Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6,10 *** 20.2 (19.8, 20.7) 1,451 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 20.7 (20.6, 20.8) 71,035 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.0, 2.6)
Hawkins County 6,10 *** 37.0 (30.8, 44.2) 27 falling falling trend -18.5 (-31.9, -2.5)
Washington County 6,10 *** 35.5 (31.2, 40.4) 50 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.7, 18.3)
Sullivan County 6,10 *** 33.8 (30.2, 37.7) 71 stable stable trend -4.8 (-14.5, 6.0)
Unicoi County 6,10 *** 33.4 (23.6, 46.3) 8 stable stable trend -10.8 (-31.6, 16.3)
Loudon County 6,10 *** 33.3 (27.0, 40.8) 23 stable stable trend -4.8 (-34.7, 38.8)
Hamblen County 6,10 *** 32.0 (26.3, 38.5) 23 stable stable trend -8.0 (-20.8, 6.9)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 31.6 (25.6, 38.6) 21 stable stable trend 3.8 (-4.9, 13.2)
Blount County 6,10 *** 31.3 (27.4, 35.7) 49 stable stable trend -5.1 (-19.1, 11.3)
Cumberland County 6,10 *** 30.7 (25.3, 37.1) 28 stable stable trend -5.3 (-14.0, 4.3)
Cocke County 6,10 *** 30.2 (23.1, 38.9) 13 stable stable trend -16.0 (-36.8, 11.7)
Sevier County 6,10 *** 29.2 (24.8, 34.2) 33 stable stable trend -10.4 (-20.2, 0.5)
Grainger County 6,10 *** 28.9 (20.5, 39.9) 8 stable stable trend -10.1 (-44.3, 45.1)
Claiborne County 6,10 *** 28.0 (20.8, 36.9) 11 stable stable trend -21.1 (-38.9, 2.0)
Humphreys County 6,10 *** 27.6 (18.1, 40.5) 6 stable stable trend -21.4 (-39.5, 2.0)
Hamilton County 6,10 *** 25.9 (23.6, 28.3) 104 stable stable trend 3.8 (-8.4, 17.7)
Sumner County 6,10 *** 25.3 (22.1, 28.9) 45 stable stable trend -7.1 (-26.3, 17.0)
White County 6,10 *** 25.2 (18.2, 34.4) 9 stable stable trend 7.9 (-33.5, 75.2)
Union County 6,10 *** 24.9 (16.0, 37.2) 5 stable stable trend 32.5 (-4.4, 83.6)
Knox County 6,10 *** 24.9 (23.0, 27.1) 120 stable stable trend -7.4 (-20.5, 7.8)
Anderson County 6,10 *** 24.8 (20.4, 29.9) 24 stable stable trend -13.0 (-34.8, 15.9)
Williamson County 6,10 *** 24.8 (21.6, 28.3) 48 stable stable trend -10.7 (-30.2, 14.3)
Sequatchie County 6,10 *** 24.7 (14.8, 38.9) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-32.8, 49.1)
Fentress County 6,10 *** 24.1 (15.3, 36.4) 5 stable stable trend 16.4 (-27.7, 87.3)
Greene County 6,10 *** 24.0 (19.6, 29.2) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.8, 4.5)
Roane County 6,10 *** 23.6 (18.6, 29.6) 17 stable stable trend -17.1 (-37.3, 9.6)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 23.4 (15.6, 33.9) 6 stable stable trend -18.4 (-46.4, 24.1)
Carter County 6,10 *** 23.2 (18.4, 29.0) 17 stable stable trend -2.7 (-30.6, 36.6)
Rhea County 6,10 *** 22.3 (15.9, 30.5) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-32.5, 45.7)
Marion County 6,10 *** 22.0 (15.3, 30.8) 8 stable stable trend 8.5 (-36.3, 84.8)
Warren County 6,10 *** 21.9 (16.1, 29.1) 10 stable stable trend 5.8 (-24.2, 47.7)
Macon County 6,10 *** 21.4 (14.1, 31.4) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-21.3, 18.7)
McMinn County 6,10 *** 21.4 (16.5, 27.5) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-22.7, 32.2)
Putnam County 6,10 *** 21.3 (16.9, 26.4) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-30.2, 38.7)
Bledsoe County 6,10 *** 21.0 (12.0, 34.7) 3
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 *** 20.7 (15.3, 27.5) 11 stable stable trend 19.0 (-16.6, 69.7)
Giles County 6,10 *** 20.5 (14.4, 28.6) 8 stable stable trend -7.5 (-36.3, 34.4)
Henderson County 6,10 *** 20.3 (13.6, 29.3) 6 stable stable trend -5.2 (-34.2, 36.4)
Cannon County 6,10 *** 20.3 (12.4, 32.2) 4 stable stable trend 6.7 (-26.7, 55.2)
Wilson County 6,10 *** 20.1 (16.7, 24.0) 26 stable stable trend 11.2 (-10.8, 38.7)
Scott County 6,10 *** 19.7 (12.5, 29.7) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-40.5, 56.6)
Henry County 6,10 *** 19.7 (13.9, 27.2) 9 stable stable trend 13.3 (-36.0, 100.5)
Overton County 6,10 *** 19.0 (12.2, 28.6) 5 stable stable trend -4.3 (-70.6, 211.4)
Coffee County 6,10 *** 18.7 (14.1, 24.4) 12 stable stable trend 15.1 (-11.8, 50.0)
Maury County 6,10 *** 18.7 (14.8, 23.3) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-20.0, 29.8)
Obion County 6,10 *** 18.2 (12.5, 25.9) 7 stable stable trend 6.0 (-46.0, 108.2)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 18.1 (13.3, 24.1) 10 stable stable trend -9.0 (-38.6, 34.9)
Robertson County 6,10 *** 17.8 (13.6, 23.0) 12 stable stable trend -5.9 (-43.2, 56.0)
Crockett County 6,10 *** 17.8 (10.3, 29.1) 3
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 17.7 (12.7, 24.0) 9 stable stable trend -4.1 (-33.8, 39.1)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 17.7 (11.9, 25.4) 6 falling falling trend -21.2 (-33.9, -5.9)
Bradley County 6,10 *** 17.4 (14.1, 21.3) 20 stable stable trend 7.2 (-23.9, 51.0)
Campbell County 6,10 *** 17.3 (12.3, 23.7) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-23.1, 32.0)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 16.4 (13.4, 19.7) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-13.1, 13.0)
Polk County 6,10 *** 16.0 (9.5, 25.9) 4 stable stable trend 12.0 (-22.6, 62.1)
Smith County 6,10 *** 16.0 (9.0, 26.3) 3
*
*
Bedford County 6,10 *** 15.9 (11.4, 21.8) 8 stable stable trend -13.4 (-30.1, 7.2)
Hickman County 6,10 *** 15.9 (9.9, 24.2) 5 stable stable trend -10.2 (-52.7, 70.4)
Lauderdale County 6,10 *** 15.7 (9.9, 23.8) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-34.2, 47.4)
Weakley County 6,10 *** 15.7 (10.5, 22.7) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-15.5, 22.0)
Carroll County 6,10 *** 15.6 (10.3, 23.0) 6 stable stable trend -3.6 (-21.8, 18.8)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 15.5 (10.7, 21.9) 7 stable stable trend -12.3 (-44.1, 37.7)
Dickson County 6,10 *** 15.5 (11.1, 20.9) 9 stable stable trend 6.9 (-23.9, 50.3)
Johnson County 6,10 *** 15.4 (9.1, 25.0) 4 stable stable trend 6.7 (-37.2, 81.4)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 15.1 (8.7, 24.9) 3
*
*
Dyer County 6,10 *** 15.1 (10.3, 21.5) 6 stable stable trend 25.8 (-18.3, 93.6)
Cheatham County 6,10 *** 14.2 (9.5, 20.4) 6 stable stable trend 4.0 (-12.9, 24.1)
McNairy County 6,10 *** 14.1 (8.9, 21.4) 5 stable stable trend -12.0 (-53.9, 67.7)
Davidson County 6,10 *** 14.0 (12.7, 15.4) 87 stable stable trend 2.6 (-7.0, 13.3)
Rutherford County 6,10 *** 13.9 (11.8, 16.2) 34 rising rising trend 17.8 (1.1, 37.3)
Hardin County 6,10 *** 13.7 (8.7, 20.8) 5 stable stable trend -15.2 (-39.7, 19.4)
Madison County 6,10 *** 13.3 (10.2, 16.9) 14 stable stable trend -7.0 (-33.3, 29.8)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 12.4 (8.2, 18.1) 6 stable stable trend -9.9 (-38.1, 31.2)
Tipton County 6,10 *** 11.5 (8.0, 16.1) 7 stable stable trend 9.5 (-14.1, 39.6)
Gibson County 6,10 *** 11.3 (7.7, 16.1) 7 stable stable trend -9.7 (-38.1, 31.6)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 11.1 (10.1, 12.1) 103 stable stable trend -7.3 (-19.4, 6.5)
Benton County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/26/2017 2:07 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top