Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Ovary, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 446 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.4, -2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.6 (11.5, 11.7) 21,294 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Shelby County 6,10 12.0 (10.7, 13.5) 62 stable stable trend -5.6 (-19.2, 10.3)
Davidson County 6,10 10.2 (8.7, 11.9) 35 falling falling trend -8.1 (-14.3, -1.5)
Knox County 6,10 11.6 (9.8, 13.6) 31 stable stable trend 5.9 (-9.7, 24.2)
Hamilton County 6,10 10.8 (8.9, 13.0) 24 stable stable trend 11.0 (-3.0, 26.9)
Rutherford County 6,10 11.4 (8.8, 14.5) 13 stable stable trend -11.2 (-39.6, 30.6)
Sumner County 6,10 12.9 (9.9, 16.7) 12 stable stable trend 5.2 (-11.3, 24.7)
Sullivan County 6,10 11.1 (8.3, 14.6) 12 stable stable trend -9.0 (-36.7, 30.9)
Bradley County 6,10 17.9 (13.3, 23.6) 11 falling falling trend -13.6 (-25.2, -0.3)
Williamson County 6,10 10.6 (7.8, 14.0) 10 stable stable trend 10.0 (-13.9, 40.6)
Blount County 6,10 11.6 (8.5, 15.6) 10 stable stable trend 15.0 (-27.3, 82.1)
Washington County 6,10 12.7 (9.3, 17.0) 10 stable stable trend -6.3 (-37.1, 39.7)
Montgomery County 6,10 11.9 (8.7, 16.0) 9 stable stable trend -5.8 (-33.7, 33.8)
Anderson County 6,10 14.2 (10.0, 19.8) 8 stable stable trend -15.3 (-49.3, 41.3)
Madison County 6,10 12.1 (8.5, 16.8) 7 stable stable trend -4.6 (-28.4, 27.1)
Maury County 6,10 13.2 (9.1, 18.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-33.6, 50.9)
Wilson County 6,10 9.1 (6.2, 13.0) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-31.1, 54.4)
Cumberland County 6,10 11.8 (7.7, 17.9) 6 stable stable trend -7.4 (-32.7, 27.4)
Sevier County 6,10 10.6 (7.2, 15.3) 6 stable stable trend -3.4 (-38.4, 51.5)
Roane County 6,10 15.9 (10.5, 23.4) 6 stable stable trend 23.0 (-27.0, 107.1)
Loudon County 6,10 16.9 (10.9, 25.1) 6 stable stable trend -6.7 (-45.1, 58.6)
Putnam County 6,10 12.7 (8.5, 18.5) 6 stable stable trend 13.9 (-21.4, 65.1)
Greene County 6,10 11.6 (7.6, 17.3) 6 falling falling trend -26.1 (-41.5, -6.5)
Gibson County 6,10 13.7 (8.7, 20.7) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 14.1 (8.9, 21.5) 5 stable stable trend -25.5 (-61.6, 44.5)
Carter County 6,10 10.9 (6.7, 17.1) 4 stable stable trend -8.8 (-41.5, 42.0)
Hawkins County 6,10 10.1 (6.1, 16.0) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-25.7, 38.4)
McMinn County 6,10 13.2 (8.0, 20.7) 4 stable stable trend -13.3 (-54.7, 66.2)
Franklin County 6,10 16.1 (9.4, 25.8) 4 stable stable trend -16.4 (-55.1, 55.7)
Bedford County 6,10 14.3 (8.4, 22.8) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-36.2, 59.8)
Cocke County 6,10 15.0 (8.6, 24.5) 4 stable stable trend 9.1 (-30.9, 72.3)
Dyer County 6,10 15.8 (9.3, 25.3) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-38.0, 57.2)
Hamblen County 6,10 8.8 (5.1, 14.2) 4 stable stable trend -4.7 (-53.7, 96.2)
Warren County 6,10 13.8 (8.1, 22.4) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-14.7, 23.8)
Hardin County 6,10 18.0 (10.2, 30.1) 3
*
*
Campbell County 6,10 11.2 (6.3, 18.8) 3
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 15.3 (8.3, 26.2) 3
*
*
Coffee County 6,10 9.5 (5.4, 15.7) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 6,10 14.1 (7.8, 23.7) 3
*
*
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheatham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McNairy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Obion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rhea County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2016 2:42 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top