Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6,8 *** 95.4 (94.7, 96.0) 16,782 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 *** 105.4 (105.2, 105.6) 208,732 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Harris County 6,8 *** 91.7 (90.2, 93.2) 2,780 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.1)
Dallas County 6,8 *** 98.3 (96.2, 100.5) 1,666 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Tarrant County 6,8 *** 101.2 (98.7, 103.6) 1,326 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
Bexar County 6,8 *** 99.6 (97.1, 102.1) 1,210 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Travis County 6,8 *** 92.1 (89.2, 95.1) 781 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Collin County 6,8 *** 98.7 (95.3, 102.1) 658 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Denton County 6,8 *** 93.8 (90.2, 97.4) 525 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
El Paso County 6,8 *** 94.9 (91.1, 98.8) 493 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Fort Bend County 6,8 *** 90.4 (86.7, 94.2) 445 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Hidalgo County 6,8 *** 81.8 (78.3, 85.4) 425 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Williamson County 6,8 *** 101.2 (96.6, 106.0) 366 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Montgomery County 6,8 *** 87.9 (83.6, 92.5) 306 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Bell County 6,8 *** 114.4 (107.8, 121.2) 236 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Cameron County 6,8 *** 92.9 (87.6, 98.4) 235 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.9)
Nueces County 6,8 *** 96.4 (90.6, 102.5) 207 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Brazoria County 6,8 *** 86.4 (81.1, 91.9) 201 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Galveston County 6,8 *** 92.7 (86.8, 98.9) 186 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Lubbock County 6,8 *** 100.2 (93.4, 107.4) 168 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
McLennan County 6,8 *** 95.6 (88.3, 103.3) 133 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Webb County 6,8 *** 77.8 (71.9, 84.0) 132 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Jefferson County 6,8 *** 84.7 (78.3, 91.5) 131 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Smith County 6,8 *** 98.7 (91.2, 106.7) 129 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Hays County 6,8 *** 91.1 (83.5, 99.1) 109 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Ellis County 6,8 *** 101.1 (92.6, 110.1) 105 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Johnson County 6,8 *** 105.1 (96.2, 114.5) 105 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Guadalupe County 6,8 *** 99.8 (91.2, 109.0) 99 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Brazos County 6,8 *** 83.3 (75.8, 91.4) 96 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Midland County 6,8 *** 97.4 (88.6, 106.8) 94 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Ector County 6,8 *** 100.2 (91.1, 109.9) 93 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Gregg County 6,8 *** 120.2 (109.1, 132.2) 87 stable stable trend 5.7 (-0.5, 12.2)
Grayson County 6,8 *** 114.0 (103.2, 125.6) 83 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.4)
Kaufman County 6,8 *** 110.8 (100.3, 122.0) 83 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.2)
Parker County 6,8 *** 107.8 (97.6, 118.8) 83 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Randall County 6,8 *** 103.5 (93.6, 114.1) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Comal County 6,8 *** 106.4 (96.2, 117.3) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Wichita County 6,8 *** 107.7 (97.2, 118.9) 80 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Potter County 6,8 *** 97.2 (87.4, 107.7) 73 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Taylor County 6,8 *** 95.8 (85.9, 106.5) 71 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Hunt County 6,8 *** 117.2 (104.5, 131.0) 63 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
Rockwall County 6,8 *** 101.6 (90.5, 113.7) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Tom Green County 6,8 *** 91.1 (80.8, 102.3) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Victoria County 6,8 *** 107.0 (94.7, 120.4) 56 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Henderson County 6,8 *** 126.7 (112.1, 142.7) 55 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.6)
Bowie County 6,8 *** 92.5 (81.6, 104.4) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Starr County 6,8 *** 136.3 (120.0, 154.1) 52 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.8, 8.0)
Coryell County 6,8 *** 97.8 (86.0, 110.9) 51 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.2)
Angelina County 6,8 *** 94.5 (83.0, 107.1) 49 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.8, -0.7)
Orange County 6,8 *** 94.7 (82.9, 107.7) 47 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.6)
Liberty County 6,8 *** 88.7 (77.4, 101.1) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.9)
Wise County 6,8 *** 113.3 (98.7, 129.5) 44 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.2, 5.2)
Bastrop County 6,8 *** 87.4 (75.9, 100.0) 42 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Walker County 6,8 *** 87.0 (75.2, 100.1) 41 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Van Zandt County 6,8 *** 123.8 (106.6, 143.0) 37 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.0, 5.1)
San Patricio County 6,8 *** 92.9 (79.9, 107.3) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.1)
Harrison County 6,8 *** 95.1 (81.8, 109.9) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Hardin County 6,8 *** 100.1 (85.5, 116.4) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Cherokee County 6,8 *** 108.2 (92.1, 126.2) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Rusk County 6,8 *** 96.7 (82.3, 113.0) 32 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Maverick County 6,8 *** 88.3 (74.7, 103.5) 31 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.3)
Nacogdoches County 6,8 *** 87.3 (73.6, 102.7) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Hopkins County 6,8 *** 143.5 (121.2, 168.6) 30 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.3)
Lamar County 6,8 *** 105.0 (88.7, 123.4) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Anderson County 6,8 *** 68.7 (57.8, 81.2) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Wilson County 6,8 *** 98.4 (82.8, 116.0) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.8)
Hood County 6,8 *** 98.5 (82.6, 116.4) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.7)
Val Verde County 6,8 *** 95.9 (80.4, 113.5) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Jim Wells County 6,8 *** 111.4 (92.9, 132.3) 26 stable stable trend 10.2 (-0.3, 21.8)
Medina County 6,8 *** 89.0 (74.2, 105.8) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.0)
Polk County 6,8 *** 95.2 (79.5, 113.2) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Jasper County 6,8 *** 127.6 (105.9, 152.3) 25 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.1, 4.6)
Kerr County 6,8 *** 100.9 (83.6, 120.7) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Fannin County 6,8 *** 119.6 (99.1, 143.1) 24 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 5.6)
Wharton County 6,8 *** 101.6 (84.1, 121.6) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Chambers County 6,8 *** 91.4 (75.6, 109.3) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Caldwell County 6,8 *** 96.0 (79.4, 115.0) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.5)
Cooke County 6,8 *** 110.7 (91.5, 132.7) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Atascosa County 6,8 *** 82.3 (68.0, 98.7) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Waller County 6,8 *** 86.8 (71.2, 104.6) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Kendall County 6,8 *** 98.6 (81.2, 118.5) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6)
Burnet County 6,8 *** 94.9 (78.1, 114.1) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Upshur County 6,8 *** 97.5 (80.0, 117.6) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
Navarro County 6,8 *** 78.7 (64.4, 95.1) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Brown County 6,8 *** 99.0 (80.8, 120.0) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Cass County 6,8 *** 119.7 (96.9, 146.1) 19 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.0, 6.9)
Erath County 6,8 *** 89.1 (71.7, 109.3) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 4.7)
Hill County 6,8 *** 100.3 (80.9, 122.9) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.8)
Wood County 6,8 *** 90.8 (73.2, 111.2) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
Howard County 6,8 *** 76.3 (61.4, 93.7) 19 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.4, -1.4)
Matagorda County 6,8 *** 92.4 (74.4, 113.3) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Hale County 6,8 *** 84.8 (67.5, 105.0) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.5)
Uvalde County 6,8 *** 114.3 (91.1, 141.3) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.8)
Bee County 6,8 *** 72.0 (57.0, 89.7) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 5.9)
Lampasas County 6,8 *** 135.6 (107.4, 168.8) 16 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Houston County 6,8 *** 117.5 (92.8, 146.9) 16 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 7.5)
Kleberg County 6,8 *** 95.2 (74.8, 119.2) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 3.1)
Titus County 6,8 *** 79.5 (62.7, 99.3) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 3.0)
Washington County 6,8 *** 83.3 (65.4, 104.4) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.3)
Palo Pinto County 6,8 *** 95.3 (74.6, 119.9) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.2)
Grimes County 6,8 *** 88.0 (68.7, 111.1) 14 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 6.8)
Milam County 6,8 *** 106.9 (83.4, 134.9) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.9)
Austin County 6,8 *** 84.5 (65.5, 107.1) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.5)
Gillespie County 6,8 *** 111.4 (85.9, 142.1) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.9)
San Jacinto County 6,8 *** 90.1 (69.4, 114.9) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Gray County 6,8 *** 90.7 (69.8, 115.9) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.4)
Hutchinson County 6,8 *** 103.8 (79.7, 132.8) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.5)
Aransas County 6,8 *** 102.4 (78.4, 131.5) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.6)
Moore County 6,8 *** 94.1 (71.9, 120.6) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.8)
Lavaca County 6,8 *** 119.5 (91.3, 153.6) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Limestone County 6,8 *** 92.0 (70.2, 118.2) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.7)
Montague County 6,8 *** 115.2 (88.0, 148.1) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.8)
Fayette County 6,8 *** 95.8 (73.0, 123.3) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.4)
DeWitt County 6,8 *** 96.4 (73.2, 124.8) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.7)
Shelby County 6,8 *** 77.2 (58.6, 99.8) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Panola County 6,8 *** 87.5 (66.2, 113.3) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.0)
Falls County 6,8 *** 107.4 (80.9, 139.7) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.4, 5.7)
Young County 6,8 *** 111.0 (83.7, 144.1) 11 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 7.4)
Freestone County 6,8 *** 93.1 (70.1, 121.2) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 3.0)
Gaines County 6,8 *** 96.6 (72.3, 126.0) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.6)
Frio County 6,8 *** 97.9 (73.3, 127.8) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.4)
Jackson County 6,8 *** 137.5 (103.2, 179.2) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.6, 6.0)
Calhoun County 6,8 *** 86.9 (64.9, 113.6) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.2)
Willacy County 6,8 *** 78.2 (58.3, 102.5) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.3, 5.5)
Gonzales County 6,8 *** 89.0 (66.3, 116.7) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Wilbarger County 6,8 *** 148.9 (110.9, 195.4) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.2)
Bandera County 6,8 *** 94.8 (69.6, 126.2) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Bosque County 6,8 *** 107.4 (79.0, 142.5) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 6.6)
Andrews County 6,8 *** 87.5 (63.7, 116.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 3.7)
Deaf Smith County 6,8 *** 84.8 (61.9, 112.9) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.1)
Hockley County 6,8 *** 71.1 (51.6, 95.2) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 2.0)
Trinity County 6,8 *** 129.4 (94.2, 173.2) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.1, 8.8)
Colorado County 6,8 *** 80.6 (58.4, 108.2) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.6)
Lee County 6,8 *** 93.2 (67.6, 125.1) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 7.4)
Ward County 6,8 *** 133.5 (96.5, 179.4) 9 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.5, 8.2)
Newton County 6,8 *** 106.0 (76.5, 143.0) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 6.2)
Eastland County 6,8 *** 92.2 (66.3, 124.5) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.4)
Robertson County 6,8 *** 88.8 (63.3, 120.9) 8 rising rising trend 10.6 (4.5, 17.0)
Tyler County 6,8 *** 68.2 (48.6, 92.8) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Callahan County 6,8 *** 103.6 (73.6, 141.7) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.4, 5.3)
Pecos County 6,8 *** 74.5 (52.9, 101.9) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 5.9)
Comanche County 6,8 *** 113.3 (79.9, 155.7) 8 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.4, 8.6)
Jones County 6,8 *** 57.2 (40.2, 79.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.5)
Scurry County 6,8 *** 72.7 (51.3, 99.8) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.7)
Burleson County 6,8 *** 81.0 (56.8, 111.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.7)
Llano County 6,8 *** 89.8 (62.9, 124.3) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 2.5)
Madison County 6,8 *** 86.6 (60.6, 119.7) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 6.6)
Nolan County 6,8 *** 87.6 (61.2, 121.1) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Camp County 6,8 *** 95.9 (66.1, 134.0) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.2)
Dimmit County 6 *** 112.2 (77.5, 156.7) 7
*
*
Franklin County 6,8 *** 119.0 (81.6, 167.2) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.6, 6.8)
Reeves County 6 *** 62.4 (42.7, 88.0) 7
*
*
Morris County 6,8 *** 102.9 (70.3, 144.9) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.6, 5.9)
Clay County 6,8 *** 108.6 (73.5, 154.6) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.1, 7.2)
Dawson County 6,8 *** 86.6 (58.5, 122.7) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 3.9)
Karnes County 6,8 *** 68.0 (46.1, 96.4) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.6, 4.7)
Leon County 6,8 *** 76.5 (51.9, 108.4) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.9)
Blanco County 6,8 *** 109.9 (73.9, 157.2) 6 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.3, 10.0)
Lamb County 6,8 *** 80.7 (54.1, 115.2) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.6)
Rains County 6,8 *** 107.2 (72.1, 153.2) 6 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.1, 8.2)
Sabine County 6 *** 123.5 (82.9, 177.0) 6
*
*
Red River County 6,8 *** 88.8 (59.3, 127.8) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.6, 2.9)
Winkler County 6,8 *** 126.6 (84.4, 181.6) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 4.8)
Ochiltree County 6,8 *** 90.8 (60.1, 130.9) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 4.3)
Dallam County 6,8 *** 126.6 (83.2, 183.6) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.3, 7.2)
Runnels County 6,8 *** 98.7 (64.8, 143.5) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.2)
Stephens County 6,8 *** 104.1 (68.5, 151.5) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.8, 5.7)
Parmer County 6,8 *** 92.0 (59.8, 134.5) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.2, 8.5)
Terry County 6,8 *** 72.1 (46.7, 105.8) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.9, 4.2)
Crosby County 6 *** 164.1 (105.8, 241.6) 5
*
*
Duval County 6,8 *** 73.4 (47.3, 108.5) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 3.1)
Live Oak County 6,8 *** 75.9 (49.0, 111.9) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.4, 8.5)
Zapata County 6,8 *** 57.5 (37.0, 84.8) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.4, 6.3)
Zavala County 6,8 *** 72.3 (46.1, 107.2) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.4)
Hamilton County 6,8 *** 109.3 (69.2, 164.1) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.7, 6.2)
Bailey County 6,8 *** 106.8 (66.4, 161.8) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-5.0, 8.8)
Marion County 6,8 *** 87.9 (54.8, 133.6) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.1)
McCulloch County 6,8 *** 98.6 (60.8, 150.7) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.9, 2.0)
Refugio County 6,8 *** 112.6 (69.4, 171.9) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 7.3)
Somervell County 6,8 *** 81.4 (50.2, 124.7) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.6, 6.2)
Brewster County 6,8 *** 82.4 (50.3, 127.1) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.5)
Goliad County 6,8 *** 99.8 (60.6, 154.5) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 8.1)
Childress County 6,8 *** 83.0 (47.9, 132.9) 4 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.2, 9.1)
Wheeler County 6,8 *** 124.0 (73.4, 194.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.3, 4.9)
Jack County 6,8 *** 62.2 (35.9, 99.9) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-7.3, 6.2)
Martin County 6,8 *** 108.1 (62.5, 172.3) 3 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.4, 8.3)
Yoakum County 6,8 *** 76.7 (44.4, 121.8) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.0, 4.9)
Coleman County 6,8 *** 74.8 (42.6, 121.6) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.8)
Mitchell County 6,8 *** 57.7 (32.8, 93.9) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.9, 7.7)
San Augustine County 6,8 *** 81.1 (46.0, 131.8) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.6)
Sutton County 6 *** 136.4 (77.3, 222.1) 3
*
*
Archer County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/30/2020 10:06 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top