Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 97.6 (96.9, 98.2) N/A 18,417 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Fisher County 7 Rural 213.4 (129.8, 329.4) 1 (1, 185) 4
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural 151.6 (94.7, 229.9) 2 (1, 195) 4
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural 140.6 (99.7, 192.1) 3 (1, 183) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
Camp County 7 Rural 140.0 (101.9, 186.9) 4 (1, 179) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.6)
Castro County 7 Rural 136.6 (89.8, 197.8) 5 (1, 193) 5
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban 135.4 (83.2, 206.4) 6 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban 131.3 (82.2, 198.9) 7 (1, 194) 4
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural 130.5 (83.9, 192.2) 8 (1, 194) 5
*
*
Gillespie County 7 Rural 129.6 (103.0, 160.9) 9 (1, 161) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.5)
Jasper County 7 Rural 128.3 (106.1, 153.7) 10 (1, 142) 24 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.2, 5.6)
Yoakum County 7 Rural 126.7 (84.7, 181.3) 11 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 6.4)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 126.3 (82.3, 184.7) 12 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 6.8)
Trinity County 7 Rural 126.0 (90.6, 170.3) 13 (1, 189) 8 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 7.7)
Limestone County 7 Rural 125.5 (98.9, 156.8) 14 (2, 175) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 2.9)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 124.1 (99.3, 152.9) 15 (2, 173) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 2.9)
Young County 7 Rural 124.0 (94.7, 159.2) 16 (1, 179) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.1)
Crane County 7 Rural 123.5 (73.0, 194.6) 17 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 5.1)
Marion County 7 Rural 122.2 (82.3, 174.9) 18 (1, 194) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 4.6)
Upshur County 7 Urban 122.1 (102.7, 144.1) 19 (3, 153) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 121.8 (89.3, 162.0) 20 (1, 188) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.8)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 120.7 (100.6, 143.6) 21 (2, 154) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Gregg County 7 Urban 120.6 (109.4, 132.5) 22 (7, 96) 87 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 1.8)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 120.0 (96.4, 147.4) 23 (2, 175) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.1)
Polk County 7 Rural 119.2 (101.8, 138.8) 24 (4, 151) 34 rising rising trend 12.9 (0.7, 23.1)
Dimmit County 7 Rural 118.6 (79.8, 168.9) 25 (1, 194) 6
*
*
Burleson County 7 Urban 118.5 (89.1, 154.2) 26 (2, 187) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 6.8)
Cass County 7 Rural 117.8 (94.9, 144.6) 27 (2, 177) 18 stable stable trend -7.4 (-22.4, 4.4)
Moore County 7 Rural 117.6 (92.6, 146.8) 28 (2, 180) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.7)
Hill County 7 Rural 117.5 (96.9, 141.2) 29 (3, 170) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Ward County 7 Rural 117.1 (83.3, 159.4) 30 (1, 190) 8 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 5.7)
Frio County 7 Rural 116.6 (89.3, 149.3) 31 (1, 186) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.7, 5.5)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 115.9 (74.1, 172.4) 32 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 3.1)
Aransas County 7 Urban 115.9 (90.0, 146.8) 33 (2, 184) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 2.6)
Floyd County 7 Rural 115.5 (68.3, 182.2) 34 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Lampasas County 7 Urban 115.2 (89.7, 145.6) 35 (2, 187) 14 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.7)
Somervell County 7 Rural 115.1 (78.1, 163.6) 36 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 6.6)
Parker County 7 Urban 115.1 (105.4, 125.5) 37 (12, 112) 103 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.1)
Delta County 7 Rural 114.3 (65.2, 185.0) 38 (1, 196) 3
*
*
Matagorda County 7 Rural 113.8 (93.7, 136.7) 39 (3, 177) 23 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.6)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 113.4 (88.4, 143.3) 40 (2, 184) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 1.9)
Runnels County 7 Rural 113.2 (76.2, 161.4) 41 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.2)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 113.0 (96.0, 132.0) 42 (6, 164) 32 stable stable trend 4.0 (-8.8, 16.3)
Chambers County 7 Urban 112.6 (96.3, 130.8) 43 (7, 166) 34 rising rising trend 8.5 (1.8, 18.3)
Newton County 7 Rural 112.3 (79.2, 154.6) 44 (1, 194) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 7.0)
Tyler County 7 Rural 111.8 (85.2, 144.0) 45 (3, 187) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.2)
Henderson County 7 Rural 111.8 (98.2, 126.7) 46 (11, 152) 49 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5)
Walker County 7 Rural 111.8 (99.0, 125.7) 47 (9, 149) 58 rising rising trend 12.8 (4.9, 25.3)
Wichita County 7 Urban 111.7 (101.2, 123.0) 48 (15, 137) 85 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.2)
Taylor County 7 Urban 111.4 (101.0, 122.5) 49 (14, 136) 88 rising rising trend 8.8 (0.6, 13.3)
Eastland County 7 Rural 111.4 (82.9, 146.2) 50 (2, 189) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.3)
Cooke County 7 Rural 111.1 (92.6, 132.3) 51 (6, 177) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.4)
Bosque County 7 Urban 111.1 (82.9, 145.8) 52 (2, 192) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.3)
Burnet County 7 Rural 111.0 (93.6, 130.8) 53 (6, 173) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.4)
Wilson County 7 Urban 110.7 (94.6, 128.8) 54 (8, 169) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0)
Victoria County 7 Urban 110.5 (98.0, 124.0) 55 (11, 152) 58 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Waller County 7 Urban 110.3 (93.7, 128.9) 56 (7, 177) 33 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Zavala County 7 Rural 110.0 (74.8, 155.1) 57 (1, 195) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.8)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 109.8 (96.1, 124.9) 58 (10, 158) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 109.7 (86.8, 136.6) 59 (4, 184) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 109.6 (91.3, 130.5) 60 (5, 176) 25 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Kendall County 7 Urban 109.3 (92.0, 129.0) 61 (5, 173) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Fannin County 7 Rural 109.3 (90.5, 130.9) 62 (7, 179) 24 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.8, 4.4)
Hansford County 7 Rural 109.0 (62.9, 174.4) 63 (1, 196) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.6)
Andrews County 7 Rural 108.8 (83.4, 139.3) 64 (3, 191) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.3)
Kerr County 7 Rural 108.4 (90.7, 128.5) 65 (6, 181) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 108.4 (92.4, 126.3) 66 (9, 174) 33 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.6)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 107.9 (92.6, 124.9) 67 (12, 177) 36 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.6)
Ector County 7 Urban 107.7 (98.8, 117.2) 68 (20, 143) 111 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.3, 9.7)
Hood County 7 Rural 107.6 (91.8, 125.2) 69 (8, 172) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Goliad County 7 Urban 107.1 (65.3, 165.4) 70 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.6)
Montague County 7 Rural 106.9 (80.6, 138.8) 71 (3, 191) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.9)
Morris County 7 Rural 106.7 (73.8, 148.9) 72 (2, 194) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.2)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 106.6 (81.0, 137.4) 73 (3, 190) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Potter County 7 Urban 106.1 (95.9, 117.1) 74 (22, 152) 80 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 105.8 (89.9, 123.6) 75 (9, 176) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Dallam County 7 Rural 105.7 (65.7, 159.5) 76 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.4)
Hardin County 7 Urban 105.6 (90.6, 122.4) 77 (11, 171) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Fayette County 7 Rural 105.5 (81.3, 134.5) 78 (3, 191) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.4)
Archer County 7 Urban 105.1 (67.2, 156.1) 79 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 2.4)
Bell County 7 Urban 104.7 (98.8, 110.9) 80 (37, 130) 239 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Wise County 7 Urban 104.6 (91.2, 119.4) 81 (16, 170) 44 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.7)
Smith County 7 Urban 104.3 (96.7, 112.3) 82 (33, 144) 143 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.8)
Clay County 7 Urban 104.2 (69.2, 150.8) 83 (2, 196) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.1, 5.6)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 104.2 (93.5, 115.7) 84 (22, 164) 72 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.7)
Williamson County 7 Urban 104.1 (99.9, 108.5) 85 (48, 126) 449 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Red River County 7 Rural 104.1 (71.0, 147.1) 86 (2, 196) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 2.7)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 103.9 (93.7, 115.0) 87 (23, 162) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 103.8 (79.2, 133.5) 88 (5, 191) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Randall County 7 Urban 103.7 (94.3, 113.8) 89 (27, 159) 90 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Lamar County 7 Rural 103.6 (87.2, 122.0) 90 (10, 179) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Grimes County 7 Rural 103.4 (83.0, 127.3) 91 (6, 190) 18 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.5, 6.3)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 103.2 (91.7, 115.7) 92 (22, 166) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Panola County 7 Rural 102.6 (79.3, 130.5) 93 (5, 192) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.4)
Galveston County 7 Urban 102.5 (96.6, 108.7) 94 (43, 142) 226 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.4, 7.1)
Wood County 7 Rural 102.3 (84.1, 123.2) 95 (9, 186) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Johnson County 7 Urban 102.1 (93.8, 110.8) 96 (34, 159) 114 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Sabine County 7 Rural 102.0 (64.5, 153.3) 97 (1, 196) 5
*
*
Orange County 7 Urban 101.2 (89.2, 114.3) 98 (21, 171) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Callahan County 7 Urban 101.2 (71.9, 138.3) 99 (3, 194) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 4.2)
Jackson County 7 Rural 101.1 (72.7, 136.5) 100 (3, 194) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.2)
McLennan County 7 Urban 100.9 (93.7, 108.5) 101 (46, 156) 150 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Bexar County 7 Urban 100.9 (98.5, 103.4) 102 (69, 124) 1,327 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Liberty County 7 Urban 100.6 (89.1, 113.0) 103 (29, 173) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Navarro County 7 Rural 100.4 (84.7, 118.1) 104 (12, 182) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.8)
Comanche County 7 Rural 100.4 (69.7, 139.5) 105 (3, 196) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.0)
Hockley County 7 Urban 100.3 (77.0, 128.1) 106 (4, 191) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.0)
Denton County 7 Urban 100.1 (96.7, 103.6) 107 (68, 135) 644 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.9)
Brown County 7 Rural 100.1 (82.2, 120.7) 108 (13, 186) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Austin County 7 Urban 100.0 (79.7, 123.8) 109 (8, 190) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.5)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 99.9 (97.6, 102.3) 110 (75, 132) 1,386 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 99.7 (93.2, 106.6) 111 (49, 154) 180 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 99.4 (90.5, 108.9) 112 (35, 164) 93 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Hunt County 7 Urban 99.2 (88.1, 111.3) 113 (28, 174) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 99.2 (67.7, 140.0) 114 (3, 196) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 5.8)
Lee County 7 Rural 99.1 (73.3, 130.9) 115 (6, 193) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.0)
El Paso County 7 Urban 99.1 (95.3, 102.9) 116 (71, 141) 537 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Nueces County 7 Urban 98.6 (92.8, 104.7) 117 (60, 156) 215 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Dallas County 7 Urban 98.6 (96.5, 100.7) 118 (83, 135) 1,717 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Grayson County 7 Urban 98.5 (88.9, 108.8) 119 (38, 170) 78 stable stable trend -5.2 (-12.9, 0.3)
Ellis County 7 Urban 98.3 (90.6, 106.5) 120 (49, 164) 120 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Harrison County 7 Urban 97.9 (84.6, 112.7) 121 (25, 180) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.0)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 97.6 (77.1, 121.6) 122 (11, 190) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.6)
Milam County 7 Rural 97.5 (75.5, 123.9) 123 (9, 192) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.6)
Comal County 7 Urban 97.2 (88.5, 106.6) 124 (47, 169) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Starr County 7 Rural 97.1 (83.6, 112.1) 125 (20, 181) 38 stable stable trend -5.5 (-17.3, 2.3)
Midland County 7 Urban 97.1 (88.8, 106.0) 126 (50, 168) 104 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Duval County 7 Rural 96.8 (64.0, 139.8) 127 (2, 196) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-5.0, 15.2)
Angelina County 7 Rural 96.8 (85.1, 109.6) 128 (31, 179) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-8.2, -0.4)
Colorado County 7 Rural 96.7 (71.2, 128.0) 129 (5, 195) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 1.9)
Bandera County 7 Urban 96.6 (71.3, 128.1) 130 (5, 194) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Leon County 7 Rural 96.6 (68.6, 131.9) 131 (3, 195) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.4)
Wharton County 7 Rural 96.4 (79.4, 116.0) 132 (18, 188) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-19.3, 2.6)
Collin County 7 Urban 96.2 (93.1, 99.4) 133 (89, 150) 733 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.6)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 95.7 (91.4, 100.0) 134 (80, 156) 382 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.8)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 95.2 (56.2, 150.3) 135 (2, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 2.9)
Travis County 7 Urban 95.1 (92.4, 98.0) 136 (95, 153) 904 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 94.5 (71.0, 123.0) 137 (8, 193) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 4.6)
Llano County 7 Rural 94.4 (67.9, 128.0) 138 (5, 195) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Bowie County 7 Urban 94.4 (83.4, 106.4) 139 (42, 181) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.4)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 94.4 (89.1, 99.9) 140 (82, 164) 239 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Washington County 7 Rural 94.1 (75.1, 116.2) 141 (17, 192) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.3)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 93.6 (85.7, 101.9) 142 (67, 173) 106 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.5, -0.2)
Rains County 7 Rural 93.3 (62.4, 134.0) 143 (3, 196) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.8)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 93.1 (89.6, 96.7) 144 (99, 162) 530 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Medina County 7 Urban 93.1 (78.2, 109.8) 145 (27, 187) 28 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Harris County 7 Urban 92.6 (91.1, 94.1) 146 (119, 155) 2,960 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Cameron County 7 Urban 92.1 (86.9, 97.6) 147 (91, 171) 236 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
Titus County 7 Rural 92.0 (73.4, 113.7) 148 (18, 192) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Scurry County 7 Rural 92.0 (67.9, 121.6) 149 (9, 194) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.2)
Gray County 7 Rural 91.5 (69.8, 117.8) 150 (12, 194) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Refugio County 7 Rural 91.3 (51.9, 147.9) 151 (2, 196) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 3.6)
Robertson County 7 Urban 91.1 (65.6, 122.9) 152 (5, 196) 8 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.7, 12.9)
Zapata County 7 Rural 90.8 (63.6, 125.1) 153 (6, 196) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.6, 8.3)
Bee County 7 Rural 90.5 (73.5, 110.3) 154 (24, 192) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.6)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 90.3 (86.8, 94.0) 155 (117, 168) 493 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.9, 3.5)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 89.5 (83.0, 96.4) 156 (96, 178) 143 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Freestone County 7 Rural 89.4 (67.1, 116.9) 157 (9, 195) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.3)
Jones County 7 Urban 89.4 (68.4, 115.0) 158 (17, 194) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.8)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 89.3 (66.0, 117.8) 159 (9, 195) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.7)
Gaines County 7 Rural 89.2 (67.4, 115.5) 160 (11, 195) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.8)
Dawson County 7 Rural 88.7 (60.1, 125.4) 161 (5, 196) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.4)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 88.6 (74.9, 104.1) 162 (37, 189) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.4)
Rusk County 7 Urban 88.2 (74.4, 103.8) 163 (42, 190) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.8)
Hays County 7 Urban 87.9 (81.3, 94.9) 164 (100, 180) 134 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Childress County 7 Rural 87.8 (50.5, 141.0) 165 (2, 196) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 5.9)
Swisher County 7 Rural 86.5 (50.1, 138.0) 166 (2, 196) 3
*
*
Houston County 7 Rural 86.4 (65.5, 111.8) 167 (17, 195) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 6.0)
Brazos County 7 Urban 85.7 (78.4, 93.4) 168 (109, 185) 111 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Stephens County 7 Rural 85.5 (53.4, 129.3) 169 (4, 196) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.0)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 85.4 (61.9, 114.5) 170 (13, 195) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Coryell County 7 Urban 83.8 (73.3, 95.4) 171 (90, 190) 47 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Nolan County 7 Rural 83.8 (58.3, 116.3) 172 (10, 196) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Erath County 7 Rural 83.7 (67.2, 102.9) 173 (41, 193) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.4)
Maverick County 7 Urban 83.4 (70.3, 98.1) 174 (60, 192) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Karnes County 7 Rural 83.3 (59.3, 113.6) 175 (13, 196) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.1)
Hale County 7 Rural 82.8 (66.0, 102.5) 176 (36, 195) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.4)
Falls County 7 Urban 82.8 (59.8, 111.6) 177 (13, 196) 9 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.6, 5.0)
Howard County 7 Rural 82.4 (66.7, 100.7) 178 (50, 194) 19 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.2, 12.6)
Webb County 7 Urban 82.1 (76.1, 88.5) 179 (136, 187) 141 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Willacy County 7 Rural 80.7 (59.5, 106.7) 180 (26, 196) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.6)
Shelby County 7 Rural 79.4 (59.9, 103.1) 181 (33, 196) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.8)
La Salle County 7 Rural 79.4 (44.9, 129.1) 182 (3, 196) 3
*
*
Terry County 7 Rural 79.2 (52.7, 114.0) 183 (12, 196) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 2.8)
Reeves County 7 Rural 77.0 (54.8, 105.2) 184 (28, 196) 8
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural 76.9 (47.5, 117.8) 185 (7, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.1)
Anderson County 7 Rural 74.1 (62.8, 87.0) 186 (121, 195) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Parmer County 7 Rural 73.3 (45.2, 111.7) 187 (11, 196) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.5, 5.7)
Winkler County 7 Rural 73.3 (43.2, 115.7) 188 (10, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.3)
Blanco County 7 Rural 73.1 (45.1, 112.4) 189 (11, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Lamb County 7 Rural 72.7 (47.4, 106.1) 190 (19, 196) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.2)
Jack County 7 Rural 70.4 (41.6, 111.4) 191 (15, 196) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.0, 4.9)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 67.9 (54.9, 83.0) 192 (135, 196) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Ochiltree County 7 Rural 65.7 (39.9, 101.2) 193 (25, 196) 4
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural 65.2 (38.9, 102.4) 194 (19, 196) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.0, 6.6)
Madison County 7 Rural 52.6 (32.4, 80.2) 195 (123, 196) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.7, 7.1)
Pecos County 7 Rural 52.2 (34.3, 76.1) 196 (142, 196) 5
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 3:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top