Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 102.7 (101.9, 103.4) N/A 14,170 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 4.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 109.9 (109.7, 110.2) N/A 211,245 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.6)
Delta County 7 167.1 (109.7, 246.4) 1 (1, 174) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.6, 7.5)
Wheeler County 7 160.8 (106.2, 236.1) 2 (1, 177) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.2)
Sutton County 7 158.0 (96.8, 247.6) 3 (1, 188) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.8)
Polk County 7 141.3 (123.6, 161.2) 4 (1, 55) 54 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.9, -3.0)
Gillespie County 7 141.1 (119.6, 166.4) 5 (1, 77) 35 stable stable trend 9.1 (-2.3, 21.8)
Bell County 7 134.1 (125.5, 143.0) 6 (1, 36) 193 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Gregg County 7 133.6 (121.4, 146.8) 7 (2, 46) 91 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Fisher County 7 133.1 (82.7, 210.4) 8 (1, 191) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.2)
Walker County 7 133.1 (118.1, 149.6) 9 (1, 64) 60 rising rising trend 20.3 (1.4, 42.8)
Terry County 7 133.0 (96.1, 179.4) 10 (1, 180) 9 stable stable trend 4.0 (-3.3, 12.0)
Smith County 7 132.6 (123.8, 141.8) 11 (2, 37) 176 rising rising trend 5.9 (1.4, 10.7)
Lampasas County 7 131.8 (106.8, 161.6) 12 (1, 128) 20 rising rising trend 9.5 (1.3, 18.4)
Williamson County 7 130.9 (124.5, 137.6) 13 (4, 35) 331 rising rising trend 12.1 (7.5, 17.0)
Jasper County 7 130.7 (111.1, 153.1) 14 (1, 97) 33 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.8)
Washington County 7 130.5 (111.1, 152.7) 15 (1, 99) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Randall County 7 128.2 (116.7, 140.6) 16 (3, 67) 95 stable stable trend 4.6 (-2.6, 12.2)
Chambers County 7 128.1 (105.9, 153.5) 17 (1, 120) 26 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 1.0)
Morris County 7 127.8 (97.0, 166.8) 18 (1, 160) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.9)
Lee County 7 125.6 (98.2, 159.2) 19 (1, 157) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.1)
El Paso County 7 124.3 (119.1, 129.6) 20 (10, 47) 455 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.9)
Angelina County 7 123.9 (110.4, 138.6) 21 (3, 89) 63 falling falling trend -5.2 (-6.5, -3.9)
Milam County 7 123.3 (101.7, 148.8) 22 (1, 133) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Waller County 7 122.7 (103.7, 144.3) 23 (2, 119) 31 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Maverick County 7 121.9 (102.6, 143.6) 24 (2, 125) 29 rising rising trend 14.2 (0.6, 29.8)
Starr County 7 121.5 (102.9, 142.4) 25 (2, 125) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Potter County 7 121.5 (108.8, 135.2) 26 (5, 94) 71 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Lubbock County 7 121.5 (113.2, 130.2) 27 (7, 69) 167 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Hutchinson County 7 120.2 (95.6, 149.6) 28 (1, 152) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.6)
Mitchell County 7 119.4 (78.0, 174.9) 29 (1, 193) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.7)
Brazoria County 7 117.8 (110.4, 125.4) 30 (13, 75) 212 rising rising trend 7.7 (1.5, 14.2)
Fort Bend County 7 117.6 (112.3, 123.1) 31 (19, 63) 432 stable stable trend 5.4 (-1.0, 12.2)
Hays County 7 115.6 (105.4, 126.6) 32 (10, 95) 106 rising rising trend 15.7 (1.6, 31.7)
Deaf Smith County 7 114.7 (85.0, 151.3) 33 (1, 185) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Taylor County 7 114.3 (103.2, 126.2) 34 (11, 100) 80 stable stable trend -5.3 (-14.9, 5.5)
Falls County 7 114.2 (88.5, 146.1) 35 (1, 178) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.7)
McCulloch County 7 114.0 (79.1, 161.6) 36 (1, 189) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.8)
Jefferson County 7 113.8 (105.9, 122.2) 37 (17, 90) 161 rising rising trend 9.5 (2.8, 16.6)
Travis County 7 113.5 (109.1, 118.0) 38 (27, 73) 573 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.0, 9.8)
Fayette County 7 112.9 (93.3, 136.2) 39 (4, 152) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-33.9, 46.3)
Johnson County 7 112.5 (102.7, 123.0) 40 (15, 103) 104 rising rising trend 9.2 (0.5, 18.7)
McLennan County 7 112.2 (104.1, 120.8) 41 (19, 93) 149 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Denton County 7 111.5 (106.2, 116.9) 42 (27, 84) 394 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.6, 6.7)
Galveston County 7 111.4 (104.4, 118.7) 43 (21, 92) 208 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 5.7)
Harrison County 7 111.3 (97.1, 127.1) 44 (9, 137) 47 stable stable trend 6.9 (-13.0, 31.4)
Panola County 7 110.7 (88.5, 137.4) 45 (3, 174) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Coryell County 7 110.6 (93.4, 129.8) 46 (6, 151) 31 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.1)
Lynn County 7 110.5 (68.8, 170.8) 47 (1, 195) 4
*
*
San Augustine County 7 110.5 (77.9, 155.8) 48 (1, 187) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Yoakum County 7 110.4 (68.5, 168.2) 49 (1, 194) 5
*
*
Burnet County 7 110.2 (95.2, 127.2) 50 (7, 141) 41 stable stable trend 8.5 (-0.8, 18.7)
Hale County 7 110.0 (88.4, 135.1) 51 (3, 174) 19 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.5)
Hill County 7 109.4 (92.0, 129.5) 52 (5, 157) 29 stable stable trend 8.2 (-2.7, 20.4)
Childress County 7 109.4 (67.4, 168.2) 53 (1, 195) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.2)
Rusk County 7 109.3 (94.0, 126.7) 54 (6, 146) 38 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.5)
Hood County 7 109.3 (96.7, 123.5) 55 (11, 131) 57 stable stable trend 3.6 (-3.8, 11.6)
Hockley County 7 109.1 (84.2, 139.2) 56 (2, 180) 14 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.3)
Erath County 7 108.6 (90.0, 130.2) 57 (3, 163) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Hardin County 7 108.3 (93.3, 125.3) 58 (8, 145) 39 stable stable trend 6.5 (-6.9, 21.8)
Harris County 7 107.9 (105.8, 110.1) 59 (47, 82) 2,142 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.1, 8.8)
Colorado County 7 107.7 (86.5, 133.5) 60 (5, 177) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Upshur County 7 107.6 (90.7, 127.1) 61 (8, 152) 30 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.6)
Lamb County 7 107.4 (77.2, 146.1) 62 (2, 186) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.4, -1.5)
Bastrop County 7 107.3 (94.4, 121.6) 63 (13, 140) 56 stable stable trend 6.1 (-0.9, 13.6)
Brazos County 7 106.9 (96.6, 117.9) 64 (21, 126) 85 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.3)
Hamilton County 7 106.8 (74.3, 151.6) 65 (1, 191) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.7, -0.3)
Cherokee County 7 106.5 (91.1, 124.0) 66 (10, 156) 35 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.6)
Newton County 7 106.4 (80.1, 139.9) 67 (2, 186) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.9)
Grayson County 7 105.9 (96.2, 116.4) 68 (24, 129) 91 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.3)
Freestone County 7 105.6 (83.3, 132.8) 69 (4, 180) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.0)
Somervell County 7 105.2 (71.7, 151.1) 70 (1, 192) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.6)
Collin County 7 105.1 (100.7, 109.7) 71 (46, 102) 465 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 8.3)
Tarrant County 7 105.0 (101.9, 108.1) 72 (52, 96) 988 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.1, -2.7)
Scurry County 7 104.9 (78.3, 137.8) 73 (2, 186) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.1)
Lavaca County 7 104.6 (83.0, 131.0) 74 (4, 178) 17 stable stable trend 8.4 (-2.9, 20.9)
Parker County 7 104.5 (94.6, 115.3) 75 (25, 135) 87 stable stable trend 8.9 (-5.4, 25.3)
Lamar County 7 104.1 (89.1, 121.2) 76 (13, 155) 35 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.2)
Sabine County 7 104.0 (76.1, 142.1) 77 (2, 188) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.4, -1.5)
Moore County 7 103.9 (76.2, 138.0) 78 (2, 188) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.5)
Robertson County 7 103.1 (78.5, 133.7) 79 (4, 184) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.1)
Rains County 7 102.9 (77.7, 136.3) 80 (3, 186) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.1)
Austin County 7 102.9 (84.6, 124.6) 81 (9, 175) 23 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.1)
Henderson County 7 102.1 (91.1, 114.3) 82 (26, 147) 66 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4)
Nolan County 7 101.8 (75.0, 135.9) 83 (3, 190) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.5)
Dallas County 7 101.4 (98.7, 104.2) 84 (62, 106) 1,142 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 3.0)
Eastland County 7 100.6 (77.3, 129.6) 85 (5, 187) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 1.0)
Marion County 7 100.3 (73.0, 137.8) 86 (2, 189) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Ellis County 7 99.9 (90.4, 110.1) 87 (36, 145) 89 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Wood County 7 99.6 (86.2, 115.1) 88 (22, 161) 42 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Archer County 7 99.2 (68.5, 141.7) 89 (2, 193) 7 rising rising trend 15.0 (5.9, 24.9)
Cooke County 7 99.2 (82.8, 118.1) 90 (12, 176) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Navarro County 7 98.8 (83.7, 116.1) 91 (19, 169) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)
Kendall County 7 98.8 (83.3, 116.6) 92 (18, 169) 30 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.8, 8.0)
Wilbarger County 7 98.7 (70.8, 135.1) 93 (3, 190) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.5)
Red River County 7 98.4 (72.2, 132.9) 94 (3, 190) 10 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.5, -4.1)
Kimble County 7 97.5 (61.3, 157.8) 95 (1, 195) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.7, -0.5)
Brown County 7 97.3 (80.9, 116.4) 96 (16, 177) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.5)
Victoria County 7 96.3 (84.6, 109.3) 97 (33, 163) 50 stable stable trend 14.9 (-0.3, 32.4)
Fannin County 7 96.1 (79.5, 115.6) 98 (15, 176) 24 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.1)
Wichita County 7 96.1 (86.0, 107.0) 99 (38, 157) 70 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.8, 11.1)
Nacogdoches County 7 96.0 (81.9, 111.9) 100 (26, 174) 35 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.1)
Bailey County 7 95.5 (57.1, 150.9) 101 (1, 195) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.6)
Orange County 7 95.2 (83.4, 108.2) 102 (33, 165) 49 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.0, -3.1)
Zapata County 7 95.0 (65.3, 133.8) 103 (3, 193) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.5)
Bosque County 7 94.8 (74.3, 120.6) 104 (10, 185) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.6)
Wise County 7 94.6 (81.3, 109.5) 105 (33, 171) 39 stable stable trend 18.4 (-0.5, 40.9)
Matagorda County 7 94.5 (77.8, 114.1) 106 (19, 181) 24 falling falling trend -5.4 (-6.9, -3.9)
Parmer County 7 94.3 (61.0, 139.8) 107 (2, 193) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.5)
Cass County 7 94.2 (77.1, 114.6) 108 (18, 181) 22 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.9)
Hopkins County 7 94.1 (77.5, 113.6) 109 (23, 183) 23 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Van Zandt County 7 94.0 (81.0, 108.7) 110 (33, 174) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Hidalgo County 7 93.7 (89.1, 98.5) 111 (79, 140) 315 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Kerr County 7 93.5 (81.3, 107.5) 112 (34, 169) 44 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.3)
Clay County 7 93.4 (66.9, 129.6) 113 (4, 192) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.2)
Callahan County 7 93.2 (68.3, 125.5) 114 (6, 192) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.0)
Kaufman County 7 93.2 (82.0, 105.5) 115 (45, 167) 56 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Anderson County 7 93.0 (78.8, 109.0) 116 (34, 178) 33 stable stable trend 4.8 (-3.5, 13.8)
Jones County 7 91.9 (69.1, 120.1) 117 (8, 191) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Rockwall County 7 91.8 (79.7, 105.2) 118 (38, 175) 45 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.4)
Guadalupe County 7 91.4 (82.4, 101.2) 119 (62, 163) 78 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.5)
Grimes County 7 91.2 (72.8, 113.3) 120 (21, 187) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.7)
Runnels County 7 91.2 (62.9, 129.6) 121 (3, 194) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.3)
Kleberg County 7 91.2 (70.7, 115.8) 122 (16, 190) 14 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.2, -1.0)
Titus County 7 90.9 (71.8, 113.8) 123 (18, 187) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Tom Green County 7 90.8 (80.6, 102.0) 124 (53, 172) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-8.8, 9.3)
Hunt County 7 90.8 (80.0, 102.7) 125 (54, 174) 54 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.2)
Montgomery County 7 90.7 (85.8, 95.8) 126 (87, 150) 280 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.2)
Gray County 7 90.1 (68.5, 116.6) 127 (10, 191) 12 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.6)
Aransas County 7 89.8 (73.2, 110.2) 128 (32, 185) 22 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.4, -3.7)
Brewster County 7 89.6 (60.3, 130.5) 129 (3, 194) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 1.5)
Montague County 7 89.4 (69.5, 114.4) 130 (12, 188) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.6)
Blanco County 7 89.3 (65.2, 122.3) 131 (5, 192) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 1.4)
DeWitt County 7 89.0 (68.1, 114.8) 132 (12, 190) 13 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.9, -1.2)
Crosby County 7 88.6 (51.2, 145.4) 133 (1, 195) 3
*
*
Mills County 7 88.5 (54.4, 144.6) 134 (2, 195) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.1)
Caldwell County 7 87.8 (71.3, 107.0) 135 (34, 187) 21 stable stable trend 17.6 (-6.1, 47.2)
Camp County 7 87.6 (62.7, 120.8) 136 (9, 192) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.6, -0.7)
Goliad County 7 86.4 (56.6, 130.1) 137 (3, 195) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.6)
Houston County 7 86.3 (68.1, 108.6) 138 (25, 189) 16 stable stable trend 4.5 (-2.8, 12.2)
Bowie County 7 86.3 (75.7, 98.1) 139 (67, 180) 49 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.8, -3.1)
Cameron County 7 85.7 (80.0, 91.7) 140 (102, 166) 171 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.1)
Liberty County 7 85.5 (73.4, 99.0) 141 (61, 184) 39 stable stable trend 6.3 (-11.1, 27.2)
Val Verde County 7 85.3 (69.5, 103.5) 142 (37, 188) 21 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.3)
Refugio County 7 85.3 (53.7, 131.8) 143 (4, 195) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -0.8)
San Jacinto County 7 84.3 (68.0, 104.0) 144 (39, 189) 20 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Castro County 7 84.1 (50.8, 132.1) 145 (3, 195) 4
*
*
Andrews County 7 83.7 (54.9, 121.2) 146 (4, 194) 6 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.8, -1.7)
Llano County 7 83.6 (66.4, 105.8) 147 (30, 190) 20 stable stable trend 14.5 (-1.9, 33.5)
Willacy County 7 83.0 (59.9, 112.0) 148 (17, 194) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.7)
Shelby County 7 83.0 (64.5, 105.6) 149 (31, 191) 14 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.8, -1.5)
Burleson County 7 82.3 (62.4, 107.8) 150 (22, 192) 12 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.6)
Howard County 7 82.3 (64.7, 103.3) 151 (37, 192) 16 stable stable trend 17.0 (-12.2, 55.8)
Comal County 7 82.0 (73.9, 90.9) 152 (98, 179) 80 rising rising trend 11.7 (4.3, 19.5)
Wharton County 7 82.0 (66.9, 99.7) 153 (53, 188) 22 stable stable trend 7.3 (-7.7, 24.7)
San Patricio County 7 81.9 (69.3, 96.3) 154 (69, 187) 31 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -2.7)
Madison County 7 81.9 (56.1, 115.8) 155 (9, 194) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Tyler County 7 81.2 (62.9, 103.8) 156 (36, 193) 14 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.9, -1.8)
Gonzales County 7 81.1 (60.6, 106.7) 157 (21, 194) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.1)
Haskell County 7 80.3 (47.1, 132.1) 158 (4, 195) 4
*
*
Carson County 7 79.9 (46.9, 131.2) 159 (3, 195) 4
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 79.5 (47.3, 125.2) 160 (4, 195) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.3, -0.3)
Jackson County 7 79.3 (55.8, 110.1) 161 (20, 194) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.8, 0.2)
Palo Pinto County 7 79.2 (62.6, 99.5) 162 (43, 192) 16 stable stable trend 12.0 (-20.0, 56.8)
Swisher County 7 78.5 (46.4, 125.5) 163 (3, 195) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.3, -2.1)
Franklin County 7 78.5 (53.4, 113.2) 164 (15, 195) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.3)
Trinity County 7 78.2 (57.8, 105.6) 165 (27, 193) 10 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.6, -2.6)
Webb County 7 78.2 (70.1, 86.9) 166 (103, 184) 72 stable stable trend 5.1 (-7.2, 18.9)
Gaines County 7 78.0 (51.1, 113.1) 167 (13, 195) 6 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.1, -1.5)
Wilson County 7 76.7 (63.4, 92.1) 168 (81, 190) 25 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.0, -2.2)
Ector County 7 76.7 (66.9, 87.4) 169 (101, 187) 49 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.7)
Nueces County 7 76.3 (70.8, 82.1) 170 (134, 182) 150 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.0, -3.6)
Medina County 7 76.2 (63.2, 91.2) 171 (86, 191) 25 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.7)
Jack County 7 76.0 (45.9, 119.0) 172 (5, 195) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -0.3)
Leon County 7 76.0 (57.6, 99.8) 173 (53, 194) 12 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.1)
Bexar County 7 75.8 (73.2, 78.5) 174 (145, 177) 681 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.6)
Bandera County 7 73.7 (58.5, 93.2) 175 (82, 193) 17 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.5)
Ward County 7 73.3 (45.5, 111.8) 176 (14, 195) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -0.8)
Atascosa County 7 72.9 (59.1, 89.0) 177 (90, 192) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Calhoun County 7 71.0 (52.7, 94.1) 178 (62, 195) 10 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -2.6)
Zavala County 7 70.7 (44.0, 108.1) 179 (17, 195) 4 stable stable trend -4.0 (-7.7, 0.0)
Dawson County 7 70.6 (44.6, 106.2) 180 (18, 195) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.1)
Midland County 7 70.5 (61.7, 80.0) 181 (130, 191) 51 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.8)
Young County 7 70.0 (51.0, 94.6) 182 (55, 195) 9 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.7, -2.6)
Comanche County 7 68.7 (49.1, 95.5) 183 (60, 195) 8 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.1, -2.9)
Jim Wells County 7 67.9 (53.3, 85.4) 184 (101, 194) 15 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.2, -3.6)
Bee County 7 67.6 (50.5, 88.5) 185 (86, 195) 11 falling falling trend -6.4 (-9.2, -3.5)
Limestone County 7 67.5 (50.0, 89.5) 186 (77, 195) 10 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -2.9)
Karnes County 7 65.9 (43.5, 95.8) 187 (44, 195) 6 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.9, -2.4)
Presidio County 7 62.6 (34.9, 106.3) 188 (22, 195) 3 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.9, -2.0)
Uvalde County 7 60.0 (44.0, 80.2) 189 (119, 195) 9 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.4, -3.4)
Live Oak County 7 57.9 (38.0, 85.9) 190 (89, 195) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.1)
Stephens County 7 57.6 (34.4, 92.2) 191 (60, 195) 4 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.0, -3.9)
Dimmit County 7 55.2 (31.1, 91.2) 192 (60, 195) 3 falling falling trend -7.7 (-9.9, -5.4)
Coleman County 7 49.8 (29.1, 83.6) 193 (106, 195) 4 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.5, -2.6)
Frio County 7 46.0 (28.2, 70.6) 194 (127, 195) 4
*
*
Pecos County 7 39.8 (22.6, 64.8) 195 (153, 195) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.3, -1.8)
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2022 1:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Armstrong, Baylor, Borden, Briscoe, Brooks, Cochran, Coke, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Crockett, Culberson, Dallam, Dickens, Donley, Duval, Edwards, Floyd, Foard, Garza, Glasscock, Hall, Hansford, Hardeman, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Kent, King, Kinney, Knox, La Salle, Lipscomb, Loving, Martin, Mason, McMullen, Menard, Motley, Oldham, Reagan, Real, Reeves, Roberts, San Saba, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Terrell, Texas, Throckmorton, Upton, Winkler

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top