Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6,10 *** 20.4 (19.9, 20.9) 1,494 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.5, 6.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 21.3 (21.2, 21.3) 74,467 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.1, 3.0)
Loudon County 6,10 *** 34.2 (28.0, 41.6) 25 stable stable trend -5.8 (-31.8, 30.1)
Washington County 6,10 *** 33.9 (29.6, 38.5) 49 stable stable trend -1.7 (-19.0, 19.3)
Sullivan County 6,10 *** 33.1 (29.6, 36.9) 70 stable stable trend -1.4 (-11.5, 9.9)
Hamblen County 6,10 *** 33.1 (27.3, 39.7) 24 stable stable trend 4.6 (-17.6, 32.7)
Grainger County 6,10 *** 32.8 (23.9, 44.1) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-31.3, 38.2)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 32.5 (26.3, 39.7) 21 stable stable trend 4.8 (-7.6, 18.8)
Hawkins County 6,10 *** 32.4 (26.6, 39.2) 23 stable stable trend -11.4 (-29.1, 10.6)
Cumberland County 6,10 *** 31.4 (25.9, 37.8) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-11.8, 10.6)
Unicoi County 6,10 *** 31.3 (21.9, 43.8) 8 stable stable trend -14.1 (-32.5, 9.4)
Blount County 6,10 *** 31.2 (27.3, 35.6) 49 stable stable trend -1.5 (-15.0, 14.1)
Union County 6,10 *** 30.3 (20.3, 43.7) 6 stable stable trend 32.9 (-5.8, 87.4)
Sevier County 6,10 *** 29.4 (25.1, 34.3) 35 stable stable trend -3.9 (-20.2, 15.5)
White County 6,10 *** 28.3 (20.7, 38.1) 10 stable stable trend 5.9 (-35.3, 73.1)
Cocke County 6,10 *** 27.6 (20.8, 35.9) 12 stable stable trend -11.9 (-35.3, 19.8)
Hamilton County 6,10 *** 27.1 (24.8, 29.5) 110 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.1, 6.4)
Warren County 6,10 *** 27.0 (20.6, 34.8) 13 stable stable trend 10.4 (-17.7, 48.2)
Carter County 6,10 *** 26.6 (21.4, 32.8) 20 stable stable trend 5.2 (-27.4, 52.5)
Anderson County 6,10 *** 25.5 (20.9, 30.7) 24 stable stable trend -2.5 (-33.1, 42.1)
Fentress County 6,10 *** 25.3 (16.2, 37.9) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-39.9, 54.9)
Knox County 6,10 *** 25.2 (23.2, 27.3) 124 stable stable trend -0.7 (-18.6, 21.2)
Williamson County 6,10 *** 25.0 (21.9, 28.4) 50 stable stable trend 5.2 (-20.7, 39.7)
Greene County 6,10 *** 24.8 (20.4, 30.1) 23 stable stable trend 3.7 (-8.0, 16.9)
Claiborne County 6,10 *** 24.6 (18.0, 33.1) 10 stable stable trend -14.5 (-38.1, 18.2)
Sumner County 6,10 *** 24.5 (21.4, 28.1) 45 stable stable trend 0.5 (-20.0, 26.3)
Marion County 6,10 *** 24.5 (17.6, 33.4) 9 stable stable trend 7.7 (-32.2, 71.2)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 24.0 (16.1, 34.7) 6 stable stable trend -10.2 (-39.5, 33.3)
Wilson County 6,10 *** 23.4 (19.8, 27.5) 31 stable stable trend 16.4 (-4.0, 41.2)
Henry County 6,10 *** 22.3 (16.1, 30.3) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-37.1, 52.1)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 22.3 (12.6, 37.2) 3
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 *** 22.1 (17.7, 27.3) 18 stable stable trend 22.3 (-2.1, 52.7)
Sequatchie County 6,10 *** 22.0 (13.0, 35.3) 4 stable stable trend 7.2 (-29.7, 63.3)
Overton County 6,10 *** 22.0 (14.5, 32.3) 6 stable stable trend -17.0 (-56.6, 58.8)
Roane County 6,10 *** 21.6 (16.9, 27.3) 16 stable stable trend -14.6 (-35.7, 13.3)
Cannon County 6,10 *** 21.6 (13.2, 33.9) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-26.2, 38.9)
Macon County 6,10 *** 21.0 (13.8, 30.9) 6 falling falling trend -10.9 (-15.1, -6.5)
McMinn County 6,10 *** 20.8 (16.0, 26.7) 14 stable stable trend -3.4 (-24.4, 23.5)
Coffee County 6,10 *** 20.1 (15.3, 25.9) 13 stable stable trend 13.7 (-11.9, 46.8)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 19.9 (14.9, 26.1) 12 stable stable trend 11.3 (-29.3, 75.3)
Meigs County 6,10 *** 19.8 (11.0, 33.6) 3
*
*
Rhea County 6,10 *** 19.7 (13.7, 27.6) 8 stable stable trend 5.3 (-33.2, 65.9)
Humphreys County 6,10 *** 19.7 (12.0, 30.6) 4 stable stable trend -20.6 (-44.2, 13.1)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 19.7 (14.5, 26.2) 11 stable stable trend 11.1 (-34.3, 87.9)
Obion County 6,10 *** 19.6 (13.6, 27.3) 8 stable stable trend 16.4 (-36.7, 114.1)
Bledsoe County 6,10 *** 19.1 (10.8, 31.8) 3
*
*
Crockett County 6,10 *** 18.9 (11.0, 30.6) 4 stable stable trend 17.1 (-14.1, 59.6)
Decatur County 6,10 *** 18.6 (10.1, 32.2) 3
*
*
Scott County 6,10 *** 18.4 (11.5, 28.0) 5 stable stable trend -13.7 (-50.3, 49.8)
DeKalb County 6,10 *** 18.3 (11.1, 28.7) 4 stable stable trend 29.3 (-26.4, 126.9)
Henderson County 6,10 *** 18.1 (11.8, 26.6) 5 stable stable trend -16.8 (-44.2, 24.1)
Giles County 6,10 *** 18.0 (12.3, 25.7) 7 stable stable trend 7.7 (-16.4, 38.7)
Stewart County 6,10 *** 17.9 (10.0, 30.1) 3
*
*
Robertson County 6,10 *** 17.9 (13.7, 22.9) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-39.2, 68.9)
Maury County 6,10 *** 17.8 (14.0, 22.2) 17 stable stable trend -2.7 (-30.8, 36.8)
Bedford County 6,10 *** 17.7 (12.9, 23.9) 9 stable stable trend 4.6 (-27.4, 50.8)
Dyer County 6,10 *** 16.9 (11.8, 23.7) 7 stable stable trend 5.9 (-27.5, 54.7)
Rutherford County 6,10 *** 16.9 (14.7, 19.4) 43 rising rising trend 18.8 (2.5, 37.8)
Campbell County 6,10 *** 16.9 (12.1, 23.1) 9 stable stable trend 10.9 (-8.6, 34.7)
Smith County 6,10 *** 16.8 (9.8, 27.0) 4 stable stable trend 24.0 (-42.3, 166.6)
Bradley County 6,10 *** 16.6 (13.4, 20.4) 19 stable stable trend -2.8 (-37.9, 52.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 16.6 (13.7, 19.9) 24 stable stable trend 1.9 (-9.8, 15.0)
Dickson County 6,10 *** 16.0 (11.6, 21.5) 9 stable stable trend 8.5 (-22.9, 52.8)
Polk County 6,10 *** 15.9 (9.2, 26.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-37.2, 54.6)
Cheatham County 6,10 *** 15.8 (11.0, 22.2) 7 rising rising trend 20.8 (10.5, 32.1)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 15.8 (11.3, 21.6) 8 stable stable trend 12.5 (-11.9, 43.7)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 15.5 (9.1, 25.3) 4 stable stable trend -9.5 (-40.2, 36.9)
Lauderdale County 6,10 *** 15.4 (9.7, 23.4) 5 stable stable trend -15.8 (-30.7, 2.2)
Johnson County 6,10 *** 15.0 (8.7, 24.6) 4 stable stable trend 8.8 (-39.0, 93.8)
Davidson County 6,10 *** 14.9 (13.5, 16.3) 95 stable stable trend 4.6 (-5.7, 16.1)
Carroll County 6,10 *** 14.8 (9.6, 22.0) 5 stable stable trend -9.5 (-24.6, 8.7)
Hardin County 6,10 *** 14.6 (9.6, 21.7) 6 stable stable trend 13.4 (-23.3, 67.6)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 14.4 (9.2, 21.5) 5 falling falling trend -26.4 (-34.4, -17.4)
McNairy County 6,10 *** 14.1 (8.8, 21.7) 5 stable stable trend -12.8 (-55.4, 70.4)
Weakley County 6,10 *** 14.0 (9.0, 20.9) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-32.9, 39.1)
Madison County 6,10 *** 13.4 (10.4, 17.0) 14 stable stable trend -6.2 (-30.8, 27.0)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 13.0 (8.7, 19.0) 6 stable stable trend 8.3 (-30.5, 68.7)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 12.6 (8.3, 18.4) 6 stable stable trend -9.3 (-44.5, 48.3)
Hickman County 6,10 *** 12.2 (7.2, 19.6) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-49.7, 108.3)
Tipton County 6,10 *** 11.3 (7.8, 15.8) 7 stable stable trend 8.7 (-19.0, 45.7)
Gibson County 6,10 *** 10.8 (7.3, 15.3) 7 stable stable trend 6.1 (-25.9, 52.1)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 10.3 (9.4, 11.3) 97 stable stable trend -4.4 (-16.2, 8.9)
Benton County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/22/2018 9:26 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top