Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 114.2 (113.4, 115.0) N/A 16,792 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 126.8 (126.6, 127.0) N/A 249,261 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
Mills County 6 *** 149.0 (93.1, 230.1) 1 (1, 196) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.5, 7.1)
Polk County 6 *** 145.4 (125.8, 167.4) 2 (1, 83) 47 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Fisher County 6 *** 143.6 (81.1, 238.1) 3 (1, 197) 4 rising rising trend 6.2 (0.4, 12.2)
Williamson County 6 *** 143.0 (136.7, 149.6) 4 (1, 20) 395 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.2, 6.3)
Blanco County 6 *** 141.7 (103.4, 190.8) 5 (1, 178) 12 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.2, 10.8)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 139.2 (110.7, 173.1) 6 (1, 155) 18 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 5.9)
Delta County 6 *** 134.4 (86.9, 202.2) 7 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.2, 7.2)
Gregg County 6 *** 133.9 (122.1, 146.7) 8 (2, 75) 99 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Lamar County 6 *** 132.4 (114.4, 152.5) 9 (1, 128) 44 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.5)
Parker County 6 *** 132.3 (121.0, 144.5) 10 (2, 82) 106 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Kleberg County 6 *** 132.0 (106.8, 161.5) 11 (1, 161) 20 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 5.3)
Goliad County 6 *** 131.6 (89.1, 189.3) 12 (1, 194) 7 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.4, 8.4)
Runnels County 6 *** 129.1 (93.0, 176.0) 13 (1, 189) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.1)
Winkler County 6 *** 128.8 (81.7, 192.9) 14 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.9, 9.0)
Denton County 6 *** 128.2 (123.2, 133.4) 15 (9, 54) 522 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Collin County 6 *** 128.1 (123.6, 132.7) 16 (9, 52) 640 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Taylor County 6 *** 127.7 (116.3, 140.0) 17 (3, 110) 98 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Travis County 6 *** 127.1 (122.8, 131.5) 18 (10, 54) 709 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Comal County 6 *** 126.8 (116.1, 138.3) 19 (4, 99) 114 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Kaufman County 6 *** 126.8 (114.5, 140.1) 20 (3, 107) 80 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Aransas County 6 *** 125.8 (101.9, 154.3) 21 (1, 164) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Tarrant County 6 *** 124.8 (121.8, 127.9) 22 (16, 56) 1,306 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Kerr County 6 *** 124.5 (107.5, 143.6) 23 (1, 145) 51 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Rockwall County 6 *** 124.3 (110.9, 138.9) 24 (4, 130) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Hood County 6 *** 123.8 (108.6, 140.6) 25 (4, 140) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Bastrop County 6 *** 123.4 (109.2, 138.8) 26 (3, 127) 60 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Bell County 6 *** 123.2 (115.5, 131.2) 27 (10, 93) 196 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Smith County 6 *** 123.2 (114.8, 132.0) 28 (7, 95) 172 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Rusk County 6 *** 123.2 (105.6, 142.9) 29 (2, 146) 38 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Hays County 6 *** 123.1 (113.2, 133.6) 30 (7, 105) 121 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Walker County 6 *** 122.8 (105.1, 142.7) 31 (3, 148) 38 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.3)
Ward County 6 *** 122.1 (86.1, 168.2) 32 (1, 191) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.4, 5.6)
Hill County 6 *** 121.2 (100.9, 144.7) 33 (1, 169) 29 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2)
Clay County 6 *** 121.2 (85.6, 167.9) 34 (1, 193) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.6)
Ellis County 6 *** 121.2 (111.1, 131.9) 35 (9, 118) 112 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Limestone County 6 *** 121.0 (97.2, 149.4) 36 (1, 179) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 3.9)
Childress County 6 *** 121.0 (73.5, 188.9) 37 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.9, 5.6)
Grimes County 6 *** 120.5 (95.4, 150.3) 38 (1, 179) 18 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.2, 5.1)
Dallas County 6 *** 119.7 (117.0, 122.5) 39 (29, 72) 1,543 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Hamilton County 6 *** 119.4 (82.3, 169.9) 40 (1, 195) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 4.2)
Johnson County 6 *** 119.3 (109.5, 129.9) 41 (11, 124) 113 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Orange County 6 *** 119.2 (105.9, 133.8) 42 (4, 146) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Henderson County 6 *** 119.2 (106.3, 133.3) 43 (5, 135) 72 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Freestone County 6 *** 119.2 (92.3, 151.8) 44 (1, 186) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.4)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 117.5 (96.0, 142.7) 45 (2, 175) 23 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Starr County 6 *** 117.3 (100.4, 136.1) 46 (3, 163) 35 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.2, 5.1)
Wheeler County 6 *** 116.8 (70.7, 183.7) 47 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.4, 8.8)
Tom Green County 6 *** 116.7 (105.1, 129.3) 48 (10, 140) 79 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Randall County 6 *** 116.6 (105.8, 128.3) 49 (9, 134) 90 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
McLennan County 6 *** 116.6 (108.5, 125.2) 50 (17, 119) 162 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Stephens County 6 *** 116.6 (78.7, 167.4) 51 (1, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 4.8)
Nolan County 6 *** 116.6 (86.8, 153.7) 52 (1, 193) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 5.8)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 116.5 (111.6, 121.6) 53 (30, 99) 452 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Wood County 6 *** 116.4 (98.9, 136.5) 54 (3, 162) 41 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.4)
Ector County 6 *** 116.3 (105.1, 128.3) 55 (10, 138) 81 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Milam County 6 *** 116.0 (92.9, 143.5) 56 (1, 179) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.7)
Gonzales County 6 *** 116.0 (89.3, 148.3) 57 (1, 188) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.3)
Lavaca County 6 *** 115.9 (90.6, 146.7) 58 (1, 183) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 6.4)
Grayson County 6 *** 115.7 (105.2, 127.0) 59 (12, 136) 97 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
San Patricio County 6 *** 115.4 (100.3, 132.1) 60 (6, 158) 44 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Hardin County 6 *** 114.6 (99.0, 132.1) 61 (7, 162) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Burleson County 6 *** 114.6 (87.9, 147.4) 62 (1, 185) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.8)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 114.5 (104.6, 125.2) 63 (16, 140) 100 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Washington County 6 *** 114.3 (94.1, 137.7) 64 (3, 176) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.2)
Gillespie County 6 *** 114.3 (93.4, 139.1) 65 (2, 176) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Kendall County 6 *** 114.0 (96.8, 133.6) 66 (5, 167) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Rains County 6 *** 113.0 (78.7, 158.0) 67 (1, 196) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.1)
Galveston County 6 *** 112.9 (106.1, 120.0) 68 (31, 125) 218 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Duval County 6 *** 112.9 (79.4, 156.4) 69 (1, 196) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.4)
Caldwell County 6 *** 112.7 (93.9, 134.2) 70 (4, 176) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Matagorda County 6 *** 112.6 (93.1, 135.2) 71 (4, 177) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Harrison County 6 *** 112.2 (97.7, 128.4) 72 (7, 163) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Bexar County 6 *** 112.0 (109.1, 115.1) 73 (51, 108) 1,120 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Brazos County 6 *** 111.8 (101.8, 122.5) 74 (19, 149) 95 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Bailey County 6 *** 111.7 (66.9, 174.5) 75 (1, 197) 4
*
*
Jasper County 6 *** 111.3 (91.8, 134.0) 76 (5, 182) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Lubbock County 6 *** 111.3 (103.7, 119.2) 77 (34, 134) 169 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Wise County 6 *** 111.3 (96.3, 127.9) 78 (9, 162) 42 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Harris County 6 *** 111.2 (109.2, 113.2) 79 (62, 106) 2,477 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Victoria County 6 *** 111.1 (98.4, 125.1) 80 (13, 157) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
DeWitt County 6 *** 111.1 (84.1, 144.2) 81 (1, 190) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.7)
Chambers County 6 *** 110.8 (90.9, 133.7) 82 (3, 181) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Karnes County 6 *** 110.5 (78.5, 151.6) 83 (1, 194) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 110.1 (87.9, 136.6) 84 (2, 186) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.4)
Upshur County 6 *** 110.0 (92.3, 130.3) 85 (5, 176) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.3)
Brazoria County 6 *** 109.9 (103.1, 117.0) 86 (32, 135) 201 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Cass County 6 *** 109.8 (89.9, 133.3) 87 (3, 182) 24 stable stable trend -12.1 (-22.9, 0.3)
Bowie County 6 *** 109.8 (97.6, 123.1) 88 (18, 160) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Cherokee County 6 *** 109.7 (93.2, 128.4) 89 (8, 171) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Wichita County 6 *** 109.3 (98.4, 121.0) 90 (21, 158) 81 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Morris County 6 *** 109.2 (77.0, 150.7) 91 (1, 194) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.7, 4.9)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 109.0 (90.7, 130.1) 92 (5, 177) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.0)
Jefferson County 6 *** 108.7 (101.0, 116.8) 93 (38, 144) 158 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Franklin County 6 *** 108.4 (72.4, 156.1) 94 (1, 196) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 4.6)
Uvalde County 6 *** 108.2 (84.6, 136.2) 95 (3, 188) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 108.1 (77.2, 147.8) 96 (1, 195) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.1)
Colorado County 6 *** 108.1 (83.9, 137.5) 97 (2, 190) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.7)
Wharton County 6 *** 107.8 (90.1, 128.1) 98 (7, 180) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.3)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 107.6 (92.9, 124.2) 99 (13, 173) 42 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Ochiltree County 6 *** 107.5 (70.2, 157.4) 100 (1, 197) 5
*
*
Midland County 6 *** 107.4 (97.1, 118.4) 101 (32, 156) 85 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Madison County 6 *** 107.1 (75.2, 148.4) 102 (1, 195) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.8, 4.2)
Anderson County 6 *** 107.1 (90.9, 125.5) 103 (11, 175) 33 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6)
Brown County 6 *** 107.0 (89.4, 127.3) 104 (7, 180) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Val Verde County 6 *** 106.9 (89.0, 127.2) 105 (8, 182) 26 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 6.8)
Burnet County 6 *** 106.8 (90.9, 124.9) 106 (10, 176) 37 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Montgomery County 6 *** 106.6 (101.4, 112.0) 107 (64, 142) 328 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.9, 7.7)
Erath County 6 *** 106.3 (87.1, 128.5) 108 (7, 184) 23 stable stable trend -8.7 (-17.8, 1.5)
Pecos County 6 *** 106.1 (75.2, 145.6) 109 (1, 196) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.1, 8.6)
Austin County 6 *** 106.0 (85.1, 130.8) 110 (3, 187) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.7)
Potter County 6 *** 105.3 (93.8, 117.8) 111 (29, 166) 64 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
El Paso County 6 *** 105.2 (100.8, 109.7) 112 (73, 138) 455 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Coryell County 6 *** 104.2 (89.5, 120.5) 113 (18, 180) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Hockley County 6 *** 104.1 (80.3, 132.9) 114 (5, 192) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 5.9)
Nueces County 6 *** 104.0 (97.7, 110.6) 115 (65, 150) 214 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Eastland County 6 *** 103.8 (78.2, 135.6) 116 (2, 194) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.1)
Maverick County 6 *** 103.5 (87.1, 121.9) 117 (13, 183) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
Medina County 6 *** 103.5 (87.7, 121.5) 118 (16, 181) 33 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.4)
Liberty County 6 *** 103.0 (90.0, 117.4) 119 (27, 174) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Gray County 6 *** 102.7 (78.2, 132.6) 120 (3, 192) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.6)
Houston County 6 *** 102.6 (78.7, 132.0) 121 (3, 193) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Angelina County 6 *** 102.4 (90.3, 115.7) 122 (35, 175) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Bee County 6 *** 102.3 (80.1, 129.0) 123 (5, 193) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.2)
Yoakum County 6 *** 102.3 (62.6, 157.4) 124 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.1, 6.6)
Hopkins County 6 *** 102.2 (83.8, 123.6) 125 (9, 186) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.3)
Crosby County 6 *** 102.2 (56.0, 170.3) 126 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.5, 4.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 102.1 (73.5, 138.5) 127 (1, 196) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.6)
Young County 6 *** 101.8 (77.1, 132.5) 128 (2, 194) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.2)
Moore County 6 *** 101.8 (75.4, 134.3) 129 (2, 195) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 4.8)
Reeves County 6 *** 101.4 (69.0, 143.8) 130 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.2, 5.8)
Lampasas County 6 *** 101.4 (78.4, 129.5) 131 (5, 192) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.4)
Terry County 6 *** 101.3 (66.6, 146.9) 132 (1, 197) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.1)
Waller County 6 *** 100.1 (82.3, 120.6) 133 (14, 189) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.3)
Lee County 6 *** 99.7 (73.4, 132.7) 134 (2, 196) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.2)
Navarro County 6 *** 99.1 (83.8, 116.6) 135 (17, 183) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Atascosa County 6 *** 99.0 (82.8, 117.6) 136 (20, 187) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.4)
Trinity County 6 *** 98.4 (70.7, 134.2) 137 (3, 195) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.1)
Cooke County 6 *** 98.4 (81.3, 118.2) 138 (16, 189) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.1)
Mason County 6 *** 98.2 (54.9, 170.5) 139 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.8, 5.9)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 98.0 (77.7, 122.4) 140 (10, 192) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.3)
Castro County 6 *** 97.1 (57.8, 152.9) 141 (1, 197) 4
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 97.0 (70.5, 130.2) 142 (3, 196) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 4.2)
Hunt County 6 *** 97.0 (85.7, 109.5) 143 (49, 181) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
McCulloch County 6 *** 96.9 (63.4, 143.9) 144 (2, 197) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.3, 3.1)
Red River County 6 *** 96.4 (67.2, 135.0) 145 (2, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.0)
Lamb County 6 *** 96.1 (67.3, 133.4) 146 (2, 197) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.3)
Webb County 6 *** 96.0 (88.2, 104.3) 147 (92, 175) 113 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Mitchell County 6 *** 95.8 (59.8, 147.5) 148 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.7, 5.4)
Jack County 6 *** 95.7 (59.9, 146.2) 149 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.4)
Falls County 6 *** 95.1 (71.7, 124.5) 150 (6, 195) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.6)
Comanche County 6 *** 95.0 (67.4, 130.8) 151 (4, 197) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 2.1)
San Augustine County 6 *** 94.9 (61.3, 142.2) 152 (1, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.1)
Archer County 6 *** 94.6 (65.2, 135.6) 153 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.4)
Cameron County 6 *** 94.3 (88.5, 100.3) 154 (107, 170) 206 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Fannin County 6 *** 94.0 (76.2, 115.0) 155 (18, 192) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.2)
Zapata County 6 *** 93.4 (63.6, 132.1) 156 (2, 197) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.7, 6.6)
Parmer County 6 *** 93.1 (59.1, 139.9) 157 (1, 197) 5
*
*
Callahan County 6 *** 93.1 (68.3, 125.3) 158 (7, 196) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Hale County 6 *** 92.7 (73.2, 115.9) 159 (20, 195) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2)
Coleman County 6 *** 91.5 (61.8, 133.7) 160 (2, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.3)
Haskell County 6 *** 91.4 (53.7, 150.1) 161 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.3, 3.1)
Bosque County 6 *** 91.3 (68.5, 120.0) 162 (9, 196) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.7)
Bandera County 6 *** 91.1 (70.8, 116.7) 163 (17, 195) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.2)
Panola County 6 *** 90.8 (70.8, 115.2) 164 (24, 195) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
Somervell County 6 *** 90.5 (58.9, 134.6) 165 (3, 197) 6
*
*
Montague County 6 *** 90.1 (68.1, 117.6) 166 (10, 195) 13 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Real County 6 *** 90.0 (49.8, 165.1) 167 (1, 197) 3
*
*
Dimmit County 6 *** 89.8 (57.6, 133.5) 168 (2, 197) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.7)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 89.3 (75.4, 105.2) 169 (67, 192) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 89.0 (84.8, 93.3) 170 (131, 177) 346 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Gaines County 6 *** 87.8 (60.9, 122.0) 171 (7, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.0)
Scurry County 6 *** 87.6 (61.7, 120.9) 172 (7, 197) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.2)
Shelby County 6 *** 86.7 (66.4, 111.5) 173 (28, 197) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.8)
Live Oak County 6 *** 86.7 (59.8, 123.2) 174 (9, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.8, 2.2)
Calhoun County 6 *** 85.7 (65.1, 111.3) 175 (26, 196) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.5, 2.0)
Leon County 6 *** 84.8 (62.2, 113.9) 176 (15, 197) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.0, 2.5)
Howard County 6 *** 84.6 (66.6, 106.1) 177 (61, 196) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Wilson County 6 *** 83.4 (68.9, 100.2) 178 (87, 195) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Jones County 6 *** 82.6 (58.9, 113.5) 179 (19, 197) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.3)
Sabine County 6 *** 82.4 (56.7, 118.6) 180 (12, 197) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.4)
Refugio County 6 *** 81.8 (51.1, 126.9) 181 (3, 197) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -1.1)
Floyd County 6 *** 81.3 (44.9, 137.4) 182 (2, 197) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.9, 4.1)
Marion County 6 *** 80.2 (55.2, 115.7) 183 (13, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Dawson County 6 *** 80.0 (51.6, 118.6) 184 (7, 197) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 3.0)
Tyler County 6 *** 79.7 (58.7, 106.4) 185 (40, 197) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7)
Swisher County 6 *** 79.5 (43.4, 133.5) 186 (2, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 5.5)
Andrews County 6 *** 77.9 (53.0, 110.3) 187 (22, 197) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.1)
Newton County 6 *** 77.6 (53.9, 109.5) 188 (22, 197) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Kimble County 6 *** 76.6 (40.9, 139.1) 189 (3, 197) 3
*
*
Camp County 6 *** 75.8 (51.3, 108.7) 190 (15, 197) 6 falling falling trend -11.5 (-20.5, -1.4)
Llano County 6 *** 71.3 (55.9, 91.9) 191 (105, 197) 17 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.2, 0.7)
Titus County 6 *** 68.5 (52.2, 88.4) 192 (128, 197) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.7)
Zavala County 6 *** 66.8 (40.6, 103.7) 193 (31, 197) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.1)
Robertson County 6 *** 66.8 (45.7, 94.6) 194 (70, 197) 7 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.4, -0.3)
Frio County 6 *** 66.7 (43.6, 97.5) 195 (66, 197) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.4, -0.3)
Willacy County 6 *** 59.4 (40.4, 84.5) 196 (116, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.3)
Brewster County 6 *** 57.9 (32.0, 97.1) 197 (40, 197) 3 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -0.6)
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2021 5:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top