Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 14.7 (14.5, 14.9) N/A 4,199 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 14.1 (14.0, 14.1) N/A 53,074 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.2)
Polk County 7 Rural 26.0 (19.9, 33.5) 1 (1, 66) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.8)
Franklin County 7 Rural 24.8 (14.2, 40.9) 2 (1, 137) 4
*
*
DeWitt County 7 Rural 24.8 (16.6, 35.8) 3 (1, 124) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.2)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 24.7 (16.8, 35.4) 4 (1, 128) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.2)
Rains County 7 Rural 23.7 (14.5, 37.7) 5 (1, 135) 5
*
*
Terry County 7 Rural 22.9 (13.0, 37.8) 6 (1, 138) 3
*
*
Wise County 7 Urban 22.4 (17.8, 27.9) 7 (1, 79) 17 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.3)
Frio County 7 Rural 21.4 (12.6, 34.0) 8 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Hood County 7 Rural 21.4 (17.1, 26.5) 9 (1, 94) 20 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.2, 5.7)
Brown County 7 Rural 21.3 (15.5, 28.5) 10 (1, 124) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-18.2, 0.9)
Wichita County 7 Urban 21.2 (17.8, 25.0) 11 (2, 75) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Hunt County 7 Urban 21.2 (17.4, 25.5) 12 (1, 85) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 4.1)
Panola County 7 Rural 21.2 (14.3, 30.4) 13 (1, 135) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.3)
Grayson County 7 Urban 20.8 (17.7, 24.3) 14 (2, 74) 35 stable stable trend -7.8 (-17.6, 2.6)
Comanche County 7 Rural 20.7 (12.2, 33.5) 15 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Red River County 7 Rural 20.6 (11.1, 35.3) 16 (1, 138) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.1)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 20.5 (11.5, 34.2) 17 (1, 138) 3
*
*
Fannin County 7 Rural 19.7 (14.1, 26.9) 18 (1, 133) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.2)
Upshur County 7 Urban 19.6 (14.3, 26.2) 19 (1, 132) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 19.4 (12.6, 29.0) 20 (1, 137) 5
*
*
Young County 7 Rural 19.4 (12.1, 29.8) 21 (1, 138) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.1, 7.5)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 19.3 (13.2, 27.5) 22 (1, 135) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.5, 7.0)
Anderson County 7 Rural 19.2 (14.5, 25.0) 23 (2, 127) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.0)
Walker County 7 Rural 19.2 (14.9, 24.3) 24 (2, 122) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Leon County 7 Rural 19.2 (12.3, 29.4) 25 (1, 138) 5
*
*
Matagorda County 7 Rural 19.0 (13.4, 26.3) 26 (1, 135) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.6)
Bandera County 7 Urban 18.9 (11.9, 29.0) 27 (1, 138) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.5)
Moore County 7 Rural 18.9 (11.4, 29.4) 28 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Gregg County 7 Urban 18.7 (15.6, 22.2) 29 (6, 103) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.0)
Burnet County 7 Rural 18.5 (14.0, 24.2) 30 (3, 132) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.7, 6.1)
Harrison County 7 Urban 18.4 (14.4, 23.3) 31 (4, 126) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.6)
Trinity County 7 Rural 18.4 (10.0, 31.5) 32 (1, 138) 3
*
*
Rusk County 7 Urban 18.4 (13.8, 24.0) 33 (3, 130) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 6.1)
Kendall County 7 Urban 18.3 (13.4, 24.4) 34 (2, 133) 10
*
*
Jasper County 7 Rural 18.2 (13.0, 25.1) 35 (2, 136) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.5)
Eastland County 7 Rural 18.2 (11.3, 28.2) 36 (1, 138) 5
*
*
Freestone County 7 Rural 18.2 (11.3, 28.1) 37 (1, 138) 5
*
*
Gillespie County 7 Rural 18.0 (12.2, 25.8) 38 (1, 137) 9 rising rising trend 7.6 (3.7, 19.6)
Milam County 7 Rural 17.9 (11.6, 26.6) 39 (1, 138) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.3)
Grimes County 7 Rural 17.9 (12.0, 25.8) 40 (1, 138) 6 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.2, 11.4)
Scurry County 7 Rural 17.7 (10.3, 28.7) 41 (1, 138) 3
*
*
Montague County 7 Rural 17.7 (11.8, 26.3) 42 (1, 138) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.5, 2.2)
Navarro County 7 Rural 17.7 (13.1, 23.5) 43 (3, 134) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 6.6)
Parker County 7 Urban 17.7 (14.9, 20.8) 44 (10, 110) 30 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.0)
Victoria County 7 Urban 17.4 (14.0, 21.5) 45 (6, 123) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-9.8, 15.7)
Hockley County 7 Urban 17.2 (10.6, 26.6) 46 (1, 138) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.3)
Ellis County 7 Urban 17.2 (14.6, 20.2) 47 (12, 115) 33 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.9)
Chambers County 7 Urban 17.2 (11.9, 24.0) 48 (2, 138) 7
*
*
Atascosa County 7 Urban 17.1 (12.5, 23.0) 49 (4, 135) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.8)
Orange County 7 Urban 17.1 (13.6, 21.2) 50 (9, 130) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 17.1 (10.8, 25.8) 51 (1, 138) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.8, 8.9)
Limestone County 7 Rural 17.0 (11.0, 25.5) 52 (1, 138) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 2.9)
Titus County 7 Rural 17.0 (11.1, 24.9) 53 (2, 138) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.4, 7.8)
Lee County 7 Rural 17.0 (9.8, 27.7) 54 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Comal County 7 Urban 16.9 (14.4, 19.8) 55 (15, 114) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 4.1)
Houston County 7 Rural 16.9 (10.7, 25.7) 56 (1, 138) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 16.8 (11.5, 24.1) 57 (3, 138) 7
*
*
McLennan County 7 Urban 16.8 (14.7, 19.2) 58 (19, 108) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.6)
Burleson County 7 Urban 16.8 (10.0, 26.9) 59 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Jones County 7 Urban 16.6 (10.0, 26.4) 60 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Kaufman County 7 Urban 16.5 (13.5, 20.0) 61 (14, 127) 22 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 4.0)
Denton County 7 Urban 16.5 (15.2, 17.9) 62 (32, 94) 131 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.6)
Galveston County 7 Urban 16.5 (14.6, 18.5) 63 (24, 106) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.2)
Callahan County 7 Urban 16.4 (9.6, 27.1) 64 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Johnson County 7 Urban 16.3 (13.8, 19.2) 65 (17, 120) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.7)
Henderson County 7 Rural 16.2 (12.9, 20.1) 66 (12, 131) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.6)
Bosque County 7 Urban 16.1 (9.8, 25.6) 67 (1, 138) 5
*
*
Angelina County 7 Rural 16.1 (12.7, 20.0) 68 (12, 131) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 16.1 (14.2, 18.1) 69 (28, 112) 56 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.4)
Hardin County 7 Urban 16.0 (11.9, 21.1) 70 (8, 136) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.1)
Randall County 7 Urban 16.0 (13.3, 19.2) 71 (17, 127) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.3)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 16.0 (11.2, 22.1) 72 (4, 138) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 6.6)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 16.0 (11.7, 21.4) 73 (7, 137) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 16.0 (13.9, 18.2) 74 (23, 119) 46 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.4, 13.2)
Collin County 7 Urban 15.9 (14.8, 17.1) 75 (39, 99) 152 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.7)
Kerr County 7 Rural 15.7 (11.7, 20.9) 76 (7, 137) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 4.0)
Bee County 7 Rural 15.6 (10.0, 23.4) 77 (2, 138) 5
*
*
Potter County 7 Urban 15.6 (12.6, 19.2) 78 (17, 131) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 15.6 (11.9, 20.1) 79 (11, 137) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.1)
Lamar County 7 Rural 15.5 (11.4, 20.7) 80 (8, 138) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.5)
Hays County 7 Urban 15.4 (13.0, 18.1) 81 (25, 128) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.3)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 15.4 (10.5, 21.8) 82 (5, 138) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.7)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 15.4 (14.6, 16.2) 83 (52, 99) 302 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 15.4 (9.2, 24.4) 84 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Fayette County 7 Rural 15.4 (9.5, 23.7) 85 (2, 138) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 3.4)
Williamson County 7 Urban 15.3 (13.9, 16.9) 86 (39, 113) 88 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.1)
Willacy County 7 Rural 15.3 (8.9, 24.8) 87 (1, 138) 3
*
*
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 15.3 (9.1, 24.4) 88 (2, 138) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.2)
Smith County 7 Urban 15.2 (13.1, 17.4) 89 (32, 126) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 15.1 (9.2, 23.6) 90 (4, 138) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 2.4)
Wharton County 7 Rural 15.0 (10.5, 20.9) 91 (8, 138) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.7)
Bell County 7 Urban 14.9 (13.1, 17.0) 92 (38, 126) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Coryell County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.0, 19.5) 93 (13, 138) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.0, 17.7)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.5, 18.6) 94 (20, 135) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.4)
Hale County 7 Rural 14.7 (9.4, 22.0) 95 (4, 138) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-9.7, 17.1)
Hill County 7 Rural 14.7 (10.1, 20.8) 96 (6, 138) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.1)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 14.5 (12.6, 16.7) 97 (38, 130) 43 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Midland County 7 Urban 14.5 (11.7, 17.7) 98 (25, 135) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Dallas County 7 Urban 14.5 (13.8, 15.2) 99 (67, 109) 347 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Wilson County 7 Urban 14.4 (10.4, 19.6) 100 (11, 138) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.7)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 14.3 (10.5, 18.9) 101 (13, 138) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.5)
Travis County 7 Urban 14.2 (13.2, 15.3) 102 (61, 120) 154 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 14.2 (9.5, 20.5) 103 (8, 138) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.8)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 14.1 (11.7, 16.8) 104 (36, 134) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.3)
Llano County 7 Rural 13.9 (7.5, 24.0) 105 (3, 138) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 3.5)
Aransas County 7 Urban 13.7 (8.6, 21.3) 106 (6, 138) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.6, 2.8)
Waller County 7 Urban 13.7 (9.4, 19.3) 107 (11, 138) 7
*
*
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 13.6 (8.7, 20.6) 108 (6, 138) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.6)
Bexar County 7 Urban 13.6 (12.8, 14.3) 109 (79, 124) 259 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Starr County 7 Rural 13.5 (9.6, 18.3) 110 (17, 138) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 6.2)
Cameron County 7 Urban 13.3 (11.8, 15.0) 111 (64, 132) 57 stable stable trend -2.1 (-15.4, 3.6)
Liberty County 7 Urban 13.3 (10.1, 17.3) 112 (26, 138) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.1)
Howard County 7 Rural 13.3 (8.3, 20.2) 113 (8, 138) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 0.6)
Ector County 7 Urban 13.3 (10.7, 16.3) 114 (40, 137) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Bowie County 7 Urban 13.3 (10.4, 16.7) 115 (32, 137) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.4)
Shelby County 7 Rural 13.1 (7.9, 20.6) 116 (9, 138) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.4)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 13.1 (10.4, 16.2) 117 (43, 138) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.6)
Harris County 7 Urban 13.1 (12.6, 13.6) 118 (94, 125) 551 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 13.0 (11.8, 14.4) 119 (75, 132) 81 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 13.0 (11.9, 14.2) 120 (80, 131) 105 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Taylor County 7 Urban 13.0 (10.5, 15.9) 121 (44, 137) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.8)
El Paso County 7 Urban 12.9 (11.8, 14.0) 122 (81, 132) 108 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Washington County 7 Rural 12.9 (8.8, 18.4) 123 (17, 138) 7 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.0, 0.6)
Webb County 7 Urban 12.9 (10.8, 15.1) 124 (58, 137) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.6)
Cooke County 7 Rural 12.8 (8.8, 18.1) 125 (19, 138) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -0.1)
Brazos County 7 Urban 12.7 (10.4, 15.4) 126 (52, 137) 22 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 12.5 (11.3, 13.7) 127 (86, 134) 93 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Wood County 7 Rural 12.5 (9.2, 16.8) 128 (34, 138) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.7)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 12.5 (7.3, 19.9) 129 (7, 138) 4
*
*
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 12.4 (8.8, 16.9) 130 (26, 138) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.5)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 12.3 (9.5, 15.8) 131 (40, 138) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 3.0)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 11.6 (7.8, 16.8) 132 (27, 138) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.2)
Medina County 7 Urban 11.6 (8.0, 16.4) 133 (35, 138) 7 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.4)
Nueces County 7 Urban 11.3 (9.8, 13.0) 134 (95, 138) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Tyler County 7 Rural 11.3 (6.5, 18.8) 135 (16, 138) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.6, 0.6)
Austin County 7 Urban 11.2 (6.7, 17.5) 136 (22, 138) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.5, 0.2)
Maverick County 7 Urban 10.8 (7.2, 15.5) 137 (43, 138) 6
*
*
Erath County 7 Rural 10.4 (6.7, 15.5) 138 (42, 138) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.1, -1.8)
Andrews County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colorado County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 10:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top