Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 159.0 (157.1, 160.9) N/A 5,563 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 156.6 (156.1, 157.1) N/A 77,629 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5)
Sutton County 7 478.1 (272.2, 778.9) 1 (1, 160) 3
*
*
Delta County 7 366.9 (222.7, 570.0) 2 (1, 162) 4
*
*
La Salle County 7 297.4 (169.7, 486.4) 3 (1, 172) 3 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.1, 0.1)
Polk County 7 279.3 (224.3, 343.4) 4 (1, 65) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Brooks County 7 263.2 (153.1, 422.4) 5 (1, 172) 3
*
*
Wharton County 7 258.4 (207.3, 318.2) 6 (2, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.0)
Gray County 7 256.2 (185.9, 343.9) 7 (1, 151) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.7)
Karnes County 7 252.5 (167.1, 365.9) 8 (1, 168) 6 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.3, 25.1)
Jim Wells County 7 251.5 (198.4, 314.4) 9 (1, 111) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.5)
Hockley County 7 247.2 (177.0, 335.9) 10 (1, 159) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.6, 6.5)
Ector County 7 246.2 (211.7, 284.6) 11 (3, 59) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Kleberg County 7 243.9 (180.3, 322.7) 12 (1, 147) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 0.9)
Dawson County 7 242.7 (153.7, 364.4) 13 (1, 170) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.6, -0.3)
Hopkins County 7 229.9 (180.9, 288.1) 14 (2, 125) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.2)
Upshur County 7 227.0 (180.4, 281.9) 15 (3, 133) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.9)
Lee County 7 226.0 (157.0, 315.0) 16 (1, 167) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.4)
Jasper County 7 225.8 (177.9, 282.7) 17 (2, 135) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.2)
Blanco County 7 224.5 (153.4, 318.1) 18 (1, 168) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 4.0)
Limestone County 7 223.9 (165.3, 296.5) 19 (2, 158) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.7)
Bee County 7 223.8 (161.5, 302.0) 20 (2, 162) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.5)
Hale County 7 223.7 (165.9, 295.2) 21 (2, 161) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Cass County 7 221.3 (173.7, 278.1) 22 (3, 143) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.0)
Liberty County 7 219.6 (180.2, 265.2) 23 (4, 122) 23 stable stable trend 9.3 (-0.5, 27.6)
Maverick County 7 219.2 (171.2, 276.6) 24 (3, 144) 14 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.9, 4.3)
Howard County 7 219.2 (161.3, 290.8) 25 (2, 164) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 0.9)
Lamb County 7 218.8 (139.6, 326.3) 26 (1, 171) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.5)
Comanche County 7 215.7 (150.1, 300.2) 27 (2, 167) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.2)
Hill County 7 211.2 (166.8, 263.9) 28 (4, 147) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.7)
Morris County 7 210.3 (139.6, 304.2) 29 (2, 171) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.3, 3.5)
Clay County 7 210.2 (132.8, 315.3) 30 (1, 172) 5
*
*
Somervell County 7 208.3 (120.5, 334.8) 31 (1, 172) 3
*
*
Newton County 7 207.2 (139.5, 296.7) 32 (2, 170) 6
*
*
Coleman County 7 205.6 (126.8, 315.4) 33 (2, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 2.8)
Dimmit County 7 202.7 (117.6, 326.0) 34 (2, 172) 3
*
*
Willacy County 7 202.7 (136.5, 289.8) 35 (2, 171) 6 stable stable trend 8.0 (-0.9, 29.6)
Frio County 7 202.6 (129.3, 302.5) 36 (2, 171) 5
*
*
Camp County 7 202.5 (127.5, 305.1) 37 (2, 172) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.5, 1.0)
Ward County 7 200.7 (114.3, 326.8) 38 (1, 172) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.9, 0.8)
Medina County 7 198.5 (157.7, 246.8) 39 (7, 155) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 2.1)
Wilbarger County 7 198.2 (126.5, 296.3) 40 (2, 172) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.8, 0.0)
Bastrop County 7 197.0 (162.2, 237.0) 41 (9, 144) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Pecos County 7 196.5 (119.6, 304.6) 42 (2, 172) 4 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.5, 0.3)
Harrison County 7 195.6 (160.0, 236.7) 43 (9, 155) 22 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.6)
Grimes County 7 195.4 (143.6, 260.2) 44 (5, 169) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.9, 2.7)
Cooke County 7 194.7 (151.4, 246.4) 45 (7, 160) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Live Oak County 7 194.4 (125.7, 287.4) 46 (3, 172) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 4.1)
Zavala County 7 193.4 (111.6, 313.2) 47 (2, 172) 3
*
*
Grayson County 7 193.0 (168.4, 220.1) 48 (17, 122) 45 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Gonzales County 7 192.9 (132.7, 271.0) 49 (3, 170) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.0)
Deaf Smith County 7 192.3 (121.1, 290.2) 50 (2, 172) 5 rising rising trend 6.6 (0.1, 22.8)
Scurry County 7 191.3 (121.0, 287.2) 51 (2, 172) 5
*
*
Wichita County 7 191.2 (164.5, 221.1) 52 (16, 135) 37 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.0)
DeWitt County 7 191.1 (135.5, 261.9) 53 (4, 169) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.2)
Tom Green County 7 191.0 (163.5, 221.9) 54 (15, 136) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.4)
Kaufman County 7 190.4 (160.2, 224.8) 55 (13, 140) 29 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.1)
Montague County 7 189.8 (136.0, 257.9) 56 (3, 170) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.2, 0.8)
Anderson County 7 189.5 (148.8, 237.7) 57 (8, 160) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.5)
Young County 7 188.5 (129.4, 265.0) 58 (4, 171) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.3, 1.1)
Bosque County 7 188.0 (135.9, 253.6) 59 (5, 169) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.4)
Terry County 7 187.9 (111.2, 297.8) 60 (2, 172) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.8, 2.5)
Runnels County 7 187.9 (114.6, 290.5) 61 (2, 172) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.3, 2.8)
Orange County 7 187.7 (155.8, 224.1) 62 (13, 149) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.8)
Matagorda County 7 187.3 (141.9, 242.8) 63 (6, 167) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Cherokee County 7 187.1 (149.4, 231.5) 64 (9, 162) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.9)
Jones County 7 186.4 (124.5, 268.5) 65 (3, 171) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.1)
San Patricio County 7 186.2 (149.7, 229.0) 66 (13, 156) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Stephens County 7 185.8 (107.9, 298.0) 67 (2, 172) 3 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.8, 0.3)
Atascosa County 7 185.3 (143.2, 236.0) 68 (7, 166) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.8)
Shelby County 7 185.0 (132.5, 251.4) 69 (5, 170) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.1)
Panola County 7 184.3 (131.2, 251.8) 70 (5, 170) 8 stable stable trend 18.6 (-6.2, 51.8)
Chambers County 7 183.8 (131.9, 249.6) 71 (4, 171) 9 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.8, 0.7)
Hutchinson County 7 183.4 (125.7, 258.7) 72 (4, 171) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -1.3)
Madison County 7 183.0 (111.6, 282.6) 73 (2, 172) 4
*
*
Fannin County 7 182.2 (138.4, 235.3) 74 (9, 166) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.9)
Nacogdoches County 7 181.8 (144.9, 225.2) 75 (13, 163) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Taylor County 7 180.9 (155.3, 209.6) 76 (22, 147) 36 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.7)
Wise County 7 180.5 (144.5, 223.0) 77 (15, 162) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.3)
Zapata County 7 180.4 (102.7, 293.8) 78 (2, 172) 3
*
*
Fayette County 7 179.5 (135.7, 232.9) 79 (8, 168) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 0.7)
Hardin County 7 179.5 (142.8, 222.8) 80 (13, 165) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.3)
Johnson County 7 179.3 (155.2, 206.1) 81 (28, 146) 41 stable stable trend 4.2 (-3.7, 10.3)
Parker County 7 179.1 (153.7, 207.4) 82 (21, 148) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.2)
Uvalde County 7 177.4 (126.5, 242.0) 83 (6, 171) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.7)
Bowie County 7 177.3 (148.5, 210.0) 84 (19, 157) 27 stable stable trend 9.3 (-2.6, 18.9)
McCulloch County 7 177.2 (100.9, 288.6) 85 (2, 172) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.6, 7.6)
Gregg County 7 174.8 (148.8, 204.0) 86 (22, 155) 33 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Victoria County 7 174.6 (145.7, 207.6) 87 (24, 158) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.8)
Brazoria County 7 174.0 (156.3, 193.3) 88 (38, 136) 73 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Aransas County 7 173.8 (131.4, 225.6) 89 (9, 170) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.4)
Eastland County 7 172.0 (118.9, 240.5) 90 (5, 172) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.0, 2.3)
Henderson County 7 171.2 (145.2, 200.6) 91 (27, 156) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Lubbock County 7 170.4 (152.2, 190.2) 92 (42, 142) 65 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.7, 8.6)
Brown County 7 170.1 (130.8, 217.6) 93 (16, 170) 13 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.1)
Wilson County 7 169.9 (129.9, 218.1) 94 (16, 169) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 1.0)
San Jacinto County 7 169.8 (126.3, 223.6) 95 (12, 170) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.1, -0.1)
Jefferson County 7 168.7 (150.0, 189.2) 96 (39, 147) 60 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
Walker County 7 168.5 (132.7, 211.0) 97 (17, 168) 16 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.3)
Palo Pinto County 7 168.2 (123.3, 224.3) 98 (10, 170) 9 falling falling trend -7.9 (-31.0, -2.2)
Val Verde County 7 167.7 (127.3, 216.9) 99 (15, 169) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.4, 2.3)
Rusk County 7 167.5 (130.7, 211.4) 100 (16, 169) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.8)
Colorado County 7 167.1 (118.6, 228.9) 101 (10, 172) 8 falling falling trend -5.8 (-20.7, -3.9)
Moore County 7 166.1 (99.3, 260.5) 102 (3, 172) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 4.0)
Van Zandt County 7 166.1 (134.0, 203.5) 103 (22, 167) 19 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -1.3)
Navarro County 7 165.0 (127.6, 209.9) 104 (16, 169) 13 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -1.0)
Hunt County 7 165.0 (137.0, 197.0) 105 (27, 165) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Angelina County 7 164.4 (135.5, 197.6) 106 (25, 166) 23 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.3)
Burleson County 7 164.3 (111.8, 233.4) 107 (6, 172) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.0)
Starr County 7 163.9 (125.2, 210.9) 108 (18, 170) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.7)
Rains County 7 162.9 (101.3, 247.9) 109 (4, 172) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.1, -1.1)
Harris County 7 161.7 (156.5, 167.1) 110 (81, 126) 765 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 0.9)
Smith County 7 160.7 (143.0, 180.0) 111 (54, 155) 61 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Washington County 7 160.3 (122.2, 206.3) 112 (18, 169) 12 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.1, -1.6)
Red River County 7 160.2 (102.5, 238.6) 113 (4, 172) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.6, 3.7)
Bell County 7 160.0 (142.0, 179.6) 114 (50, 156) 59 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.9)
Dallas County 7 159.4 (152.7, 166.4) 115 (81, 134) 435 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 3.0)
Caldwell County 7 159.4 (117.1, 212.1) 116 (17, 171) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 0.8)
Potter County 7 158.1 (130.6, 189.7) 117 (32, 167) 24 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -2.0)
Cameron County 7 157.8 (143.4, 173.2) 118 (58, 153) 89 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
El Paso County 7 156.6 (145.8, 168.0) 119 (78, 146) 158 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 5.6)
Erath County 7 156.5 (114.6, 208.8) 120 (21, 172) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1)
Lavaca County 7 156.1 (108.3, 217.5) 121 (11, 172) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.6)
Ellis County 7 155.7 (132.8, 181.5) 122 (46, 165) 34 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Gillespie County 7 155.4 (119.0, 199.4) 123 (26, 170) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.6)
Hays County 7 155.2 (132.0, 181.2) 124 (48, 166) 34 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 1.1)
Milam County 7 155.1 (109.9, 212.5) 125 (14, 172) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.8)
Wood County 7 154.5 (124.4, 189.8) 126 (34, 169) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Bexar County 7 152.8 (145.6, 160.1) 127 (90, 146) 355 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Jackson County 7 152.3 (92.7, 235.6) 128 (8, 172) 4 falling falling trend -9.6 (-45.3, -4.6)
Tarrant County 7 152.3 (145.0, 159.8) 129 (93, 145) 343 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Titus County 7 152.2 (104.9, 213.5) 130 (12, 172) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 0.7)
Falls County 7 151.5 (96.9, 226.0) 131 (8, 172) 5 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.5, -1.0)
Lamar County 7 150.4 (117.4, 190.0) 132 (34, 170) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Tyler County 7 149.7 (104.7, 207.4) 133 (19, 172) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.7)
Nolan County 7 149.4 (92.3, 229.3) 134 (9, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.4, 3.1)
Callahan County 7 149.2 (93.1, 227.1) 135 (10, 172) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.9)
Webb County 7 148.7 (128.2, 171.5) 136 (60, 167) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Nueces County 7 148.5 (133.9, 164.2) 137 (75, 162) 78 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.6, -2.6)
Randall County 7 148.2 (124.9, 174.7) 138 (50, 169) 29 stable stable trend 9.5 (-3.0, 20.1)
Williamson County 7 148.2 (135.1, 162.2) 139 (81, 160) 98 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 5.5)
Marion County 7 147.8 (88.5, 231.8) 140 (10, 172) 4
*
*
Galveston County 7 147.7 (132.2, 164.5) 141 (76, 163) 69 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.1, -3.8)
Sabine County 7 146.9 (94.0, 219.1) 142 (8, 172) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.8, -0.2)
Calhoun County 7 146.6 (96.3, 213.7) 143 (15, 172) 5 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.5, -2.1)
Houston County 7 146.5 (103.7, 201.3) 144 (22, 172) 8 stable stable trend 15.9 (-2.0, 30.3)
San Augustine County 7 144.9 (82.7, 235.7) 145 (6, 172) 3 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.1, 0.5)
Hamilton County 7 144.8 (82.2, 236.4) 146 (5, 172) 3 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.7, 2.0)
Guadalupe County 7 144.1 (122.4, 168.5) 147 (64, 168) 32 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.3)
Montgomery County 7 143.9 (131.6, 157.0) 148 (93, 162) 106 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.3)
Travis County 7 143.1 (133.2, 153.7) 149 (104, 160) 165 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 6.1)
Lampasas County 7 143.1 (95.3, 206.4) 150 (17, 172) 6 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.5)
Brazos County 7 142.7 (120.1, 168.3) 151 (64, 169) 29 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.7)
Kerr County 7 141.6 (115.4, 172.0) 152 (53, 170) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Waller County 7 139.9 (100.0, 190.4) 153 (28, 172) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.1)
McLennan County 7 139.6 (122.8, 158.1) 154 (86, 168) 51 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.1, 11.3)
Burnet County 7 139.5 (109.0, 175.9) 155 (47, 171) 15 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.5)
Hidalgo County 7 138.5 (128.1, 149.5) 156 (108, 165) 133 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.2, 8.1)
Fort Bend County 7 137.8 (126.2, 150.1) 157 (106, 166) 115 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.5, -3.4)
Austin County 7 137.3 (97.2, 188.6) 158 (29, 172) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 8.3)
Coryell County 7 137.1 (101.5, 181.1) 159 (40, 172) 10 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.0, -1.7)
Rockwall County 7 136.2 (108.0, 169.6) 160 (57, 171) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.4)
Trinity County 7 133.9 (87.1, 197.1) 161 (22, 172) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.8, -0.4)
Denton County 7 133.4 (122.2, 145.3) 162 (116, 167) 112 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.0, -3.2)
Bandera County 7 132.7 (93.6, 182.6) 163 (34, 172) 8 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.9, -2.4)
Leon County 7 130.1 (86.3, 188.5) 164 (28, 172) 6 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.3, -1.2)
Comal County 7 129.4 (109.9, 151.4) 165 (94, 171) 33 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.6)
Collin County 7 128.3 (118.5, 138.6) 166 (130, 169) 134 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.3, -3.3)
Freestone County 7 126.7 (81.8, 187.6) 167 (26, 172) 5 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.7, -2.1)
Midland County 7 126.1 (103.3, 152.4) 168 (92, 172) 22 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.3)
Hood County 7 123.8 (99.7, 152.0) 169 (79, 172) 18 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.3, -3.4)
Kendall County 7 115.9 (85.5, 153.6) 170 (78, 172) 10 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.8, -1.9)
Robertson County 7 93.0 (53.0, 151.8) 171 (80, 172) 3 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.4, -4.3)
Llano County 7 92.8 (64.9, 128.5) 172 (126, 172) 7 falling falling trend -6.4 (-9.4, -3.9)
Andrews County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/04/2024 8:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top