Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

White Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 346.6 (344.6, 348.6) N/A 25,200 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 *** 343.9 (343.0, 344.8) N/A 125,085 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Freestone County 6 *** 643.1 (401.2, 958.5) 1 (1, 184) 7
*
*
Cass County 6 *** 561.9 (317.9, 904.6) 2 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Blanco County 6 *** 550.0 (393.7, 745.5) 3 (1, 172) 9 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.8, 9.7)
Reagan County 6 *** 515.9 (350.5, 725.1) 4 (1, 183) 7
*
*
Fannin County 6 *** 497.0 (339.2, 696.6) 5 (1, 189) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-4.4, 9.7)
Walker County 6 *** 488.8 (403.6, 585.5) 6 (1, 109) 35 stable stable trend 33.0 (-2.8, 82.1)
Knox County 6 *** 485.4 (304.3, 730.0) 7 (1, 195) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.9, 8.4)
Starr County 6 *** 482.5 (456.0, 510.0) 8 (3, 30) 253 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.4)
Sutton County 6 *** 471.8 (354.7, 615.3) 9 (1, 176) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.4)
Dawson County 6 *** 471.2 (392.5, 560.2) 10 (1, 126) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Falls County 6 *** 467.8 (353.9, 604.8) 11 (1, 172) 12 rising rising trend 11.7 (2.8, 21.4)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 461.4 (341.0, 606.2) 12 (1, 181) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.1, 7.7)
Anderson County 6 *** 459.5 (351.6, 586.5) 13 (1, 164) 20 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.0, 11.6)
Coryell County 6 *** 459.0 (374.4, 555.2) 14 (1, 150) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.7)
Kleberg County 6 *** 451.1 (408.9, 496.4) 15 (4, 75) 86 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.5, 7.3)
McCulloch County 6 *** 449.1 (338.2, 585.1) 16 (1, 176) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9)
Lee County 6 *** 447.6 (309.7, 620.0) 17 (1, 191) 9 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.3, 10.8)
Kimble County 6 *** 443.8 (274.3, 678.5) 18 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.9, 6.7)
Hood County 6 *** 440.0 (342.9, 553.9) 19 (1, 168) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.4)
Bell County 6 *** 436.5 (406.1, 468.4) 20 (8, 68) 180 stable stable trend -6.6 (-13.1, 0.5)
Lavaca County 6 *** 431.5 (320.4, 566.5) 21 (1, 180) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.7)
Nolan County 6 *** 430.8 (348.5, 526.2) 22 (1, 164) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Mitchell County 6 *** 429.6 (315.2, 570.5) 23 (1, 184) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.0, 5.2)
Randall County 6 *** 428.3 (369.4, 492.9) 24 (4, 121) 53 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.1)
Taylor County 6 *** 423.0 (382.0, 466.9) 25 (8, 98) 86 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Eastland County 6 *** 416.0 (283.9, 583.6) 26 (1, 192) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Jackson County 6 *** 414.6 (319.0, 528.0) 27 (2, 182) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.5)
Crosby County 6 *** 412.8 (305.6, 543.9) 28 (2, 187) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Lynn County 6 *** 411.8 (302.3, 547.1) 29 (1, 190) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 6.3)
Young County 6 *** 410.5 (255.3, 613.5) 30 (1, 198) 6 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.3, 10.7)
Polk County 6 *** 410.4 (304.0, 537.7) 31 (1, 186) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.1, 4.2)
Karnes County 6 *** 408.8 (342.5, 483.8) 32 (5, 163) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.3)
Bee County 6 *** 407.1 (363.0, 454.9) 33 (10, 127) 65 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Gillespie County 6 *** 405.7 (318.5, 508.1) 34 (2, 173) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 404.0 (373.2, 436.7) 35 (16, 101) 131 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Lubbock County 6 *** 403.7 (381.2, 427.0) 36 (22, 87) 272 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Wichita County 6 *** 403.6 (355.1, 456.4) 37 (8, 138) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Edwards County 6 *** 403.2 (248.8, 618.5) 38 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.1, 7.2)
Rusk County 6 *** 403.0 (299.1, 527.7) 39 (1, 187) 17 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.6, 1.6)
Duval County 6 *** 403.0 (352.7, 458.8) 40 (8, 140) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Runnels County 6 *** 402.9 (304.1, 523.0) 41 (2, 189) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 2.1)
Potter County 6 *** 402.6 (366.5, 441.1) 42 (14, 113) 108 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Kaufman County 6 *** 401.6 (334.1, 477.2) 43 (5, 165) 39 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.4)
Val Verde County 6 *** 400.1 (371.9, 430.0) 44 (17, 107) 151 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.4)
DeWitt County 6 *** 399.2 (330.5, 477.7) 45 (4, 169) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.7)
Milam County 6 *** 398.1 (308.3, 503.9) 46 (3, 185) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 4.9)
Victoria County 6 *** 397.4 (367.5, 429.0) 47 (17, 114) 137 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Swisher County 6 *** 397.1 (288.5, 531.2) 48 (1, 192) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Refugio County 6 *** 396.7 (311.4, 498.5) 49 (4, 188) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Martin County 6 *** 396.5 (255.2, 580.9) 50 (1, 197) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.7, 6.4)
San Patricio County 6 *** 395.7 (365.4, 427.8) 51 (19, 113) 131 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Goliad County 6 *** 395.5 (298.0, 515.5) 52 (3, 189) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Uvalde County 6 *** 393.6 (352.0, 438.6) 53 (14, 136) 67 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Lamar County 6 *** 392.3 (249.6, 577.9) 54 (1, 197) 6 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.6, 11.6)
Hockley County 6 *** 391.9 (327.2, 464.9) 55 (5, 169) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Calhoun County 6 *** 391.9 (332.7, 458.3) 56 (7, 159) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.0)
El Paso County 6 *** 389.1 (382.1, 396.2) 57 (42, 78) 2,415 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Howard County 6 *** 386.3 (332.9, 445.3) 58 (11, 157) 42 rising rising trend 8.1 (0.3, 16.4)
Maverick County 6 *** 386.1 (361.7, 411.6) 59 (26, 109) 191 rising rising trend 6.0 (1.5, 10.6)
Floyd County 6 *** 385.9 (284.3, 510.3) 60 (2, 192) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.5)
Angelina County 6 *** 385.4 (327.7, 449.4) 61 (9, 167) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
Ector County 6 *** 385.2 (361.0, 410.5) 62 (29, 110) 220 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Tom Green County 6 *** 383.6 (354.1, 414.9) 63 (24, 123) 132 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Winkler County 6 *** 383.3 (292.7, 491.9) 64 (4, 188) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.3)
Concho County 6 *** 382.1 (228.7, 595.0) 65 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.1, 8.8)
Haskell County 6 *** 381.3 (235.7, 579.7) 66 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.1, 5.5)
Yoakum County 6 *** 380.3 (286.0, 493.4) 67 (3, 191) 12 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.0, 9.6)
Bailey County 6 *** 379.8 (280.2, 501.0) 68 (3, 191) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.1)
Robertson County 6 *** 377.7 (272.6, 508.5) 69 (2, 195) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.0, 2.9)
Montague County 6 *** 377.7 (201.8, 628.9) 70 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-8.4, 8.9)
Hays County 6 *** 376.2 (348.4, 405.5) 71 (28, 128) 164 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Aransas County 6 *** 375.4 (307.0, 454.0) 72 (8, 176) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.2)
Coleman County 6 *** 375.1 (235.7, 565.6) 73 (1, 198) 5
*
*
Bastrop County 6 *** 374.7 (331.4, 421.8) 74 (18, 156) 65 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Dimmit County 6 *** 371.5 (317.0, 432.6) 75 (11, 168) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Johnson County 6 *** 371.5 (327.9, 418.7) 76 (19, 157) 69 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
Hartley County 6 *** 370.9 (177.2, 662.7) 77 (1, 198) 3
*
*
McLennan County 6 *** 370.6 (341.6, 401.2) 78 (31, 137) 138 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Lampasas County 6 *** 370.0 (278.0, 482.1) 79 (4, 191) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 3.8)
Limestone County 6 *** 369.8 (247.5, 524.2) 80 (2, 197) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.1, 6.4)
Burleson County 6 *** 369.2 (271.7, 488.9) 81 (3, 192) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.2)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 369.0 (272.5, 485.8) 82 (2, 192) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.2)
Hill County 6 *** 367.8 (284.6, 466.0) 83 (4, 187) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.1)
Wharton County 6 *** 366.9 (319.3, 419.2) 84 (19, 165) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 365.7 (264.4, 491.2) 85 (3, 194) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.6, 5.7)
Parker County 6 *** 365.5 (300.3, 439.3) 86 (9, 179) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Colorado County 6 *** 362.1 (281.2, 457.6) 87 (5, 189) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.7, 1.8)
Cameron County 6 *** 360.3 (350.9, 369.8) 88 (67, 114) 1,157 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.0, 0.0)
Hale County 6 *** 360.2 (314.3, 410.5) 89 (18, 165) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Brown County 6 *** 358.9 (289.7, 438.9) 90 (10, 185) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Zavala County 6 *** 358.8 (309.2, 414.0) 91 (20, 171) 39 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Frio County 6 *** 358.4 (313.1, 408.3) 92 (20, 172) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Travis County 6 *** 357.7 (345.1, 370.7) 93 (63, 124) 780 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Bexar County 6 *** 357.1 (351.5, 362.8) 94 (73, 113) 3,275 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Caldwell County 6 *** 355.8 (314.4, 401.0) 95 (29, 166) 58 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Kendall County 6 *** 355.1 (293.2, 425.6) 96 (13, 182) 26 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.5)
Midland County 6 *** 354.9 (327.0, 384.4) 97 (41, 151) 143 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Washington County 6 *** 354.8 (252.2, 482.0) 98 (3, 196) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.0, 5.2)
Hardin County 6 *** 353.8 (243.8, 494.9) 99 (3, 197) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.5, 3.7)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 353.5 (328.1, 380.3) 100 (49, 148) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Matagorda County 6 *** 353.2 (301.9, 410.2) 101 (22, 176) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Comal County 6 *** 353.1 (322.0, 386.3) 102 (37, 157) 103 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Ellis County 6 *** 353.0 (314.7, 394.4) 103 (31, 164) 82 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Brazos County 6 *** 352.1 (315.6, 391.3) 104 (35, 163) 88 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Williamson County 6 *** 350.9 (328.9, 373.9) 105 (52, 147) 245 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Willacy County 6 *** 350.5 (312.1, 392.1) 106 (30, 164) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Jones County 6 *** 348.7 (261.0, 454.7) 107 (7, 195) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.2)
Mason County 6 *** 347.8 (192.2, 575.7) 108 (1, 198) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.7, 6.2)
Ward County 6 *** 346.7 (276.6, 428.7) 109 (10, 190) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.6)
Hunt County 6 *** 346.3 (273.4, 430.5) 110 (10, 186) 24 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.7, 0.7)
Gonzales County 6 *** 345.1 (288.2, 409.5) 111 (17, 185) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Stephens County 6 *** 345.0 (209.8, 528.7) 112 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.5, 2.6)
Dallam County 6 *** 344.8 (228.0, 495.1) 113 (3, 198) 6 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.3, 1.0)
Pecos County 6 *** 344.3 (293.9, 400.7) 114 (22, 179) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Gaines County 6 *** 343.4 (270.9, 428.0) 115 (11, 189) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.9)
Lamb County 6 *** 341.7 (276.0, 417.9) 116 (16, 189) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Live Oak County 6 *** 341.2 (270.5, 424.8) 117 (14, 188) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.6)
Nueces County 6 *** 340.8 (329.5, 352.5) 118 (85, 139) 709 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Schleicher County 6 *** 340.5 (215.2, 510.9) 119 (2, 198) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.7, 4.8)
Atascosa County 6 *** 340.3 (310.0, 372.7) 120 (48, 166) 97 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Brazoria County 6 *** 339.2 (317.2, 362.2) 121 (64, 158) 215 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Gregg County 6 *** 337.9 (278.1, 405.5) 122 (20, 185) 33 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.4)
Scurry County 6 *** 337.5 (265.1, 422.7) 123 (12, 193) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
Jim Hogg County 6 *** 337.4 (268.4, 418.8) 124 (16, 191) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.6)
Comanche County 6 *** 337.2 (225.3, 480.7) 125 (3, 198) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -0.6)
Bowie County 6 *** 335.8 (231.5, 466.4) 126 (4, 198) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 1.2)
Reeves County 6 *** 335.5 (287.4, 389.3) 127 (34, 182) 35 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Dallas County 6 *** 335.5 (327.6, 343.5) 128 (96, 142) 1,846 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Webb County 6 *** 333.8 (322.3, 345.6) 129 (93, 151) 659 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Moore County 6 *** 333.4 (273.0, 402.3) 130 (17, 188) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.9)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 332.7 (326.0, 339.5) 131 (102, 144) 1,954 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Wilson County 6 *** 332.1 (294.2, 373.5) 132 (45, 175) 59 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Terry County 6 *** 330.5 (262.2, 410.4) 133 (14, 192) 18 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.8)
Orange County 6 *** 329.5 (252.1, 421.9) 134 (13, 195) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.8, -0.1)
Tarrant County 6 *** 328.6 (318.2, 339.1) 135 (102, 151) 992 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Harrison County 6 *** 328.4 (224.2, 458.7) 136 (2, 197) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.2, 4.6)
Zapata County 6 *** 327.7 (281.5, 379.2) 137 (33, 183) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Medina County 6 *** 326.3 (294.0, 361.3) 138 (63, 174) 78 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Brooks County 6 *** 325.7 (270.4, 389.5) 139 (28, 186) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.5)
Cherokee County 6 *** 324.5 (248.5, 414.0) 140 (14, 196) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.8)
Jasper County 6 *** 322.5 (175.4, 529.7) 141 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.0, 0.0)
Galveston County 6 *** 322.2 (299.9, 345.6) 142 (83, 169) 172 stable stable trend 3.3 (-6.3, 13.8)
Hansford County 6 *** 321.8 (189.4, 503.8) 143 (2, 198) 4
*
*
Harris County 6 *** 320.9 (315.7, 326.2) 144 (116, 153) 3,617 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Brewster County 6 *** 319.2 (247.1, 406.1) 145 (19, 196) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.5)
Austin County 6 *** 318.8 (241.6, 410.8) 146 (9, 196) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.0)
Smith County 6 *** 318.3 (278.5, 361.6) 147 (51, 183) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Collin County 6 *** 318.3 (297.5, 340.1) 148 (96, 168) 239 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
La Salle County 6 *** 315.7 (248.9, 394.4) 149 (23, 195) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.2)
Denton County 6 *** 313.8 (293.1, 335.5) 150 (96, 171) 241 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Real County 6 *** 312.7 (182.9, 509.3) 151 (2, 198) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.6, 7.5)
Grayson County 6 *** 311.5 (249.9, 382.3) 152 (24, 193) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.6)
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 310.5 (258.4, 369.4) 153 (36, 191) 28 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Upton County 6 *** 310.2 (193.6, 468.4) 154 (4, 198) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.1)
Cooke County 6 *** 309.6 (216.6, 424.9) 155 (8, 198) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.5)
Llano County 6 *** 307.3 (193.5, 461.4) 156 (4, 198) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.8, 0.3)
Burnet County 6 *** 305.2 (240.9, 380.2) 157 (25, 195) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.7)
Henderson County 6 *** 304.8 (233.7, 388.6) 158 (17, 196) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.7, 5.1)
San Saba County 6 *** 304.5 (181.0, 477.4) 159 (4, 198) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.4)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 302.7 (287.2, 318.7) 160 (125, 173) 344 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Kinney County 6 *** 301.2 (206.3, 425.4) 161 (7, 198) 7
*
*
Cochran County 6 *** 300.8 (185.5, 464.2) 162 (4, 198) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.7, 4.0)
Kerr County 6 *** 298.7 (251.8, 351.4) 163 (59, 193) 31 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Jefferson County 6 *** 297.3 (266.2, 330.8) 164 (100, 186) 81 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Wood County 6 *** 289.9 (198.4, 406.6) 165 (13, 198) 7
*
*
Waller County 6 *** 289.5 (227.7, 361.4) 166 (40, 195) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.2)
Rockwall County 6 *** 286.6 (227.4, 355.0) 167 (41, 196) 23 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Chambers County 6 *** 285.5 (194.6, 400.8) 168 (11, 198) 11 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.0, -2.0)
Madison County 6 *** 284.9 (164.8, 454.3) 169 (3, 198) 4
*
*
San Jacinto County 6 *** 284.7 (187.3, 411.6) 170 (14, 198) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.3, 5.6)
Bandera County 6 *** 280.1 (215.8, 359.1) 171 (31, 197) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 3.9)
Montgomery County 6 *** 279.5 (258.4, 301.8) 172 (137, 185) 181 stable stable trend 4.6 (-3.9, 13.9)
Childress County 6 *** 276.4 (158.0, 445.0) 173 (5, 198) 3
*
*
Leon County 6 *** 276.3 (155.7, 448.4) 174 (4, 198) 4
*
*
Crane County 6 *** 276.2 (181.0, 401.4) 175 (13, 198) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.4)
Wise County 6 *** 275.7 (213.0, 349.5) 176 (48, 197) 18 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 5.6)
Ochiltree County 6 *** 274.9 (192.2, 381.4) 177 (13, 198) 9
*
*
Andrews County 6 *** 271.7 (213.0, 340.7) 178 (64, 198) 17 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -0.8)
Grimes County 6 *** 271.0 (197.7, 360.8) 179 (39, 198) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.5)
Upshur County 6 *** 270.1 (166.0, 414.3) 180 (6, 198) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.4, 4.1)
Hudspeth County 6 *** 269.7 (193.0, 366.6) 181 (24, 198) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 5.9)
Castro County 6 *** 269.6 (196.4, 359.7) 182 (32, 198) 10 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.1, -2.0)
Fayette County 6 *** 269.0 (189.1, 368.7) 183 (30, 198) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.9, -0.2)
Hopkins County 6 *** 267.2 (179.2, 380.9) 184 (14, 198) 9 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.4, 0.7)
Gray County 6 *** 263.9 (180.4, 370.3) 185 (21, 198) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.3, 4.4)
Bosque County 6 *** 261.2 (169.8, 382.0) 186 (15, 198) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.0, 7.6)
Garza County 6 *** 258.3 (146.4, 415.0) 187 (5, 198) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.4, 4.5)
Erath County 6 *** 254.6 (180.7, 346.3) 188 (43, 198) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.3)
Parmer County 6 *** 249.9 (182.0, 333.4) 189 (45, 198) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 4.3)
Crockett County 6 *** 249.6 (168.3, 357.3) 190 (36, 198) 6
*
*
Liberty County 6 *** 246.4 (194.1, 307.5) 191 (107, 198) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.3)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 244.3 (167.7, 343.3) 192 (46, 198) 7 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.4, 0.6)
Navarro County 6 *** 238.8 (184.7, 302.5) 193 (103, 198) 16 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.8, -0.1)
Presidio County 6 *** 224.5 (177.6, 280.8) 194 (137, 198) 18 stable stable trend 5.1 (-4.7, 15.8)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 212.6 (156.5, 280.8) 195 (124, 198) 12 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.5, -2.5)
Titus County 6 *** 198.8 (144.4, 266.0) 196 (142, 198) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.2, 1.7)
Shelby County 6 *** 171.7 (88.2, 294.9) 197 (42, 198) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.1, 6.4)
Culberson County 6 *** 167.2 (95.4, 275.2) 198 (131, 198) 3 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.1, -3.8)
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2021 4:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top