Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

Black (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 438.3 (434.8, 441.8) N/A 13,437 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 444.9 (444.0, 445.9) N/A 187,408 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Dawson County 6 *** 738.4 (446.5, 1,135.8) 1 (1, 117) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 *** 717.6 (485.9, 1,017.4) 2 (1, 105) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.4, 5.6)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 599.6 (389.1, 876.5) 3 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.3, 3.8)
Burnet County 6 *** 590.1 (346.0, 928.1) 4 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Wise County 6 *** 589.3 (293.3, 1,020.8) 5 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Kleberg County 6 *** 584.1 (369.6, 871.6) 6 (1, 119) 5
*
*
DeWitt County 6 *** 565.0 (428.7, 731.5) 7 (1, 107) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.3)
Matagorda County 6 *** 557.7 (467.1, 661.4) 8 (1, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.4)
Lampasas County 6 *** 556.5 (329.8, 876.2) 9 (1, 120) 5 stable stable trend -4.8 (-9.5, 0.2)
Lamar County 6 *** 551.2 (474.1, 637.3) 10 (2, 71) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Titus County 6 *** 547.4 (440.2, 672.9) 11 (1, 98) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1)
Wharton County 6 *** 540.5 (462.7, 628.0) 12 (2, 82) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Henderson County 6 *** 536.2 (453.0, 630.4) 13 (2, 86) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Howard County 6 *** 535.7 (368.1, 747.0) 14 (1, 116) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.9, 7.0)
Hill County 6 *** 535.5 (415.5, 679.7) 15 (1, 107) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.0)
Gregg County 6 *** 530.3 (489.1, 574.0) 16 (5, 49) 131 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.8, 7.6)
Red River County 6 *** 528.4 (416.7, 664.6) 17 (2, 105) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Hardin County 6 *** 523.6 (415.2, 651.6) 18 (2, 107) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.2)
Colorado County 6 *** 519.1 (405.8, 654.4) 19 (1, 111) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.2)
Sabine County 6 *** 518.2 (333.7, 775.5) 20 (1, 119) 5
*
*
Taylor County 6 *** 516.9 (446.0, 595.3) 21 (3, 89) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.6)
Lamb County 6 *** 514.4 (286.6, 848.0) 22 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Potter County 6 *** 510.6 (445.5, 581.9) 23 (4, 80) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Cooke County 6 *** 507.0 (321.4, 752.7) 24 (1, 120) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.4)
Bastrop County 6 *** 503.8 (431.3, 585.1) 25 (4, 92) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.8)
Jasper County 6 *** 503.5 (426.3, 590.7) 26 (4, 93) 33 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.6)
Smith County 6 *** 498.8 (468.0, 531.2) 27 (11, 61) 207 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Grayson County 6 *** 498.4 (428.7, 576.0) 28 (4, 93) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Camp County 6 *** 496.2 (384.2, 632.4) 29 (2, 113) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.5)
Houston County 6 *** 491.7 (419.6, 573.1) 30 (4, 97) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.2)
Bell County 6 *** 488.9 (459.9, 519.0) 31 (14, 61) 268 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Angelina County 6 *** 486.3 (433.1, 544.3) 32 (7, 85) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Nolan County 6 *** 484.6 (280.5, 777.3) 33 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Rusk County 6 *** 483.7 (426.0, 547.4) 34 (6, 91) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Lee County 6 *** 481.7 (360.2, 632.9) 35 (2, 115) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 4.9)
Rockwall County 6 *** 480.0 (378.3, 598.4) 36 (3, 113) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.5)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 478.9 (249.2, 824.6) 37 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Williamson County 6 *** 477.8 (431.9, 526.8) 38 (10, 85) 117 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Grimes County 6 *** 477.4 (391.5, 577.0) 39 (5, 111) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.4)
Dallas County 6 *** 475.8 (467.1, 484.6) 40 (27, 55) 2,576 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Walker County 6 *** 475.4 (422.8, 532.7) 41 (9, 89) 69 stable stable trend 11.9 (-3.7, 30.0)
Cherokee County 6 *** 475.1 (408.5, 549.6) 42 (6, 101) 40 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Brazos County 6 *** 474.5 (427.5, 524.9) 43 (11, 87) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Hays County 6 *** 471.0 (380.8, 574.3) 44 (4, 110) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.7, 1.6)
Limestone County 6 *** 465.9 (379.2, 566.8) 45 (4, 111) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
McLennan County 6 *** 465.7 (433.3, 499.8) 46 (19, 78) 163 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 465.4 (332.2, 634.7) 47 (2, 118) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 3.9)
Hopkins County 6 *** 463.0 (358.7, 588.6) 48 (3, 115) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.6)
Hunt County 6 *** 461.8 (392.8, 539.4) 49 (6, 106) 34 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Wichita County 6 *** 461.8 (407.9, 520.7) 50 (9, 99) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Lubbock County 6 *** 460.1 (415.3, 508.3) 51 (15, 94) 84 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Harrison County 6 *** 459.1 (413.4, 508.6) 52 (15, 92) 80 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Victoria County 6 *** 458.6 (383.4, 543.9) 53 (7, 109) 28 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Fayette County 6 *** 458.4 (325.7, 627.1) 54 (2, 118) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.7, -0.7)
Randall County 6 *** 452.0 (309.5, 630.2) 55 (1, 119) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.0, 6.4)
Tarrant County 6 *** 449.9 (437.4, 462.8) 56 (38, 72) 1,168 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
Milam County 6 *** 449.1 (343.4, 578.2) 57 (3, 116) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
Johnson County 6 *** 447.3 (357.3, 551.8) 58 (5, 114) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.8)
San Patricio County 6 *** 446.6 (287.6, 657.1) 59 (2, 120) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 3.3)
Ellis County 6 *** 441.2 (393.9, 492.6) 60 (19, 101) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Harris County 6 *** 441.1 (434.2, 448.1) 61 (46, 73) 3,454 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Fannin County 6 *** 440.4 (321.4, 588.6) 62 (3, 118) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.2)
Newton County 6 *** 439.9 (345.4, 553.6) 63 (4, 115) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.4)
Madison County 6 *** 437.4 (319.5, 583.2) 64 (3, 118) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.7)
Ector County 6 *** 436.0 (363.6, 518.0) 65 (9, 114) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Wood County 6 *** 434.9 (319.7, 579.6) 66 (4, 118) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.5)
Liberty County 6 *** 433.0 (373.1, 500.0) 67 (15, 110) 40 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Tom Green County 6 *** 432.8 (348.8, 530.3) 68 (7, 115) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Kaufman County 6 *** 427.2 (374.0, 485.7) 69 (20, 108) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Travis County 6 *** 426.4 (406.3, 447.2) 70 (44, 91) 387 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Polk County 6 *** 426.0 (341.1, 525.1) 71 (8, 117) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Jefferson County 6 *** 424.9 (405.5, 444.9) 72 (47, 90) 386 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Galveston County 6 *** 424.3 (397.5, 452.3) 73 (41, 96) 199 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Denton County 6 *** 422.8 (391.0, 456.2) 74 (39, 99) 208 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Navarro County 6 *** 421.9 (357.3, 495.1) 75 (16, 113) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Burleson County 6 *** 421.8 (320.7, 546.1) 76 (6, 117) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.1)
Falls County 6 *** 421.0 (338.5, 517.6) 77 (9, 116) 19 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 1.6)
Panola County 6 *** 419.4 (338.1, 515.2) 78 (10, 115) 20 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.9)
Cass County 6 *** 418.6 (350.5, 496.8) 79 (15, 114) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Orange County 6 *** 418.0 (355.0, 489.1) 80 (18, 113) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Freestone County 6 *** 410.1 (326.8, 509.8) 81 (10, 116) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.5)
Marion County 6 *** 409.5 (316.2, 525.9) 82 (7, 117) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.6)
Collin County 6 *** 408.8 (381.8, 437.0) 83 (50, 104) 265 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Brown County 6 *** 405.4 (251.7, 613.2) 84 (2, 120) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.2, 6.5)
Midland County 6 *** 401.3 (346.0, 462.6) 85 (24, 114) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Trinity County 6 *** 400.9 (272.7, 570.9) 86 (4, 120) 7 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.7)
Chambers County 6 *** 399.2 (309.3, 507.4) 87 (9, 118) 14 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.2)
Anderson County 6 *** 398.7 (342.8, 460.9) 88 (27, 114) 41 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 398.2 (309.8, 505.7) 89 (10, 118) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 4.8)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 395.7 (379.1, 412.7) 90 (67, 101) 559 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Lavaca County 6 *** 394.6 (269.0, 561.9) 91 (4, 120) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.2)
Morris County 6 *** 393.4 (304.6, 501.2) 92 (10, 118) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Montgomery County 6 *** 392.9 (354.6, 434.1) 93 (47, 111) 92 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Bexar County 6 *** 390.4 (375.4, 406.0) 94 (72, 103) 549 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Hale County 6 *** 390.2 (255.5, 566.4) 95 (4, 120) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.5)
Brazoria County 6 *** 385.3 (355.8, 416.5) 96 (58, 109) 159 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Austin County 6 *** 384.0 (290.3, 498.6) 97 (10, 119) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Upshur County 6 *** 383.5 (307.2, 474.5) 98 (17, 117) 18 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.2, -0.7)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 380.1 (328.8, 436.9) 99 (39, 115) 46 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
San Augustine County 6 *** 379.6 (277.9, 510.0) 100 (9, 120) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Gonzales County 6 *** 372.2 (253.0, 529.6) 101 (6, 120) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.9, 3.9)
Robertson County 6 *** 370.9 (290.5, 467.4) 102 (23, 119) 15 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 0.0)
Washington County 6 *** 370.2 (306.3, 443.8) 103 (36, 117) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 367.7 (295.4, 452.7) 104 (22, 118) 19 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.7)
Kerr County 6 *** 366.8 (218.0, 577.3) 105 (3, 120) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.5, 3.5)
Waller County 6 *** 365.3 (305.7, 433.2) 106 (36, 117) 29 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Coryell County 6 *** 363.2 (299.3, 435.8) 107 (36, 117) 29 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.1)
Parker County 6 *** 362.7 (223.7, 548.7) 108 (4, 120) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 1.9)
Bowie County 6 *** 362.2 (327.0, 400.0) 109 (69, 115) 84 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Nueces County 6 *** 358.9 (316.8, 405.0) 110 (62, 116) 56 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 358.1 (306.3, 416.0) 111 (51, 117) 37 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.2)
El Paso County 6 *** 336.6 (303.1, 372.5) 112 (86, 117) 80 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Leon County 6 *** 336.1 (235.7, 475.6) 113 (16, 120) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.2)
Caldwell County 6 *** 306.2 (220.4, 414.4) 114 (42, 120) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.8)
Jones County 6 *** 302.7 (164.4, 504.0) 115 (5, 120) 4
*
*
Wilson County 6 *** 288.0 (157.9, 489.6) 116 (7, 120) 3 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.0, 1.0)
Tyler County 6 *** 275.1 (186.2, 392.1) 117 (58, 120) 6 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.8, -1.9)
Cameron County 6 *** 265.9 (180.1, 376.2) 118 (67, 120) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 2.2)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 234.4 (166.4, 318.1) 119 (98, 120) 9 rising rising trend 8.1 (1.0, 15.7)
Comal County 6 *** 232.9 (159.2, 329.2) 120 (90, 120) 8 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.9, -1.1)
Andrews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Aransas County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atascosa County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Erath County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gillespie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hood County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Wells County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kendall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Llano County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Medina County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Pinto County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Val Verde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2021 5:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top