Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 12.0 (11.8, 12.2) N/A 3,526 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 8.6 (8.5, 8.6) N/A 34,507 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Anderson County 6 *** 21.2 (16.7, 26.6) 10 (2, 39) 16
*
*
Angelina County 6 *** 11.9 (9.1, 15.4) 56 (20, 116) 13 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.5, 8.5)
Aransas County 6 *** 12.9 (8.4, 19.7) 43 (8, 122) 6
*
*
Atascosa County 6 *** 13.0 (9.2, 18.1) 41 (10, 118) 8 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.3, 8.2)
Austin County 6 *** 10.7 (6.6, 16.8) 74 (12, 123) 4
*
*
Bastrop County 6 *** 15.0 (11.6, 18.9) 28 (8, 91) 15
*
*
Bee County 6 *** 31.6 (23.6, 41.5) 1 (1, 15) 11
*
*
Bell County 6 *** 12.8 (11.0, 14.7) 47 (23, 84) 40 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 6.2)
Bexar County 6 *** 16.6 (15.8, 17.5) 20 (12, 32) 320 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 2.8)
Bowie County 6 *** 7.7 (5.6, 10.4) 115 (59, 123) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.3)
Brazoria County 6 *** 14.5 (12.7, 16.4) 31 (17, 64) 54 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.6, 6.9)
Brazos County 6 *** 9.2 (7.2, 11.5) 97 (49, 121) 16 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.6, 9.2)
Brown County 6 *** 12.8 (8.6, 18.5) 46 (10, 120) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 6.5)
Burleson County 6 *** 11.5 (6.6, 19.3) 63 (7, 123) 3
*
*
Burnet County 6 *** 8.2 (5.5, 12.0) 109 (41, 123) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.0, 7.0)
Caldwell County 6 *** 20.2 (14.8, 27.0) 11 (1, 63) 10 rising rising trend 8.7 (3.2, 14.5)
Calhoun County 6 *** 13.0 (7.6, 21.1) 42 (6, 123) 4 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.1, 10.5)
Cameron County 6 *** 14.2 (12.6, 15.9) 32 (18, 65) 60 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.4)
Cass County 6 *** 10.0 (5.9, 16.1) 86 (12, 123) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-5.1, 8.4)
Chambers County 6 *** 10.0 (6.1, 15.4) 87 (14, 123) 4
*
*
Cherokee County 6 *** 10.9 (7.7, 15.1) 69 (20, 122) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.2)
Collin County 6 *** 7.6 (6.8, 8.5) 117 (92, 121) 66 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.1)
Colorado County 6 *** 11.9 (7.3, 19.0) 57 (9, 123) 4
*
*
Comal County 6 *** 10.7 (8.6, 13.1) 75 (32, 115) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.4)
Cooke County 6 *** 7.7 (4.8, 11.9) 116 (37, 123) 4
*
*
Coryell County 6 *** 12.9 (9.2, 17.6) 44 (10, 118) 8
*
*
Dallas County 6 *** 13.6 (13.0, 14.3) 37 (28, 55) 345 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
DeWitt County 6 *** 13.6 (8.0, 21.9) 38 (4, 123) 4
*
*
Denton County 6 *** 7.3 (6.4, 8.3) 120 (94, 123) 56 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.4)
Duval County 6 *** 27.5 (16.2, 44.0) 3 (1, 93) 4
*
*
Ector County 6 *** 15.7 (12.9, 19.0) 26 (9, 73) 23 rising rising trend 6.3 (3.6, 9.1)
El Paso County 6 *** 16.5 (15.2, 17.8) 22 (13, 36) 134 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.7, 4.8)
Ellis County 6 *** 10.5 (8.5, 12.9) 78 (34, 114) 20 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.4, 8.1)
Fannin County 6 *** 10.9 (7.0, 16.5) 70 (13, 123) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.3, 8.0)
Fayette County 6 *** 7.5 (4.3, 12.9) 119 (34, 123) 3
*
*
Fort Bend County 6 *** 9.6 (8.5, 10.7) 95 (62, 112) 68 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 2.9)
Frio County 6 *** 23.2 (14.1, 35.8) 6 (1, 100) 4 rising rising trend 8.0 (4.5, 11.7)
Galveston County 6 *** 12.6 (11.0, 14.3) 48 (27, 84) 51 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.2)
Gillespie County 6 *** 7.1 (3.7, 12.9) 121 (27, 123) 3
*
*
Grayson County 6 *** 8.3 (6.4, 10.5) 108 (56, 123) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.0)
Gregg County 6 *** 10.3 (8.1, 13.0) 82 (32, 119) 15 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 6.7)
Grimes County 6 *** 14.7 (9.7, 21.7) 30 (5, 121) 6
*
*
Guadalupe County 6 *** 11.6 (9.4, 14.2) 61 (25, 107) 20 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 4.7)
Hale County 6 *** 12.3 (7.7, 18.7) 52 (8, 123) 4 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.7, 10.5)
Hardin County 6 *** 9.9 (6.9, 14.0) 88 (23, 123) 7 rising rising trend 6.8 (1.8, 12.1)
Harris County 6 *** 12.5 (12.1, 13.0) 49 (38, 66) 547 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.3, 2.3)
Harrison County 6 *** 7.8 (5.5, 10.9) 114 (51, 123) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.4)
Hays County 6 *** 12.1 (9.9, 14.6) 55 (23, 102) 23 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.3, 7.0)
Henderson County 6 *** 11.4 (8.8, 14.6) 65 (23, 116) 14 rising rising trend 5.2 (3.1, 7.5)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 12.2 (11.1, 13.4) 54 (32, 80) 89 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.4, 3.9)
Hill County 6 *** 10.7 (7.0, 16.0) 73 (15, 123) 6
*
*
Hockley County 6 *** 16.2 (9.9, 25.2) 24 (2, 120) 4
*
*
Hood County 6 *** 10.4 (7.6, 14.2) 80 (23, 121) 10
*
*
Hopkins County 6 *** 9.0 (5.6, 13.9) 99 (25, 123) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.8, 11.0)
Howard County 6 *** 16.1 (11.0, 22.7) 25 (3, 110) 7 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.6, 11.4)
Hunt County 6 *** 9.7 (7.4, 12.6) 94 (32, 121) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.0)
Jasper County 6 *** 10.3 (6.6, 15.5) 83 (17, 123) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 6 *** 12.3 (10.6, 14.2) 53 (27, 95) 39 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 27.2 (20.7, 35.1) 4 (1, 21) 12 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.1, 8.9)
Johnson County 6 *** 11.3 (9.2, 13.7) 66 (27, 110) 21 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.9, 10.0)
Jones County 6 *** 13.8 (8.0, 22.5) 36 (4, 123) 3
*
*
Kaufman County 6 *** 10.7 (8.3, 13.7) 72 (28, 118) 14 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 8.4)
Kendall County 6 *** 7.9 (4.7, 12.6) 113 (31, 123) 4
*
*
Kerr County 6 *** 9.7 (7.0, 13.5) 93 (26, 123) 9 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.6, 8.4)
Kleberg County 6 *** 17.8 (11.7, 26.0) 13 (2, 111) 5 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.1, 10.1)
Lamar County 6 *** 11.0 (7.8, 15.3) 68 (16, 121) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.9, 10.6)
Lampasas County 6 *** 10.7 (6.0, 18.0) 76 (11, 123) 3
*
*
Lavaca County 6 *** 11.9 (6.6, 20.1) 58 (6, 123) 3
*
*
Leon County 6 *** 11.0 (6.5, 18.6) 67 (11, 123) 4
*
*
Liberty County 6 *** 11.5 (8.5, 15.2) 64 (18, 120) 10 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.5, 9.5)
Llano County 6 *** 8.6 (4.8, 15.5) 104 (19, 123) 4
*
*
Lubbock County 6 *** 14.8 (12.9, 16.9) 29 (14, 63) 45 rising rising trend 6.5 (4.2, 8.9)
Matagorda County 6 *** 13.8 (9.3, 20.0) 35 (7, 119) 6
*
*
Maverick County 6 *** 22.4 (17.1, 28.9) 9 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.4)
McLennan County 6 *** 8.9 (7.4, 10.7) 100 (60, 119) 25 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 3.8)
Medina County 6 *** 11.6 (8.1, 16.3) 62 (14, 121) 7 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.4, 7.7)
Midland County 6 *** 13.3 (10.8, 16.2) 40 (15, 97) 21 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.6, 10.1)
Milam County 6 *** 10.9 (6.5, 17.4) 71 (13, 123) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 6 *** 8.6 (7.5, 9.7) 105 (76, 118) 54 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.4, 5.3)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 7.9 (5.2, 11.7) 112 (38, 123) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.8, 6.3)
Navarro County 6 *** 8.4 (5.5, 12.3) 107 (36, 123) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 7.5)
Nolan County 6 *** 17.0 (9.5, 28.4) 17 (1, 123) 3
*
*
Nueces County 6 *** 17.5 (15.8, 19.5) 15 (9, 33) 74 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.3)
Orange County 6 *** 9.3 (7.0, 12.3) 96 (37, 122) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.5)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 9.8 (6.0, 15.4) 91 (16, 123) 4 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 10.0)
Panola County 6 *** 9.9 (5.7, 16.4) 89 (14, 123) 3
*
*
Parker County 6 *** 9.8 (7.6, 12.3) 92 (38, 121) 16 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.5, 7.7)
Pecos County 6 *** 17.7 (10.1, 29.1) 14 (1, 123) 3
*
*
Polk County 6 *** 12.3 (8.8, 16.9) 51 (13, 120) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 6.4)
Potter County 6 *** 16.7 (13.6, 20.2) 19 (7, 66) 21 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.1, 7.9)
Randall County 6 *** 8.8 (6.8, 11.2) 103 (52, 122) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.2, 7.3)
Reeves County 6 *** 26.6 (16.0, 41.5) 5 (1, 100) 4
*
*
Robertson County 6 *** 13.4 (7.5, 22.5) 39 (4, 123) 3
*
*
Rockwall County 6 *** 6.1 (4.1, 8.8) 123 (77, 123) 6
*
*
Rusk County 6 *** 10.4 (7.2, 14.7) 81 (24, 122) 7 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.3, 11.7)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 8.0 (4.7, 13.3) 110 (27, 123) 4
*
*
San Patricio County 6 *** 16.5 (12.7, 21.1) 23 (6, 83) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 6.3)
Shelby County 6 *** 10.2 (5.7, 16.9) 85 (12, 123) 3 stable stable trend 3.0 (-4.0, 10.5)
Smith County 6 *** 9.8 (8.2, 11.6) 90 (48, 115) 27 rising rising trend 5.0 (3.1, 7.0)
Starr County 6 *** 17.3 (12.8, 22.8) 16 (4, 90) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.4, 7.6)
Tarrant County 6 *** 10.5 (9.8, 11.2) 79 (60, 93) 212 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.2, 4.8)
Taylor County 6 *** 14.1 (11.5, 17.1) 33 (13, 85) 21 rising rising trend 28.0 (4.7, 56.4)
Titus County 6 *** 9.1 (5.2, 14.9) 98 (18, 123) 3
*
*
Tom Green County 6 *** 12.5 (9.9, 15.5) 50 (17, 102) 17 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.3, 7.9)
Travis County 6 *** 11.8 (10.9, 12.8) 60 (37, 82) 127 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.9, 5.1)
Trinity County 6 *** 16.8 (9.9, 27.5) 18 (2, 121) 4
*
*
Upshur County 6 *** 7.9 (5.0, 12.2) 111 (34, 123) 5
*
*
Uvalde County 6 *** 16.6 (10.8, 24.6) 21 (2, 115) 5
*
*
Val Verde County 6 *** 23.0 (17.5, 29.8) 8 (1, 42) 12 rising rising trend 6.6 (1.1, 12.5)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 10.3 (7.3, 14.2) 84 (22, 122) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.3, 8.3)
Victoria County 6 *** 13.9 (10.9, 17.5) 34 (12, 97) 15 rising rising trend 6.3 (3.5, 9.2)
Walker County 6 *** 23.1 (18.6, 28.4) 7 (1, 25) 19 rising rising trend 43.3 (4.6, 96.3)
Waller County 6 *** 7.0 (4.1, 11.2) 122 (51, 123) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 *** 11.9 (8.1, 17.0) 59 (12, 122) 7
*
*
Webb County 6 *** 18.7 (16.1, 21.5) 12 (6, 38) 40 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
Wharton County 6 *** 8.8 (5.6, 13.4) 101 (26, 123) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.9, 6.2)
Wichita County 6 *** 12.8 (10.3, 15.8) 45 (17, 99) 19 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.2, 11.2)
Willacy County 6 *** 15.2 (9.0, 24.3) 27 (3, 123) 4
*
*
Williamson County 6 *** 8.5 (7.4, 9.7) 106 (75, 119) 44 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.6, 3.1)
Wilson County 6 *** 7.6 (4.8, 11.5) 118 (39, 123) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.4, 5.9)
Wise County 6 *** 10.6 (7.5, 14.5) 77 (24, 122) 8
*
*
Wood County 6 *** 8.8 (5.9, 12.9) 102 (32, 123) 7 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.8, 11.1)
Zavala County 6 *** 30.7 (18.3, 48.3) 2 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Andrews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Erath County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/28/2021 9:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top