Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 23.2 (22.9, 23.6) N/A 3,525 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.5, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) N/A 56,559 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.3)
Bee County 6 *** 43.8 (29.7, 62.6) 1 (1, 80) 7
*
*
Kleberg County 6 *** 39.3 (25.9, 57.1) 2 (1, 106) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 4.6)
Maverick County 6 *** 37.1 (27.5, 48.8) 3 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.2, 10.0)
Atascosa County 6 *** 36.6 (27.0, 48.5) 4 (1, 78) 10
*
*
Lampasas County 6 *** 32.8 (19.7, 51.6) 5 (1, 119) 4 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.3, 11.7)
Medina County 6 *** 31.8 (22.9, 43.2) 6 (1, 105) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.4, 8.3)
Gregg County 6 *** 31.6 (26.0, 38.2) 7 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.1)
Victoria County 6 *** 31.3 (24.6, 39.1) 8 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 7.4)
Nolan County 6 *** 29.9 (16.9, 50.2) 9 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Lee County 6 *** 29.7 (16.8, 49.4) 10 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Limestone County 6 *** 29.7 (18.1, 46.2) 11 (1, 119) 5 rising rising trend 7.8 (1.5, 14.4)
Bexar County 6 *** 29.6 (28.1, 31.1) 12 (8, 31) 304 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.9, 3.4)
Trinity County 6 *** 29.4 (16.4, 50.4) 13 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Rusk County 6 *** 28.4 (20.4, 38.6) 14 (1, 112) 9 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.1)
Navarro County 6 *** 28.4 (19.9, 39.2) 15 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Ellis County 6 *** 28.1 (23.5, 33.3) 16 (4, 82) 28 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 4.8)
Lavaca County 6 *** 28.0 (16.3, 45.4) 17 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Panola County 6 *** 27.8 (16.3, 44.3) 18 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Burleson County 6 *** 27.5 (16.2, 44.9) 19 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Uvalde County 6 *** 27.5 (16.3, 43.4) 20 (1, 120) 4
*
*
San Patricio County 6 *** 27.3 (20.0, 36.3) 21 (2, 113) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.4)
Gonzales County 6 *** 27.1 (15.3, 44.7) 22 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Eastland County 6 *** 26.9 (16.1, 43.7) 23 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Hays County 6 *** 26.9 (22.4, 31.9) 24 (6, 90) 27 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 5.7)
Williamson County 6 *** 26.7 (24.1, 29.6) 25 (11, 66) 77 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.5)
Montague County 6 *** 26.4 (15.3, 43.2) 26 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend 4.8 (-2.2, 12.3)
Wilson County 6 *** 26.4 (18.7, 36.4) 27 (2, 117) 8 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.5, 14.9)
Gillespie County 6 *** 26.0 (16.3, 40.2) 28 (1, 119) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 6.9)
Wharton County 6 *** 26.0 (17.5, 37.3) 29 (2, 119) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 5.8)
Cherokee County 6 *** 25.7 (18.1, 35.7) 30 (2, 117) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 6.3)
Titus County 6 *** 25.7 (16.3, 38.7) 31 (1, 120) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.5, 7.1)
Hopkins County 6 *** 25.7 (16.7, 37.8) 32 (2, 119) 6
*
*
Travis County 6 *** 25.6 (23.7, 27.6) 33 (18, 63) 148 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Dallas County 6 *** 25.6 (24.3, 26.8) 34 (21, 56) 340 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.2, 3.0)
Kerr County 6 *** 25.5 (18.8, 34.3) 35 (3, 114) 11 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.3, 7.2)
Nueces County 6 *** 25.4 (22.3, 28.8) 36 (12, 80) 52 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.2)
Fannin County 6 *** 25.4 (16.9, 37.2) 37 (2, 119) 6
*
*
Caldwell County 6 *** 25.4 (16.9, 36.8) 38 (1, 119) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 4.7)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 25.2 (23.0, 27.5) 39 (17, 71) 99 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.6)
Upshur County 6 *** 25.1 (16.9, 36.1) 40 (2, 119) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.2)
Burnet County 6 *** 24.9 (17.6, 34.5) 41 (2, 117) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.1, 7.4)
Houston County 6 *** 24.9 (14.8, 40.2) 42 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Lamar County 6 *** 24.9 (17.6, 34.3) 43 (3, 116) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.0)
McLennan County 6 *** 24.8 (21.1, 28.9) 44 (11, 94) 35 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
DeWitt County 6 *** 24.6 (13.3, 42.0) 45 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Val Verde County 6 *** 24.5 (16.7, 34.9) 46 (3, 119) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.5, 7.2)
Aransas County 6 *** 24.5 (15.2, 38.6) 47 (1, 120) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Randall County 6 *** 24.2 (19.3, 29.8) 48 (8, 111) 18 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.8, 6.9)
Bell County 6 *** 24.1 (20.8, 27.8) 49 (15, 97) 40 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.1)
Harris County 6 *** 24.1 (23.2, 25.0) 50 (32, 65) 559 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.3, 2.7)
Robertson County 6 *** 23.7 (13.4, 40.2) 51 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Comal County 6 *** 23.7 (19.2, 28.9) 52 (11, 108) 22 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 5.7)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 23.6 (13.8, 37.6) 53 (1, 120) 4 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.4, 9.0)
Henderson County 6 *** 23.5 (17.8, 30.6) 54 (7, 115) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.8)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 23.2 (12.9, 38.9) 55 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Bandera County 6 *** 23.1 (13.4, 38.7) 56 (2, 120) 4
*
*
Smith County 6 *** 23.1 (19.6, 27.0) 57 (16, 104) 33 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Anderson County 6 *** 23.1 (15.9, 32.6) 58 (3, 119) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.5, 10.6)
Shelby County 6 *** 23.0 (13.6, 37.0) 59 (2, 120) 4
*
*
Potter County 6 *** 22.9 (17.7, 29.1) 60 (9, 117) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Harrison County 6 *** 22.9 (16.7, 30.6) 61 (4, 118) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.0)
Kendall County 6 *** 22.8 (15.8, 32.3) 62 (4, 119) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Bastrop County 6 *** 22.7 (17.1, 29.7) 63 (7, 116) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 3.1)
Cass County 6 *** 22.7 (14.4, 34.5) 64 (2, 120) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.0, 7.2)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 22.5 (18.3, 27.5) 65 (11, 112) 20 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.9, 2.4)
Tarrant County 6 *** 22.4 (21.2, 23.8) 66 (39, 84) 245 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.7)
Liberty County 6 *** 21.8 (16.3, 28.8) 67 (9, 119) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 6.4)
Brazoria County 6 *** 21.8 (18.9, 25.1) 68 (28, 106) 41 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 4.6)
Polk County 6 *** 21.8 (14.7, 31.5) 69 (5, 120) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.7)
Grimes County 6 *** 21.8 (12.8, 35.2) 70 (2, 120) 4
*
*
El Paso County 6 *** 21.7 (19.7, 23.7) 71 (38, 98) 96 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 2.9)
Wood County 6 *** 21.6 (14.0, 32.2) 72 (5, 120) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.0)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 21.6 (15.0, 30.2) 73 (6, 119) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.9)
Ector County 6 *** 21.6 (17.0, 27.0) 74 (15, 116) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.9)
Coryell County 6 *** 21.6 (15.3, 29.6) 75 (10, 120) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.6)
Hill County 6 *** 21.5 (14.0, 32.1) 76 (5, 120) 6 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.5, 8.1)
Galveston County 6 *** 21.5 (18.7, 24.7) 77 (30, 107) 44 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Angelina County 6 *** 21.4 (16.2, 27.8) 78 (11, 117) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.2, 6.1)
Lubbock County 6 *** 21.3 (18.1, 25.0) 79 (25, 111) 32 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Erath County 6 *** 21.3 (13.4, 32.3) 80 (5, 120) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.6, 5.2)
Wichita County 6 *** 21.2 (16.7, 26.7) 81 (16, 116) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 4.6)
Webb County 6 *** 21.2 (17.7, 25.2) 82 (23, 113) 26 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 5.2)
Milam County 6 *** 21.0 (12.0, 34.5) 83 (3, 120) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.3, 8.6)
Wise County 6 *** 20.9 (14.9, 28.7) 84 (10, 120) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 7.1)
Taylor County 6 *** 20.8 (16.4, 26.1) 85 (21, 117) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Starr County 6 *** 20.8 (14.1, 29.5) 86 (7, 120) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.1, 6.5)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 20.6 (13.0, 31.0) 87 (6, 120) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.0)
Cameron County 6 *** 20.5 (17.9, 23.4) 88 (36, 111) 45 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Parker County 6 *** 20.4 (16.1, 25.6) 89 (22, 118) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.6)
Fayette County 6 *** 20.3 (12.1, 33.1) 90 (4, 120) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.8, 3.3)
Chambers County 6 *** 20.2 (12.6, 31.0) 91 (5, 120) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.3, 2.9)
Hood County 6 *** 19.9 (14.4, 27.2) 92 (13, 120) 10 stable stable trend 31.6 (-4.6, 81.5)
Austin County 6 *** 19.9 (12.1, 31.3) 93 (6, 120) 4
*
*
Fort Bend County 6 *** 19.8 (17.9, 21.9) 94 (53, 109) 80 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Johnson County 6 *** 19.8 (15.9, 24.3) 95 (29, 118) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Hardin County 6 *** 19.8 (13.4, 28.1) 96 (10, 120) 7 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.5, 8.7)
Collin County 6 *** 19.7 (18.0, 21.6) 97 (55, 109) 100 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 19.5 (16.4, 23.1) 98 (38, 116) 30 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.1)
Walker County 6 *** 19.5 (13.2, 27.9) 99 (9, 120) 7 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.8, 9.5)
Brazos County 6 *** 19.4 (15.5, 24.0) 100 (28, 118) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.8)
Kaufman County 6 *** 19.4 (14.9, 24.7) 101 (27, 119) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 5.8)
Tom Green County 6 *** 19.2 (14.7, 24.6) 102 (22, 119) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.0)
Denton County 6 *** 18.9 (17.1, 21.0) 103 (62, 112) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Howard County 6 *** 18.9 (10.8, 30.8) 104 (6, 120) 3
*
*
Waller County 6 *** 18.8 (11.9, 28.4) 105 (9, 120) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 6.1)
Cooke County 6 *** 18.6 (11.7, 28.3) 106 (10, 120) 5
*
*
Midland County 6 *** 18.6 (14.6, 23.4) 107 (33, 119) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.2)
Matagorda County 6 *** 17.9 (10.4, 28.6) 108 (8, 120) 4
*
*
Van Zandt County 6 *** 17.8 (11.9, 25.8) 109 (17, 120) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 17.3 (15.3, 19.5) 110 (74, 117) 57 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.6)
Jasper County 6 *** 17.1 (10.0, 27.7) 111 (10, 120) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.7, 7.2)
Grayson County 6 *** 17.1 (13.2, 21.9) 112 (47, 120) 15 stable stable trend -20.0 (-36.7, 1.2)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 16.4 (9.3, 27.6) 113 (12, 120) 4
*
*
Bowie County 6 *** 16.2 (11.9, 21.8) 114 (41, 120) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.0, 6.3)
Orange County 6 *** 15.8 (11.4, 21.5) 115 (43, 120) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.0)
Llano County 6 *** 15.6 (8.7, 28.9) 116 (11, 120) 4
*
*
Rockwall County 6 *** 15.6 (11.1, 21.4) 117 (42, 120) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.5)
Brown County 6 *** 15.4 (8.9, 24.9) 118 (21, 120) 4 stable stable trend -15.2 (-32.2, 6.2)
Hunt County 6 *** 14.9 (10.8, 20.2) 119 (58, 120) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.7)
Washington County 6 *** 13.8 (7.9, 23.0) 120 (29, 120) 4
*
*
Andrews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colorado County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freestone County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hockley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/28/2021 5:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top