Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 20.0 (19.7, 20.2) N/A 5,861 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.2, 2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.2 (17.1, 17.2) N/A 65,490 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.7)
Fayette County 7 13.2 (8.1, 20.7) 157 (57, 157) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 2.4)
Austin County 7 14.1 (9.5, 20.5) 156 (63, 157) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.2, 4.7)
Sabine County 7 14.7 (8.1, 26.9) 155 (18, 157) 3
*
*
Fort Bend County 7 14.8 (13.6, 16.1) 154 (130, 157) 115 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 1.2)
Shelby County 7 15.7 (10.2, 23.3) 153 (32, 157) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.9, 6.0)
Kerr County 7 15.7 (11.9, 20.7) 152 (64, 157) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.6)
Nacogdoches County 7 15.8 (11.8, 20.7) 151 (57, 157) 11 rising rising trend 18.8 (0.2, 35.3)
Comal County 7 15.8 (13.3, 18.6) 150 (100, 157) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.1)
Kendall County 7 15.8 (11.5, 21.3) 149 (50, 157) 10
*
*
Erath County 7 15.9 (10.8, 22.4) 148 (34, 157) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 6.2)
Waller County 7 15.9 (11.5, 21.6) 147 (52, 157) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 7.9)
Collin County 7 16.2 (15.0, 17.4) 146 (120, 153) 160 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.3)
Burleson County 7 16.2 (9.3, 26.5) 145 (11, 157) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.2)
Travis County 7 16.6 (15.6, 17.8) 144 (116, 150) 190 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Rusk County 7 16.7 (12.5, 22.0) 143 (41, 157) 11 falling falling trend -19.7 (-35.7, -1.4)
Limestone County 7 16.9 (10.6, 25.8) 142 (12, 157) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.3, 6.7)
Denton County 7 17.1 (15.8, 18.4) 141 (106, 149) 140 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 2.1)
Gray County 7 17.1 (10.6, 26.2) 140 (12, 157) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.1)
Aransas County 7 17.2 (11.2, 25.6) 139 (19, 157) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.3, 4.2)
Navarro County 7 17.2 (12.7, 22.7) 138 (39, 157) 11 stable stable trend -5.3 (-29.0, 0.5)
Harris County 7 17.4 (16.8, 18.0) 137 (112, 144) 753 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
Montgomery County 7 17.6 (16.2, 19.2) 136 (99, 148) 114 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.7)
Brazos County 7 17.8 (15.0, 20.9) 135 (70, 154) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.2)
Anderson County 7 17.8 (13.5, 23.1) 134 (33, 157) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 3.0)
Midland County 7 18.0 (15.1, 21.3) 133 (57, 154) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.4)
Cooke County 7 18.2 (13.3, 24.4) 132 (23, 157) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.3)
Deaf Smith County 7 18.2 (10.7, 29.1) 131 (5, 157) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 7 18.3 (16.1, 20.7) 130 (75, 150) 52 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Red River County 7 18.4 (10.8, 30.3) 129 (6, 157) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 5.0)
Dallas County 7 18.5 (17.7, 19.3) 128 (99, 137) 456 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.0)
Robertson County 7 18.5 (11.5, 28.6) 127 (6, 157) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.7)
Moore County 7 18.5 (10.9, 29.3) 126 (6, 157) 4
*
*
Williamson County 7 18.5 (17.0, 20.2) 125 (84, 143) 110 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.5)
Blanco County 7 18.6 (10.4, 32.0) 124 (4, 157) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.7, 6.4)
Hill County 7 18.6 (13.3, 25.5) 123 (19, 157) 9 falling falling trend -20.0 (-33.0, -2.3)
Bosque County 7 18.9 (12.3, 28.4) 122 (9, 157) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.6)
Llano County 7 19.0 (12.0, 29.3) 121 (7, 157) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.5)
Galveston County 7 19.0 (17.1, 21.1) 120 (71, 145) 74 rising rising trend 9.2 (0.6, 15.5)
Hidalgo County 7 19.3 (17.9, 20.7) 119 (81, 137) 145 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 3.0)
Titus County 7 19.5 (13.3, 27.6) 118 (9, 157) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.4)
Young County 7 19.6 (11.5, 31.2) 117 (4, 157) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.6, 8.6)
Bandera County 7 19.7 (13.1, 28.9) 116 (6, 157) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.7)
Tarrant County 7 19.8 (18.9, 20.7) 115 (84, 127) 409 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Henderson County 7 20.0 (16.4, 24.2) 114 (35, 151) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.2)
Eastland County 7 20.1 (13.0, 30.3) 113 (5, 157) 6
*
*
Gonzales County 7 20.2 (12.9, 30.3) 112 (6, 157) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.1, 5.1)
Brown County 7 20.3 (14.8, 27.2) 111 (12, 156) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Harrison County 7 20.4 (16.1, 25.5) 110 (20, 154) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 4.2)
Cameron County 7 20.4 (18.5, 22.5) 109 (55, 133) 85 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.5, 3.7)
Kaufman County 7 20.4 (17.0, 24.3) 108 (32, 151) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.1)
Brazoria County 7 20.5 (18.5, 22.7) 107 (54, 133) 78 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.6)
Palo Pinto County 7 20.5 (14.2, 28.9) 106 (6, 157) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.0, 13.5)
Randall County 7 20.6 (17.5, 24.1) 105 (33, 145) 32 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.5, 5.4)
Montague County 7 20.6 (13.8, 30.1) 104 (5, 157) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.8, 9.1)
Karnes County 7 20.6 (11.6, 33.8) 103 (2, 157) 3
*
*
Rockwall County 7 20.7 (16.9, 25.0) 102 (28, 151) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 4.4)
Newton County 7 20.7 (12.2, 33.4) 101 (2, 157) 4
*
*
Smith County 7 20.9 (18.5, 23.6) 100 (43, 135) 58 stable stable trend -3.0 (-15.8, 1.0)
Rains County 7 20.9 (12.7, 33.7) 99 (3, 157) 4
*
*
Wise County 7 21.0 (16.7, 26.2) 98 (19, 151) 17 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.9, 10.1)
Hutchinson County 7 21.1 (13.9, 30.9) 97 (4, 157) 6 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 7.2)
Calhoun County 7 21.1 (13.5, 31.3) 96 (4, 157) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.9, 5.6)
Trinity County 7 21.1 (13.0, 33.0) 95 (2, 157) 5
*
*
Hockley County 7 21.2 (13.5, 31.7) 94 (3, 157) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 3.9)
Grayson County 7 21.2 (18.1, 24.7) 93 (28, 141) 36 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.2)
Starr County 7 21.2 (16.1, 27.4) 92 (12, 156) 12 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.6, 10.2)
Medina County 7 21.3 (16.3, 27.4) 91 (15, 154) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.3)
Johnson County 7 21.3 (18.5, 24.6) 90 (33, 139) 41 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.2)
Hunt County 7 21.7 (17.9, 26.1) 89 (18, 146) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 3.0)
Cass County 7 21.8 (15.8, 29.5) 88 (5, 155) 10 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.9, 7.5)
Madison County 7 21.8 (12.8, 35.0) 87 (2, 157) 4
*
*
Hays County 7 21.9 (19.1, 25.1) 86 (29, 138) 45 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.4)
Bowie County 7 21.9 (18.1, 26.3) 85 (19, 143) 25 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.4)
Hood County 7 22.0 (17.4, 27.4) 84 (13, 150) 20 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.2)
Ector County 7 22.0 (18.6, 25.8) 83 (22, 139) 31 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.6)
Willacy County 7 22.2 (14.0, 33.5) 82 (2, 157) 5
*
*
Orange County 7 22.2 (18.2, 27.0) 81 (15, 145) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.2, 1.6)
Wichita County 7 22.3 (18.9, 26.1) 80 (21, 139) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Lavaca County 7 22.4 (14.6, 33.1) 79 (3, 157) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.5)
Potter County 7 22.5 (18.8, 26.7) 78 (19, 140) 27 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.3, 7.2)
Parker County 7 22.6 (19.4, 26.1) 77 (22, 134) 39 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.8)
Lee County 7 22.6 (14.6, 33.9) 76 (3, 157) 5
*
*
Bastrop County 7 22.6 (18.6, 27.3) 75 (15, 141) 24 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.2, 5.0)
Bexar County 7 22.6 (21.7, 23.6) 74 (48, 94) 443 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.3)
Wilson County 7 22.7 (17.4, 29.1) 73 (9, 152) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.6)
Guadalupe County 7 22.7 (19.7, 26.0) 72 (21, 130) 42 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 4.3)
Howard County 7 23.0 (16.8, 30.8) 71 (5, 155) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.7)
San Jacinto County 7 23.1 (16.2, 32.2) 70 (3, 156) 9 stable stable trend 4.6 (0.0, 11.4)
Grimes County 7 23.2 (16.4, 32.0) 69 (3, 156) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.3, 8.1)
Van Zandt County 7 23.2 (18.5, 28.9) 68 (9, 145) 18 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.7, 5.4)
Live Oak County 7 23.3 (12.7, 39.1) 67 (1, 157) 3
*
*
Freestone County 7 23.4 (15.5, 34.0) 66 (2, 157) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-25.5, 4.1)
Angelina County 7 23.4 (19.4, 28.1) 65 (11, 138) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.5)
Cherokee County 7 23.4 (18.4, 29.5) 64 (7, 149) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.3)
Hopkins County 7 23.6 (17.8, 30.9) 63 (5, 152) 11 stable stable trend 4.1 (0.0, 9.7)
Washington County 7 23.8 (18.2, 30.8) 62 (5, 148) 13 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.7, 6.8)
Bee County 7 23.8 (16.9, 32.6) 61 (3, 155) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 5.3)
Hardin County 7 23.9 (18.8, 29.8) 60 (8, 143) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.7)
Chambers County 7 23.9 (17.7, 31.7) 59 (4, 152) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 3.1)
Nueces County 7 24.0 (21.8, 26.3) 58 (23, 104) 94 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.3)
Morris County 7 24.0 (14.3, 38.4) 57 (1, 157) 4
*
*
Lampasas County 7 24.0 (16.2, 34.5) 56 (2, 157) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.6, 7.6)
Liberty County 7 24.0 (19.6, 29.1) 55 (10, 137) 22 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.6)
Fannin County 7 24.1 (18.0, 31.7) 54 (3, 153) 11 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.1, 8.5)
Uvalde County 7 24.1 (16.8, 33.6) 53 (2, 156) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.5)
Tyler County 7 24.2 (16.5, 34.5) 52 (3, 156) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.1, 7.7)
Taylor County 7 24.3 (20.7, 28.3) 51 (12, 124) 34 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.2)
Wood County 7 24.3 (18.6, 31.3) 50 (4, 144) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.7, 5.9)
Gillespie County 7 24.4 (17.2, 33.8) 49 (2, 154) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.0, 7.0)
Burnet County 7 24.4 (19.1, 31.0) 48 (6, 145) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.2)
Webb County 7 24.5 (21.6, 27.6) 47 (17, 108) 55 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.3, 4.9)
Lamar County 7 24.5 (19.2, 30.7) 46 (6, 143) 16 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 5.1)
Caldwell County 7 24.5 (18.6, 31.8) 45 (5, 149) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.3)
Jones County 7 24.6 (16.4, 35.8) 44 (2, 157) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.3, 2.7)
El Paso County 7 24.8 (23.3, 26.4) 43 (24, 80) 203 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.3)
Callahan County 7 25.0 (16.0, 37.8) 42 (1, 157) 5
*
*
Somervell County 7 25.0 (14.3, 41.7) 41 (1, 157) 3
*
*
Lubbock County 7 25.0 (22.5, 27.7) 40 (16, 99) 74 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.1)
Walker County 7 25.0 (20.2, 30.6) 39 (6, 132) 20 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 6.8)
McLennan County 7 25.3 (22.6, 28.2) 38 (15, 95) 69 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 3.4)
Falls County 7 25.3 (16.7, 37.0) 37 (1, 156) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 8.9)
Camp County 7 25.4 (14.5, 41.1) 36 (1, 157) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.1, 10.8)
Ellis County 7 25.5 (22.3, 29.1) 35 (11, 104) 47 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 4.1)
Panola County 7 25.8 (18.1, 35.9) 34 (1, 155) 8 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.7)
Bell County 7 26.1 (23.6, 28.8) 33 (13, 87) 84 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.2, 5.2)
Scurry County 7 26.2 (16.8, 39.2) 32 (1, 157) 5
*
*
Hale County 7 26.3 (19.0, 35.6) 31 (2, 151) 9 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 7.0)
Jackson County 7 26.4 (17.1, 39.4) 30 (1, 156) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.5)
Victoria County 7 26.5 (22.2, 31.4) 29 (5, 113) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-8.1, 3.9)
Coryell County 7 26.6 (21.2, 32.9) 28 (4, 129) 17 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.9)
Gregg County 7 26.6 (22.9, 30.9) 27 (7, 108) 37 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.2)
Terry County 7 27.1 (16.2, 42.8) 26 (1, 157) 4
*
*
Matagorda County 7 27.1 (20.5, 35.2) 25 (2, 137) 12 rising rising trend 6.5 (3.8, 10.3)
Colorado County 7 27.1 (18.6, 38.5) 24 (1, 154) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 7.7)
Upshur County 7 27.6 (21.3, 35.2) 23 (2, 133) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.6)
San Patricio County 7 27.7 (22.4, 33.8) 22 (3, 116) 20 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.3, 6.4)
Jim Wells County 7 27.9 (21.2, 36.0) 21 (1, 137) 12 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.7, 7.4)
Val Verde County 7 28.2 (21.9, 35.7) 20 (2, 131) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.5, 7.3)
Polk County 7 28.3 (22.4, 35.3) 19 (2, 113) 18 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 6.1)
Maverick County 7 28.5 (22.4, 35.6) 18 (2, 123) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.4, 8.2)
Leon County 7 28.7 (18.9, 41.9) 17 (1, 153) 7 rising rising trend 7.2 (1.9, 15.1)
Atascosa County 7 29.2 (23.3, 36.3) 16 (2, 109) 17 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.4, 5.2)
Wharton County 7 29.3 (22.9, 36.9) 15 (2, 118) 15 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.6)
Milam County 7 29.5 (21.4, 39.8) 14 (1, 139) 10 rising rising trend 11.8 (5.6, 32.8)
Houston County 7 29.5 (21.5, 39.7) 13 (1, 138) 10 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.2, 9.5)
DeWitt County 7 30.1 (21.7, 41.0) 12 (1, 145) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.2)
Dawson County 7 30.2 (18.4, 46.7) 11 (1, 157) 4
*
*
Jasper County 7 30.4 (23.5, 38.7) 10 (1, 113) 15 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.9, 7.6)
Stephens County 7 30.6 (17.2, 50.6) 9 (1, 157) 3
*
*
Tom Green County 7 31.9 (27.5, 36.8) 8 (1, 50) 41 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.0, 6.7)
Zavala County 7 32.0 (19.0, 50.5) 7 (1, 156) 4
*
*
Frio County 7 32.2 (21.4, 46.3) 6 (1, 151) 6
*
*
Franklin County 7 32.9 (20.3, 50.9) 5 (1, 154) 5
*
*
Refugio County 7 33.7 (19.5, 55.6) 4 (1, 157) 4
*
*
Nolan County 7 34.6 (23.4, 49.5) 3 (1, 138) 6 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.2, 13.2)
Kleberg County 7 35.8 (26.3, 47.6) 2 (1, 105) 10 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.9, 7.0)
Wilbarger County 7 43.9 (29.0, 63.5) 1 (1, 121) 6
*
*
Andrews County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 10:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top