State Cancer Profiles

Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Name

Explanation of Column Headers

Objective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.

Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:

• Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
• Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
• Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.

AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time

• Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
• Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.

Other Notes

• Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
• Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.

Line by Line Interpretation of the Report

Texas⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.7 to 97.0 and 17,757 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 0.2.

US (SEER+NPCR)¹

• Rate : The incidence rate is 106.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.3 to 106.7 and 208,914 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to -0.2.

Anderson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 74.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.8 to 87.0 and 31 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 190 (116, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 2.1.

Andrews County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.4 to 125.1 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 119 (5, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 2.8.

Angelina County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 92.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 81.2 to 105.0 and 49 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 139 (36, 183)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to -0.1.

Aransas County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.0 to 126.4 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 103 (7, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to 0.9.

Archer County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 74.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 43.1 to 118.6 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 189 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.2 to 2.0.

Atascosa County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 88.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.9 to 104.8 and 27 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 152 (36, 192)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 2.0.

Austin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 91.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.0 to 114.9 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 142 (12, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 1.7.

Bailey County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 78.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.6 to 127.7 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 180 (4, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to 3.0.

Bandera County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 91.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.3 to 121.1 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 143 (6, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.4 to 1.1.

Bastrop County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 99.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.7 to 112.7 and 51 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 96 (20, 168)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 1.3.

Bee County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 81.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.5 to 100.1 and 18 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 175 (42, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 4.0.

Bell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 106.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.9 to 112.5 and 231 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 59 (29, 122)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 0.6.

Bexar County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 98.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.8 to 100.7 and 1,256 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 100 (72, 130)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 0.1.

Blanco County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.9 to 137.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 127 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 4.6.

Bosque County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 114.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.7 to 149.9 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 30 (1, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 4.3.

Bowie County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 83.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.6 to 95.2 and 48 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 168 (70, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 1.3.

Brazoria County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 90.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 84.9 to 95.5 and 223 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 147 (90, 170)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 0.2.

Brazos County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 78.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.3 to 85.9 and 100 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 183 (128, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to -0.5.

Brewster County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.7 to 143.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 107 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 4.4.

Brooks County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 110.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.5 to 168.1 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 45 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Brown County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.3 to 117.8 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 105 (13, 189)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 1.4.

Burleson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.6 to 134.5 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 85 (3, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 4.8.

Burnet County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 109.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.0 to 129.6 and 27 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 47 (6, 170)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.1.

Caldwell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 86.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.4 to 104.5 and 22 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 158 (37, 194)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.6.

Calhoun County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 83.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.6 to 109.7 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 169 (19, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 4.5.

Callahan County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.1 to 130.9 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 124 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 3.4.

Cameron County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.5 to 100.3 and 245 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 123 (68, 159)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 1.7.

Camp County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 110.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.2 to 151.5 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 46 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 2.5.

Cass County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 126.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 102.7 to 152.9 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (1, 155)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.3 to 4.7.

Castro County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 87.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 51.6 to 137.2 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 155 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Chambers County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 105.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.8 to 123.8 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 63 (9, 178)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 1.7.

Cherokee County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 112.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.4 to 130.6 and 35 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 37 (6, 152)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 2.4.

Childress County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 78.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.0 to 128.7 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 181 (3, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 4.8.

Clay County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 104.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.8 to 150.1 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 67 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 5.4.

Coleman County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 49.7 to 133.2 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 166 (3, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 1.7.

Collin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 98.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.0 to 101.5 and 707 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 101 (70, 132)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 0.6.

Colorado County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.7 to 113.4 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 162 (14, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 1.1.

Comal County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.7 to 113.3 and 88 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 72 (24, 149)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 0.7.

Comanche County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 119.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.8 to 162.7 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (1, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 4.9.

Cooke County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 84.9 to 123.9 and 23 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 73 (8, 185)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 2.3.

Coryell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 86.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 75.4 to 98.6 and 46 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 159 (66, 189)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 1.8.

Crosby County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 120.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.0 to 188.5 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Dallam County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 111.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 70.9 to 164.9 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 41 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to 4.3.

Dallas County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.8 to 100.0 and 1,713 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 102 (76, 127)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 0.7.

Dawson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 68.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.4 to 101.5 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 195 (27, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.3 to 3.9.

DeWitt County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 107.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.7 to 137.3 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 54 (2, 190)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 1.8.

Deaf Smith County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.5 to 125.8 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 114 (7, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 1.1.

Delta County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 114.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.0 to 184.8 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 32 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Denton County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.7 to 99.7 and 584 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 111 (78, 144)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 0.7.

Dimmit County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 126.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.0 to 174.4 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (1, 192)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Duval County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 70.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.5 to 105.9 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 193 (21, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 1.9.

Eastland County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 70.5 to 129.3 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 108 (5, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 1.2.

Ector County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.5 to 110.8 and 101 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 86 (31, 155)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 0.2.

El Paso County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 97.0 to 104.8 and 530 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 89 (56, 126)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.2 to 1.0.

Ellis County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.0 to 108.8 and 112 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 95 (36, 159)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.3.

Erath County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.3 to 114.4 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 129 (19, 192)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 3.7.

Falls County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.7 to 131.5 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 93 (5, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 3.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.5 to 5.5.

Fannin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 125.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.4 to 148.6 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (2, 133)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.0 to 4.5.

Fayette County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.7 to 122.7 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 120 (8, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 0.4.

Floyd County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 102.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.4 to 163.6 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 78 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Fort Bend County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 91.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.3 to 95.6 and 496 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 141 (94, 158)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to -0.2.

Franklin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 132.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.1 to 182.8 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (1, 187)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 2.8.

Freestone County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.3 to 130.0 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 87 (6, 192)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 2.9.

Frio County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.1 to 129.1 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 94 (5, 193)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 3.8.

Gaines County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 91.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 68.0 to 118.7 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 144 (9, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 3.6.

Galveston County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.5 to 103.6 and 206 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 104 (55, 153)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 0.1.

Gillespie County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 111.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.8 to 141.3 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 39 (3, 188)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 3.0.

Goliad County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 105.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.2 to 161.7 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 61 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 5.9.

Gonzales County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.5 to 124.4 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 115 (6, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 3.4.

Gray County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.3 to 109.1 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 164 (23, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to 1.7.

Grayson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 104.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 94.2 to 115.0 and 80 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 68 (20, 147)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 1.4.

Gregg County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 124.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 113.4 to 136.8 and 91 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (4, 69)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 1.6.

Grimes County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 92.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.2 to 116.1 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 136 (15, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 3.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.3 to 6.5.

Guadalupe County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 99.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.7 to 107.9 and 104 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 98 (39, 158)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 0.5.

Hale County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.1 to 115.2 and 19 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 128 (12, 193)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 3.7.

Hamilton County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 129.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.1 to 188.1 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 6.1.

Hansford County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 106.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.8 to 170.6 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 57 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 1.5.

Hardeman County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 151.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.9 to 242.4 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hardin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 102.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.8 to 118.8 and 35 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 77 (11, 180)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 0.6.

Harris County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 90.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.4 to 92.4 and 2,875 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 145 (116, 155)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to -0.1.

Harrison County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 109.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.4 to 125.4 and 43 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 48 (9, 157)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 1.3.

Haskell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 146.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.0 to 221.5 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hays County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 93.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.3 to 101.2 and 127 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 131 (59, 167)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 0.0.

Henderson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 117.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 103.5 to 132.7 and 52 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (6, 127)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 2.4.

Hidalgo County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 81.3 to 88.4 and 458 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 163 (133, 175)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 1.3.

Hill County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 106.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.3 to 128.8 and 20 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 60 (6, 182)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 2.4.

Hockley County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 82.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.8 to 108.1 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 172 (17, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to 2.4.

Hood County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.5 to 118.5 and 30 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 88 (14, 178)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 1.8.

Hopkins County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 133.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 111.8 to 156.9 and 28 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 110)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 4.3.

Houston County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.0 to 129.3 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 81 (6, 193)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 3.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.6 to 5.8.

Howard County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 80.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.1 to 98.1 and 20 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 176 (51, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 3.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 9.2.

Hunt County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.9 to 112.7 and 57 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 92 (25, 166)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 1.5.

Hutchinson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 125.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.9 to 156.2 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (1, 166)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 1.6.

Jack County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 66.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 38.5 to 105.9 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 197 (11, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 4.1.

Jackson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 113.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.8 to 150.9 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 34 (1, 193)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to 3.1.

Jasper County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 120.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.8 to 144.6 and 24 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (3, 156)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -6.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.9 to 4.4.

Jefferson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 88.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.0 to 95.4 and 139 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 151 (93, 176)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 0.1.

Jim Wells County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 114.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.4 to 135.1 and 27 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 33 (5, 157)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 2.4.

Johnson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 107.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.9 to 116.9 and 113 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 53 (20, 130)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.2.

Jones County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 77.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 58.1 to 102.4 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 184 (29, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 4.1.

Karnes County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 70.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 48.7 to 98.7 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 194 (39, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 1.4.

Kaufman County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.3 to 112.2 and 83 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 80 (28, 155)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 2.1.

Kendall County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 88.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.8 to 106.1 and 23 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 153 (30, 194)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to 1.1.

Kerr County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 98.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 81.8 to 118.3 and 24 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 99 (12, 188)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 0.7.

Kleberg County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 112.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.1 to 138.0 and 19 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 38 (4, 177)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 2.2.

Lamar County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 109.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.8 to 128.3 and 31 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 50 (8, 166)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 2.1.

Lamb County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 79.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 52.8 to 113.8 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 179 (13, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 3.1.

Lampasas County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 123.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.4 to 154.8 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (1, 177)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 3.2.

Lavaca County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 90.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.2 to 119.9 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 146 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 2.8.

Lee County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 107.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.9 to 140.4 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 56 (3, 192)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 3.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 6.2.

Leon County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 87.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.1 to 119.8 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 156 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to 3.0.

Liberty County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 99.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.8 to 112.3 and 53 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 97 (24, 170)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 2.3.

Limestone County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.8 to 130.6 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 74 (5, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.5.

Live Oak County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 83.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.1 to 120.1 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 170 (8, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 6.5.

Llano County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.0 to 116.4 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 167 (10, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.6 to 0.9.

Lubbock County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.2 to 103.6 and 170 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 109 (54, 156)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to -0.4.

Lynn County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 118.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.9 to 185.9 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Madison County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 68.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.0 to 98.5 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 196 (32, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 5.9.

Marion County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 115.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.8 to 165.8 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 28 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to 3.7.

Martin County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 152.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.1 to 224.1 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 195)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Matagorda County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.7 to 123.3 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 84 (8, 188)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 3.5.

Maverick County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 89.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 75.8 to 104.6 and 32 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 149 (30, 192)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 2.8.

McCulloch County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 107.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.9 to 160.9 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 55 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.7 to 1.8.

McLennan County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 104.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 97.3 to 112.7 and 150 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 65 (30, 135)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.9.

Medina County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.1 to 110.8 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 130 (21, 188)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 3.4.

Midland County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 91.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 83.7 to 100.7 and 96 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 140 (60, 175)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 0.5.

Milam County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.0 to 128.7 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 83 (7, 193)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 2.7.

Mitchell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 78.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 48.4 to 120.2 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 182 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 6.3.

Montague County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 120.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.3 to 154.0 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (1, 182)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 3.0.

Montgomery County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 93.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.8 to 97.6 and 351 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 134 (80, 156)
• Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to -0.7.

Moore County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 110.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.3 to 139.0 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 42 (3, 190)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 4.0.

Morris County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 63.5 to 134.3 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 126 (3, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 4.3.

Nacogdoches County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 77.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.8 to 92.3 and 27 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 186 (79, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 1.0.

Navarro County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 84.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.6 to 101.0 and 23 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 165 (35, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 1.1.

Newton County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 102.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.4 to 139.4 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 76 (3, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 5.5.

Nolan County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 90.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 63.2 to 123.8 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 148 (5, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.3 to 1.0.

Nueces County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 97.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.4 to 103.2 and 214 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 106 (56, 151)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 0.1.

Ochiltree County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 92.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.4 to 133.8 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 137 (3, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.3 to 4.1.

Orange County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 102.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.0 to 115.4 and 52 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 79 (18, 164)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 0.3.

Palo Pinto County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 115.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.9 to 142.6 and 18 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (2, 177)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 4.1.

Panola County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 89.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.8 to 114.9 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 150 (14, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 2.4.

Parker County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 113.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 103.2 to 124.0 and 93 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 35 (11, 112)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.5 to 2.0.

Parmer County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 105.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.0 to 150.5 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 62 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 5.2.

Pecos County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 77.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.7 to 105.5 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 185 (25, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 3.4.

Polk County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 93.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.0 to 110.7 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 133 (21, 189)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 1.3.

Potter County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 111.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 100.9 to 122.6 and 84 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 40 (13, 126)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 2.0.

Rains County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 101.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 68.5 to 145.4 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 82 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 5.6.

Randall County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.9 to 113.9 and 86 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 69 (22, 149)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 0.3.

Red River County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 73.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.7 to 109.1 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 192 (19, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.1 to 1.4.

Reeves County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 75.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 54.0 to 102.1 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 187 (20, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Refugio County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.8 to 160.8 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 71 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 4.5.

Robertson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 92.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.0 to 124.7 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 138 (4, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 7.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 2.8 to 13.0.

Rockwall County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 102.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.2 to 114.2 and 69 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 75 (22, 156)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 0.8.

Runnels County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 86.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.0 to 127.9 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 160 (4, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 3.5.

Rusk County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 93.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.1 to 108.9 and 32 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 135 (26, 188)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 1.9.

Sabine County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 60.4 to 144.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 116 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

San Augustine County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 81.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.3 to 132.4 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 174 (3, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.9.

San Jacinto County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.6 to 119.1 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 125 (11, 195)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.8.

San Patricio County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 105.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.3 to 120.1 and 43 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 64 (13, 167)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 1.9.

Scurry County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.7 to 126.8 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 110 (3, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.4 to 2.4.

Shelby County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 74.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.9 to 96.3 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 191 (40, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.6.

Smith County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 103.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.9 to 111.5 and 140 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 70 (32, 143)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 0.8.

Somervell County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 85.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 53.1 to 128.9 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 161 (4, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 3.9.

Starr County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 114.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.9 to 131.0 and 44 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 29 (6, 148)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -9.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -21.9 to 4.6.

Stephens County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 116.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.1 to 165.4 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 3.9.

Sutton County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 161.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.0 to 255.7 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 196)
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Tarrant County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.3 to 103.1 and 1,374 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 90 (62, 119)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.2 to 0.5.

Taylor County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.1 to 106.3 and 74 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 117 (38, 173)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.0.

Terry County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 82.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.8 to 117.9 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 171 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 3.1.

Titus County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 82.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.9 to 102.1 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 173 (33, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 2.6.

Tom Green County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 84.8 to 106.4 and 64 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 121 (40, 178)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 1.5.

Travis County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 94.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.0 to 97.8 and 859 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 122 (85, 145)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 3.0.

Trinity County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 146.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 108.9 to 192.6 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 169)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 6.8.

Tyler County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 107.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.7 to 137.9 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 52 (3, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 4.4.

Upshur County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 110.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.0 to 131.3 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 43 (7, 172)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.0 to 1.6.

Uvalde County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 110.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.7 to 136.3 and 17 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 44 (4, 185)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.7.

Val Verde County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 106.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.0 to 124.6 and 31 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 58 (9, 175)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 2.7.

Van Zandt County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 113.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 97.1 to 131.2 and 36 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 36 (7, 156)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -7.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -22.8 to 10.3.

Victoria County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 114.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 101.8 to 128.3 and 60 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 31 (7, 126)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 1.5.

Walker County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 108.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.9 to 123.3 and 52 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 51 (10, 155)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 14.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.7 to 29.9.

Waller County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.2 to 114.0 and 27 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 112 (21, 189)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 2.6.

Ward County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 128.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.3 to 173.0 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (1, 190)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -19.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -35.7 to 0.8.

Washington County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 88.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.8 to 109.8 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 154 (21, 196)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.4 to 1.0.

Webb County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 79.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.5 to 85.5 and 140 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 178 (134, 190)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 0.7.

Wharton County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 95.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.8 to 115.2 and 23 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 118 (17, 190)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 2.5.

Wichita County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 116.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 105.8 to 128.2 and 88 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (9, 100)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 2.2.

Wilbarger County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 157.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 118.7 to 203.7 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 131)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 3.2.

Willacy County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 80.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.7 to 104.9 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 177 (23, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 4.7.

Williamson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 104.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 100.2 to 109.2 and 417 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 66 (41, 110)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.5.

Wilson County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 93.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.6 to 110.2 and 28 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 132 (24, 189)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 2.9.

Winkler County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 109.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 71.9 to 159.3 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 49 (1, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 4.2.

Wise County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 116.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 102.4 to 132.6 and 48 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (6, 130)
• Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.1 to 3.8.

Wood County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 96.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.3 to 116.5 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 113 (13, 191)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 1.7.

Yoakum County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 100.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.3 to 148.0 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 91 (2, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 5.6.

Young County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 126.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.9 to 161.4 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (1, 179)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 4.1.

Zapata County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 86.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 60.8 to 119.8 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 157 (9, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 3.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 8.3.

Zavala County⁷

• Rate : The incidence rate is 74.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 48.0 to 109.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
• CI*Rank⋔ : 188 (14, 197)
• Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 2.6.

Armstrong County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Baylor County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Borden County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Briscoe County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Carson County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Cochran County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Coke County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Collingsworth County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Concho County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Cottle County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Crane County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Crockett County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Culberson County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Dickens County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Donley County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Edwards County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Fisher County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Foard County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Garza County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Glasscock County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hall County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hartley County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hemphill County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Hudspeth County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Irion County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Jeff Davis County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Jim Hogg County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Kenedy County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Kent County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Kimble County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

King County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Kinney County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Knox County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

La Salle County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Lipscomb County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Loving County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Mason County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

McMullen County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Menard County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Mills County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Motley County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Oldham County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Presidio County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Reagan County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Real County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Roberts County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

San Saba County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Schleicher County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Shackelford County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Sherman County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Sterling County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Stonewall County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Swisher County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Terrell County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Texas⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Throckmorton County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Upton County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Wheeler County⁷

• Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
• CI*Rank⋔ : *
• Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/07/2023 3:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Armstrong, Baylor, Borden, Briscoe, Carson, Cochran, Coke, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Culberson, Dickens, Donley, Edwards, Fisher, Foard, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Kent, Kimble, King, Kinney, Knox, La Salle, Lipscomb, Loving, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Mills, Motley, Oldham, Presidio, Reagan, Real, Roberts, San Saba, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Swisher, Terrell, Texas, Throckmorton, Upton, Wheeler

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.