Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 97.6 (96.8, 98.4) N/A 13,056 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.1, 4.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Anderson County 6 *** 91.0 (76.9, 107.1) 106 (27, 173) 31 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -0.9)
Andrews County 6 *** 81.6 (53.3, 118.7) 140 (4, 196) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.5, 0.3)
Angelina County 6 *** 119.8 (106.4, 134.5) 23 (3, 86) 60 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.0, -4.1)
Aransas County 6 *** 67.9 (53.6, 86.0) 175 (86, 195) 16 falling falling trend -7.5 (-9.7, -5.3)
Archer County 6 *** 83.0 (54.5, 123.7) 138 (3, 196) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 4.8)
Atascosa County 6 *** 74.5 (60.3, 91.1) 161 (72, 192) 20 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.4)
Austin County 6 *** 100.7 (82.0, 122.9) 68 (7, 168) 21 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.6)
Bailey County 6 *** 91.2 (54.7, 144.3) 104 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.4, 1.7)
Bandera County 6 *** 78.1 (61.4, 99.5) 149 (43, 193) 17 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.8, -2.7)
Bastrop County 6 *** 102.1 (89.2, 116.5) 61 (13, 143) 50 stable stable trend 7.3 (-0.8, 16.0)
Bee County 6 *** 59.1 (43.0, 79.1) 188 (93, 196) 9 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -2.0)
Bell County 6 *** 128.7 (120.2, 137.6) 7 (3, 35) 179 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.3, 10.6)
Bexar County 6 *** 74.2 (71.6, 76.9) 162 (138, 172) 648 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.6, 4.1)
Blanco County 6 *** 88.3 (64.0, 121.6) 120 (7, 193) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.6, 3.2)
Bosque County 6 *** 92.6 (72.1, 118.5) 98 (9, 189) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.3, -0.4)
Bowie County 6 *** 87.6 (76.7, 99.6) 122 (50, 167) 49 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.1, -2.8)
Brazoria County 6 *** 110.5 (103.2, 118.1) 37 (15, 85) 192 stable stable trend 8.7 (-2.3, 20.9)
Brazos County 6 *** 104.0 (93.6, 115.1) 55 (16, 125) 79 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.4, -2.6)
Brewster County 6 *** 89.9 (60.5, 130.8) 114 (2, 196) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.2, 5.0)
Brown County 6 *** 92.8 (76.9, 111.4) 97 (18, 175) 25 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.1)
Burleson County 6 *** 75.4 (56.4, 100.0) 159 (35, 194) 11 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.1, -1.4)
Burnet County 6 *** 101.9 (87.2, 118.7) 63 (11, 144) 37 stable stable trend 5.1 (-5.0, 16.2)
Caldwell County 6 *** 77.1 (61.5, 95.7) 152 (50, 193) 18 stable stable trend 17.0 (-13.3, 58.0)
Calhoun County 6 *** 70.6 (52.1, 94.0) 172 (52, 195) 10 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -1.5)
Callahan County 6 *** 98.2 (72.7, 131.0) 79 (2, 185) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.8)
Cameron County 6 *** 83.1 (77.4, 89.1) 137 (93, 161) 162 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -1.9)
Camp County 6 *** 89.1 (63.4, 123.1) 116 (3, 194) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.0, -0.3)
Carson County 6 *** 71.5 (40.5, 120.9) 169 (3, 196) 3
*
*
Cass County 6 *** 101.2 (83.2, 122.4) 65 (6, 159) 23 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.8, -1.5)
Castro County 6 *** 84.6 (51.3, 132.7) 132 (2, 196) 4
*
*
Chambers County 6 *** 108.5 (87.9, 132.6) 40 (3, 157) 21 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.5)
Cherokee County 6 *** 98.2 (83.3, 115.1) 78 (15, 162) 32 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.8)
Childress County 6 *** 120.2 (75.7, 181.4) 21 (1, 195) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.8, 0.7)
Clay County 6 *** 91.0 (64.6, 127.2) 107 (3, 195) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.0)
Coleman County 6 *** 72.7 (46.5, 111.6) 166 (12, 196) 5 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.1, -1.7)
Collin County 6 *** 97.7 (93.2, 102.3) 81 (51, 113) 408 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.1, 10.0)
Colorado County 6 *** 98.1 (77.7, 123.2) 80 (4, 180) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Comal County 6 *** 72.3 (64.5, 80.9) 167 (115, 187) 67 stable stable trend 3.9 (-9.4, 19.1)
Comanche County 6 *** 58.4 (40.5, 83.7) 190 (93, 196) 7 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.5, -3.4)
Cooke County 6 *** 94.6 (78.5, 113.3) 93 (14, 170) 26 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.4)
Coryell County 6 *** 115.4 (97.7, 135.3) 30 (1, 127) 32 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.8)
Dallam County 6 *** 118.0 (68.8, 187.5) 25 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.3, 7.6)
Dallas County 6 *** 99.8 (97.0, 102.6) 72 (52, 97) 1,094 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Dawson County 6 *** 85.4 (56.5, 123.6) 128 (3, 196) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.2, 0.9)
DeWitt County 6 *** 84.5 (64.4, 109.5) 133 (16, 192) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.9, -0.1)
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 97.4 (70.2, 131.6) 83 (2, 191) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Delta County 6 *** 132.8 (82.3, 205.5) 5 (1, 190) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.4, 6.9)
Denton County 6 *** 107.8 (102.5, 113.4) 42 (24, 83) 360 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.3, 7.6)
Dimmit County 6 *** 55.4 (31.2, 91.4) 194 (37, 196) 3 falling falling trend -7.2 (-10.2, -4.2)
Duval County 6 *** 57.0 (34.8, 89.1) 191 (45, 196) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.8, 5.7)
Eastland County 6 *** 81.3 (61.0, 107.2) 141 (20, 193) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.2, 0.2)
Ector County 6 *** 75.0 (65.2, 85.7) 160 (99, 186) 47 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.4, -2.7)
El Paso County 6 *** 120.1 (115.0, 125.4) 22 (9, 43) 430 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Ellis County 6 *** 95.8 (86.3, 106.1) 90 (32, 145) 82 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -1.9)
Erath County 6 *** 100.7 (82.5, 121.9) 67 (7, 164) 22 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.9)
Falls County 6 *** 112.3 (86.8, 143.9) 35 (1, 169) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.5)
Fannin County 6 *** 96.6 (79.8, 116.4) 87 (12, 171) 24 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -0.9)
Fayette County 6 *** 108.3 (89.1, 131.3) 41 (4, 153) 24 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.4, -1.1)
Fisher County 6 *** 125.7 (77.2, 201.0) 10 (1, 192) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 109.9 (104.6, 115.3) 38 (21, 75) 384 stable stable trend 7.0 (-0.1, 14.6)
Franklin County 6 *** 78.6 (53.6, 113.4) 147 (8, 196) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.7, 3.0)
Freestone County 6 *** 121.0 (96.6, 150.4) 20 (1, 142) 17 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.8)
Frio County 6 *** 56.1 (35.9, 83.3) 192 (77, 196) 5 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.2, -3.7)
Gaines County 6 *** 74.0 (47.7, 108.5) 163 (10, 196) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.0, -0.6)
Galveston County 6 *** 105.8 (98.8, 113.2) 49 (22, 97) 188 stable stable trend 3.2 (-4.6, 11.7)
Garza County 6 *** 106.1 (59.6, 174.3) 47 (1, 196) 3
*
*
Gillespie County 6 *** 124.3 (104.7, 147.6) 13 (1, 113) 31 stable stable trend 4.4 (-7.8, 18.1)
Goliad County 6 *** 87.2 (56.4, 132.0) 125 (2, 196) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.7, 3.0)
Gonzales County 6 *** 63.7 (45.7, 87.1) 184 (62, 196) 8 stable stable trend 16.3 (-13.7, 56.8)
Gray County 6 *** 81.0 (60.7, 106.2) 144 (20, 193) 11 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -1.9)
Grayson County 6 *** 106.8 (96.9, 117.6) 44 (16, 111) 88 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.8)
Gregg County 6 *** 124.4 (112.5, 137.2) 12 (3, 63) 84 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Grimes County 6 *** 84.1 (66.1, 105.9) 135 (23, 190) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.5)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 90.0 (80.8, 100.1) 113 (46, 157) 73 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.8, 8.2)
Hale County 6 *** 93.6 (73.8, 117.1) 94 (10, 184) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.1)
Hamilton County 6 *** 96.2 (65.4, 139.4) 88 (1, 194) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.7, 2.4)
Hardin County 6 *** 106.3 (91.1, 123.4) 46 (6, 138) 37 rising rising trend 12.7 (0.7, 26.1)
Harris County 6 *** 102.2 (100.0, 104.3) 59 (49, 86) 1,960 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.1, 9.3)
Harrison County 6 *** 96.8 (83.6, 111.7) 86 (20, 156) 40 rising rising trend 18.1 (0.7, 38.5)
Hartley County 6 *** 100.0 (56.8, 163.5) 69 (1, 196) 3
*
*
Haskell County 6 *** 76.4 (44.1, 127.1) 156 (4, 196) 3
*
*
Hays County 6 *** 106.3 (96.2, 117.1) 45 (15, 115) 93 rising rising trend 16.4 (6.0, 27.8)
Henderson County 6 *** 101.0 (89.9, 113.4) 66 (19, 139) 63 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.3)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 90.2 (85.7, 95.0) 112 (75, 136) 296 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.2)
Hill County 6 *** 101.5 (84.8, 120.9) 64 (10, 166) 27 stable stable trend 15.7 (-6.0, 42.3)
Hockley County 6 *** 99.8 (76.3, 128.6) 71 (3, 182) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.6, 1.2)
Hood County 6 *** 99.5 (87.2, 113.5) 73 (17, 146) 49 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.1, -3.3)
Hopkins County 6 *** 87.6 (71.4, 106.6) 123 (22, 184) 21 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.3)
Houston County 6 *** 81.3 (63.6, 103.1) 142 (38, 194) 15 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.3)
Howard County 6 *** 75.5 (58.5, 95.8) 158 (46, 194) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.8, 0.5)
Hunt County 6 *** 86.9 (76.1, 98.8) 126 (51, 171) 49 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.8, -1.9)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 104.1 (81.1, 132.0) 54 (3, 174) 15 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.2)
Jackson County 6 *** 77.5 (53.9, 108.5) 151 (13, 196) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.0, -0.6)
Jasper County 6 *** 122.1 (103.0, 144.0) 16 (1, 110) 30 stable stable trend 14.7 (-5.0, 38.5)
Jefferson County 6 *** 102.0 (94.5, 110.0) 62 (29, 113) 144 rising rising trend 10.9 (0.8, 22.1)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 55.6 (42.4, 71.7) 193 (135, 196) 13 falling falling trend -7.1 (-10.1, -4.0)
Johnson County 6 *** 102.5 (93.0, 112.8) 58 (23, 119) 91 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Jones County 6 *** 97.3 (73.6, 126.5) 84 (4, 186) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.7)
Karnes County 6 *** 63.7 (41.3, 93.7) 185 (36, 196) 5 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.3, -3.1)
Kaufman County 6 *** 88.6 (77.6, 100.7) 118 (44, 167) 52 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.5)
Kendall County 6 *** 90.7 (75.5, 108.3) 108 (24, 176) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-8.0, 10.2)
Kerr County 6 *** 93.6 (81.1, 108.0) 95 (26, 161) 43 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.3, -2.8)
Kimble County 6 *** 122.4 (80.9, 187.6) 15 (1, 189) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.2, 2.0)
Kleberg County 6 *** 80.1 (60.8, 103.7) 146 (22, 193) 12 falling falling trend -13.1 (-20.2, -5.3)
Lamar County 6 *** 100.0 (85.0, 117.1) 70 (13, 155) 33 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -0.8)
Lamb County 6 *** 102.1 (72.4, 140.5) 60 (1, 192) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.5, -0.6)
Lampasas County 6 *** 121.8 (97.5, 151.0) 18 (1, 145) 18 stable stable trend 11.3 (0.0, 23.9)
Lavaca County 6 *** 98.6 (77.9, 124.2) 75 (4, 184) 16 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.2, -3.3)
Lee County 6 *** 136.7 (107.7, 172.1) 4 (1, 114) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.0)
Leon County 6 *** 71.6 (53.5, 95.3) 168 (46, 195) 11 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.1, -1.5)
Liberty County 6 *** 84.2 (72.0, 97.8) 134 (46, 180) 38 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.2, 13.0)
Limestone County 6 *** 73.4 (55.0, 96.3) 164 (35, 195) 11 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.8, -2.7)
Live Oak County 6 *** 51.5 (32.4, 78.8) 195 (101, 196) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.0, 2.1)
Llano County 6 *** 69.5 (53.8, 90.5) 173 (64, 195) 17 stable stable trend 6.3 (-6.8, 21.2)
Lubbock County 6 *** 114.9 (106.8, 123.4) 32 (9, 74) 156 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Lynn County 6 *** 105.6 (64.9, 165.1) 50 (1, 195) 4
*
*
Madison County 6 *** 66.3 (43.1, 97.7) 180 (33, 196) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.7, -1.1)
Marion County 6 *** 98.3 (71.1, 135.8) 77 (1, 191) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.0)
Matagorda County 6 *** 98.3 (80.9, 118.6) 76 (7, 168) 24 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.8, -3.7)
Maverick County 6 *** 121.2 (101.9, 143.0) 19 (1, 114) 29 rising rising trend 21.5 (10.2, 34.1)
McCulloch County 6 *** 128.0 (90.7, 177.8) 9 (1, 179) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.4)
McLennan County 6 *** 106.0 (98.1, 114.4) 48 (21, 101) 138 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Medina County 6 *** 71.0 (58.2, 85.9) 170 (93, 193) 23 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.4)
Midland County 6 *** 76.4 (67.2, 86.5) 155 (97, 184) 54 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Milam County 6 *** 122.6 (100.9, 148.3) 14 (1, 123) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Mills County 6 *** 96.9 (60.2, 155.7) 85 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.9)
Mitchell County 6 *** 99.1 (62.2, 149.8) 74 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.1, 4.3)
Montague County 6 *** 90.3 (70.0, 115.7) 111 (11, 188) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.0)
Montgomery County 6 *** 89.1 (84.1, 94.3) 115 (77, 145) 260 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.3)
Moore County 6 *** 90.4 (64.2, 123.1) 110 (3, 193) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.3, -0.4)
Morris County 6 *** 115.9 (86.1, 154.3) 28 (1, 174) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 4.0)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 91.9 (77.9, 107.8) 100 (27, 170) 32 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.1, -2.8)
Navarro County 6 *** 91.3 (76.7, 108.1) 103 (25, 174) 29 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.4)
Newton County 6 *** 84.8 (61.4, 115.4) 131 (9, 194) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 1.9)
Nolan County 6 *** 97.4 (71.0, 131.2) 82 (3, 190) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.4)
Nueces County 6 *** 66.3 (61.1, 71.8) 179 (148, 188) 128 falling falling trend -9.6 (-12.4, -6.6)
Orange County 6 *** 87.2 (76.0, 99.7) 124 (41, 174) 45 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.3, -2.5)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 67.1 (51.8, 86.0) 177 (86, 196) 14 falling falling trend -7.7 (-9.6, -5.8)
Panola County 6 *** 104.7 (83.2, 130.7) 51 (3, 169) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.5)
Parker County 6 *** 91.4 (81.9, 101.8) 101 (39, 155) 73 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.4, -3.1)
Parmer County 6 *** 107.1 (71.1, 155.3) 43 (1, 194) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -1.1)
Pecos County 6 *** 38.8 (22.4, 62.5) 196 (147, 196) 3 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.6, -1.4)
Polk County 6 *** 138.4 (120.9, 158.0) 3 (1, 47) 51 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.9)
Potter County 6 *** 121.9 (109.0, 135.8) 17 (2, 77) 69 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Rains County 6 *** 85.9 (62.6, 117.7) 127 (11, 194) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.4)
Randall County 6 *** 116.3 (105.1, 128.3) 27 (6, 83) 84 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.8)
Red River County 6 *** 92.9 (67.3, 126.9) 96 (2, 192) 9 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.0, -2.9)
Refugio County 6 *** 75.5 (45.7, 120.4) 157 (5, 196) 4 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.1, 0.0)
Robertson County 6 *** 95.7 (71.8, 126.0) 91 (4, 188) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.1, -1.5)
Rockwall County 6 *** 91.9 (79.6, 105.7) 99 (35, 166) 44 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.4)
Runnels County 6 *** 81.2 (54.6, 118.0) 143 (7, 196) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.3, 2.6)
Rusk County 6 *** 114.3 (98.2, 132.4) 33 (3, 119) 38 stable stable trend 7.4 (-3.5, 19.5)
Sabine County 6 *** 108.8 (80.2, 147.6) 39 (1, 183) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8)
San Augustine County 6 *** 110.6 (78.2, 155.5) 36 (1, 186) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 0.9)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 85.2 (68.5, 105.6) 129 (29, 188) 19 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.1)
San Patricio County 6 *** 72.9 (60.9, 86.7) 165 (84, 192) 27 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.9, -2.9)
San Saba County 6 *** 64.1 (36.2, 110.0) 183 (10, 196) 3 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.3, -2.1)
Scurry County 6 *** 103.8 (77.1, 137.0) 56 (2, 187) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.7)
Shelby County 6 *** 76.8 (58.9, 98.8) 154 (43, 194) 13 falling falling trend -6.2 (-10.2, -2.0)
Smith County 6 *** 118.9 (110.5, 127.7) 24 (6, 60) 154 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.8, 11.7)
Somervell County 6 *** 90.6 (59.1, 134.8) 109 (2, 195) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.7, 2.0)
Starr County 6 *** 128.1 (108.9, 149.7) 8 (1, 83) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.0)
Stephens County 6 *** 64.8 (39.8, 101.2) 182 (24, 196) 4 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.2, -1.6)
Sutton County 6 *** 158.4 (95.3, 250.7) 1 (1, 188) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.4, 8.1)
Swisher County 6 *** 77.7 (45.9, 124.2) 150 (3, 196) 4 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.8, -1.6)
Tarrant County 6 *** 103.2 (100.1, 106.3) 57 (41, 86) 939 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Taylor County 6 *** 115.6 (104.4, 127.8) 29 (7, 89) 79 stable stable trend 0.6 (-11.0, 13.8)
Terry County 6 *** 125.0 (89.1, 170.4) 11 (1, 175) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.5, 2.6)
Titus County 6 *** 85.0 (66.5, 107.1) 130 (19, 189) 15 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.5, -1.8)
Tom Green County 6 *** 89.0 (78.8, 100.2) 117 (45, 162) 57 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Travis County 6 *** 104.1 (99.8, 108.6) 53 (36, 90) 502 stable stable trend 10.2 (-3.6, 26.1)
Trinity County 6 *** 80.7 (60.1, 108.2) 145 (23, 195) 11 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.0, -1.8)
Tyler County 6 *** 70.9 (53.6, 92.8) 171 (49, 195) 12 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.1, -3.0)
Upshur County 6 *** 104.2 (87.4, 123.5) 52 (7, 157) 29 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
Uvalde County 6 *** 59.3 (43.3, 79.5) 187 (99, 196) 9 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.3, -3.2)
Val Verde County 6 *** 91.1 (74.8, 109.9) 105 (20, 176) 22 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 91.4 (78.5, 106.0) 102 (28, 165) 37 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Victoria County 6 *** 82.4 (71.6, 94.5) 139 (64, 180) 43 rising rising trend 9.8 (0.1, 20.3)
Walker County 6 *** 115.3 (101.1, 131.1) 31 (5, 105) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Waller County 6 *** 112.9 (94.3, 134.2) 34 (3, 141) 28 stable stable trend 9.9 (-1.7, 22.8)
Ward County 6 *** 67.7 (40.9, 105.3) 176 (18, 196) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.3, 2.6)
Washington County 6 *** 131.9 (112.4, 154.3) 6 (1, 80) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Webb County 6 *** 65.8 (58.4, 74.0) 181 (142, 191) 60 stable stable trend 5.3 (-11.1, 24.6)
Wharton County 6 *** 83.3 (67.8, 101.6) 136 (31, 188) 21 rising rising trend 10.3 (0.1, 21.5)
Wheeler County 6 *** 150.8 (98.7, 222.9) 2 (1, 181) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.5, 3.5)
Wichita County 6 *** 88.1 (78.4, 98.8) 121 (51, 167) 62 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 88.4 (61.9, 123.4) 119 (6, 195) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.8, 0.1)
Willacy County 6 *** 69.2 (48.0, 96.3) 174 (35, 196) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.8, -0.7)
Williamson County 6 *** 117.2 (110.9, 123.7) 26 (11, 55) 280 rising rising trend 12.9 (6.7, 19.5)
Wilson County 6 *** 78.4 (64.7, 94.3) 148 (61, 189) 24 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.3, -2.8)
Wise County 6 *** 77.1 (65.0, 90.9) 153 (76, 188) 31 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -1.3)
Wood County 6 *** 96.2 (82.7, 111.7) 89 (20, 161) 39 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Yoakum County 6 *** 94.8 (55.9, 150.1) 92 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Young County 6 *** 61.6 (43.6, 85.3) 186 (71, 196) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.6, -1.8)
Zapata County 6 *** 66.4 (41.9, 99.9) 178 (20, 196) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.2)
Zavala County 6 *** 59.0 (35.2, 93.3) 189 (35, 196) 4 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.8, -0.7)
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2021 10:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top