Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 46.5 (46.1, 46.8) N/A 13,468 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Anderson County 7 59.1 (51.1, 68.1) 76 (13, 141) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Andrews County 7 36.4 (24.1, 52.4) 179 (64, 198) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.0, -3.1)
Angelina County 7 63.0 (56.6, 70.1) 57 (14, 112) 70 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Aransas County 7 77.8 (66.3, 91.3) 6 (1, 77) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Archer County 7 52.8 (37.3, 74.1) 102 (5, 193) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.5)
Atascosa County 7 43.3 (35.9, 51.8) 148 (79, 187) 25 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.2)
Austin County 7 45.0 (36.4, 55.2) 141 (57, 188) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Bandera County 7 46.7 (38.3, 57.1) 136 (54, 184) 23 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.7)
Bastrop County 7 64.1 (57.2, 71.6) 51 (13, 111) 67 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Baylor County 7 73.4 (46.8, 114.1) 15 (1, 190) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.6, 1.8)
Bee County 7 47.5 (37.5, 59.5) 131 (38, 186) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.6, -0.1)
Bell County 7 70.8 (66.6, 75.2) 22 (8, 57) 221 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Bexar County 7 38.0 (36.8, 39.3) 172 (155, 181) 722 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Blanco County 7 41.7 (30.3, 57.5) 162 (50, 197) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 0.1)
Bosque County 7 60.1 (49.2, 73.4) 71 (6, 153) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.7)
Bowie County 7 71.9 (65.3, 79.2) 19 (4, 67) 87 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Brazoria County 7 51.0 (47.7, 54.6) 116 (81, 142) 184 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.3)
Brazos County 7 43.3 (38.9, 48.1) 146 (106, 178) 73 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Brewster County 7 27.8 (16.1, 45.6) 193 (86, 198) 4
*
*
Brown County 7 62.2 (53.3, 72.4) 64 (9, 131) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Burleson County 7 68.5 (55.3, 84.5) 32 (2, 132) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Burnet County 7 59.5 (51.9, 68.0) 74 (15, 140) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Caldwell County 7 47.5 (39.0, 57.3) 132 (54, 183) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Calhoun County 7 54.5 (42.9, 68.5) 96 (13, 176) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
Callahan County 7 52.2 (39.7, 68.2) 105 (14, 187) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
Cameron County 7 26.4 (24.3, 28.7) 195 (183, 198) 117 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.3, -1.8)
Camp County 7 74.3 (56.7, 96.2) 12 (1, 133) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.6)
Carson County 7 41.5 (24.9, 67.1) 163 (12, 198) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.4, 1.2)
Cass County 7 76.2 (65.6, 88.3) 9 (2, 84) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.1)
Chambers County 7 63.4 (52.5, 75.9) 54 (4, 141) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Cherokee County 7 66.3 (57.9, 75.6) 41 (7, 105) 47 falling falling trend -3.4 (-11.8, -0.4)
Childress County 7 49.1 (29.2, 77.7) 124 (3, 198) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.5, 2.2)
Clay County 7 53.0 (39.1, 71.5) 101 (9, 190) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.8, 3.1)
Coke County 7 56.4 (33.9, 94.6) 87 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.7, 5.0)
Coleman County 7 70.2 (52.0, 94.4) 23 (1, 166) 11 stable stable trend 16.2 (-1.8, 34.1)
Collin County 7 39.1 (37.2, 41.0) 169 (146, 179) 346 falling falling trend -3.6 (-8.4, -1.7)
Colorado County 7 42.4 (32.8, 54.4) 153 (56, 196) 14 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.9, -3.3)
Comal County 7 42.5 (38.4, 46.8) 152 (113, 178) 86 falling falling trend -4.3 (-15.0, -1.7)
Comanche County 7 47.5 (35.9, 62.6) 133 (32, 193) 11 falling falling trend -10.1 (-34.3, -4.4)
Cooke County 7 72.8 (63.0, 83.7) 16 (2, 92) 42 stable stable trend 6.6 (-0.8, 15.8)
Coryell County 7 92.6 (82.1, 104.0) 2 (1, 19) 58 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.1)
Crosby County 7 58.3 (37.3, 88.4) 80 (1, 198) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.8)
Dallam County 7 43.3 (24.4, 71.2) 147 (5, 198) 3 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.5, -1.2)
Dallas County 7 45.9 (44.7, 47.2) 138 (118, 151) 1,073 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -2.5)
Dawson County 7 42.2 (28.5, 60.3) 154 (28, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.4, 2.4)
DeWitt County 7 50.2 (39.5, 63.3) 120 (23, 185) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Deaf Smith County 7 34.6 (23.6, 48.9) 185 (87, 198) 7 falling falling trend -9.4 (-32.6, -0.9)
Delta County 7 64.0 (41.4, 96.5) 52 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.7)
Denton County 7 42.9 (40.7, 45.2) 150 (128, 168) 311 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Donley County 7 57.8 (33.4, 98.6) 81 (1, 198) 3 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.7, -1.5)
Duval County 7 37.6 (24.9, 55.1) 175 (33, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.5, 3.4)
Eastland County 7 52.1 (40.8, 66.1) 106 (18, 186) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Ector County 7 50.3 (44.9, 56.1) 118 (63, 157) 66 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
El Paso County 7 28.0 (26.4, 29.7) 192 (182, 197) 226 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.3, -2.5)
Ellis County 7 56.1 (51.3, 61.3) 89 (49, 129) 105 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 3.6)
Erath County 7 55.2 (45.9, 66.0) 93 (16, 165) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Falls County 7 63.7 (50.2, 80.1) 53 (3, 160) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.3)
Fannin County 7 73.9 (63.6, 85.6) 14 (2, 85) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Fayette County 7 42.1 (33.7, 52.3) 157 (72, 192) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Floyd County 7 45.8 (27.9, 72.6) 139 (6, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.0, 5.0)
Fort Bend County 7 33.4 (31.5, 35.5) 187 (168, 191) 243 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.5, -2.7)
Franklin County 7 74.1 (56.0, 96.9) 13 (1, 146) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.0)
Freestone County 7 77.5 (63.6, 93.8) 7 (1, 96) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.6)
Frio County 7 35.2 (24.2, 49.5) 183 (79, 198) 7 falling falling trend -6.9 (-22.4, -2.7)
Gaines County 7 36.4 (24.0, 52.5) 180 (65, 198) 6 falling falling trend -5.5 (-27.9, -2.3)
Galveston County 7 57.2 (53.8, 60.8) 82 (51, 113) 225 stable stable trend 3.5 (-2.6, 7.9)
Gillespie County 7 37.8 (30.6, 46.8) 174 (105, 196) 21 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.3)
Goliad County 7 47.9 (32.1, 70.5) 129 (6, 197) 6 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.3, 0.2)
Gonzales County 7 51.1 (39.6, 65.1) 115 (16, 186) 14 rising rising trend 10.2 (0.9, 29.3)
Gray County 7 56.0 (44.3, 70.1) 90 (9, 175) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.0)
Grayson County 7 66.1 (60.8, 71.7) 43 (13, 84) 121 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Gregg County 7 58.5 (53.1, 64.4) 79 (33, 121) 88 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Grimes County 7 53.3 (43.5, 64.9) 99 (21, 174) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Guadalupe County 7 48.3 (43.9, 53.1) 126 (86, 161) 89 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Hale County 7 46.0 (36.7, 57.1) 137 (37, 188) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 2.9)
Hamilton County 7 66.5 (48.3, 90.7) 38 (1, 176) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Hardeman County 7 67.5 (41.3, 107.2) 36 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.6, 5.0)
Hardin County 7 62.3 (54.5, 70.9) 63 (11, 120) 48 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Harris County 7 42.7 (41.7, 43.6) 151 (135, 164) 1,742 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -3.2)
Harrison County 7 65.9 (58.4, 74.1) 46 (8, 106) 58 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Haskell County 7 44.5 (27.2, 71.2) 143 (5, 198) 4
*
*
Hays County 7 36.5 (32.7, 40.7) 178 (141, 189) 72 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Henderson County 7 81.1 (74.3, 88.4) 3 (2, 35) 111 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Hidalgo County 7 25.2 (23.6, 26.9) 198 (188, 198) 189 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -3.1)
Hill County 7 69.3 (59.7, 80.3) 28 (4, 102) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Hockley County 7 36.1 (26.5, 48.1) 181 (89, 198) 10 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -1.4)
Hood County 7 56.0 (49.6, 63.1) 91 (36, 144) 60 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Hopkins County 7 66.3 (56.6, 77.3) 40 (5, 117) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Houston County 7 51.6 (41.9, 63.3) 113 (26, 182) 20 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Howard County 7 51.8 (42.2, 63.1) 110 (28, 177) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Hunt County 7 69.2 (62.7, 76.2) 29 (6, 83) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Hutchinson County 7 54.8 (43.1, 69.1) 94 (8, 180) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Jack County 7 53.0 (35.8, 76.4) 100 (4, 196) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.3, -0.7)
Jackson County 7 58.8 (44.5, 76.5) 77 (3, 180) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.4)
Jasper County 7 57.2 (48.2, 67.5) 83 (19, 156) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Jefferson County 7 52.5 (48.8, 56.4) 104 (72, 137) 157 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.1, -3.0)
Jim Wells County 7 32.0 (25.2, 40.2) 189 (137, 198) 16 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.3)
Johnson County 7 65.6 (60.5, 71.0) 47 (15, 91) 129 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Jones County 7 62.6 (49.0, 79.0) 61 (3, 168) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Karnes County 7 43.6 (30.5, 60.6) 145 (27, 198) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.0)
Kaufman County 7 62.7 (56.5, 69.3) 60 (16, 106) 79 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Kendall County 7 45.1 (38.0, 53.4) 140 (70, 183) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.1)
Kerr County 7 51.9 (45.2, 59.5) 109 (50, 161) 50 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Kleberg County 7 52.0 (41.1, 64.9) 108 (25, 185) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.6)
Knox County 7 60.7 (35.3, 100.6) 69 (1, 198) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.4, 5.5)
Lamar County 7 72.1 (63.6, 81.6) 17 (3, 83) 53 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Lamb County 7 38.6 (26.7, 54.6) 170 (59, 198) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.4)
Lampasas County 7 66.1 (54.1, 80.5) 42 (3, 141) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Lavaca County 7 44.5 (35.0, 56.5) 142 (46, 190) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.9)
Lee County 7 51.7 (39.8, 66.7) 112 (19, 184) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 3.0)
Leon County 7 59.7 (48.0, 74.2) 73 (6, 162) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.6)
Liberty County 7 75.8 (67.8, 84.4) 10 (2, 60) 71 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Limestone County 7 63.1 (51.5, 76.7) 56 (5, 150) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Live Oak County 7 52.7 (38.9, 70.6) 103 (7, 189) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.6, 0.0)
Llano County 7 57.0 (46.9, 69.6) 84 (15, 162) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.3)
Lubbock County 7 47.7 (44.3, 51.4) 130 (94, 157) 144 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Madison County 7 66.8 (50.4, 87.0) 37 (2, 162) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.3)
Marion County 7 69.9 (53.0, 92.0) 27 (1, 167) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.7)
Matagorda County 7 62.7 (52.8, 74.0) 59 (8, 133) 30 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Maverick County 7 28.9 (22.7, 36.2) 191 (156, 198) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.5)
McCulloch County 7 68.5 (49.6, 93.6) 33 (1, 170) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.7)
McLennan County 7 56.9 (53.0, 61.0) 85 (51, 119) 162 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.6)
Medina County 7 42.0 (35.2, 49.8) 158 (94, 187) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.8)
Midland County 7 42.1 (37.4, 47.2) 155 (108, 182) 61 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.5)
Milam County 7 59.4 (48.5, 72.2) 75 (7, 156) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Mills County 7 39.7 (23.4, 67.4) 165 (10, 198) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.1, 5.7)
Mitchell County 7 66.0 (45.2, 93.6) 44 (1, 185) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.5)
Montague County 7 64.6 (52.3, 79.4) 50 (3, 151) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Montgomery County 7 49.5 (47.0, 52.1) 122 (92, 141) 315 falling falling trend -4.7 (-10.7, -3.0)
Moore County 7 36.0 (24.9, 50.3) 182 (72, 198) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.0, -0.1)
Morris County 7 72.1 (55.8, 92.4) 18 (1, 150) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.8)
Nacogdoches County 7 53.7 (46.3, 62.0) 98 (42, 158) 39 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
Navarro County 7 59.9 (51.6, 69.2) 72 (14, 141) 38 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
Newton County 7 61.8 (47.8, 79.3) 66 (3, 169) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.3)
Nolan County 7 64.7 (49.6, 83.3) 49 (2, 165) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.0)
Nueces County 7 41.8 (39.0, 44.8) 161 (127, 176) 173 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Ochiltree County 7 49.3 (30.5, 75.2) 123 (3, 198) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.2, 5.7)
Orange County 7 69.1 (62.0, 76.7) 30 (5, 88) 73 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Palo Pinto County 7 63.1 (52.7, 75.2) 55 (6, 137) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Panola County 7 71.2 (58.9, 85.7) 21 (2, 121) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Parker County 7 71.8 (66.1, 77.9) 20 (6, 64) 123 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.8, 9.9)
Parmer County 7 37.8 (23.0, 58.9) 173 (26, 198) 4
*
*
Pecos County 7 38.6 (26.2, 55.0) 171 (51, 198) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.2, -0.1)
Polk County 7 102.0 (90.8, 114.4) 1 (1, 7) 70 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 5.1)
Potter County 7 62.8 (56.5, 69.5) 58 (17, 109) 77 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Rains County 7 67.6 (52.0, 87.3) 35 (1, 159) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.9)
Randall County 7 48.3 (43.6, 53.5) 127 (82, 163) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Real County 7 65.4 (39.9, 107.3) 48 (1, 198) 5
*
*
Red River County 7 66.4 (52.2, 84.3) 39 (2, 144) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Reeves County 7 31.9 (20.2, 47.8) 190 (67, 198) 5 falling falling trend -7.0 (-12.2, -4.6)
Refugio County 7 39.5 (25.0, 61.3) 168 (26, 198) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.7, -0.2)
Robertson County 7 65.9 (52.2, 82.5) 45 (2, 155) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Rockwall County 7 48.4 (42.3, 55.1) 125 (70, 169) 48 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.3)
Runnels County 7 44.2 (30.5, 62.8) 144 (23, 198) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.1)
Rusk County 7 62.4 (54.4, 71.5) 62 (11, 123) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Sabine County 7 54.7 (41.2, 73.1) 95 (6, 187) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.3)
San Augustine County 7 58.6 (41.9, 81.5) 78 (2, 189) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.2)
San Jacinto County 7 77.1 (65.8, 90.1) 8 (1, 86) 36 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.3)
San Patricio County 7 50.5 (43.7, 58.2) 117 (52, 165) 40 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
San Saba County 7 34.7 (20.4, 58.0) 184 (34, 198) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.4, 0.8)
Scurry County 7 42.1 (30.2, 57.3) 156 (47, 197) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.4)
Shelby County 7 68.1 (56.2, 81.9) 34 (2, 133) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Smith County 7 61.4 (57.4, 65.6) 67 (34, 98) 180 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Somervell County 7 41.9 (27.7, 61.9) 159 (22, 198) 6 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.6, 1.7)
Starr County 7 32.1 (25.8, 39.3) 188 (140, 198) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Stephens County 7 78.2 (58.3, 103.6) 5 (1, 144) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.5)
Swisher County 7 56.2 (37.2, 82.5) 88 (2, 196) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.6, 6.5)
Tarrant County 7 49.7 (48.3, 51.2) 121 (99, 135) 965 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.6)
Taylor County 7 51.1 (46.1, 56.5) 114 (68, 152) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Terry County 7 48.1 (33.6, 67.0) 128 (13, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.1)
Titus County 7 61.1 (50.2, 73.8) 68 (6, 148) 22 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.0)
Tom Green County 7 52.0 (46.7, 57.7) 107 (56, 149) 73 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Travis County 7 37.5 (35.7, 39.3) 176 (154, 183) 377 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.0)
Trinity County 7 79.1 (64.7, 96.7) 4 (1, 91) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.4)
Tyler County 7 56.8 (45.9, 70.1) 86 (13, 169) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Upshur County 7 62.1 (53.4, 72.1) 65 (9, 132) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Uvalde County 7 41.4 (32.0, 52.8) 164 (68, 197) 14 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.9)
Val Verde County 7 34.3 (27.7, 42.2) 186 (126, 197) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Van Zandt County 7 70.0 (62.2, 78.7) 25 (5, 89) 60 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Victoria County 7 50.2 (44.5, 56.6) 119 (66, 160) 56 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Walker County 7 55.5 (48.2, 63.6) 92 (33, 152) 43 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.6)
Waller County 7 51.8 (43.0, 61.7) 111 (35, 170) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.5)
Ward County 7 43.0 (28.4, 62.5) 149 (16, 198) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 3.7)
Washington County 7 39.6 (32.7, 47.9) 167 (95, 191) 23 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.5)
Webb County 7 25.6 (22.6, 28.9) 196 (184, 198) 54 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Wharton County 7 39.7 (32.5, 48.1) 166 (98, 192) 22 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.8)
Wheeler County 7 75.1 (50.3, 109.9) 11 (1, 176) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.1, 4.8)
Wichita County 7 60.5 (55.1, 66.4) 70 (28, 110) 94 falling falling trend -3.1 (-8.6, -2.1)
Wilbarger County 7 47.5 (34.0, 65.1) 134 (17, 195) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.6)
Willacy County 7 27.6 (18.7, 39.3) 194 (132, 198) 6 falling falling trend -25.6 (-45.8, -2.1)
Williamson County 7 41.8 (39.4, 44.4) 160 (132, 172) 226 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Wilson County 7 36.6 (30.2, 44.1) 177 (116, 197) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.6)
Winkler County 7 53.7 (32.8, 82.8) 97 (1, 198) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 2.7)
Wise County 7 68.9 (60.9, 77.6) 31 (6, 92) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Wood County 7 70.2 (62.2, 79.1) 24 (4, 86) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Yoakum County 7 47.2 (28.2, 73.9) 135 (4, 198) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.0, 4.8)
Young County 7 69.9 (56.2, 86.4) 26 (1, 132) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Zapata County 7 25.4 (15.0, 40.3) 197 (124, 198) 4 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.9, -4.5)
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/20/2024 6:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Armstrong, Bailey, Borden, Briscoe, Brooks, Castro, Cochran, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Culberson, Dickens, Dimmit, Edwards, Fisher, Foard, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hansford, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Kent, Kimble, King, Kinney, La Salle, Lipscomb, Loving, Lynn, Martin, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Motley, Oldham, Presidio, Reagan, Roberts, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Sutton, Terrell, Throckmorton, Upton, Zavala

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top