Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Breast, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 121.7 (120.1, 123.3) 4,725 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.3 (123.1, 123.5) 224,504 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Fayette County 6,10 146.8 (125.9, 170.5) 38 stable stable trend -5.8 (-24.6, 17.6)
Williamson County 6,10 144.5 (134.0, 155.5) 152 stable stable trend 4.0 (-6.4, 15.6)
Fentress County 6,10 143.6 (114.2, 179.0) 18 stable stable trend 6.7 (-10.6, 27.3)
Marion County 6,10 138.5 (114.8, 166.0) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-8.1, 8.7)
White County 6,10 136.6 (112.4, 165.0) 24 stable stable trend 17.8 (-1.9, 41.4)
Humphreys County 6,10 136.5 (107.0, 172.0) 16 stable stable trend 6.0 (-41.8, 93.0)
Anderson County 6,10 135.8 (121.8, 151.1) 73 stable stable trend 1.5 (-9.1, 13.3)
Lewis County 6,10 135.7 (101.0, 179.4) 11 stable stable trend -9.0 (-37.4, 32.3)
Loudon County 6,10 133.8 (116.8, 152.8) 51 stable stable trend 7.8 (-6.8, 24.7)
Sumner County 6,10 133.1 (123.0, 143.9) 131 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.1, 7.0)
Haywood County 6,10 132.9 (104.2, 167.2) 16 stable stable trend 6.0 (-39.4, 85.4)
Clay County 6,10 131.7 (89.8, 188.1) 7 stable stable trend -17.6 (-49.7, 35.1)
Davidson County 6,10 130.4 (124.9, 136.1) 438 stable stable trend -3.3 (-10.5, 4.4)
Cheatham County 6,10 130.1 (109.5, 153.7) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.0, 9.9)
Shelby County 6,10 129.9 (125.4, 134.4) 668 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 2.0)
Crockett County 6,10 129.0 (97.6, 167.6) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-30.4, 47.3)
Macon County 6,10 128.4 (102.0, 159.9) 17 stable stable trend -25.3 (-49.2, 9.9)
Hardeman County 6,10 128.4 (103.5, 157.8) 20 stable stable trend -3.0 (-22.8, 21.7)
Knox County 6,10 127.6 (121.4, 134.0) 334 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.4)
Washington County 6,10 127.3 (115.9, 139.4) 98 stable stable trend 3.5 (-10.6, 19.9)
Perry County 6,10 126.4 (85.1, 182.2) 7 stable stable trend 5.8 (-28.5, 56.6)
Wilson County 6,10 125.4 (113.7, 138.0) 88 stable stable trend -2.2 (-9.2, 5.4)
Robertson County 6,10 125.1 (109.6, 142.3) 48 stable stable trend 5.1 (-8.1, 20.1)
Hickman County 6,10 124.5 (99.5, 154.3) 18 stable stable trend -3.4 (-35.6, 44.7)
Stewart County 6,10 123.3 (90.3, 165.0) 10 stable stable trend 15.0 (-8.6, 44.7)
Hamblen County 6,10 123.2 (108.5, 139.6) 53 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.9, 15.7)
Madison County 6,10 122.1 (109.6, 135.6) 73 stable stable trend -0.0 (-12.6, 14.4)
Marshall County 6,10 121.5 (99.5, 147.1) 22 stable stable trend 7.6 (-3.3, 19.7)
Blount County 6,10 121.2 (110.5, 132.6) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.2, 9.2)
Sullivan County 6,10 121.1 (112.1, 130.8) 143 stable stable trend 2.1 (-8.1, 13.4)
Hamilton County 6,10 121.1 (114.5, 127.9) 267 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.1, 1.0)
Gibson County 6,10 120.8 (104.0, 139.7) 40 stable stable trend 9.5 (-14.2, 39.8)
Putnam County 6,10 120.2 (105.9, 136.0) 54 stable stable trend 10.3 (-1.9, 23.9)
Cumberland County 6,10 119.6 (104.3, 136.7) 55 stable stable trend -7.2 (-28.6, 20.7)
Hardin County 6,10 119.3 (97.0, 145.6) 22 stable stable trend 2.9 (-23.9, 39.0)
Campbell County 6,10 119.1 (101.1, 139.7) 33 stable stable trend -3.1 (-21.1, 18.9)
Lauderdale County 6,10 118.5 (94.9, 146.3) 18 stable stable trend -11.2 (-32.0, 15.9)
Rutherford County 6,10 118.1 (109.6, 127.1) 147 rising rising trend 8.0 (3.8, 12.4)
Sevier County 6,10 117.3 (105.1, 130.7) 71 stable stable trend 6.8 (-4.5, 19.5)
Union County 6,10 117.1 (90.4, 149.6) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-27.2, 35.4)
Jefferson County 6,10 116.9 (100.6, 135.3) 39 stable stable trend 3.8 (-10.9, 20.9)
Claiborne County 6,10 116.6 (96.6, 139.9) 25 stable stable trend -3.5 (-18.0, 13.5)
Morgan County 6,10 116.2 (90.8, 147.1) 15 stable stable trend 4.9 (-23.6, 44.2)
Van Buren County 6,10 115.6 (71.7, 179.9) 5 stable stable trend -9.9 (-39.5, 34.0)
Obion County 6,10 115.5 (96.0, 138.2) 26 stable stable trend 14.7 (-6.5, 40.8)
Roane County 6,10 115.3 (100.5, 132.0) 47 stable stable trend -3.7 (-24.2, 22.3)
Greene County 6,10 115.2 (101.6, 130.2) 56 stable stable trend -6.7 (-22.4, 12.3)
Tipton County 6,10 114.8 (98.9, 132.5) 39 stable stable trend 4.6 (-5.3, 15.5)
Bedford County 6,10 114.5 (96.9, 134.6) 31 stable stable trend 6.7 (-11.3, 28.4)
Smith County 6,10 113.7 (87.3, 145.8) 13 stable stable trend -5.6 (-27.0, 21.9)
Jackson County 6,10 113.6 (82.5, 154.2) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-37.0, 61.0)
Weakley County 6,10 112.9 (93.6, 135.4) 25 stable stable trend -9.1 (-26.4, 12.1)
Rhea County 6,10 112.3 (92.7, 135.1) 24 stable stable trend -5.0 (-26.4, 22.5)
Polk County 6,10 112.0 (85.0, 145.6) 12 stable stable trend 5.7 (-11.9, 26.9)
DeKalb County 6,10 111.2 (86.8, 141.1) 15 stable stable trend 5.4 (-37.8, 78.8)
Carter County 6,10 111.0 (96.1, 127.8) 43 rising rising trend 12.9 (3.6, 22.9)
Coffee County 6,10 111.0 (95.2, 128.8) 37 stable stable trend 4.5 (-12.6, 24.8)
Bradley County 6,10 110.4 (98.8, 123.0) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-14.2, 14.7)
Franklin County 6,10 110.2 (92.7, 130.2) 31 rising rising trend 15.0 (1.5, 30.3)
Maury County 6,10 109.9 (97.1, 124.0) 56 stable stable trend 2.2 (-9.2, 15.0)
Henderson County 6,10 109.7 (88.9, 134.1) 20 stable stable trend -4.8 (-17.7, 10.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 109.6 (99.2, 120.8) 83 stable stable trend -1.5 (-12.7, 11.1)
Warren County 6,10 109.4 (91.2, 130.2) 27 stable stable trend -3.3 (-25.9, 26.4)
Grundy County 6,10 109.3 (80.6, 145.8) 11 stable stable trend 15.8 (-17.8, 63.1)
Dickson County 6,10 109.2 (92.9, 127.7) 33 stable stable trend 6.6 (-4.5, 19.0)
McMinn County 6,10 108.3 (93.2, 125.4) 39 stable stable trend -7.1 (-15.5, 2.1)
Hawkins County 6,10 107.8 (93.2, 124.3) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-18.6, 22.1)
Unicoi County 6,10 107.7 (83.0, 138.2) 14 stable stable trend 6.9 (-10.4, 27.4)
Monroe County 6,10 107.4 (91.1, 126.0) 33 falling falling trend -9.8 (-17.0, -2.1)
Hancock County 6,10 107.2 (69.5, 160.8) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-22.8, 32.9)
Johnson County 6,10 107.1 (81.8, 138.7) 13 stable stable trend 13.5 (-25.7, 73.2)
Dyer County 6,10 106.1 (88.2, 126.7) 26 stable stable trend 2.5 (-5.8, 11.5)
Lincoln County 6,10 105.9 (87.2, 127.6) 24 stable stable trend 6.3 (-14.8, 32.6)
Scott County 6,10 105.3 (81.3, 134.4) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-13.7, 11.9)
Houston County 6,10 104.6 (68.7, 153.9) 6 stable stable trend 36.5 (-5.3, 96.7)
Benton County 6,10 103.2 (78.1, 134.7) 13 stable stable trend 3.3 (-8.0, 16.1)
Grainger County 6,10 102.0 (80.3, 128.4) 16 stable stable trend 4.2 (-9.5, 20.1)
Cannon County 6,10 100.9 (73.4, 136.0) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-23.9, 35.3)
Sequatchie County 6,10 100.8 (73.9, 135.2) 10 stable stable trend 12.6 (-20.1, 58.6)
Henry County 6,10 100.6 (83.1, 121.2) 25 stable stable trend 10.5 (-9.4, 34.7)
Lawrence County 6,10 100.6 (83.9, 119.8) 27 stable stable trend 5.7 (-0.8, 12.5)
Decatur County 6,10 99.3 (69.6, 138.5) 8 stable stable trend -13.4 (-40.6, 26.4)
Lake County 6,10 97.8 (56.6, 159.6) 4 stable stable trend 28.7 (-10.2, 84.5)
Overton County 6,10 97.3 (75.9, 123.5) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.8, 9.7)
Wayne County 6,10 97.1 (71.8, 129.5) 10 stable stable trend -3.3 (-21.2, 18.6)
Giles County 6,10 96.9 (78.3, 118.9) 20 stable stable trend -4.0 (-20.9, 16.5)
Meigs County 6,10 95.5 (65.9, 134.9) 7 stable stable trend -5.9 (-45.3, 61.8)
Carroll County 6,10 94.6 (76.2, 116.6) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-16.4, 24.0)
McNairy County 6,10 92.9 (73.5, 116.2) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-12.9, 15.5)
Cocke County 6,10 92.8 (75.8, 112.7) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-16.7, 22.9)
Moore County 6,10 91.8 (55.3, 146.0) 4 stable stable trend -11.7 (-68.8, 149.8)
Chester County 6,10 82.4 (59.1, 112.2) 9 stable stable trend -3.6 (-42.6, 61.9)
Pickett County 6,10 81.1 (45.7, 139.2) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-40.1, 62.9)
Trousdale County 6,10 78.9 (45.8, 127.3) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-33.7, 44.4)
Bledsoe County 6,10 77.3 (52.2, 111.6) 6 stable stable trend 9.4 (-41.1, 103.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/27/2016 11:49 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top