Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 15.0 (14.8, 15.2) N/A 3,981 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.7 (19.6, 19.7) N/A 75,383 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Polk County 6 *** 33.7 (27.3, 41.2) 1 (1, 17) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.1)
Runnels County 6 *** 32.5 (21.2, 48.8) 2 (1, 120) 5
*
*
McCulloch County 6 *** 26.9 (15.5, 45.0) 3 (1, 140) 3
*
*
Red River County 6 *** 25.9 (16.6, 39.5) 4 (1, 127) 5
*
*
Coryell County 6 *** 25.7 (20.1, 32.3) 5 (1, 80) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.5)
San Patricio County 6 *** 24.7 (19.9, 30.3) 6 (1, 65) 19 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.0)
Sabine County 6 *** 24.6 (14.8, 39.9) 7 (1, 137) 5 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.2, 8.9)
Comanche County 6 *** 24.4 (15.8, 36.9) 8 (1, 132) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.5, 7.9)
Marion County 6 *** 23.9 (15.2, 37.9) 9 (1, 138) 5
*
*
Panola County 6 *** 23.5 (16.3, 33.0) 10 (1, 122) 7 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.8, 6.3)
Aransas County 6 *** 23.5 (17.5, 31.5) 11 (1, 110) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.7)
Kaufman County 6 *** 23.4 (19.5, 27.8) 12 (2, 66) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.4)
Camp County 6 *** 23.3 (14.3, 36.4) 13 (1, 139) 4
*
*
Van Zandt County 6 *** 23.2 (18.7, 28.6) 14 (2, 79) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Trinity County 6 *** 23.0 (15.7, 33.8) 15 (1, 133) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.3)
Hood County 6 *** 22.8 (18.6, 27.8) 16 (2, 80) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Lampasas County 6 *** 22.6 (15.2, 32.7) 17 (1, 133) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.9, 7.1)
Gaines County 6 *** 22.6 (13.0, 36.1) 18 (1, 143) 3
*
*
Tom Green County 6 *** 22.5 (19.0, 26.5) 19 (3, 77) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Henderson County 6 *** 21.8 (18.2, 25.9) 20 (3, 79) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Wood County 6 *** 21.7 (17.2, 27.3) 21 (3, 96) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Wichita County 6 *** 21.2 (17.9, 24.8) 22 (4, 76) 31 stable stable trend 11.4 (-0.8, 25.1)
Angelina County 6 *** 20.8 (17.1, 25.2) 23 (4, 88) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Smith County 6 *** 20.6 (18.2, 23.2) 24 (9, 68) 57 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Hopkins County 6 *** 20.5 (15.1, 27.4) 25 (2, 122) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
Franklin County 6 *** 20.5 (12.1, 33.8) 26 (1, 143) 4
*
*
Lamar County 6 *** 20.3 (15.7, 25.9) 27 (3, 122) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 4.7)
Orange County 6 *** 20.1 (16.4, 24.5) 28 (6, 104) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.0)
Parker County 6 *** 20.0 (16.9, 23.5) 29 (8, 92) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Leon County 6 *** 19.8 (13.4, 29.2) 30 (2, 138) 6
*
*
Chambers County 6 *** 19.6 (13.7, 27.2) 31 (2, 135) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 4.1)
Karnes County 6 *** 19.6 (11.1, 32.1) 32 (1, 143) 3
*
*
Morris County 6 *** 19.5 (11.9, 31.3) 33 (1, 143) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 4.7)
Jasper County 6 *** 19.3 (14.3, 25.9) 34 (3, 131) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.0)
San Augustine County 6 *** 19.3 (11.0, 34.1) 35 (1, 143) 3
*
*
Upshur County 6 *** 19.2 (14.3, 25.3) 36 (3, 130) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 5.4)
Hunt County 6 *** 19.2 (15.6, 23.3) 37 (8, 110) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 19.1 (13.5, 26.5) 38 (3, 137) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.0)
Kleberg County 6 *** 19.0 (12.6, 27.7) 39 (2, 139) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.9)
Wilson County 6 *** 19.0 (14.2, 25.1) 40 (4, 130) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.8, 4.3)
Fannin County 6 *** 19.0 (13.8, 25.7) 41 (3, 133) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.4, 1.2)
Bell County 6 *** 18.9 (16.7, 21.4) 42 (14, 88) 53 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Moore County 6 *** 18.8 (11.0, 29.9) 43 (1, 143) 4
*
*
Johnson County 6 *** 18.8 (16.1, 22.0) 44 (10, 98) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Newton County 6 *** 18.5 (10.7, 30.4) 45 (1, 143) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.1, 7.9)
Blanco County 6 *** 18.4 (10.7, 31.2) 46 (1, 143) 4
*
*
Taylor County 6 *** 18.1 (15.2, 21.5) 47 (12, 110) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Hill County 6 *** 18.1 (13.4, 24.2) 48 (6, 133) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Bastrop County 6 *** 18.1 (14.2, 22.7) 49 (8, 125) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.1)
Grayson County 6 *** 18.1 (15.3, 21.2) 50 (14, 109) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Williamson County 6 *** 18.0 (16.3, 19.9) 51 (24, 86) 84 stable stable trend 8.7 (-0.1, 18.4)
Liberty County 6 *** 18.0 (14.1, 22.7) 52 (7, 126) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.6)
Denton County 6 *** 17.9 (16.3, 19.6) 53 (23, 88) 109 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Erath County 6 *** 17.8 (12.5, 24.7) 54 (4, 138) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.1)
Lee County 6 *** 17.8 (10.9, 28.1) 55 (2, 143) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 5.8)
Gregg County 6 *** 17.8 (14.8, 21.2) 56 (14, 117) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Matagorda County 6 *** 17.5 (12.5, 24.0) 57 (5, 137) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.2, 5.7)
Rockwall County 6 *** 17.5 (13.7, 22.0) 58 (9, 127) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.5)
Gonzales County 6 *** 17.5 (10.9, 27.0) 59 (2, 142) 4
*
*
Titus County 6 *** 17.4 (11.7, 25.0) 60 (4, 140) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.5)
Jackson County 6 *** 17.3 (10.2, 28.1) 61 (2, 143) 4
*
*
Cooke County 6 *** 17.1 (12.6, 22.9) 62 (6, 138) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.8)
Tarrant County 6 *** 16.9 (16.1, 17.8) 63 (43, 86) 298 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Ellis County 6 *** 16.9 (14.1, 20.1) 64 (18, 118) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Cass County 6 *** 16.8 (12.1, 23.1) 65 (8, 138) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.8)
Montgomery County 6 *** 16.7 (15.1, 18.3) 66 (37, 102) 90 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Collin County 6 *** 16.5 (15.2, 17.9) 67 (39, 100) 130 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Harrison County 6 *** 16.5 (12.8, 21.1) 68 (12, 134) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Waller County 6 *** 16.4 (11.4, 22.8) 69 (6, 139) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.2, 1.8)
Wharton County 6 *** 16.4 (11.8, 22.4) 70 (8, 139) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.0)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 16.4 (10.1, 25.3) 71 (3, 143) 4
*
*
Bandera County 6 *** 16.4 (11.3, 23.9) 72 (5, 140) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.6, 0.9)
Hardin County 6 *** 16.4 (12.3, 21.4) 73 (13, 136) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.3)
Rains County 6 *** 16.3 (9.0, 28.5) 74 (2, 143) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.6, 6.6)
Jones County 6 *** 16.2 (9.7, 25.7) 75 (3, 143) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.4, 4.5)
Bowie County 6 *** 16.1 (13.0, 19.9) 76 (18, 129) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Wise County 6 *** 16.0 (12.2, 20.7) 77 (14, 138) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Brazoria County 6 *** 15.9 (13.9, 18.0) 78 (37, 119) 52 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Kerr County 6 *** 15.8 (12.6, 20.0) 79 (22, 133) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 2.9)
Anderson County 6 *** 15.6 (11.5, 20.8) 80 (14, 138) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.5)
Cherokee County 6 *** 15.6 (11.6, 20.6) 81 (12, 139) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.5)
Nueces County 6 *** 15.5 (13.8, 17.4) 82 (42, 120) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Montague County 6 *** 15.4 (9.9, 23.6) 83 (4, 143) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.1)
Walker County 6 *** 15.4 (11.5, 20.2) 84 (17, 138) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
Brown County 6 *** 15.3 (10.7, 21.4) 85 (14, 141) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Burnet County 6 *** 15.3 (11.4, 20.4) 86 (10, 138) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.1)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 15.3 (10.4, 22.1) 87 (8, 142) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.1)
Calhoun County 6 *** 15.3 (9.5, 23.5) 88 (4, 143) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.3, 2.0)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 15.2 (10.5, 21.4) 89 (10, 142) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.1, 3.7)
Comal County 6 *** 15.1 (12.6, 18.0) 90 (32, 130) 28 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.8)
Houston County 6 *** 15.1 (10.1, 22.3) 91 (8, 143) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 3.8)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 15.0 (12.4, 18.0) 92 (34, 131) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Dallas County 6 *** 14.9 (14.2, 15.7) 93 (67, 107) 325 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ector County 6 *** 14.8 (11.9, 18.1) 94 (31, 134) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Hays County 6 *** 14.8 (12.2, 17.7) 95 (36, 132) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 14.7 (9.5, 22.0) 96 (10, 143) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 6 *** 14.7 (12.7, 16.8) 97 (47, 126) 42 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Llano County 6 *** 14.5 (9.1, 22.9) 98 (5, 143) 7 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -1.1)
Freestone County 6 *** 14.4 (8.6, 23.1) 99 (6, 143) 4
*
*
Potter County 6 *** 14.4 (11.5, 17.8) 100 (30, 137) 17 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.7)
Kendall County 6 *** 14.2 (10.2, 19.5) 101 (20, 141) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.8, 1.6)
Rusk County 6 *** 14.1 (10.3, 19.0) 102 (20, 142) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.8, 3.0)
Victoria County 6 *** 14.1 (11.0, 17.7) 103 (32, 139) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.0)
Navarro County 6 *** 14.1 (10.2, 19.0) 104 (19, 141) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.5, 0.7)
Eastland County 6 *** 14.0 (8.6, 22.2) 105 (6, 143) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.4, 1.2)
Midland County 6 *** 14.0 (11.3, 17.0) 106 (40, 137) 21 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.5)
Travis County 6 *** 13.9 (12.8, 15.1) 107 (73, 124) 125 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.7, 9.7)
DeWitt County 6 *** 13.8 (8.5, 21.8) 108 (7, 143) 4
*
*
Galveston County 6 *** 13.8 (12.1, 15.7) 109 (61, 130) 50 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Bee County 6 *** 13.7 (8.5, 21.0) 110 (10, 143) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.8, 2.9)
Brazos County 6 *** 13.7 (11.1, 16.6) 111 (46, 138) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.2)
McLennan County 6 *** 13.5 (11.6, 15.6) 112 (62, 133) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 13.5 (9.8, 18.0) 113 (29, 141) 9 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.3, -1.1)
Hale County 6 *** 13.4 (8.5, 20.3) 114 (10, 143) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.8, 2.7)
Austin County 6 *** 13.4 (8.8, 19.9) 115 (15, 143) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.1)
Lubbock County 6 *** 13.2 (11.4, 15.3) 116 (67, 135) 38 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Harris County 6 *** 13.2 (12.7, 13.8) 117 (93, 124) 487 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Milam County 6 *** 13.0 (8.2, 19.9) 118 (15, 143) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.2, 2.5)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 13.0 (11.6, 14.4) 119 (80, 132) 79 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Maverick County 6 *** 12.7 (8.6, 17.9) 120 (27, 143) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.2, 4.7)
Howard County 6 *** 12.7 (8.0, 19.0) 121 (14, 143) 5 stable stable trend -22.5 (-42.1, 3.7)
Young County 6 *** 12.6 (7.2, 21.1) 122 (13, 143) 3
*
*
Lavaca County 6 *** 12.6 (7.5, 20.4) 123 (18, 143) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.8, 6.1)
Bexar County 6 *** 12.6 (11.8, 13.3) 124 (97, 130) 225 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Grimes County 6 *** 12.5 (7.8, 19.2) 125 (21, 143) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.7, 6.3)
Tyler County 6 *** 12.4 (7.6, 19.8) 126 (14, 143) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.2)
Cameron County 6 *** 12.4 (10.9, 14.0) 127 (83, 137) 51 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Colorado County 6 *** 12.3 (7.6, 19.6) 128 (17, 143) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.5, 2.2)
Uvalde County 6 *** 12.2 (7.4, 19.2) 129 (15, 143) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.8, 2.5)
Limestone County 6 *** 12.0 (7.1, 19.3) 130 (17, 143) 4
*
*
Randall County 6 *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.6) 131 (68, 141) 18 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.7, -2.5)
Bosque County 6 *** 11.6 (6.6, 19.7) 132 (18, 143) 3 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.2, 9.1)
Starr County 6 *** 11.3 (7.6, 16.0) 133 (47, 143) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.4)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 10.9 (9.8, 12.0) 134 (110, 139) 77 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Gillespie County 6 *** 10.7 (7.4, 16.0) 135 (57, 143) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.0, 4.3)
Val Verde County 6 *** 10.5 (6.9, 15.3) 136 (50, 143) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.4)
El Paso County 6 *** 10.4 (9.4, 11.5) 137 (118, 141) 80 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Washington County 6 *** 9.9 (6.4, 15.1) 138 (42, 143) 5 falling falling trend -28.9 (-45.3, -7.5)
Medina County 6 *** 9.6 (6.4, 13.8) 139 (76, 143) 6 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.3, 0.5)
Caldwell County 6 *** 9.2 (5.6, 14.3) 140 (64, 143) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.1)
Atascosa County 6 *** 8.6 (5.5, 12.9) 141 (86, 143) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.9, 1.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 7.5 (4.5, 12.6) 142 (102, 143) 4
*
*
Webb County 6 *** 7.3 (5.7, 9.2) 143 (130, 143) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.0)
Andrews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burleson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/18/2021 11:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top