Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 95.8 (95.2, 96.5) N/A 17,901 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Haskell County 7 165.4 (106.4, 244.9) 1 (1, 185) 5
*
*
Wilbarger County 7 146.4 (109.7, 191.1) 2 (1, 166) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Castro County 7 135.5 (89.1, 196.2) 3 (1, 192) 5
*
*
Franklin County 7 131.7 (92.9, 180.8) 4 (1, 187) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.8)
Camp County 7 131.3 (95.1, 176.0) 5 (1, 185) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.9)
Trinity County 7 131.0 (95.7, 174.7) 6 (1, 184) 9 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 7.5)
Marion County 7 128.9 (88.0, 182.4) 7 (1, 191) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 4.1)
Lynn County 7 128.8 (78.4, 197.8) 8 (1, 194) 4
*
*
Gillespie County 7 128.2 (101.5, 159.5) 9 (1, 160) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.9)
Cass County 7 126.2 (102.8, 153.3) 10 (1, 146) 20 rising rising trend 7.9 (2.2, 24.6)
Moore County 7 124.8 (98.8, 155.3) 11 (1, 169) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.3)
Yoakum County 7 124.6 (84.4, 176.3) 12 (1, 193) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.8, 7.2)
Young County 7 124.4 (95.1, 159.8) 13 (1, 176) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 4.8)
Martin County 7 123.2 (75.8, 187.7) 14 (1, 193) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 7 122.8 (80.0, 179.7) 15 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 7.6)
Brooks County 7 122.4 (76.9, 183.4) 16 (1, 194) 5
*
*
Ward County 7 121.8 (87.3, 164.6) 17 (1, 190) 8 stable stable trend -17.9 (-34.4, 1.5)
Fannin County 7 120.8 (100.7, 143.7) 18 (2, 153) 26 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.7)
Gregg County 7 120.1 (109.0, 132.0) 19 (5, 89) 87 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 11.3)
Palo Pinto County 7 120.1 (96.6, 147.3) 20 (1, 163) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.2)
Jasper County 7 119.9 (99.0, 143.7) 21 (1, 156) 23 stable stable trend -6.2 (-14.3, 1.3)
Hopkins County 7 119.7 (99.5, 142.6) 22 (1, 153) 25 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 5.0)
Dimmit County 7 119.6 (82.7, 166.7) 23 (1, 192) 7
*
*
Delta County 7 117.7 (67.1, 190.1) 24 (1, 194) 3
*
*
Hutchinson County 7 117.5 (92.0, 147.6) 25 (1, 178) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.2)
Burnet County 7 117.3 (99.2, 137.8) 26 (4, 147) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Victoria County 7 115.3 (102.6, 129.1) 27 (6, 122) 61 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Floyd County 7 115.2 (69.1, 179.6) 28 (1, 194) 4
*
*
Lampasas County 7 115.1 (89.5, 145.7) 29 (1, 180) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Parker County 7 114.9 (104.9, 125.6) 30 (9, 97) 98 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.8, 8.2)
Wichita County 7 114.8 (104.1, 126.2) 31 (8, 106) 88 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Henderson County 7 114.1 (100.4, 129.1) 32 (6, 135) 51 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.6)
Morris County 7 113.1 (79.1, 156.3) 33 (1, 192) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.1)
Somervell County 7 112.8 (75.4, 162.1) 34 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.1)
Uvalde County 7 112.6 (89.8, 139.1) 35 (2, 181) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Upshur County 7 112.5 (94.0, 133.5) 36 (3, 167) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Walker County 7 112.1 (98.9, 126.6) 37 (8, 142) 54 rising rising trend 11.0 (1.9, 21.8)
Jim Wells County 7 110.4 (92.2, 131.1) 38 (4, 170) 26 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.2)
Cooke County 7 110.1 (91.4, 131.4) 39 (5, 168) 25 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.8)
Potter County 7 109.9 (99.5, 121.2) 40 (14, 129) 82 rising rising trend 8.3 (0.5, 13.8)
Montague County 7 109.3 (82.6, 141.6) 41 (2, 187) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Newton County 7 109.2 (78.8, 147.5) 42 (1, 192) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 7.4)
Hill County 7 108.9 (89.0, 131.8) 43 (4, 175) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Stephens County 7 108.2 (71.7, 156.3) 44 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.1)
Cherokee County 7 108.1 (92.3, 125.7) 45 (9, 165) 34 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Polk County 7 108.0 (91.7, 126.5) 46 (7, 166) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
San Patricio County 7 108.0 (94.1, 123.3) 47 (9, 155) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
Brewster County 7 107.9 (71.6, 156.1) 48 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.4)
Comanche County 7 107.9 (75.8, 148.7) 49 (1, 192) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.7)
Van Zandt County 7 107.6 (92.0, 125.0) 50 (9, 169) 34 falling falling trend -10.1 (-18.5, -3.2)
Wilson County 7 107.6 (91.7, 125.3) 51 (8, 167) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3)
Jackson County 7 107.6 (78.0, 144.2) 52 (1, 191) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.0)
Grayson County 7 107.3 (97.2, 118.1) 53 (13, 137) 84 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Limestone County 7 107.1 (83.3, 135.3) 54 (3, 186) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.3)
Hardin County 7 107.0 (92.0, 123.7) 55 (9, 164) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Val Verde County 7 106.8 (90.5, 125.1) 56 (7, 167) 31 stable stable trend 4.9 (-8.4, 21.4)
Bell County 7 106.5 (100.4, 112.9) 57 (28, 110) 236 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Goliad County 7 106.1 (65.5, 162.2) 58 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 5.8)
Matagorda County 7 106.0 (86.7, 128.2) 59 (5, 179) 21 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.6)
Chambers County 7 106.0 (89.7, 124.3) 60 (7, 173) 30 stable stable trend 8.3 (-0.1, 16.5)
Waller County 7 105.7 (89.3, 124.1) 61 (7, 175) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.4)
Taylor County 7 105.2 (95.0, 116.2) 62 (17, 151) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Carson County 7 105.1 (62.2, 166.2) 63 (1, 194) 4
*
*
Kleberg County 7 104.9 (83.5, 129.9) 64 (5, 186) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.7)
Crosby County 7 104.7 (59.7, 169.0) 65 (1, 194) 3
*
*
Hood County 7 104.7 (89.1, 122.2) 66 (9, 171) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Wise County 7 104.5 (91.0, 119.3) 67 (13, 166) 44 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.1, 4.0)
DeWitt County 7 104.2 (79.7, 133.8) 68 (3, 190) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.1)
Kaufman County 7 104.1 (94.7, 114.2) 69 (21, 146) 89 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.2)
Randall County 7 103.9 (94.3, 114.2) 70 (22, 146) 88 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Tyler County 7 103.9 (79.2, 133.8) 71 (3, 189) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.2, 5.5)
Dallam County 7 103.6 (64.6, 156.2) 72 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.9)
Archer County 7 103.6 (66.2, 154.0) 73 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 2.5)
Johnson County 7 103.4 (95.0, 112.4) 74 (26, 140) 112 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Rockwall County 7 103.2 (92.8, 114.5) 75 (20, 154) 72 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Eastland County 7 103.1 (76.0, 136.5) 76 (3, 191) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.7)
San Jacinto County 7 103.1 (81.4, 128.7) 77 (4, 185) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.4)
Williamson County 7 103.0 (98.6, 107.4) 78 (44, 114) 427 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 5.9)
Freestone County 7 102.8 (78.8, 131.9) 79 (3, 188) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.8)
Harrison County 7 102.5 (88.7, 117.8) 80 (14, 169) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Fayette County 7 102.4 (78.9, 130.5) 81 (3, 190) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
McLennan County 7 102.1 (94.8, 109.8) 82 (30, 140) 150 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Orange County 7 102.0 (89.9, 115.4) 83 (16, 169) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Bosque County 7 102.0 (75.1, 135.3) 84 (2, 193) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.5)
Kerr County 7 101.9 (84.8, 121.5) 85 (9, 180) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
El Paso County 7 101.8 (97.9, 105.8) 86 (49, 117) 537 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.0, 5.8)
Andrews County 7 101.7 (76.8, 131.7) 87 (3, 191) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.5)
Brown County 7 101.3 (83.1, 122.2) 88 (8, 184) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.4)
Lee County 7 101.1 (74.7, 133.6) 89 (3, 193) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.6)
Smith County 7 101.1 (93.6, 109.0) 90 (37, 143) 138 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Burleson County 7 100.8 (74.2, 133.7) 91 (4, 192) 10 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 5.9)
Bastrop County 7 100.7 (88.9, 113.7) 92 (20, 166) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Hunt County 7 100.3 (89.0, 112.6) 93 (20, 165) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Runnels County 7 100.3 (66.5, 144.8) 94 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.6)
Lamar County 7 100.1 (84.0, 118.3) 95 (12, 180) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Tarrant County 7 100.0 (97.6, 102.4) 96 (63, 118) 1,377 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
Galveston County 7 100.0 (94.1, 106.2) 97 (43, 138) 213 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Deaf Smith County 7 99.9 (75.0, 130.0) 98 (4, 191) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Clay County 7 99.7 (66.1, 144.4) 99 (2, 194) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 6.6)
Ellis County 7 99.3 (91.4, 107.8) 100 (32, 156) 115 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Tom Green County 7 99.3 (88.7, 110.8) 101 (24, 164) 67 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Starr County 7 99.2 (85.4, 114.5) 102 (19, 173) 38 stable stable trend -8.1 (-17.7, 3.7)
Callahan County 7 99.1 (70.1, 135.9) 103 (2, 193) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.4)
Ector County 7 98.9 (90.2, 108.1) 104 (36, 161) 101 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Austin County 7 98.5 (78.1, 122.3) 105 (8, 190) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.0)
Bexar County 7 98.4 (96.0, 100.9) 106 (73, 125) 1,278 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Lubbock County 7 98.3 (91.8, 105.2) 107 (47, 151) 175 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Frio County 7 98.3 (74.5, 127.0) 108 (3, 191) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.0)
McCulloch County 7 98.3 (60.7, 150.1) 109 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.7, 2.7)
Rains County 7 97.5 (65.6, 139.3) 110 (2, 194) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 6.7)
Denton County 7 97.0 (93.6, 100.5) 111 (71, 136) 607 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Aransas County 7 96.6 (73.2, 125.2) 112 (4, 191) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.3)
Scurry County 7 96.4 (71.6, 126.7) 113 (4, 193) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.7)
Comal County 7 96.3 (87.4, 105.9) 114 (41, 167) 86 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Dallas County 7 96.1 (94.1, 98.2) 115 (85, 133) 1,687 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Milam County 7 96.1 (74.0, 122.5) 116 (6, 192) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.0)
Nueces County 7 96.0 (90.3, 102.0) 117 (59, 155) 213 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Collin County 7 95.7 (92.6, 98.9) 118 (80, 145) 708 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
San Augustine County 7 95.3 (57.2, 149.0) 119 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.2)
Liberty County 7 95.0 (83.7, 107.3) 120 (34, 175) 52 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
Atascosa County 7 94.9 (80.1, 111.7) 121 (18, 184) 29 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Wharton County 7 94.7 (77.8, 114.0) 122 (17, 187) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-18.7, 5.9)
Live Oak County 7 94.2 (64.3, 133.1) 123 (2, 194) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 6.5)
Travis County 7 94.1 (91.3, 97.0) 124 (89, 144) 874 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 4.8)
Wood County 7 94.1 (76.6, 114.2) 125 (13, 189) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Winkler County 7 94.0 (59.3, 140.8) 126 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.3)
Guadalupe County 7 94.0 (86.0, 102.5) 127 (52, 169) 102 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 0.0)
Calhoun County 7 93.8 (70.9, 121.6) 128 (9, 192) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.0)
Angelina County 7 93.6 (82.2, 106.2) 129 (28, 178) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-10.0, -0.3)
Grimes County 7 93.6 (74.0, 116.7) 130 (10, 190) 16 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.9, 7.2)
Navarro County 7 93.6 (78.1, 111.1) 131 (22, 186) 26 stable stable trend 14.4 (-1.2, 30.5)
Gonzales County 7 93.4 (70.1, 121.5) 132 (8, 193) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.1)
Kendall County 7 93.1 (77.4, 111.0) 133 (18, 188) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.7)
Bowie County 7 93.0 (82.1, 104.9) 134 (42, 183) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.8)
Panola County 7 92.7 (70.9, 119.1) 135 (9, 192) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Montgomery County 7 92.7 (88.4, 97.1) 136 (79, 157) 359 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 6.3)
Cameron County 7 92.5 (87.3, 98.0) 137 (80, 160) 239 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Medina County 7 92.3 (77.6, 108.9) 138 (20, 187) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.8)
Houston County 7 91.9 (70.4, 118.0) 139 (11, 192) 12 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.0)
Washington County 7 91.5 (72.8, 113.5) 140 (14, 190) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.4)
Harris County 7 90.7 (89.2, 92.2) 141 (116, 152) 2,885 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Bandera County 7 89.9 (66.3, 119.2) 142 (9, 194) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.6)
Fort Bend County 7 89.7 (86.2, 93.3) 143 (107, 162) 499 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Jefferson County 7 89.6 (83.1, 96.6) 144 (78, 175) 140 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Brazoria County 7 89.3 (84.2, 94.7) 145 (97, 170) 226 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Gaines County 7 89.3 (67.2, 115.9) 146 (13, 193) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.5)
Jones County 7 88.9 (67.7, 114.8) 147 (9, 193) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.1, 5.6)
Midland County 7 88.8 (80.8, 97.2) 148 (73, 178) 96 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Leon County 7 88.5 (62.5, 121.3) 149 (8, 194) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.8)
Red River County 7 88.4 (58.5, 128.0) 150 (3, 194) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.5, 2.0)
Hockley County 7 88.1 (66.6, 114.1) 151 (13, 193) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.0)
Erath County 7 88.0 (71.1, 107.6) 152 (22, 192) 20 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.3)
Colorado County 7 87.9 (64.2, 117.1) 153 (10, 194) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.4)
Falls County 7 87.3 (63.8, 116.6) 154 (9, 194) 9 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.6)
Llano County 7 87.2 (61.8, 119.6) 155 (9, 194) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Hays County 7 87.2 (80.4, 94.4) 156 (91, 177) 125 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Childress County 7 87.0 (50.5, 138.8) 157 (2, 194) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 5.9)
Lavaca County 7 87.0 (63.3, 116.3) 158 (9, 194) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Hale County 7 86.9 (69.6, 107.1) 159 (24, 192) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.8)
Coryell County 7 86.6 (75.6, 98.9) 160 (59, 186) 46 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Gray County 7 86.2 (65.6, 111.2) 161 (13, 194) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.0)
Bailey County 7 86.1 (49.8, 137.3) 162 (2, 194) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.7, 4.3)
Robertson County 7 85.8 (61.3, 116.7) 163 (9, 194) 8 rising rising trend 7.8 (3.4, 16.9)
Hidalgo County 7 85.8 (82.3, 89.4) 164 (125, 173) 466 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 4.8)
Parmer County 7 84.7 (54.1, 125.7) 165 (5, 194) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 6.1)
Shelby County 7 84.1 (64.4, 107.8) 166 (16, 193) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.0)
Rusk County 7 84.0 (70.8, 99.0) 167 (44, 190) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Zapata County 7 83.7 (58.2, 115.9) 168 (5, 194) 7 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.9, 9.1)
Brazos County 7 83.6 (76.4, 91.3) 169 (107, 184) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Ochiltree County 7 83.4 (53.7, 123.0) 170 (6, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.6, 5.5)
Lamb County 7 83.0 (55.8, 118.3) 171 (9, 194) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.1)
Mitchell County 7 81.9 (51.0, 124.5) 172 (5, 194) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.0, 7.7)
Bee County 7 81.6 (65.8, 100.2) 173 (48, 193) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.6)
Nolan County 7 81.5 (56.0, 114.1) 174 (9, 194) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.3)
Sabine County 7 80.9 (48.4, 126.6) 175 (4, 194) 4
*
*
Maverick County 7 80.6 (67.8, 95.0) 176 (60, 191) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.2)
Webb County 7 80.4 (74.5, 86.6) 177 (132, 185) 142 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Nacogdoches County 7 79.6 (66.6, 94.3) 178 (70, 192) 28 falling falling trend -3.4 (-17.0, -0.9)
Dawson County 7 79.1 (52.8, 113.3) 179 (11, 194) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.7, 4.4)
Willacy County 7 78.5 (58.3, 103.1) 180 (29, 194) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.8)
Howard County 7 78.0 (62.9, 95.5) 181 (64, 193) 19 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.0, 15.3)
Zavala County 7 77.1 (50.1, 112.7) 182 (8, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.7)
Caldwell County 7 75.6 (61.4, 92.1) 183 (77, 194) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Anderson County 7 75.1 (63.6, 88.1) 184 (98, 193) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.3)
Duval County 7 74.1 (47.2, 110.3) 185 (15, 194) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.1)
La Salle County 7 73.9 (42.1, 119.6) 186 (6, 194) 3
*
*
Titus County 7 72.3 (56.3, 91.4) 187 (63, 194) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.6)
Terry County 7 72.3 (47.3, 105.4) 188 (21, 194) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.5)
Blanco County 7 70.7 (43.6, 108.5) 189 (15, 194) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.5, 5.3)
Reeves County 7 70.2 (49.7, 96.3) 190 (46, 194) 8
*
*
Karnes County 7 63.6 (43.1, 90.4) 191 (54, 194) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.7)
Jack County 7 62.0 (35.4, 100.6) 192 (26, 194) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.2)
Pecos County 7 59.8 (40.8, 84.5) 193 (91, 194) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
Madison County 7 58.1 (37.3, 85.9) 194 (73, 194) 5 stable stable trend -28.5 (-61.0, 7.1)
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/01/2024 1:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top