Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 205.9 (205.1, 206.7) N/A 54,410 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Trinity County 6 *** 275.2 (235.3, 320.3) 1 (1, 122) 42 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.5)
Jasper County 6 *** 272.0 (247.1, 298.9) 2 (1, 66) 99 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.2)
Lampasas County 6 *** 265.1 (234.0, 299.3) 3 (1, 113) 59 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.0)
Henderson County 6 *** 262.0 (245.9, 279.0) 4 (1, 54) 225 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Kleberg County 6 *** 257.8 (229.3, 288.9) 5 (1, 128) 62 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Sabine County 6 *** 257.3 (212.6, 309.6) 6 (1, 191) 30 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.7, 7.6)
Cherokee County 6 *** 257.0 (237.0, 278.3) 7 (1, 88) 131 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.2)
Cass County 6 *** 256.9 (231.0, 285.1) 8 (1, 104) 82 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.2)
Gregg County 6 *** 254.9 (241.8, 268.6) 9 (3, 57) 302 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.7)
Lamar County 6 *** 254.1 (233.9, 275.7) 10 (1, 88) 128 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Sutton County 6 *** 253.0 (183.2, 341.3) 11 (1, 230) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.2, 4.6)
Wheeler County 6 *** 252.8 (193.9, 324.5) 12 (1, 225) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 4.9)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 251.9 (221.7, 285.2) 13 (1, 145) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 250.6 (213.3, 292.7) 14 (1, 175) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Hardeman County 6 *** 250.5 (181.8, 337.8) 15 (1, 226) 10 rising rising trend 14.9 (2.6, 28.7)
Burleson County 6 *** 248.6 (216.1, 284.8) 16 (1, 166) 50 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 3.9)
Delta County 6 *** 248.0 (189.2, 320.6) 17 (1, 223) 14 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 4.6)
McCulloch County 6 *** 248.0 (200.5, 304.3) 18 (1, 204) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.2)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 247.9 (207.6, 293.9) 19 (1, 188) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Fannin County 6 *** 247.5 (224.1, 272.8) 20 (1, 131) 90 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.4)
Morris County 6 *** 247.4 (207.4, 293.2) 21 (1, 188) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.8)
Dawson County 6 *** 246.7 (206.2, 292.7) 22 (1, 190) 28 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.7)
Bell County 6 *** 246.0 (237.8, 254.3) 23 (11, 60) 709 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Hopkins County 6 *** 245.2 (221.7, 270.6) 24 (1, 126) 87 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
Hill County 6 *** 244.9 (221.2, 270.6) 25 (2, 136) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Walker County 6 *** 244.3 (227.9, 261.5) 26 (5, 103) 172 rising rising trend 16.2 (4.0, 29.9)
Aransas County 6 *** 244.0 (216.2, 274.8) 27 (2, 147) 68 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Houston County 6 *** 242.7 (214.6, 273.8) 28 (1, 164) 60 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 5.9)
DeWitt County 6 *** 242.2 (212.5, 275.2) 29 (1, 165) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Stonewall County 6 *** 242.0 (131.8, 412.3) 30 (1, 237) 3
*
*
Hardin County 6 *** 241.8 (223.7, 261.0) 31 (5, 123) 144 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Limestone County 6 *** 241.7 (213.9, 272.4) 32 (1, 169) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 240.8 (197.4, 291.1) 33 (1, 206) 25 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.0)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 238.7 (212.9, 267.0) 34 (2, 156) 71 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 1.9)
Orange County 6 *** 238.5 (223.7, 254.0) 35 (10, 103) 210 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Wichita County 6 *** 238.0 (225.6, 251.0) 36 (12, 102) 295 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Ward County 6 *** 237.8 (196.3, 285.4) 37 (1, 209) 24 stable stable trend -2.3 (-15.8, 13.4)
Starr County 6 *** 237.6 (218.5, 257.8) 38 (7, 137) 117 falling falling trend -7.8 (-12.4, -2.9)
Hunt County 6 *** 237.6 (223.4, 252.5) 39 (8, 109) 226 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Stephens County 6 *** 237.0 (192.9, 288.7) 40 (1, 213) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Crosby County 6 *** 236.7 (177.6, 308.9) 41 (1, 225) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.0, 6.3)
Marion County 6 *** 236.0 (195.7, 283.3) 42 (1, 206) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Milam County 6 *** 235.9 (208.4, 266.1) 43 (2, 170) 60 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Taylor County 6 *** 234.7 (222.3, 247.6) 44 (15, 116) 286 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Duval County 6 *** 234.5 (194.5, 280.6) 45 (1, 209) 25 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.6)
Red River County 6 *** 234.4 (197.4, 276.9) 46 (1, 204) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Hamilton County 6 *** 233.7 (187.7, 288.5) 47 (1, 217) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Potter County 6 *** 233.5 (220.8, 246.8) 48 (14, 115) 263 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Chambers County 6 *** 233.3 (212.3, 255.9) 49 (5, 152) 93 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Polk County 6 *** 233.2 (214.5, 253.2) 50 (9, 139) 134 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Coke County 6 *** 232.4 (159.8, 329.4) 51 (1, 234) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.2)
Armstrong County 6 *** 232.4 (138.8, 368.3) 52 (1, 237) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.9, 6.4)
Hall County 6 *** 232.4 (155.0, 336.2) 53 (1, 236) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.6, 6.1)
Grayson County 6 *** 232.2 (220.3, 244.7) 54 (17, 117) 311 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Johnson County 6 *** 232.2 (221.6, 243.1) 55 (21, 107) 384 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Upshur County 6 *** 231.7 (210.7, 254.3) 56 (7, 162) 102 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 231.2 (212.9, 250.8) 57 (8, 154) 132 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Kaufman County 6 *** 230.7 (218.3, 243.5) 58 (21, 120) 272 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Falls County 6 *** 230.2 (198.9, 265.3) 59 (2, 201) 42 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Bosque County 6 *** 230.1 (198.1, 266.2) 60 (2, 195) 44 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.0)
McLennan County 6 *** 229.8 (220.8, 239.2) 61 (26, 104) 521 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Coryell County 6 *** 229.8 (213.2, 247.3) 62 (14, 137) 145 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Brown County 6 *** 229.1 (207.3, 252.7) 63 (9, 169) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Rusk County 6 *** 228.8 (210.9, 247.8) 64 (9, 150) 129 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.7, 9.5)
Angelina County 6 *** 228.3 (214.0, 243.4) 65 (17, 134) 200 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Victoria County 6 *** 227.7 (213.2, 243.0) 66 (18, 137) 198 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Val Verde County 6 *** 226.8 (206.0, 249.0) 67 (7, 167) 90 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.5, 4.4)
Wood County 6 *** 226.7 (206.0, 249.1) 68 (8, 171) 107 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.9)
Panola County 6 *** 226.6 (199.8, 256.1) 69 (5, 189) 59 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Clay County 6 *** 226.0 (185.2, 273.8) 70 (1, 217) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.0)
Camp County 6 *** 225.6 (189.0, 267.6) 71 (2, 213) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
San Patricio County 6 *** 225.6 (209.0, 243.2) 72 (18, 157) 144 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hood County 6 *** 224.6 (206.7, 243.8) 73 (15, 162) 139 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Montague County 6 *** 224.5 (194.5, 258.0) 74 (4, 203) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Rains County 6 *** 224.4 (185.5, 269.7) 75 (1, 218) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.8)
Freestone County 6 *** 223.6 (194.6, 256.0) 76 (4, 200) 46 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Parker County 6 *** 223.5 (212.1, 235.4) 77 (31, 131) 313 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Coleman County 6 *** 223.4 (180.1, 275.2) 78 (1, 223) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3)
Smith County 6 *** 223.3 (214.2, 232.7) 79 (39, 129) 486 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Nolan County 6 *** 223.1 (188.7, 262.0) 80 (2, 210) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Goliad County 6 *** 222.3 (175.5, 278.7) 81 (1, 226) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.5)
Liberty County 6 *** 222.0 (207.6, 237.1) 82 (27, 150) 187 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Washington County 6 *** 221.8 (199.4, 246.3) 83 (8, 191) 82 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Refugio County 6 *** 221.1 (172.5, 279.8) 84 (1, 227) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Harrison County 6 *** 221.0 (204.8, 238.1) 85 (19, 174) 151 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Young County 6 *** 220.4 (189.7, 254.9) 86 (3, 204) 42 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
San Augustine County 6 *** 219.6 (175.7, 272.2) 87 (1, 223) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.9)
Ellis County 6 *** 219.6 (209.5, 230.0) 88 (41, 143) 371 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 219.5 (195.1, 246.4) 89 (9, 198) 70 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Lubbock County 6 *** 219.3 (211.1, 227.8) 90 (48, 134) 570 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Ector County 6 *** 219.2 (208.0, 230.9) 91 (38, 149) 295 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 219.2 (197.7, 242.5) 92 (15, 189) 81 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Cooke County 6 *** 219.1 (198.2, 241.8) 93 (13, 187) 91 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Navarro County 6 *** 219.0 (200.4, 238.9) 94 (15, 184) 110 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Uvalde County 6 *** 218.9 (191.7, 248.9) 95 (10, 200) 49 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Colorado County 6 *** 218.4 (190.0, 250.1) 96 (8, 206) 50 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Matagorda County 6 *** 218.2 (196.6, 241.6) 97 (12, 186) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Wise County 6 *** 217.7 (201.7, 234.7) 98 (28, 169) 149 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Lamb County 6 *** 217.5 (181.3, 259.1) 99 (2, 219) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Runnels County 6 *** 217.3 (176.8, 264.9) 100 (1, 221) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Williamson County 6 *** 217.3 (211.5, 223.2) 101 (66, 129) 1,085 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.8)
Tom Green County 6 *** 216.5 (203.8, 229.8) 102 (40, 162) 235 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Bastrop County 6 *** 216.4 (202.4, 231.2) 103 (35, 173) 194 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.0, 10.3)
Mills County 6 *** 215.3 (157.1, 289.7) 104 (1, 233) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.1)
Ochiltree County 6 *** 214.6 (173.1, 262.8) 105 (2, 225) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.6)
Donley County 6 *** 214.4 (141.6, 312.1) 106 (1, 235) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.5, 7.3)
Kerr County 6 *** 214.3 (195.0, 235.1) 107 (21, 191) 110 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Tarrant County 6 *** 214.3 (211.4, 217.3) 108 (83, 126) 4,171 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Burnet County 6 *** 213.6 (194.4, 234.4) 109 (22, 193) 105 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Lynn County 6 *** 213.4 (160.6, 278.5) 110 (1, 232) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.5)
Randall County 6 *** 213.3 (201.8, 225.3) 111 (48, 170) 275 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Dallas County 6 *** 213.1 (210.5, 215.7) 112 (88, 128) 5,162 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 212.9 (202.6, 223.7) 113 (57, 158) 325 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Knox County 6 *** 212.8 (146.9, 298.9) 114 (1, 235) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.6)
Lavaca County 6 *** 211.0 (181.7, 244.0) 115 (7, 216) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
Frio County 6 *** 210.2 (179.2, 245.0) 116 (7, 216) 33 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Dimmit County 6 *** 210.0 (168.4, 258.5) 117 (1, 228) 19 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.4)
Wharton County 6 *** 209.6 (189.5, 231.4) 118 (27, 199) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Bowie County 6 *** 208.9 (195.7, 222.9) 119 (56, 184) 198 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Newton County 6 *** 208.6 (176.3, 245.8) 120 (7, 221) 33 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.8)
Grimes County 6 *** 208.5 (185.0, 234.2) 121 (20, 204) 64 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.9, 3.8)
Leon County 6 *** 207.9 (177.6, 242.3) 122 (11, 219) 40 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 207.7 (199.7, 215.9) 123 (84, 168) 541 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Nueces County 6 *** 207.2 (200.3, 214.3) 124 (85, 163) 725 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Madison County 6 *** 207.0 (172.1, 246.9) 125 (6, 224) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.2)
Calhoun County 6 *** 206.2 (179.3, 236.2) 126 (16, 214) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Bexar County 6 *** 206.0 (202.9, 209.0) 127 (108, 152) 3,608 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Baylor County 6 *** 203.9 (142.4, 285.7) 128 (1, 236) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.8)
Midland County 6 *** 203.8 (193.4, 214.7) 129 (77, 182) 303 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Anderson County 6 *** 203.4 (187.6, 220.4) 130 (58, 199) 124 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Austin County 6 *** 203.2 (180.4, 228.4) 131 (25, 212) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Gonzales County 6 *** 203.1 (175.1, 234.3) 132 (16, 219) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Gray County 6 *** 203.0 (176.9, 232.0) 133 (19, 218) 46 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Galveston County 6 *** 202.8 (196.0, 209.9) 134 (99, 174) 705 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Gillespie County 6 *** 202.7 (176.4, 232.0) 135 (23, 216) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Caldwell County 6 *** 202.5 (182.9, 223.7) 136 (38, 207) 83 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Eastland County 6 *** 202.0 (172.2, 235.8) 137 (10, 221) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Hansford County 6 *** 201.9 (149.4, 267.2) 138 (1, 234) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Blanco County 6 *** 201.8 (164.9, 245.5) 139 (4, 226) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Brazoria County 6 *** 201.6 (194.9, 208.4) 140 (97, 176) 712 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Comal County 6 *** 201.3 (190.6, 212.5) 141 (84, 189) 298 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Comanche County 6 *** 200.3 (164.3, 242.0) 142 (8, 228) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.4)
El Paso County 6 *** 199.7 (195.1, 204.4) 143 (116, 174) 1,471 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Scurry County 6 *** 199.1 (169.2, 232.9) 144 (20, 223) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Collin County 6 *** 198.4 (194.4, 202.5) 145 (122, 175) 1,853 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Denton County 6 *** 198.4 (194.0, 202.9) 146 (123, 176) 1,564 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Erath County 6 *** 198.2 (177.1, 221.1) 147 (47, 214) 70 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Atascosa County 6 *** 197.8 (179.8, 217.2) 148 (62, 208) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Wilson County 6 *** 197.8 (180.5, 216.4) 149 (61, 210) 105 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Rockwall County 6 *** 197.5 (184.9, 210.8) 150 (83, 199) 187 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Haskell County 6 *** 197.4 (146.5, 261.4) 151 (1, 235) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Titus County 6 *** 197.4 (175.1, 221.7) 152 (41, 216) 59 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Travis County 6 *** 196.0 (192.3, 199.7) 153 (132, 178) 2,231 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.6)
Winkler County 6 *** 195.9 (151.3, 249.4) 154 (3, 231) 14 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.3)
Hays County 6 *** 195.7 (186.6, 205.2) 155 (112, 195) 358 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Kendall County 6 *** 195.2 (176.5, 215.4) 156 (64, 213) 89 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Waller County 6 *** 195.1 (176.4, 215.2) 157 (60, 211) 87 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Maverick County 6 *** 194.9 (177.4, 213.7) 158 (68, 211) 93 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.1)
Harris County 6 *** 194.7 (192.8, 196.6) 159 (143, 179) 8,375 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Parmer County 6 *** 194.6 (155.1, 241.0) 160 (7, 230) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Howard County 6 *** 194.5 (174.8, 215.8) 161 (62, 216) 74 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 194.4 (189.2, 199.7) 162 (132, 186) 1,094 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.0)
Callahan County 6 *** 194.3 (162.2, 231.5) 163 (12, 226) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.0)
Floyd County 6 *** 193.4 (143.8, 255.3) 164 (2, 234) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.5)
Cottle County 6 *** 193.2 (108.2, 331.3) 165 (1, 237) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.8, 3.8)
Moore County 6 *** 193.2 (165.5, 224.1) 166 (32, 225) 36 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.6)
Bee County 6 *** 192.8 (171.3, 216.4) 167 (54, 219) 59 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Collingsworth County 6 *** 192.8 (124.2, 286.6) 168 (1, 237) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.9, 2.7)
Jones County 6 *** 192.7 (166.3, 222.4) 169 (42, 223) 40 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.0)
Fayette County 6 *** 192.6 (167.6, 220.6) 170 (37, 222) 52 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Reeves County 6 *** 192.4 (160.1, 229.4) 171 (14, 227) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.4)
Llano County 6 *** 192.4 (164.0, 225.0) 172 (21, 224) 45 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Upton County 6 *** 192.0 (128.8, 275.3) 173 (1, 237) 6 stable stable trend 18.8 (-0.9, 42.3)
Bandera County 6 *** 191.4 (165.5, 220.8) 174 (39, 223) 53 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Medina County 6 *** 190.9 (173.6, 209.6) 175 (80, 214) 97 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Irion County 6 *** 190.9 (107.0, 322.7) 176 (1, 237) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.1, 5.8)
Shelby County 6 *** 190.7 (166.6, 217.5) 177 (52, 221) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Zavala County 6 *** 190.1 (152.8, 233.5) 178 (14, 232) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.2)
Childress County 6 *** 189.9 (142.9, 247.4) 179 (3, 235) 12 stable stable trend -4.5 (-10.1, 1.4)
Robertson County 6 *** 189.2 (159.7, 222.7) 180 (30, 227) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Lee County 6 *** 189.1 (160.1, 222.0) 181 (34, 226) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.0)
Fisher County 6 *** 188.4 (127.3, 270.0) 182 (1, 236) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Mason County 6 *** 188.3 (128.4, 268.3) 183 (1, 236) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.0)
Somervell County 6 *** 187.7 (149.2, 234.0) 184 (17, 231) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Hockley County 6 *** 187.4 (161.6, 216.3) 185 (43, 225) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Kimble County 6 *** 187.0 (130.0, 262.6) 186 (1, 237) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.2)
Brooks County 6 *** 186.4 (141.8, 241.1) 187 (6, 234) 13 stable stable trend 7.7 (-18.9, 42.9)
Terry County 6 *** 186.1 (152.0, 225.7) 188 (16, 232) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 185.2 (180.8, 189.6) 189 (161, 200) 1,389 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Hale County 6 *** 184.4 (163.0, 207.9) 190 (80, 225) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Brazos County 6 *** 183.8 (174.3, 193.7) 191 (140, 209) 294 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Cameron County 6 *** 183.7 (177.3, 190.2) 192 (157, 206) 648 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Tyler County 6 *** 183.6 (157.9, 212.5) 193 (54, 227) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Andrews County 6 *** 183.6 (154.2, 216.8) 194 (35, 229) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 180.5 (164.6, 197.6) 195 (119, 222) 104 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Live Oak County 6 *** 179.7 (146.9, 218.1) 196 (26, 232) 23 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.4)
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 179.4 (151.0, 211.5) 197 (48, 230) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Mitchell County 6 *** 178.8 (139.2, 226.4) 198 (16, 234) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Martin County 6 *** 178.7 (128.2, 242.2) 199 (4, 236) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.2)
Brewster County 6 *** 177.8 (140.3, 223.1) 200 (23, 234) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1)
Crane County 6 *** 177.4 (124.9, 244.4) 201 (2, 237) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.0)
Dickens County 6 *** 176.8 (99.9, 291.1) 202 (1, 237) 4 stable stable trend 40.2 (-2.0, 100.5)
Bailey County 6 *** 176.4 (131.9, 231.2) 203 (11, 235) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.3)
Archer County 6 *** 175.7 (139.7, 219.2) 204 (24, 234) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.5)
Carson County 6 *** 175.7 (131.3, 231.4) 205 (7, 235) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.9, 0.8)
Dallam County 6 *** 174.7 (130.6, 228.7) 206 (13, 236) 11 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.3)
Kinney County 6 *** 171.6 (114.7, 249.1) 207 (2, 237) 6
*
*
San Saba County 6 *** 171.0 (124.6, 230.2) 208 (7, 237) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.6)
Zapata County 6 *** 170.1 (137.5, 208.0) 209 (52, 234) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 5.8)
Karnes County 6 *** 169.5 (140.1, 203.3) 210 (61, 233) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Hartley County 6 *** 168.2 (124.3, 223.7) 211 (18, 236) 10 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 7.1)
La Salle County 6 *** 167.6 (123.6, 222.0) 212 (20, 236) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.2)
Willacy County 6 *** 166.9 (141.1, 196.1) 213 (96, 232) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 166.6 (162.2, 171.1) 214 (193, 220) 1,096 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Swisher County 6 *** 164.9 (122.7, 216.9) 215 (28, 236) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.3)
Jack County 6 *** 164.8 (128.9, 208.3) 216 (39, 235) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Menard County 6 *** 164.3 (90.9, 279.8) 217 (1, 237) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.9, 1.6)
Schleicher County 6 *** 163.2 (103.6, 246.6) 218 (2, 237) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.3, 9.0)
Webb County 6 *** 162.4 (154.9, 170.3) 219 (193, 225) 350 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Jim Hogg County 6 *** 160.0 (109.0, 226.1) 220 (4, 237) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.6)
Yoakum County 6 *** 160.0 (120.4, 208.1) 221 (47, 236) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.3)
Hudspeth County 6 *** 159.5 (104.9, 232.8) 222 (5, 237) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 6.4)
Pecos County 6 *** 159.1 (131.8, 190.5) 223 (121, 234) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.6)
Garza County 6 *** 156.7 (114.1, 210.7) 224 (28, 237) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.8)
Reagan County 6 *** 151.8 (98.3, 223.7) 225 (9, 237) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.7)
Real County 6 *** 151.4 (99.6, 226.2) 226 (14, 237) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.3, 3.7)
Gaines County 6 *** 148.5 (122.7, 178.0) 227 (149, 235) 24 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.1)
Lipscomb County 6 *** 144.6 (87.4, 224.6) 228 (9, 237) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-5.1, 9.6)
Cochran County 6 *** 143.4 (89.5, 220.5) 229 (16, 237) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.3, 5.9)
Sherman County 6 *** 142.0 (87.7, 219.0) 230 (13, 237) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.8, 7.4)
Concho County 6 *** 141.0 (90.2, 213.4) 231 (12, 237) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Castro County 6 *** 128.9 (93.8, 173.1) 232 (130, 237) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.4)
Hemphill County 6 *** 125.3 (79.2, 189.0) 233 (53, 237) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.7)
Presidio County 6 *** 116.1 (80.0, 163.0) 234 (148, 237) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.4, 3.3)
Shackelford County 6 *** 107.4 (63.2, 173.8) 235 (143, 237) 4
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 *** 104.3 (53.7, 211.5) 236 (51, 237) 4 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.1, -0.3)
Crockett County 6 *** 100.4 (59.4, 160.6) 237 (154, 237) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.4, 4.8)
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2021 1:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top