Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 20.6 (20.3, 20.8) N/A 6,101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 41.0 (26.8, 60.1) 1 (1, 141) 6
*
*
Zavala County 7 Rural 41.0 (24.7, 63.9) 2 (1, 157) 4
*
*
Refugio County 7 Rural 36.5 (21.5, 59.5) 3 (1, 161) 4
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural 35.4 (22.5, 53.8) 4 (1, 158) 5
*
*
Dawson County 7 Rural 34.5 (21.6, 52.2) 5 (1, 159) 5
*
*
Scurry County 7 Rural 34.4 (23.4, 48.8) 6 (1, 149) 7
*
*
Atascosa County 7 Urban 34.1 (27.5, 41.9) 7 (1, 80) 19 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.5, 5.7)
Camp County 7 Rural 34.1 (21.2, 51.9) 8 (1, 160) 5 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.3, 11.4)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 33.3 (28.9, 38.2) 9 (2, 50) 44 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.2, 6.3)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 33.2 (25.8, 42.2) 10 (1, 111) 14 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.9, 7.6)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 33.2 (19.3, 54.5) 11 (1, 161) 4
*
*
Jasper County 7 Rural 32.9 (25.5, 41.8) 12 (1, 113) 15 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.9, 7.3)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 32.9 (23.9, 44.0) 13 (1, 145) 9 falling falling trend -18.3 (-29.2, -6.3)
Nolan County 7 Rural 32.8 (21.9, 47.6) 14 (1, 159) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.2, 11.4)
Frio County 7 Rural 32.8 (21.6, 47.6) 15 (1, 155) 6
*
*
Polk County 7 Rural 31.8 (25.4, 39.4) 16 (1, 102) 20 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.1, 5.9)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 31.6 (24.8, 39.7) 17 (1, 129) 15 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 7.3)
Terry County 7 Rural 31.2 (19.1, 48.3) 18 (1, 161) 4
*
*
Goliad County 7 Urban 30.8 (17.8, 51.6) 19 (1, 162) 4
*
*
Uvalde County 7 Rural 30.8 (22.1, 41.8) 20 (1, 146) 9 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.1, 8.2)
Duval County 7 Rural 30.6 (17.9, 49.1) 21 (1, 162) 4
*
*
Live Oak County 7 Rural 30.4 (18.0, 48.3) 22 (1, 162) 4
*
*
Leon County 7 Rural 29.6 (19.1, 44.0) 23 (1, 160) 6 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.9, 13.6)
Bee County 7 Rural 29.5 (21.5, 39.5) 24 (1, 148) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.9, 5.1)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 29.3 (22.4, 37.7) 25 (2, 142) 13 rising rising trend 6.2 (3.9, 9.4)
Upshur County 7 Urban 29.3 (22.8, 37.1) 26 (3, 133) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.5)
Stephens County 7 Rural 29.1 (15.9, 49.1) 27 (1, 162) 3
*
*
Falls County 7 Urban 29.1 (19.8, 41.6) 28 (1, 159) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.6, 8.1)
Milam County 7 Rural 28.9 (21.0, 39.2) 29 (1, 154) 9 rising rising trend 9.9 (3.5, 32.5)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 28.8 (23.4, 35.0) 30 (4, 120) 21 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.8)
Callahan County 7 Urban 28.6 (18.6, 42.7) 31 (1, 160) 6
*
*
Wharton County 7 Rural 28.5 (22.3, 36.0) 32 (4, 136) 15 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.7)
Colorado County 7 Rural 28.4 (19.3, 40.3) 33 (1, 160) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.9, 7.7)
Maverick County 7 Urban 27.9 (21.8, 35.0) 34 (4, 141) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 7.0)
Houston County 7 Rural 27.8 (20.0, 38.1) 35 (2, 153) 9 falling falling trend -18.4 (-28.1, -11.1)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 27.7 (19.6, 38.3) 36 (2, 156) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.4)
Burnet County 7 Rural 27.4 (21.7, 34.3) 37 (5, 137) 19 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 5.0)
Victoria County 7 Urban 27.4 (23.0, 32.4) 38 (8, 121) 29 stable stable trend 0.6 (-10.0, 3.1)
Howard County 7 Rural 27.0 (20.1, 35.5) 39 (3, 154) 11 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.4, 8.3)
Hale County 7 Rural 26.9 (19.4, 36.2) 40 (2, 158) 9 stable stable trend -4.0 (-17.8, 2.3)
Brown County 7 Rural 26.8 (20.5, 34.5) 41 (4, 153) 14 rising rising trend 31.5 (11.8, 52.1)
Panola County 7 Rural 26.7 (18.8, 37.0) 42 (2, 159) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.4)
Bell County 7 Urban 26.6 (24.1, 29.2) 43 (20, 93) 88 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.0, 4.5)
Newton County 7 Rural 26.5 (16.1, 41.6) 44 (1, 162) 5
*
*
Karnes County 7 Rural 26.2 (15.8, 40.9) 45 (1, 162) 4
*
*
Reeves County 7 Rural 26.0 (15.1, 41.6) 46 (1, 162) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.6, 6.6)
Grimes County 7 Rural 26.0 (18.7, 35.2) 47 (3, 158) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.5, 7.0)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 25.6 (23.0, 28.4) 48 (22, 105) 75 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.9)
Tyler County 7 Rural 25.5 (17.1, 36.8) 49 (2, 162) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.5)
Nueces County 7 Urban 25.4 (23.2, 27.8) 50 (26, 99) 98 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.1)
Sabine County 7 Rural 25.3 (15.5, 40.7) 51 (1, 162) 5
*
*
Ellis County 7 Urban 25.2 (22.1, 28.7) 52 (20, 118) 49 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.6)
Webb County 7 Urban 25.2 (22.3, 28.4) 53 (22, 119) 56 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.5)
Angelina County 7 Rural 25.2 (20.9, 30.1) 54 (16, 138) 26 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.4)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 25.0 (20.2, 30.8) 55 (11, 147) 20 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.8, 5.3)
Llano County 7 Rural 25.0 (17.1, 36.0) 56 (3, 161) 10 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.3, 7.1)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 25.0 (13.5, 43.6) 57 (1, 162) 3
*
*
Wood County 7 Rural 24.8 (19.2, 31.6) 58 (9, 151) 18 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 5.3)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 24.7 (17.3, 34.3) 59 (4, 161) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.0, 10.7)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 24.6 (17.5, 33.8) 60 (3, 160) 9 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.7, 12.1)
McLennan County 7 Urban 24.5 (21.9, 27.3) 61 (28, 120) 68 stable stable trend -6.0 (-12.8, 0.7)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 24.4 (18.7, 31.4) 62 (8, 155) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.2)
Wichita County 7 Urban 24.3 (20.7, 28.4) 63 (20, 136) 34 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.8, 16.0)
Wilson County 7 Urban 24.3 (18.8, 30.9) 64 (10, 157) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.4)
Gregg County 7 Urban 24.2 (20.6, 28.3) 65 (20, 138) 34 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.5)
Parker County 7 Urban 24.1 (20.9, 27.7) 66 (21, 132) 43 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.9)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 24.1 (18.8, 30.4) 67 (10, 154) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 4.1)
Bexar County 7 Urban 24.0 (23.0, 25.0) 68 (47, 93) 473 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.3)
Hardin County 7 Urban 24.0 (18.9, 30.0) 69 (12, 153) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Limestone County 7 Rural 23.9 (16.1, 34.4) 70 (4, 162) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.2, 8.9)
Coryell County 7 Urban 23.8 (18.9, 29.6) 71 (11, 152) 17 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 5.0)
Morris County 7 Rural 23.7 (13.7, 38.6) 72 (1, 162) 4
*
*
Bowie County 7 Urban 23.7 (19.7, 28.3) 73 (17, 147) 26 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.8)
Jackson County 7 Rural 23.6 (14.8, 36.0) 74 (2, 162) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.2)
Red River County 7 Rural 23.5 (14.8, 36.7) 75 (2, 162) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 5.1)
Somervell County 7 Rural 23.5 (13.5, 39.3) 76 (1, 162) 3
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 23.4 (17.7, 30.6) 77 (11, 158) 12 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.4, 6.0)
Walker County 7 Rural 23.4 (18.9, 28.7) 78 (18, 152) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 5.2)
Taylor County 7 Urban 23.3 (19.8, 27.3) 79 (25, 147) 33 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.6)
Chambers County 7 Urban 23.3 (17.3, 30.7) 80 (8, 160) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 2.1)
Hays County 7 Urban 23.3 (20.4, 26.4) 81 (31, 134) 51 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 3.1)
Trinity County 7 Rural 23.2 (13.8, 36.9) 82 (2, 162) 5
*
*
Grayson County 7 Urban 23.0 (19.8, 26.7) 83 (28, 142) 39 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 23.0 (15.1, 33.6) 84 (4, 162) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.9)
El Paso County 7 Urban 22.8 (21.4, 24.3) 85 (52, 116) 193 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.8)
Hood County 7 Rural 22.8 (18.1, 28.4) 86 (19, 156) 20 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.5)
Liberty County 7 Urban 22.8 (18.6, 27.7) 87 (22, 153) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.4)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 22.8 (14.7, 33.8) 88 (4, 162) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.2)
Johnson County 7 Urban 22.7 (19.7, 26.0) 89 (33, 138) 44 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Smith County 7 Urban 22.7 (20.2, 25.4) 90 (39, 134) 63 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 22.6 (16.4, 30.7) 91 (10, 160) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.5, 6.7)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 22.6 (18.7, 27.1) 92 (27, 152) 25 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 4.2)
Hunt County 7 Urban 22.6 (18.7, 27.0) 93 (29, 152) 25 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.8)
Cooke County 7 Rural 22.5 (16.9, 29.4) 94 (12, 160) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.6, 8.0)
Freestone County 7 Rural 22.5 (14.9, 32.8) 95 (4, 162) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-22.2, 2.7)
Bandera County 7 Urban 22.5 (15.2, 32.5) 96 (6, 162) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.8)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 22.4 (19.5, 25.7) 97 (32, 143) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 4.0)
Lamar County 7 Rural 22.4 (17.3, 28.5) 98 (18, 158) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.5)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 22.3 (14.6, 32.6) 99 (5, 162) 6 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.0, 6.9)
Starr County 7 Rural 22.2 (17.0, 28.3) 100 (19, 159) 13 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.7, 9.5)
Potter County 7 Urban 22.1 (18.5, 26.2) 101 (29, 151) 27 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.3, 6.2)
Ector County 7 Urban 22.0 (18.6, 25.8) 102 (33, 151) 31 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.2)
Fannin County 7 Rural 21.9 (16.2, 29.1) 103 (14, 160) 10 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 7.9)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 21.9 (15.1, 30.9) 104 (9, 162) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 6.1)
Wise County 7 Urban 21.8 (17.4, 27.0) 105 (23, 157) 18 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.4, 8.8)
Kendall County 7 Urban 21.7 (16.5, 28.0) 106 (17, 161) 13
*
*
Jones County 7 Urban 21.6 (13.9, 32.4) 107 (6, 162) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.2, 1.8)
Young County 7 Rural 21.6 (13.0, 33.8) 108 (4, 162) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.9, 7.6)
Moore County 7 Rural 21.6 (13.2, 33.1) 109 (4, 162) 4
*
*
Burleson County 7 Urban 21.5 (13.2, 33.2) 110 (5, 162) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 2.9)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 21.3 (15.8, 28.3) 111 (19, 161) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.2)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 21.2 (13.7, 31.6) 112 (7, 162) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.8, 5.4)
Harrison County 7 Urban 21.2 (16.8, 26.4) 113 (30, 158) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.2)
Lee County 7 Rural 21.2 (13.5, 32.0) 114 (6, 162) 5
*
*
Medina County 7 Urban 21.1 (16.1, 27.2) 115 (22, 160) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.4, 4.6)
Cameron County 7 Urban 21.1 (19.1, 23.2) 116 (63, 140) 88 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.7, 3.6)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 21.0 (17.7, 24.8) 117 (38, 155) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.4)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 21.0 (18.9, 23.2) 118 (60, 143) 80 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.5)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 20.8 (19.4, 22.3) 119 (77, 137) 157 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.5, 3.2)
Orange County 7 Urban 20.7 (16.9, 25.2) 120 (32, 158) 21 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.0, 0.4)
Galveston County 7 Urban 20.7 (18.6, 22.8) 121 (64, 144) 82 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.8)
Randall County 7 Urban 20.6 (17.5, 24.1) 122 (44, 153) 33 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.5)
Eastland County 7 Rural 20.5 (13.5, 30.5) 123 (10, 162) 6
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural 20.4 (16.8, 24.7) 124 (37, 158) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Willacy County 7 Rural 20.2 (12.2, 31.4) 125 (5, 162) 4
*
*
Tarrant County 7 Urban 20.2 (19.3, 21.1) 126 (91, 136) 418 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.4, 1.3)
Hockley County 7 Urban 20.1 (12.3, 30.8) 127 (7, 162) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 3.2)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 19.9 (12.1, 31.1) 128 (5, 162) 4
*
*
Rains County 7 Rural 19.8 (11.7, 32.5) 129 (6, 162) 4
*
*
Midland County 7 Urban 19.8 (16.6, 23.3) 130 (53, 157) 30 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.4)
Titus County 7 Rural 19.8 (13.4, 28.2) 131 (10, 162) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.7)
Robertson County 7 Urban 19.7 (12.5, 30.1) 132 (9, 162) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.7)
Brazos County 7 Urban 19.3 (16.4, 22.6) 133 (63, 158) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.0, 1.2)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 19.3 (15.7, 23.4) 134 (53, 160) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 3.5)
Williamson County 7 Urban 19.2 (17.6, 20.8) 135 (89, 149) 117 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.3)
Erath County 7 Rural 19.1 (13.7, 26.1) 136 (23, 162) 9 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.7)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 19.0 (16.8, 21.5) 137 (80, 155) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Dallas County 7 Urban 18.9 (18.2, 19.7) 138 (109, 145) 468 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.0)
Marion County 7 Rural 18.7 (10.9, 32.3) 139 (9, 162) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Urban 18.7 (17.2, 20.3) 140 (101, 152) 123 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.7)
Hill County 7 Rural 18.4 (13.1, 25.4) 141 (29, 162) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.5, 5.8)
Blanco County 7 Rural 18.1 (9.9, 31.8) 142 (6, 162) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.9)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 18.1 (11.8, 27.0) 143 (25, 162) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 6.9)
Montague County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.6, 27.3) 144 (18, 162) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.6, 7.3)
Denton County 7 Urban 18.1 (16.8, 19.4) 145 (112, 154) 155 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.6)
Waller County 7 Urban 18.0 (13.2, 24.0) 146 (42, 162) 10 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 7.4)
Anderson County 7 Rural 17.9 (13.6, 23.3) 147 (39, 162) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.5)
Harris County 7 Urban 17.7 (17.2, 18.3) 148 (126, 152) 777 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.0)
Bosque County 7 Urban 17.7 (11.3, 27.1) 149 (20, 162) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 17.7 (13.3, 23.1) 150 (53, 162) 12 stable stable trend 7.9 (-1.9, 33.7)
Aransas County 7 Urban 17.3 (11.4, 25.6) 151 (27, 162) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Travis County 7 Urban 17.2 (16.1, 18.4) 152 (124, 156) 198 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.3)
Navarro County 7 Rural 17.1 (12.7, 22.6) 153 (50, 162) 11 stable stable trend -4.1 (-31.0, 1.2)
Comal County 7 Urban 16.8 (14.3, 19.7) 154 (99, 161) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.8)
Collin County 7 Urban 16.5 (15.4, 17.7) 155 (130, 159) 168 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Gray County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.1, 25.5) 156 (27, 162) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.1)
Shelby County 7 Rural 16.4 (10.5, 24.6) 157 (22, 162) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.2, 5.5)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 15.4 (14.1, 16.7) 158 (138, 161) 124 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Kerr County 7 Rural 15.2 (11.3, 20.2) 159 (90, 162) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 3.1)
Rusk County 7 Urban 15.0 (11.0, 20.1) 160 (81, 162) 10 stable stable trend -3.8 (-18.1, 1.6)
Austin County 7 Urban 14.1 (9.5, 20.4) 161 (78, 162) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.3, 3.4)
Fayette County 7 Rural 12.8 (7.9, 19.9) 162 (82, 162) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.1)
Andrews County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 9:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top