Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 37.9 (37.6, 38.3) N/A 11,132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Llano County 7 Rural 24.4 (17.0, 34.6) 192 (111, 192) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -1.2)
Robertson County 7 Urban 24.8 (16.3, 36.6) 191 (80, 192) 6 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.7, -1.0)
Coryell County 7 Urban 28.6 (23.2, 34.9) 190 (132, 192) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -0.9)
Bandera County 7 Urban 28.8 (21.4, 38.9) 189 (83, 192) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.6)
Kendall County 7 Urban 29.8 (23.8, 37.1) 188 (99, 192) 18 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -0.7)
Denton County 7 Urban 30.9 (29.2, 32.7) 187 (161, 189) 260 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -1.8)
Comal County 7 Urban 31.1 (27.6, 34.9) 186 (136, 191) 64 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.7, -1.9)
Austin County 7 Urban 31.2 (24.0, 40.1) 185 (78, 192) 14 falling falling trend -9.4 (-19.5, -3.2)
Archer County 7 Urban 31.4 (18.7, 50.5) 184 (14, 192) 4
*
*
Collin County 7 Urban 31.6 (30.0, 33.2) 183 (161, 188) 317 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 3.3)
Trinity County 7 Rural 31.9 (21.8, 46.0) 182 (36, 192) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.7, 0.4)
Jack County 7 Rural 33.2 (19.9, 53.1) 181 (15, 192) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 3.8)
Hays County 7 Urban 33.3 (29.8, 37.2) 180 (118, 189) 70 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.5)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 33.5 (31.6, 35.4) 179 (146, 186) 265 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.8)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 33.6 (31.6, 35.7) 178 (141, 185) 215 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.2)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 33.7 (29.0, 39.1) 177 (93, 190) 37 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.1, 0.1)
Travis County 7 Urban 33.9 (32.3, 35.5) 176 (143, 184) 380 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.7)
Williamson County 7 Urban 33.9 (31.8, 36.1) 175 (138, 184) 201 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.5, -2.5)
Blanco County 7 Rural 34.2 (23.9, 49.1) 174 (23, 192) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.2, 1.4)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 34.2 (21.6, 53.2) 173 (12, 192) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.5, 2.9)
Brazos County 7 Urban 34.9 (30.9, 39.1) 172 (92, 188) 60 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Gaines County 7 Rural 35.0 (22.8, 50.9) 171 (14, 192) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.2)
Stephens County 7 Rural 35.6 (22.7, 54.3) 170 (14, 192) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.5)
El Paso County 7 Urban 35.6 (33.8, 37.5) 169 (122, 177) 300 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Hood County 7 Rural 35.8 (30.0, 42.4) 168 (61, 190) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.8)
Grimes County 7 Rural 35.8 (27.7, 45.7) 167 (39, 192) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.5)
Midland County 7 Urban 36.1 (31.8, 40.8) 166 (81, 187) 54 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -1.0)
Nolan County 7 Rural 36.1 (25.0, 50.9) 165 (17, 192) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 36.4 (34.5, 38.4) 164 (118, 176) 277 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.0, 7.8)
Dallas County 7 Urban 36.6 (35.5, 37.7) 163 (124, 167) 893 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 2.4)
Ellis County 7 Urban 36.7 (32.9, 40.8) 162 (84, 182) 71 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Scurry County 7 Rural 36.7 (25.6, 51.2) 161 (19, 192) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Jackson County 7 Rural 36.8 (25.1, 52.4) 160 (16, 192) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-15.5, -0.9)
Nueces County 7 Urban 36.9 (34.2, 39.7) 159 (95, 176) 146 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.1)
Harris County 7 Urban 37.0 (36.1, 37.8) 158 (125, 164) 1,604 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 1.0)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 37.0 (33.9, 40.3) 157 (93, 179) 108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Callahan County 7 Urban 37.0 (25.7, 52.2) 156 (18, 192) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.7)
Red River County 7 Rural 37.2 (26.0, 52.8) 155 (15, 192) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.3)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 37.2 (36.0, 38.5) 154 (118, 165) 755 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 3.8)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 37.3 (33.4, 41.5) 153 (76, 182) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Wilson County 7 Urban 37.6 (30.8, 45.5) 152 (42, 190) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.7)
Moore County 7 Rural 37.6 (26.3, 52.0) 151 (15, 192) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 3.1)
Bexar County 7 Urban 37.6 (36.4, 38.9) 150 (114, 162) 730 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.7)
Webb County 7 Urban 37.7 (34.1, 41.6) 149 (82, 179) 83 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Randall County 7 Urban 37.8 (33.5, 42.6) 148 (71, 182) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Hardin County 7 Urban 37.8 (31.5, 45.1) 147 (46, 189) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Burnet County 7 Rural 37.9 (31.4, 45.6) 146 (40, 189) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Titus County 7 Rural 38.0 (29.1, 48.9) 145 (25, 192) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Bell County 7 Urban 38.2 (35.2, 41.4) 144 (78, 173) 123 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Lee County 7 Rural 38.4 (28.2, 51.5) 143 (23, 192) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.4)
Erath County 7 Rural 38.4 (30.4, 48.0) 142 (31, 190) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 38.5 (26.6, 53.7) 141 (12, 192) 7 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 11.5)
Waller County 7 Urban 38.8 (31.1, 47.7) 140 (33, 190) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Cameron County 7 Urban 38.8 (36.1, 41.6) 139 (83, 169) 164 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 38.9 (29.0, 51.4) 138 (20, 192) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.4)
Kerr County 7 Rural 39.0 (32.6, 46.4) 137 (42, 188) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Freestone County 7 Rural 39.2 (29.1, 52.1) 136 (16, 191) 11 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.2, 24.7)
Ward County 7 Rural 39.2 (24.3, 59.7) 135 (6, 192) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-9.4, -0.2)
Smith County 7 Urban 39.3 (36.0, 42.9) 134 (73, 174) 108 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.6, 5.0)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 39.5 (23.9, 61.7) 133 (7, 192) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.6, 7.0)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 39.8 (36.6, 43.2) 132 (74, 168) 119 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 5.3)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 39.9 (37.0, 43.0) 131 (74, 164) 146 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 3.9)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 40.1 (29.2, 53.7) 130 (12, 191) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.9)
Wood County 7 Rural 40.1 (33.3, 48.1) 129 (28, 186) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Potter County 7 Urban 40.1 (35.2, 45.5) 128 (49, 182) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Galveston County 7 Urban 40.4 (37.6, 43.4) 127 (68, 157) 163 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.4, 11.8)
Young County 7 Rural 40.5 (29.3, 54.9) 126 (13, 192) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.3)
Reeves County 7 Rural 40.5 (26.6, 59.0) 125 (7, 192) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.7)
McLennan County 7 Urban 40.6 (37.1, 44.2) 124 (62, 165) 110 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 6.0)
Parker County 7 Urban 40.7 (36.4, 45.5) 123 (52, 170) 68 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 40.8 (34.2, 48.5) 122 (31, 185) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.2)
Navarro County 7 Rural 40.9 (33.8, 49.1) 121 (27, 185) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Starr County 7 Rural 40.9 (33.9, 49.0) 120 (28, 187) 24 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.3)
Hunt County 7 Urban 41.4 (36.2, 47.0) 119 (43, 174) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Houston County 7 Rural 41.4 (32.2, 52.9) 118 (18, 190) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Leon County 7 Rural 41.5 (29.7, 56.8) 117 (10, 192) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.3)
Terry County 7 Rural 41.5 (27.3, 60.6) 116 (6, 192) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.4)
Taylor County 7 Urban 41.7 (37.2, 46.7) 115 (44, 168) 63 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Jones County 7 Urban 41.8 (30.7, 55.8) 114 (10, 191) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 41.8 (32.6, 53.1) 113 (14, 189) 19 stable stable trend -6.2 (-22.7, 11.4)
Harrison County 7 Urban 41.8 (35.7, 48.8) 112 (33, 180) 36 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.7)
Somervell County 7 Rural 41.9 (26.8, 63.0) 111 (5, 192) 5
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 41.9 (33.8, 51.5) 110 (17, 187) 21 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.6)
Johnson County 7 Urban 42.0 (37.9, 46.4) 109 (48, 164) 81 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 9.5)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 42.0 (36.5, 48.1) 108 (36, 172) 46 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.2, 13.1)
Fayette County 7 Rural 42.1 (32.6, 53.9) 107 (14, 190) 17 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.1)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 42.2 (28.7, 60.4) 106 (7, 192) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Bowie County 7 Urban 42.3 (37.1, 48.1) 105 (35, 170) 49 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.9)
Andrews County 7 Rural 42.3 (29.4, 59.0) 104 (8, 192) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.8)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 42.4 (36.0, 49.7) 103 (26, 180) 32 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 42.4 (34.8, 51.3) 102 (21, 186) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Hale County 7 Rural 42.6 (33.4, 53.5) 101 (15, 189) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Anderson County 7 Rural 42.7 (35.9, 50.4) 100 (24, 179) 29 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Comanche County 7 Rural 42.7 (30.8, 58.4) 99 (10, 191) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 42.8 (36.3, 50.1) 98 (27, 176) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Goliad County 7 Urban 42.8 (26.6, 66.7) 97 (4, 192) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.1, 3.6)
Falls County 7 Urban 42.9 (31.0, 58.0) 96 (9, 191) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.9, -0.6)
Willacy County 7 Rural 42.9 (31.2, 57.6) 95 (9, 191) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.4)
Milam County 7 Rural 42.9 (33.4, 54.6) 94 (15, 188) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Tyler County 7 Rural 42.9 (32.3, 56.3) 93 (12, 189) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Victoria County 7 Urban 43.1 (37.6, 49.3) 92 (28, 171) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Medina County 7 Urban 43.2 (35.9, 51.5) 91 (22, 183) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Aransas County 7 Urban 43.4 (34.1, 54.9) 90 (15, 186) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 43.5 (38.6, 48.9) 89 (33, 162) 60 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.1, 14.5)
Panola County 7 Rural 43.6 (33.7, 55.9) 88 (9, 189) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 0.7)
Rains County 7 Rural 43.6 (30.8, 61.0) 87 (7, 191) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.5)
Angelina County 7 Rural 43.7 (38.1, 50.0) 86 (28, 168) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Pecos County 7 Rural 44.0 (30.5, 61.4) 85 (7, 192) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.5)
Madison County 7 Rural 44.0 (30.2, 62.2) 84 (6, 192) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.2)
Lamb County 7 Rural 44.1 (31.0, 61.3) 83 (7, 191) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.6, 4.6)
Runnels County 7 Rural 44.4 (29.7, 64.4) 82 (4, 192) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 2.8)
San Saba County 7 Rural 44.4 (26.1, 72.5) 81 (2, 192) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 2.7)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 44.7 (37.5, 53.0) 80 (18, 175) 28 stable stable trend 3.5 (-14.0, 18.5)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 44.7 (37.0, 53.5) 79 (18, 178) 25 rising rising trend 7.8 (0.3, 17.4)
Rusk County 7 Urban 44.7 (37.6, 52.9) 78 (18, 175) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Haskell County 7 Rural 44.9 (26.6, 73.3) 77 (3, 192) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.0)
Henderson County 7 Rural 44.9 (39.3, 51.1) 76 (25, 158) 53 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Gray County 7 Rural 44.9 (34.0, 58.2) 75 (10, 188) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.4)
Lamar County 7 Rural 44.9 (37.7, 53.1) 74 (17, 176) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 44.9 (33.6, 59.0) 73 (10, 190) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.7)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 45.0 (31.5, 62.7) 72 (5, 192) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.9)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 45.0 (33.9, 58.7) 71 (9, 188) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.0)
Grayson County 7 Urban 45.2 (40.6, 50.2) 70 (29, 140) 76 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Ochiltree County 7 Rural 45.2 (27.6, 69.7) 69 (2, 192) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.4, 1.9)
Wise County 7 Urban 45.4 (38.8, 52.8) 68 (20, 171) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 45.5 (29.7, 68.1) 67 (2, 192) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.4)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 45.6 (36.0, 57.1) 66 (9, 185) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Franklin County 7 Rural 45.8 (30.4, 66.8) 65 (3, 192) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.4)
Bee County 7 Rural 45.8 (35.6, 58.1) 64 (9, 186) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 45.9 (40.9, 51.5) 63 (24, 144) 62 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 46.1 (37.5, 56.2) 62 (14, 179) 21 stable stable trend 9.2 (-1.3, 22.9)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 46.1 (35.2, 59.6) 61 (10, 189) 13 rising rising trend 21.9 (0.4, 38.2)
Bosque County 7 Urban 46.1 (34.8, 60.4) 60 (7, 187) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.1)
Clay County 7 Urban 46.2 (31.1, 66.9) 59 (4, 192) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.9)
Newton County 7 Rural 46.3 (33.0, 63.9) 58 (4, 191) 9
*
*
Fannin County 7 Rural 46.6 (37.9, 56.7) 57 (12, 175) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.5)
Brown County 7 Rural 46.6 (38.2, 56.5) 56 (13, 170) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Shelby County 7 Rural 46.9 (36.5, 59.5) 55 (8, 183) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.9)
Refugio County 7 Rural 47.2 (28.5, 74.3) 54 (2, 192) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 2.8)
Orange County 7 Urban 47.2 (41.3, 53.7) 53 (20, 153) 48 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 47.5 (38.8, 57.7) 52 (11, 172) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Gregg County 7 Urban 47.9 (42.7, 53.5) 51 (20, 128) 65 stable stable trend 9.8 (-2.8, 17.1)
Upshur County 7 Urban 48.0 (39.8, 57.7) 50 (11, 168) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Howard County 7 Rural 48.4 (38.6, 60.0) 49 (8, 175) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.4)
Wichita County 7 Urban 48.6 (43.5, 54.1) 48 (19, 122) 70 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 13.2)
Cooke County 7 Rural 49.1 (40.6, 58.9) 47 (10, 167) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Walker County 7 Rural 49.1 (42.5, 56.5) 46 (12, 131) 41 rising rising trend 12.0 (0.9, 28.6)
Chambers County 7 Urban 49.4 (40.2, 59.9) 45 (8, 166) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 3.2)
Eastland County 7 Rural 49.4 (37.4, 64.4) 44 (5, 183) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.5)
Hill County 7 Rural 49.4 (40.7, 59.6) 43 (9, 166) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.1)
Burleson County 7 Urban 49.8 (38.1, 64.4) 42 (7, 182) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 49.9 (32.0, 75.3) 41 (2, 192) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.6, 3.8)
Liberty County 7 Urban 50.0 (43.5, 57.2) 40 (12, 124) 45 stable stable trend 3.6 (-5.2, 15.7)
Marion County 7 Rural 50.7 (34.4, 73.1) 39 (2, 190) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.7)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 50.9 (40.6, 63.0) 38 (5, 172) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Sabine County 7 Rural 51.0 (36.3, 71.2) 37 (2, 189) 10 stable stable trend -4.4 (-14.7, 0.8)
Colorado County 7 Rural 51.1 (39.6, 65.2) 36 (5, 180) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 0.6)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 51.8 (41.0, 64.7) 35 (4, 169) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.6)
Frio County 7 Rural 52.4 (38.0, 70.2) 34 (2, 186) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.6)
Dimmit County 7 Rural 52.6 (35.0, 76.5) 33 (1, 191) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.5, 8.2)
Zapata County 7 Rural 52.8 (36.6, 73.6) 32 (2, 188) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.4)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 52.9 (41.1, 67.1) 31 (4, 177) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
Jasper County 7 Rural 53.6 (44.2, 64.5) 30 (5, 140) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Ector County 7 Urban 53.6 (48.0, 59.7) 29 (9, 81) 70 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 53.9 (45.0, 64.1) 28 (5, 129) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.7)
Karnes County 7 Rural 54.1 (38.9, 73.5) 27 (1, 186) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Morris County 7 Rural 54.5 (39.0, 74.6) 26 (1, 186) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.1)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 54.7 (42.7, 69.4) 25 (3, 172) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Maverick County 7 Urban 54.7 (46.0, 64.5) 24 (5, 114) 29 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.6, 5.1)
Wharton County 7 Rural 54.8 (45.9, 64.9) 23 (5, 120) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.6)
Montague County 7 Rural 55.1 (42.8, 70.1) 22 (3, 163) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.3)
Hockley County 7 Urban 55.2 (42.3, 70.7) 21 (3, 168) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 4.9)
Crosby County 7 Urban 55.2 (31.8, 89.7) 20 (1, 192) 4 rising rising trend 6.3 (0.3, 30.9)
Limestone County 7 Rural 55.6 (43.9, 69.7) 19 (4, 156) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.8)
Camp County 7 Rural 57.0 (40.2, 78.6) 18 (1, 184) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 59.0 (48.8, 70.9) 17 (3, 97) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Duval County 7 Rural 60.0 (41.5, 84.2) 16 (1, 187) 7 rising rising trend 13.1 (1.6, 37.0)
Kimble County 7 Rural 60.6 (32.5, 104.2) 15 (1, 192) 4
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural 61.6 (39.2, 92.4) 14 (1, 191) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 4.3)
Dawson County 7 Rural 62.2 (44.1, 85.3) 13 (1, 177) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 62.9 (52.7, 74.5) 12 (2, 73) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Delta County 7 Rural 64.6 (42.3, 96.6) 11 (1, 188) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 5.2)
Winkler County 7 Rural 65.5 (41.6, 98.0) 10 (1, 190) 5
*
*
Polk County 7 Rural 66.0 (56.1, 77.2) 9 (1, 54) 38 rising rising trend 10.8 (1.2, 20.9)
Zavala County 7 Rural 68.8 (47.5, 96.3) 8 (1, 174) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.6)
Coleman County 7 Rural 69.5 (48.9, 97.1) 7 (1, 163) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 6.6)
Floyd County 7 Rural 70.0 (41.5, 110.3) 6 (1, 192) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 3.6)
Martin County 7 Urban 74.0 (42.5, 119.0) 5 (1, 191) 3
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural 74.5 (43.9, 118.1) 4 (1, 191) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.2)
Sutton County 7 Rural 78.4 (44.7, 129.2) 3 (1, 190) 3
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural 80.7 (53.4, 117.3) 2 (1, 179) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 5.2)
Brooks County 7 Rural 81.3 (54.9, 116.0) 1 (1, 143) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.4, 8.5)
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 1:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top