Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 117.0 (116.2, 117.8) N/A 17,596 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 128.1 (127.9, 128.3) N/A 253,845 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
Mills County 7 167.1 (105.9, 254.1) 1 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.7, 7.6)
Polk County 7 157.5 (137.4, 180.1) 2 (1, 63) 52 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.3)
Blanco County 7 155.6 (116.4, 205.1) 3 (1, 171) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.5)
Williamson County 7 146.5 (140.2, 152.9) 4 (1, 22) 427 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.0, 5.0)
Parker County 7 139.4 (127.9, 151.6) 5 (2, 67) 116 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Fisher County 7 136.5 (75.3, 230.4) 6 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.1, 8.5)
Grimes County 7 134.9 (108.2, 166.1) 7 (1, 170) 20 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.1, 4.6)
Lamar County 7 134.0 (116.1, 154.1) 8 (1, 128) 45 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.8)
Gregg County 7 133.0 (121.2, 145.7) 9 (3, 92) 100 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Winkler County 7 131.7 (83.7, 196.6) 10 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 3.0)
Collin County 7 131.0 (126.6, 135.6) 11 (11, 55) 683 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Hutchinson County 7 130.6 (102.5, 164.1) 12 (1, 178) 16 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.4)
Hill County 7 130.2 (109.5, 153.9) 13 (1, 154) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.7)
Denton County 7 130.0 (125.1, 135.0) 14 (11, 62) 557 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Kaufman County 7 129.4 (117.2, 142.5) 15 (5, 110) 85 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Hays County 7 129.3 (119.5, 139.8) 16 (6, 94) 135 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Travis County 7 129.0 (124.7, 133.3) 17 (14, 63) 746 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Palo Pinto County 7 128.8 (106.6, 154.7) 18 (1, 161) 26 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Starr County 7 128.8 (111.1, 148.5) 19 (2, 142) 39 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.6)
Taylor County 7 128.4 (116.8, 140.8) 20 (6, 107) 98 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Chambers County 7 128.3 (107.3, 152.3) 21 (1, 157) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Bastrop County 7 128.0 (113.8, 143.6) 22 (4, 128) 64 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Smith County 7 127.9 (119.4, 136.8) 23 (8, 88) 182 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
San Patricio County 7 127.8 (112.0, 145.4) 24 (2, 141) 49 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.4)
Comal County 7 127.8 (117.2, 139.1) 25 (6, 105) 120 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Yoakum County 7 127.8 (82.6, 188.3) 26 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.7)
Ward County 7 127.7 (90.9, 174.6) 27 (1, 193) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.5)
Childress County 7 127.1 (78.2, 196.5) 28 (1, 199) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.1)
Tarrant County 7 127.1 (124.0, 130.2) 29 (18, 62) 1,361 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Kerr County 7 127.0 (109.5, 146.6) 30 (3, 151) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Hardeman County 7 126.7 (70.0, 214.1) 31 (1, 199) 3
*
*
Clay County 7 126.7 (91.1, 173.2) 32 (1, 193) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.1)
Ellis County 7 126.7 (116.7, 137.4) 33 (7, 109) 123 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.2)
Lavaca County 7 126.0 (100.0, 157.3) 34 (1, 177) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 4.5)
Gonzales County 7 126.0 (98.0, 159.5) 35 (1, 182) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Aransas County 7 125.4 (101.1, 154.4) 36 (1, 174) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Rockwall County 7 124.1 (111.1, 138.3) 37 (5, 137) 68 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Limestone County 7 124.0 (99.6, 153.0) 38 (1, 179) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Henderson County 7 123.8 (110.8, 138.1) 39 (7, 132) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Burleson County 7 123.4 (96.5, 156.1) 40 (1, 184) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.3)
Dallas County 7 123.3 (120.6, 126.1) 41 (30, 74) 1,612 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Rusk County 7 122.6 (105.1, 142.3) 42 (4, 163) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Runnels County 7 122.6 (88.8, 166.6) 43 (1, 195) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.3)
Fort Bend County 7 121.7 (116.8, 126.8) 44 (23, 90) 492 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.3, 8.8)
Johnson County 7 121.6 (111.8, 132.2) 45 (12, 126) 118 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3)
Pecos County 7 121.1 (87.2, 163.8) 46 (1, 194) 9 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 6.8)
Somervell County 7 121.1 (83.6, 170.9) 47 (1, 196) 7
*
*
Walker County 7 121.0 (103.5, 140.6) 48 (3, 161) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.6)
Hood County 7 120.7 (106.0, 137.2) 49 (4, 153) 58 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Randall County 7 120.7 (109.7, 132.4) 50 (11, 136) 95 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Wood County 7 120.4 (103.1, 140.2) 51 (4, 165) 45 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Wheeler County 7 120.3 (72.2, 189.9) 52 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 7.3)
DeWitt County 7 120.1 (91.2, 155.3) 53 (1, 187) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Bell County 7 120.1 (112.6, 127.9) 54 (18, 115) 199 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Tom Green County 7 119.9 (108.1, 132.6) 55 (11, 137) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Anderson County 7 119.3 (102.0, 138.9) 56 (5, 170) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Galveston County 7 119.3 (112.4, 126.5) 57 (22, 115) 236 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.2)
Guadalupe County 7 119.2 (109.2, 129.8) 58 (13, 134) 108 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
McLennan County 7 119.1 (110.9, 127.7) 59 (22, 124) 169 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Matagorda County 7 118.4 (98.3, 141.6) 60 (3, 177) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Uvalde County 7 118.4 (94.0, 147.2) 61 (2, 184) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Orange County 7 117.8 (104.6, 132.3) 62 (9, 154) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Goliad County 7 117.4 (78.5, 171.0) 63 (1, 198) 7 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.3, 6.2)
Washington County 7 117.3 (97.0, 140.7) 64 (1, 175) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Hansford County 7 117.2 (65.5, 192.8) 65 (1, 199) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.1)
Lubbock County 7 117.1 (109.4, 125.1) 66 (25, 131) 181 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Hamilton County 7 116.9 (79.8, 167.6) 67 (1, 198) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.2)
Victoria County 7 116.7 (103.7, 131.0) 68 (12, 161) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Bee County 7 116.7 (92.7, 145.2) 69 (2, 187) 18 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 5.2)
Lynn County 7 116.5 (70.0, 183.5) 70 (1, 199) 4
*
*
Comanche County 7 116.4 (85.5, 155.6) 71 (1, 195) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.8)
Bowie County 7 116.1 (103.6, 129.7) 72 (14, 155) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Jack County 7 116.1 (76.6, 169.9) 73 (1, 198) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Gillespie County 7 116.0 (94.8, 141.3) 74 (4, 183) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Cass County 7 115.9 (95.5, 139.9) 75 (5, 178) 26 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.1, 4.7)
Kleberg County 7 115.7 (91.9, 143.8) 76 (2, 183) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.5)
Wise County 7 115.6 (100.6, 132.3) 77 (9, 174) 45 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Milam County 7 115.2 (92.7, 142.0) 78 (2, 185) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Stephens County 7 115.2 (78.6, 164.4) 79 (1, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.9)
Hopkins County 7 115.1 (95.4, 137.7) 80 (5, 179) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.0)
Upshur County 7 114.8 (96.4, 135.8) 81 (5, 178) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Harrison County 7 114.6 (100.0, 130.8) 82 (9, 169) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Bexar County 7 114.4 (111.5, 117.4) 83 (59, 114) 1,169 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Archer County 7 114.4 (78.7, 162.4) 84 (1, 197) 8 stable stable trend 16.1 (-0.9, 36.1)
Grayson County 7 114.4 (104.1, 125.5) 85 (21, 150) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Duval County 7 113.9 (80.0, 158.0) 86 (1, 197) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Ector County 7 113.8 (102.8, 125.6) 87 (20, 154) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Caldwell County 7 113.6 (94.9, 134.9) 88 (7, 181) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Harris County 7 113.4 (111.4, 115.4) 89 (68, 113) 2,583 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Brazoria County 7 113.3 (106.5, 120.4) 90 (40, 138) 213 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Gray County 7 113.2 (87.0, 144.9) 91 (2, 192) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Jim Hogg County 7 112.9 (61.9, 189.0) 92 (1, 199) 3 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.4, 9.8)
Moore County 7 112.8 (84.5, 147.3) 93 (1, 195) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Austin County 7 112.8 (91.4, 137.8) 94 (4, 185) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
El Paso County 7 112.4 (108.0, 117.1) 95 (57, 126) 490 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 2.4)
Cherokee County 7 112.4 (95.6, 131.4) 96 (9, 176) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Marion County 7 112.4 (80.8, 154.6) 97 (2, 197) 10 stable stable trend 26.7 (-3.7, 66.6)
Freestone County 7 112.1 (86.8, 143.2) 98 (2, 192) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Franklin County 7 112.1 (76.7, 158.6) 99 (1, 197) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.3)
Fayette County 7 111.9 (89.0, 139.2) 100 (3, 190) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.8)
Potter County 7 111.6 (99.7, 124.6) 101 (22, 166) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Jackson County 7 111.5 (82.1, 148.5) 102 (1, 195) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 1.3)
Lee County 7 111.5 (83.8, 145.7) 103 (2, 195) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Morris County 7 111.4 (80.1, 151.5) 104 (2, 196) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.9)
Nueces County 7 111.2 (104.7, 118.1) 105 (48, 141) 230 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Cooke County 7 111.0 (92.9, 131.8) 106 (8, 181) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.2)
Refugio County 7 110.2 (70.2, 166.0) 107 (1, 199) 6 stable stable trend 26.9 (-17.7, 95.7)
Liberty County 7 110.0 (96.7, 124.7) 108 (17, 168) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Brazos County 7 110.0 (100.3, 120.5) 109 (33, 158) 96 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Delta County 7 109.8 (67.1, 173.1) 110 (1, 199) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.1)
Montgomery County 7 109.8 (104.6, 115.2) 111 (64, 139) 350 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.6, 10.4)
Van Zandt County 7 109.7 (95.2, 126.1) 112 (16, 175) 45 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Maverick County 7 109.7 (92.7, 128.8) 113 (12, 181) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Medina County 7 108.8 (92.6, 127.2) 114 (14, 182) 35 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 5.5)
Nolan County 7 108.3 (78.7, 145.5) 115 (2, 197) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.7)
Wharton County 7 108.1 (90.3, 128.4) 116 (12, 184) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Madison County 7 108.0 (76.2, 149.0) 117 (2, 198) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.1)
Kendall County 7 107.6 (91.4, 126.2) 118 (15, 182) 34 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Jefferson County 7 107.6 (99.9, 115.7) 119 (58, 155) 155 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Terry County 7 107.1 (71.7, 153.3) 120 (1, 199) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.2)
Wichita County 7 107.0 (96.3, 118.7) 121 (36, 169) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.5)
Colorado County 7 106.9 (82.7, 136.4) 122 (3, 194) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Hardin County 7 106.6 (91.7, 123.4) 123 (19, 180) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Midland County 7 106.1 (96.0, 117.0) 124 (49, 169) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Val Verde County 7 106.1 (88.1, 126.5) 125 (13, 186) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.8)
Bailey County 7 105.8 (62.6, 167.1) 126 (1, 199) 4
*
*
Burnet County 7 105.7 (89.9, 123.7) 127 (19, 182) 37 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.5)
Trinity County 7 105.5 (76.7, 142.3) 128 (3, 197) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.5)
Live Oak County 7 105.4 (73.2, 147.8) 129 (2, 199) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 3.8)
Ochiltree County 7 104.9 (68.0, 154.6) 130 (1, 199) 5
*
*
Montague County 7 104.9 (80.5, 134.7) 131 (5, 194) 15 rising rising trend 6.9 (0.4, 13.7)
Zapata County 7 104.4 (72.8, 144.8) 132 (2, 198) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 3.9)
Deaf Smith County 7 104.3 (76.2, 139.1) 133 (2, 196) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
McCulloch County 7 103.5 (68.8, 151.7) 134 (1, 199) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.3)
San Jacinto County 7 103.4 (82.4, 128.5) 135 (11, 194) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Brown County 7 103.3 (85.9, 123.4) 136 (18, 187) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Hockley County 7 103.2 (79.5, 131.8) 137 (7, 196) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Bosque County 7 102.8 (78.1, 133.5) 138 (5, 196) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Houston County 7 102.6 (78.9, 131.8) 139 (5, 194) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.7)
Angelina County 7 102.5 (90.4, 115.9) 140 (40, 179) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Lamb County 7 102.5 (72.5, 141.1) 141 (2, 198) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Waller County 7 102.0 (84.6, 121.9) 142 (15, 187) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Jim Wells County 7 101.4 (83.8, 121.8) 143 (17, 189) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Castro County 7 100.8 (61.0, 157.1) 144 (1, 199) 4
*
*
Mason County 7 100.8 (57.1, 173.3) 145 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.6, 4.8)
Jasper County 7 100.8 (82.4, 122.3) 146 (13, 192) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Coryell County 7 100.8 (86.4, 116.8) 147 (31, 186) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Karnes County 7 99.5 (68.9, 139.3) 148 (3, 199) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.2)
Haskell County 7 99.2 (57.1, 163.6) 149 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.8)
Lampasas County 7 99.1 (76.9, 126.4) 150 (11, 195) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Erath County 7 98.9 (80.3, 120.6) 151 (18, 192) 21 stable stable trend -6.2 (-12.1, 0.0)
Eastland County 7 98.4 (73.2, 129.9) 152 (4, 196) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Fannin County 7 98.0 (79.5, 119.9) 153 (21, 193) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Young County 7 97.9 (73.4, 128.4) 154 (8, 197) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.3)
Kimble County 7 97.6 (52.0, 172.1) 155 (1, 199) 4
*
*
Rains County 7 97.1 (66.5, 138.0) 156 (3, 199) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.1)
Navarro County 7 96.5 (81.5, 113.5) 157 (52, 190) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Wilbarger County 7 96.2 (67.6, 133.4) 158 (5, 199) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.2)
Hale County 7 96.1 (76.6, 119.2) 159 (21, 195) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.2)
Calhoun County 7 95.7 (72.7, 124.0) 160 (14, 197) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.0)
Cameron County 7 95.7 (89.9, 101.7) 161 (112, 176) 211 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Hunt County 7 95.6 (84.5, 107.7) 162 (71, 185) 58 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Atascosa County 7 95.4 (79.7, 113.3) 163 (42, 192) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
San Saba County 7 94.7 (52.5, 159.5) 164 (1, 199) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.0, 6.0)
Webb County 7 93.9 (86.3, 102.1) 165 (109, 182) 113 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Dawson County 7 93.8 (63.9, 133.5) 166 (3, 199) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Coleman County 7 93.4 (62.7, 137.2) 167 (3, 199) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.3)
Gaines County 7 92.5 (65.1, 127.0) 168 (6, 199) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Leon County 7 92.1 (68.9, 121.5) 169 (16, 198) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Panola County 7 92.1 (71.8, 116.8) 170 (24, 197) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Reeves County 7 90.4 (59.2, 131.8) 171 (4, 199) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.9)
Wilson County 7 90.3 (75.4, 107.6) 172 (68, 194) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Shelby County 7 90.2 (69.2, 115.6) 173 (17, 198) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Hidalgo County 7 89.7 (85.5, 94.0) 174 (142, 182) 354 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.1)
Tyler County 7 89.3 (66.3, 118.0) 175 (17, 199) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Llano County 7 89.1 (70.1, 113.5) 176 (38, 197) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.6)
Callahan County 7 89.1 (64.5, 121.1) 177 (14, 199) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.7)
Bandera County 7 89.0 (69.4, 113.5) 178 (37, 197) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Jones County 7 88.3 (62.3, 122.1) 179 (9, 199) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 1.9)
Nacogdoches County 7 87.7 (74.0, 103.3) 180 (82, 196) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Scurry County 7 87.5 (61.4, 121.1) 181 (11, 199) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Dimmit County 7 87.4 (56.1, 130.1) 182 (4, 199) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.8)
Parmer County 7 85.0 (52.6, 130.1) 183 (3, 199) 4
*
*
Sabine County 7 84.1 (58.8, 119.7) 184 (15, 199) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Red River County 7 84.0 (58.5, 118.5) 185 (20, 199) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Howard County 7 83.4 (65.3, 105.1) 186 (71, 198) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
Falls County 7 82.6 (60.7, 110.5) 187 (36, 199) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Mitchell County 7 82.4 (49.4, 131.2) 188 (4, 199) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.6)
Robertson County 7 81.7 (58.6, 111.3) 189 (28, 199) 9 stable stable trend 34.1 (-2.3, 84.1)
Titus County 7 74.6 (57.5, 95.2) 190 (116, 199) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.2)
Newton County 7 74.0 (50.1, 106.2) 191 (64, 199) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.0)
San Augustine County 7 73.2 (44.5, 116.0) 192 (11, 199) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.2)
Swisher County 7 72.3 (39.3, 122.8) 193 (6, 199) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.5)
Camp County 7 70.7 (47.4, 102.3) 194 (64, 199) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -0.5)
Brewster County 7 70.2 (41.3, 112.4) 195 (26, 199) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.8, -1.0)
Andrews County 7 64.1 (41.6, 94.1) 196 (97, 199) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.4)
Willacy County 7 63.0 (43.3, 88.9) 197 (105, 199) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Frio County 7 59.4 (37.9, 88.7) 198 (121, 199) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.2)
Zavala County 7 59.2 (34.9, 93.9) 199 (98, 199) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.6, 2.1)
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2023 1:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2021 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top