Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 16.8 (16.2, 17.4) 619 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 16.2 (16.1, 16.3) 28,423 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Anderson County 6,10 21.7 (15.8, 29.0) 10 stable stable trend -6.7 (-32.7, 29.2)
Bedford County 6,10 13.5 (8.0, 21.4) 4 stable stable trend -14.7 (-55.0, 61.8)
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blount County 6,10 25.8 (20.9, 31.7) 20 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.3, -1.7)
Bradley County 6,10 17.3 (12.8, 23.0) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-33.2, 48.1)
Campbell County 6,10 16.3 (9.6, 26.1) 4 stable stable trend -20.2 (-49.0, 24.9)
Cannon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6,10 18.6 (12.6, 26.6) 7 stable stable trend -11.9 (-38.1, 25.5)
Cheatham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6,10 18.6 (10.8, 30.2) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-41.3, 59.9)
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cocke County 6,10 20.2 (12.3, 31.5) 4 stable stable trend -4.4 (-47.5, 74.1)
Coffee County 6,10 11.0 (6.3, 17.8) 3
*
*
Crockett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 26.8 (19.4, 36.3) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-32.7, 43.2)
Davidson County 6,10 10.1 (8.6, 11.7) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-16.8, 19.4)
DeKalb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickson County 6,10 14.9 (9.1, 23.0) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-46.7, 64.9)
Dyer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 13.6 (7.5, 22.9) 3
*
*
Fentress County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 17.2 (10.7, 26.6) 5 stable stable trend -7.5 (-47.5, 62.8)
Gibson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County 6,10 19.6 (11.7, 31.4) 4 stable stable trend -7.0 (-24.5, 14.6)
Grainger County 6,10 32.4 (20.0, 50.2) 4
*
*
Greene County 6,10 19.2 (13.6, 26.4) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-20.3, 25.0)
Grundy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamblen County 6,10 29.7 (22.1, 39.0) 11 stable stable trend -18.8 (-35.9, 2.8)
Hamilton County 6,10 21.3 (18.5, 24.5) 44 stable stable trend 9.5 (-8.9, 31.5)
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hawkins County 6,10 33.6 (25.3, 43.8) 12 stable stable trend -10.1 (-30.7, 16.7)
Haywood County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 23.3 (16.2, 32.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-15.1, 17.6)
Johnson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6,10 20.7 (18.2, 23.5) 52 falling falling trend -12.1 (-16.3, -7.7)
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10 20.9 (13.5, 30.9) 5 stable stable trend -15.8 (-47.9, 36.0)
Lewis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6,10 12.8 (7.3, 21.5) 3
*
*
Loudon County 6,10 26.2 (18.0, 36.8) 8 stable stable trend 15.7 (-38.1, 116.1)
Macon County 6,10 24.0 (13.4, 39.9) 3
*
*
Madison County 6,10 10.5 (6.9, 15.4) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-52.3, 102.2)
Marion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6,10 19.7 (11.5, 31.7) 4 stable stable trend -27.6 (-64.2, 46.2)
Maury County 6,10 13.5 (9.1, 19.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-51.9, 106.5)
McMinn County 6,10 16.6 (10.9, 24.5) 6 stable stable trend 11.4 (-15.5, 46.7)
McNairy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 20.4 (13.4, 29.9) 6 stable stable trend -4.8 (-35.2, 39.8)
Montgomery County 6,10 13.7 (10.2, 18.0) 11 falling falling trend -18.8 (-32.6, -2.3)
Moore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Obion County 6,10 19.0 (11.2, 30.3) 4 stable stable trend 25.2 (-35.1, 141.5)
Overton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 20.1 (14.2, 27.6) 8 stable stable trend -17.0 (-38.4, 11.8)
Rhea County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County 6,10 23.5 (16.2, 33.1) 8 stable stable trend -12.0 (-40.1, 29.2)
Robertson County 6,10 16.6 (11.1, 23.8) 6 stable stable trend -20.6 (-45.5, 15.7)
Rutherford County 6,10 11.9 (9.3, 15.0) 15 stable stable trend -8.6 (-28.9, 17.5)
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 6,10 23.5 (18.0, 30.2) 13 stable stable trend -8.2 (-26.6, 14.7)
Shelby County 6,10 9.2 (8.0, 10.5) 47 stable stable trend 1.2 (-16.5, 22.6)
Smith County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6,10 28.4 (23.8, 33.7) 29 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.9, 0.8)
Sumner County 6,10 22.6 (18.3, 27.5) 20 stable stable trend -10.1 (-28.2, 12.7)
Tipton County 6,10 11.0 (6.4, 17.8) 3
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6,10 42.1 (25.9, 65.0) 5 stable stable trend -14.1 (-28.9, 3.7)
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6,10 15.3 (8.9, 24.6) 4 stable stable trend 7.8 (-40.7, 95.7)
Washington County 6,10 29.5 (23.9, 36.0) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-16.0, 15.0)
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 6,10 23.9 (14.4, 37.6) 4 stable stable trend 23.8 (-27.4, 111.1)
Williamson County 6,10 23.6 (19.4, 28.4) 24 stable stable trend -13.7 (-37.5, 19.2)
Wilson County 6,10 13.0 (9.3, 17.7) 8 stable stable trend 16.7 (-17.3, 64.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/24/2016 1:59 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top