Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 11.2 (11.0, 11.4) N/A 3,201 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 11.9 (11.8, 11.9) N/A 46,147 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Webb County 6 *** 6.0 (4.5, 7.6) 120 (109, 120) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.6)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 6.8 (6.0, 7.7) 119 (109, 120) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 7.2 (4.1, 11.9) 118 (38, 120) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.8, 3.5)
El Paso County 6 *** 7.2 (6.4, 8.1) 117 (107, 120) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Val Verde County 6 *** 7.5 (4.4, 11.9) 116 (44, 120) 4
*
*
Cameron County 6 *** 7.9 (6.7, 9.2) 115 (97, 120) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Atascosa County 6 *** 8.2 (5.1, 12.6) 114 (31, 120) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.2, 0.6)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 9.1 (8.1, 10.2) 113 (84, 116) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Starr County 6 *** 9.3 (6.1, 13.6) 112 (24, 120) 5
*
*
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 9.5 (6.4, 13.6) 111 (24, 120) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 5.9)
Nueces County 6 *** 9.7 (8.3, 11.2) 110 (67, 116) 39 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Bexar County 6 *** 9.8 (9.1, 10.4) 109 (84, 112) 185 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Midland County 6 *** 9.8 (7.7, 12.3) 108 (46, 119) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Titus County 6 *** 9.9 (5.7, 16.0) 107 (8, 120) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.5, 8.7)
Wilson County 6 *** 10.0 (6.7, 14.4) 106 (19, 120) 6
*
*
Wharton County 6 *** 10.1 (6.3, 15.2) 105 (12, 120) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.4, 2.7)
Tyler County 6 *** 10.1 (5.8, 16.9) 104 (5, 120) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.4, 2.7)
Medina County 6 *** 10.1 (6.9, 14.6) 103 (19, 120) 6
*
*
Milam County 6 *** 10.2 (5.7, 17.0) 102 (5, 120) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 5.0)
Chambers County 6 *** 10.3 (6.3, 15.8) 101 (10, 120) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.5, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 10.3 (8.7, 12.2) 100 (51, 114) 30 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Harris County 6 *** 10.6 (10.1, 11.0) 99 (75, 105) 449 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Lubbock County 6 *** 10.6 (9.0, 12.5) 98 (44, 113) 31 stable stable trend -7.0 (-15.1, 1.8)
Collin County 6 *** 10.9 (9.9, 11.9) 97 (60, 108) 99 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.9)
Anderson County 6 *** 11.0 (7.6, 15.3) 96 (14, 120) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.2)
Dallas County 6 *** 11.0 (10.4, 11.6) 95 (66, 102) 265 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Smith County 6 *** 11.0 (9.2, 13.0) 94 (38, 113) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Hopkins County 6 *** 11.0 (7.1, 16.5) 93 (7, 120) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.4)
Comal County 6 *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.6) 92 (33, 114) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Brazoria County 6 *** 11.3 (9.7, 13.0) 91 (38, 111) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Denton County 6 *** 11.3 (10.2, 12.5) 90 (50, 106) 86 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
San Patricio County 6 *** 11.4 (8.2, 15.4) 89 (11, 119) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.1, 2.7)
Shelby County 6 *** 11.4 (6.7, 18.4) 88 (2, 120) 4
*
*
Waller County 6 *** 11.4 (7.5, 16.7) 87 (7, 120) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.3, 6.7)
Grimes County 6 *** 11.4 (6.9, 17.9) 86 (4, 120) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.3, 7.9)
Caldwell County 6 *** 11.4 (7.5, 16.8) 85 (6, 120) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.9, 3.2)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 11.5 (9.3, 14.1) 84 (26, 114) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.2)
Angelina County 6 *** 11.5 (8.7, 15.0) 83 (16, 118) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.2)
Randall County 6 *** 11.6 (9.3, 14.3) 82 (21, 115) 18 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.6)
Travis County 6 *** 11.7 (10.7, 12.6) 81 (48, 100) 129 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Montgomery County 6 *** 11.7 (10.5, 13.1) 80 (41, 105) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Lavaca County 6 *** 11.7 (6.8, 19.5) 79 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.1, 2.6)
Hays County 6 *** 11.9 (9.7, 14.4) 78 (23, 111) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.5)
Ector County 6 *** 11.9 (9.4, 14.8) 77 (17, 113) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Bowie County 6 *** 11.9 (9.2, 15.3) 76 (13, 116) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.5)
Tom Green County 6 *** 11.9 (9.4, 15.0) 75 (16, 114) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.1)
Williamson County 6 *** 12.0 (10.7, 13.5) 74 (34, 101) 63 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.2, 3.9)
Montague County 6 *** 12.1 (7.1, 19.9) 73 (2, 120) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.5, 1.2)
McLennan County 6 *** 12.1 (10.3, 14.2) 72 (27, 107) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Tarrant County 6 *** 12.2 (11.5, 13.0) 71 (45, 88) 245 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Brazos County 6 *** 12.3 (10.0, 15.0) 70 (16, 111) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.1)
Ellis County 6 *** 12.3 (10.1, 14.9) 69 (17, 110) 23 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.2)
Hood County 6 *** 12.3 (9.2, 16.3) 68 (11, 116) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.0)
Jasper County 6 *** 12.4 (8.0, 18.5) 67 (3, 120) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 4.9)
Erath County 6 *** 12.5 (8.1, 18.5) 66 (2, 120) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 1.2)
Houston County 6 *** 12.6 (7.3, 20.3) 65 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Galveston County 6 *** 12.6 (11.0, 14.3) 64 (25, 102) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Gregg County 6 *** 12.6 (10.0, 15.7) 63 (13, 112) 17 stable stable trend 18.5 (-4.9, 47.5)
Victoria County 6 *** 12.7 (9.8, 16.2) 62 (11, 114) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 12.7 (9.3, 17.0) 61 (7, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.8)
Gillespie County 6 *** 12.9 (8.2, 19.7) 60 (1, 119) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.6, 6.8)
Wood County 6 *** 12.9 (9.5, 17.5) 59 (4, 116) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 3.8)
Fayette County 6 *** 13.2 (8.2, 20.4) 58 (1, 120) 5
*
*
Panola County 6 *** 13.2 (7.8, 21.2) 57 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 3.7)
Bell County 6 *** 13.3 (11.5, 15.2) 56 (19, 97) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Howard County 6 *** 13.3 (8.6, 19.7) 55 (1, 119) 5
*
*
Upshur County 6 *** 13.4 (9.3, 18.8) 54 (3, 118) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.9, 7.4)
Bosque County 6 *** 13.4 (7.4, 22.7) 53 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Kendall County 6 *** 13.4 (9.3, 19.0) 52 (3, 118) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.8, 5.4)
Taylor County 6 *** 13.4 (10.9, 16.5) 51 (8, 108) 20 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 4.7)
Navarro County 6 *** 13.7 (9.7, 18.7) 50 (3, 115) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 2.0)
Harrison County 6 *** 13.7 (10.3, 18.0) 49 (4, 113) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.6)
Fannin County 6 *** 13.9 (9.5, 19.8) 48 (2, 117) 7 stable stable trend -5.7 (-11.9, 0.9)
Bee County 6 *** 13.9 (8.8, 21.0) 47 (1, 120) 5
*
*
Rockwall County 6 *** 14.0 (10.8, 17.7) 46 (5, 108) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Washington County 6 *** 14.1 (9.8, 19.9) 45 (2, 115) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 4.8)
Johnson County 6 *** 14.1 (11.7, 16.9) 44 (7, 99) 25 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 5.8)
Austin County 6 *** 14.2 (9.0, 21.2) 43 (1, 119) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.7)
Kleberg County 6 *** 14.2 (8.6, 22.1) 42 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.6, 3.2)
Kerr County 6 *** 14.3 (10.4, 19.2) 41 (2, 113) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.2)
Rusk County 6 *** 14.3 (10.5, 19.1) 40 (3, 113) 10 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 7.2)
Orange County 6 *** 14.4 (11.3, 18.1) 39 (5, 106) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
DeWitt County 6 *** 14.4 (8.8, 22.7) 38 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Parker County 6 *** 14.6 (12.0, 17.5) 37 (5, 97) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Wise County 6 *** 14.6 (11.0, 19.0) 36 (3, 109) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.7, 6.6)
Cooke County 6 *** 14.7 (10.4, 20.4) 35 (1, 114) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.1)
Bandera County 6 *** 14.7 (9.4, 22.7) 34 (1, 118) 6
*
*
Bastrop County 6 *** 14.8 (11.5, 18.7) 33 (3, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.6)
Wichita County 6 *** 14.8 (12.1, 18.0) 32 (5, 97) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Hardin County 6 *** 14.8 (11.0, 19.5) 31 (3, 111) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 4.8)
Brown County 6 *** 14.8 (10.3, 20.8) 30 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.7, 7.9)
Walker County 6 *** 14.9 (11.3, 19.3) 29 (2, 108) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 7.0)
Liberty County 6 *** 14.9 (11.6, 18.9) 28 (2, 103) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.5)
Burnet County 6 *** 15.1 (11.0, 20.4) 27 (1, 110) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.5)
Freestone County 6 *** 15.1 (9.0, 24.0) 26 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Young County 6 *** 15.2 (8.7, 24.9) 25 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.1, 7.0)
Potter County 6 *** 15.3 (12.4, 18.8) 24 (3, 99) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Grayson County 6 *** 15.4 (12.7, 18.4) 23 (4, 90) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.8)
Cherokee County 6 *** 15.4 (11.2, 20.6) 22 (1, 111) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.5, 8.1)
Jones County 6 *** 15.4 (9.2, 24.5) 21 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Gray County 6 *** 15.6 (9.6, 24.1) 20 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.6, 9.6)
Cass County 6 *** 15.6 (10.4, 22.8) 19 (1, 117) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.7)
Coryell County 6 *** 15.7 (11.6, 20.7) 18 (1, 109) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.9, 5.1)
Robertson County 6 *** 15.9 (9.3, 25.7) 17 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Aransas County 6 *** 15.9 (10.9, 22.9) 16 (1, 113) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.8)
Henderson County 6 *** 16.6 (13.2, 20.7) 15 (1, 93) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.4)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 16.7 (10.5, 25.3) 14 (1, 117) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.6, 8.0)
Matagorda County 6 *** 16.7 (11.7, 23.1) 13 (1, 110) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.6, 7.1)
Kaufman County 6 *** 16.9 (13.8, 20.5) 12 (1, 80) 21 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.0, 6.2)
Limestone County 6 *** 16.9 (10.8, 25.5) 11 (1, 116) 5 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.8, 12.5)
Hunt County 6 *** 17.6 (14.2, 21.5) 10 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 5.9)
Lamar County 6 *** 17.6 (13.2, 23.0) 9 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.5)
Sabine County 6 *** 17.9 (9.8, 31.7) 8 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Hill County 6 *** 18.5 (13.2, 25.4) 7 (1, 104) 9 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.3, 8.9)
Trinity County 6 *** 18.6 (10.9, 30.5) 6 (1, 118) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-5.5, 10.1)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 18.7 (12.8, 26.6) 5 (1, 105) 7 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.5, 10.7)
Llano County 6 *** 18.7 (12.4, 28.1) 4 (1, 110) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 3.9)
Calhoun County 6 *** 19.1 (11.9, 29.0) 3 (1, 117) 5
*
*
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 19.7 (13.5, 27.9) 2 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.5)
Polk County 6 *** 20.0 (15.3, 25.7) 1 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.1)
Andrews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burleson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colorado County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2021 6:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top