0) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-24.9, 36.0)
Washington County 6,10 53.9 (46.9, 61.7) 44 stable stable trend -4.7 (-12.4, 3.8)
Wayne County 6,10 65.2 (44.8, 92.9) 7 stable stable trend -16.8 (-41.4, 18.0)
Weakley County 6,10 52.8 (40.1, 68.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-31.6, 44.2)
White County 6,10 70.7 (54.9, 90.4) 14 stable stable trend 11.2 (-8.0, 34.3)
Williamson County 6,10 37.2 (31.6, 43.5) 33 stable stable trend -1.7 (-12.9, 10.8)
Wilson County 6,10 60.6 (52.6, 69.5) 43 stable stable trend -7.3 (-28.0, 19.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/29/2016 8:05 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top