Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 48.3 (47.9, 48.7) N/A 13,561 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 56.3 (56.2, 56.4) N/A 223,216 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Willacy County 7 33.6 (23.6, 46.5) 187 (103, 197) 7 stable stable trend -25.5 (-52.9, 17.8)
Comanche County 7 35.9 (25.9, 49.4) 181 (95, 197) 9 falling falling trend -10.8 (-17.5, -3.4)
Colorado County 7 41.1 (31.6, 53.0) 160 (79, 195) 14 falling falling trend -8.3 (-14.1, -2.1)
Cameron County 7 29.2 (26.9, 31.6) 192 (179, 197) 125 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.0, -2.9)
Jefferson County 7 54.3 (50.5, 58.3) 105 (75, 135) 161 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.1, -0.3)
Reeves County 7 27.9 (17.0, 43.0) 194 (108, 197) 4 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.9, -1.7)
Andrews County 7 33.2 (21.3, 49.1) 189 (88, 197) 5 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.8, -2.8)
Refugio County 7 46.3 (30.2, 69.7) 140 (6, 197) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.7, -0.5)
Leon County 7 64.9 (52.4, 80.0) 63 (4, 157) 20 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.8, 3.0)
Goliad County 7 51.7 (35.1, 75.0) 120 (6, 196) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -0.8)
Hockley County 7 37.1 (27.4, 49.1) 176 (95, 197) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.0, -1.7)
Montgomery County 7 49.6 (47.0, 52.2) 128 (100, 145) 302 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.2)
Harris County 7 44.2 (43.2, 45.2) 152 (134, 162) 1,752 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.1)
Jack County 7 52.0 (34.8, 75.4) 118 (3, 196) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
Fort Bend County 7 35.0 (32.9, 37.2) 183 (166, 188) 240 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.4, -2.9)
Walker County 7 55.5 (48.1, 63.7) 100 (33, 152) 42 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.1)
Somervell County 7 36.6 (23.3, 55.9) 179 (59, 197) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.5, -0.5)
Wharton County 7 40.7 (33.3, 49.3) 163 (102, 191) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Jim Wells County 7 30.3 (23.6, 38.3) 191 (149, 197) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.9)
Moore County 7 37.6 (26.2, 52.3) 172 (75, 197) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.7)
Collin County 7 40.5 (38.6, 42.6) 164 (145, 177) 340 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
Hidalgo County 7 26.1 (24.5, 27.8) 197 (186, 197) 189 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
San Saba County 7 42.5 (25.3, 69.0) 156 (7, 197) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.3, 0.0)
Gillespie County 7 38.6 (31.3, 47.6) 171 (110, 196) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.1)
Brazoria County 7 52.3 (48.8, 55.9) 116 (84, 141) 182 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Callahan County 7 46.5 (34.5, 62.2) 138 (31, 196) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.4)
Denton County 7 44.7 (42.4, 47.1) 150 (124, 164) 301 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Navarro County 7 62.3 (53.7, 71.8) 73 (12, 133) 39 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.0)
Pecos County 7 33.8 (22.2, 49.3) 186 (82, 197) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.8)
Tarrant County 7 51.9 (50.4, 53.4) 119 (98, 131) 973 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.6)
Dallas County 7 48.1 (46.8, 49.5) 135 (116, 146) 1,095 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.2, -2.5)
Ector County 7 53.9 (48.3, 60.0) 107 (59, 148) 70 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
El Paso County 7 28.9 (27.2, 30.7) 193 (180, 196) 229 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.5)
Live Oak County 7 51.3 (37.6, 69.2) 121 (14, 192) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
Rockwall County 7 47.5 (41.2, 54.3) 136 (84, 176) 44 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.6)
Travis County 7 39.6 (37.8, 41.5) 167 (149, 180) 382 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.3)
Kerr County 7 48.2 (41.8, 55.5) 134 (76, 175) 47 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.2)
Lavaca County 7 45.4 (35.6, 57.5) 145 (57, 191) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Nacogdoches County 7 53.5 (46.1, 61.9) 110 (50, 161) 39 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Val Verde County 7 33.3 (26.7, 41.0) 188 (138, 197) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Washington County 7 37.1 (30.3, 45.3) 174 (122, 195) 21 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Galveston County 7 58.1 (54.7, 61.8) 91 (61, 115) 219 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.0)
Nueces County 7 44.1 (41.2, 47.1) 153 (124, 170) 178 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.1)
San Patricio County 7 53.2 (46.1, 61.1) 111 (46, 162) 41 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Atascosa County 7 45.6 (37.9, 54.5) 143 (76, 184) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Blanco County 7 50.4 (37.4, 67.9) 124 (14, 193) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.3)
Caldwell County 7 47.0 (38.5, 57.0) 137 (70, 184) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Gaines County 7 37.5 (24.8, 53.9) 173 (62, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.5)
Madison County 7 67.4 (50.6, 88.2) 45 (1, 173) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.3)
Midland County 7 46.4 (41.4, 51.9) 139 (98, 174) 66 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Williamson County 7 44.6 (41.9, 47.3) 151 (121, 165) 228 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -1.9)
Wilson County 7 41.0 (34.0, 49.0) 161 (100, 189) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Gregg County 7 62.8 (57.1, 69.0) 70 (25, 111) 92 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Kleberg County 7 53.0 (42.0, 66.0) 112 (27, 183) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Lubbock County 7 49.5 (45.9, 53.3) 130 (93, 153) 146 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Victoria County 7 54.7 (48.6, 61.4) 104 (52, 148) 60 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Wichita County 7 61.5 (56.0, 67.5) 76 (30, 116) 94 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Austin County 7 44.9 (36.2, 55.3) 149 (70, 188) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Bee County 7 42.3 (32.8, 53.7) 157 (76, 195) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Brazos County 7 45.0 (40.4, 50.0) 148 (103, 175) 72 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Clay County 7 49.2 (35.7, 67.5) 131 (18, 194) 9 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.9, 1.2)
Fayette County 7 41.7 (33.4, 52.0) 159 (91, 193) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Franklin County 7 60.6 (44.2, 81.8) 81 (2, 184) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.1)
Guadalupe County 7 50.3 (45.6, 55.2) 126 (84, 157) 89 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Hays County 7 39.2 (35.2, 43.7) 169 (134, 186) 73 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
McLennan County 7 58.4 (54.4, 62.7) 90 (54, 117) 162 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Nolan County 7 61.8 (47.1, 80.0) 75 (2, 175) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Orange County 7 71.1 (63.9, 78.9) 30 (4, 83) 75 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Titus County 7 60.9 (49.8, 73.7) 79 (8, 162) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Waller County 7 50.3 (41.5, 60.3) 125 (55, 180) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.7)
Bexar County 7 39.5 (38.2, 40.9) 168 (150, 178) 731 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Chambers County 7 65.1 (53.8, 78.0) 61 (4, 145) 25 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Houston County 7 56.3 (46.1, 68.6) 96 (19, 172) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Aransas County 7 72.8 (61.8, 85.8) 21 (2, 105) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Baylor County 7 71.7 (45.3, 112.4) 27 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.2)
Kendall County 7 46.2 (38.8, 54.8) 142 (83, 181) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Lamb County 7 42.0 (29.5, 58.5) 158 (30, 197) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.4)
Upshur County 7 62.6 (53.6, 72.8) 72 (12, 139) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Uvalde County 7 45.1 (35.1, 57.1) 147 (61, 192) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.2)
Angelina County 7 65.7 (59.0, 73.0) 57 (13, 107) 72 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Bandera County 7 48.9 (40.1, 60.0) 132 (44, 182) 22 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Childress County 7 52.3 (32.2, 81.0) 115 (2, 197) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.4)
Liberty County 7 76.6 (68.5, 85.4) 11 (2, 71) 69 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
McCulloch County 7 73.7 (54.5, 98.9) 14 (1, 170) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.2)
Wilbarger County 7 60.6 (45.3, 79.9) 82 (2, 183) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Coleman County 7 69.2 (50.7, 93.7) 35 (1, 170) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Comal County 7 42.7 (38.5, 47.2) 155 (119, 179) 82 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Dawson County 7 36.8 (24.4, 53.6) 178 (67, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.4)
Gray County 7 65.7 (52.8, 81.0) 56 (2, 148) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.2)
Grayson County 7 67.3 (61.9, 73.1) 46 (13, 90) 119 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Hamilton County 7 62.8 (45.8, 85.7) 71 (1, 179) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
Potter County 7 66.1 (59.7, 73.1) 51 (11, 102) 80 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Carson County 7 36.9 (21.4, 61.5) 177 (31, 197) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.4, 1.8)
Frio County 7 37.1 (25.6, 51.9) 175 (75, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 1.6)
Jackson County 7 60.7 (46.0, 79.0) 80 (3, 174) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Kaufman County 7 66.6 (60.0, 73.6) 48 (11, 102) 80 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Scurry County 7 49.6 (36.4, 66.2) 127 (17, 192) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.7)
Falls County 7 66.4 (52.2, 83.6) 49 (2, 154) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.7)
Hardin County 7 67.2 (59.0, 76.4) 47 (6, 115) 50 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Harrison County 7 66.1 (58.5, 74.5) 54 (12, 110) 56 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Palo Pinto County 7 68.9 (58.0, 81.6) 37 (2, 126) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Runnels County 7 43.9 (30.3, 62.4) 154 (29, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.3)
Grimes County 7 55.6 (45.3, 67.7) 99 (17, 170) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Hood County 7 58.7 (52.1, 66.1) 89 (30, 131) 61 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Llano County 7 63.5 (53.1, 76.3) 69 (7, 138) 32 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Bowie County 7 77.5 (70.5, 85.1) 9 (2, 61) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Brown County 7 65.3 (56.1, 75.9) 60 (8, 125) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Eastland County 7 54.1 (42.8, 68.0) 106 (19, 178) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
Marion County 7 72.4 (55.3, 94.6) 25 (1, 153) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.1)
Matagorda County 7 65.7 (55.5, 77.3) 58 (6, 137) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Tyler County 7 59.9 (48.6, 73.6) 83 (6, 160) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Bastrop County 7 65.4 (58.3, 73.2) 59 (11, 109) 66 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Burleson County 7 66.3 (53.1, 82.3) 50 (2, 154) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Johnson County 7 68.1 (62.8, 73.6) 41 (13, 87) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
San Jacinto County 7 73.6 (62.7, 86.1) 15 (2, 98) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Winkler County 7 52.6 (32.2, 81.2) 113 (2, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.8)
Hunt County 7 71.3 (64.5, 78.5) 29 (5, 84) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Jasper County 7 59.3 (50.0, 70.0) 86 (18, 154) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Randall County 7 50.6 (45.7, 56.0) 123 (79, 158) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Rusk County 7 64.3 (56.0, 73.5) 65 (9, 127) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Taylor County 7 52.4 (47.3, 57.9) 114 (73, 153) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Tom Green County 7 55.2 (49.7, 61.1) 101 (56, 144) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Webb County 7 27.6 (24.4, 31.0) 196 (178, 197) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Bosque County 7 67.6 (55.3, 82.4) 43 (3, 140) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Calhoun County 7 53.8 (42.3, 67.7) 108 (16, 181) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.8)
Henderson County 7 80.7 (73.8, 88.0) 5 (2, 43) 108 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Lamar County 7 72.7 (64.1, 82.3) 23 (3, 91) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Milam County 7 55.7 (45.1, 68.3) 98 (20, 174) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Smith County 7 63.6 (59.5, 67.9) 68 (30, 99) 182 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Terry County 7 48.3 (33.7, 67.2) 133 (14, 196) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.2)
Ochiltree County 7 40.8 (23.8, 64.8) 162 (11, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 3.8)
Panola County 7 71.4 (59.1, 85.9) 28 (2, 126) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
DeWitt County 7 61.9 (49.8, 76.4) 74 (4, 161) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Ellis County 7 59.8 (54.7, 65.2) 84 (37, 119) 107 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Hill County 7 72.5 (62.3, 84.0) 24 (2, 99) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Hopkins County 7 70.1 (59.9, 81.7) 33 (3, 114) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Howard County 7 56.8 (46.7, 68.5) 93 (15, 166) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Red River County 7 68.2 (53.6, 86.6) 40 (1, 150) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Stephens County 7 64.8 (46.8, 88.3) 64 (1, 177) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Ward County 7 54.9 (38.3, 76.5) 102 (3, 194) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.8)
Duval County 7 36.5 (24.3, 53.5) 180 (69, 197) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.3)
Erath County 7 61.2 (51.3, 72.5) 77 (8, 147) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Jones County 7 69.3 (54.9, 86.5) 34 (1, 145) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Starr County 7 38.8 (31.8, 46.9) 170 (112, 193) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Castro County 7 34.7 (19.4, 57.7) 184 (27, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.5)
Hutchinson County 7 68.3 (54.8, 84.3) 39 (2, 144) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Yoakum County 7 49.6 (30.0, 76.9) 129 (3, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.4)
Bell County 7 73.1 (68.7, 77.6) 17 (7, 57) 219 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Floyd County 7 39.9 (23.2, 65.7) 166 (12, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.8)
Karnes County 7 52.2 (37.7, 70.5) 117 (12, 195) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Maverick County 7 27.8 (21.6, 35.1) 195 (166, 197) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.8)
Robertson County 7 69.1 (55.0, 86.2) 36 (2, 150) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Hardeman County 7 61.1 (36.3, 99.5) 78 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 4.5)
Lee County 7 58.7 (45.8, 74.6) 88 (5, 180) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.3)
Morris County 7 67.5 (51.6, 87.5) 44 (1, 165) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Polk County 7 101.1 (89.9, 113.3) 1 (1, 7) 68 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
San Augustine County 7 59.4 (41.7, 83.5) 85 (2, 191) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.1)
Van Zandt County 7 70.6 (62.6, 79.5) 31 (4, 93) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Anderson County 7 68.0 (59.4, 77.6) 42 (4, 111) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Cooke County 7 73.0 (63.1, 84.2) 20 (2, 100) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Fannin County 7 80.3 (69.4, 92.7) 6 (1, 80) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Mitchell County 7 72.8 (50.8, 101.6) 22 (1, 179) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Shelby County 7 68.9 (56.9, 82.9) 38 (2, 136) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Young County 7 76.9 (62.5, 94.0) 10 (1, 113) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Hale County 7 45.5 (36.2, 56.6) 144 (52, 191) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Limestone County 7 66.1 (54.3, 80.1) 52 (3, 146) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.4)
Medina County 7 46.2 (39.0, 54.5) 141 (72, 180) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Freestone County 7 76.5 (62.8, 92.7) 12 (1, 115) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Burnet County 7 63.7 (55.8, 72.7) 67 (8, 122) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Camp County 7 66.1 (49.4, 87.1) 53 (1, 173) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.1)
Cherokee County 7 73.0 (64.2, 82.9) 18 (3, 96) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Delta County 7 72.3 (48.0, 106.6) 26 (1, 188) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.1)
Newton County 7 64.2 (49.9, 82.0) 66 (2, 159) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Sabine County 7 65.9 (51.6, 84.9) 55 (2, 157) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Wheeler County 7 58.9 (37.0, 90.7) 87 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.3)
Coryell County 7 89.5 (79.0, 101.0) 2 (1, 37) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Lampasas County 7 78.7 (65.2, 94.6) 7 (1, 100) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.1)
Deaf Smith County 7 35.2 (24.0, 49.8) 182 (89, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.2)
Rains County 7 81.2 (63.8, 103.0) 4 (1, 116) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Trinity County 7 82.9 (67.9, 101.0) 3 (1, 101) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Wood County 7 74.0 (65.6, 83.3) 13 (3, 83) 63 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Wise County 7 70.6 (62.3, 79.6) 32 (4, 99) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Coke County 7 57.8 (34.7, 96.7) 92 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.4)
Knox County 7 56.8 (32.4, 95.5) 94 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 4.7)
Montague County 7 73.1 (59.7, 89.0) 16 (1, 123) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Crosby County 7 64.9 (42.7, 96.0) 62 (1, 191) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.3)
Cass County 7 77.6 (66.7, 90.0) 8 (1, 87) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Mills County 7 45.2 (27.9, 73.6) 146 (7, 197) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.3)
Archer County 7 53.7 (37.2, 76.2) 109 (3, 193) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.3)
Swisher County 7 54.9 (36.3, 80.6) 103 (2, 197) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.3)
Parker County 7 73.0 (67.1, 79.4) 19 (5, 73) 118 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.6, 8.8)
Gonzales County 7 50.8 (39.4, 64.7) 122 (24, 186) 14 rising rising trend 9.4 (2.4, 16.9)
Brewster County 7 32.9 (20.2, 51.7) 190 (44, 197) 5
*
*
Brooks County 7 34.6 (19.3, 58.0) 185 (37, 197) 3
*
*
Haskell County 7 55.9 (34.7, 87.0) 97 (1, 196) 5
*
*
Parmer County 7 39.9 (24.6, 61.4) 165 (24, 197) 4
*
*
Real County 7 56.5 (34.6, 94.6) 95 (1, 197) 4
*
*
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2022 3:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Armstrong, Bailey, Borden, Briscoe, Cochran, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Culberson, Dallam, Dickens, Dimmit, Donley, Edwards, Fisher, Foard, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hansford, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Kent, Kimble, King, Kinney, La Salle, Lipscomb, Loving, Lynn, Martin, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Motley, Oldham, Presidio, Reagan, Roberts, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Sutton, Terrell, Texas, Throckmorton, Upton, Zapata, Zavala

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top