Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah 7 *** 406.9 (403.2, 410.7) N/A 9,233 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 *** 465.7 (465.4, 466.1) N/A 1,276,790 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Beaver County 7 *** 513.6 (434.8, 602.9) 1 (1, 15) 32 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Piute County 7 *** 476.7 (329.3, 672.9) 2 (1, 28) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.1)
Daggett County 7 *** 473.9 (334.5, 664.8) 3 (1, 28) 8
*
*
Duchesne County 7 *** 460.5 (414.9, 509.8) 4 (1, 17) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Tooele County 7 *** 451.3 (423.1, 480.9) 5 (1, 13) 202 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Iron County 7 *** 451.2 (421.6, 482.3) 6 (1, 14) 183 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Summit County 7 *** 445.7 (412.8, 480.5) 7 (1, 17) 166 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.3)
Wasatch County 7 *** 428.4 (390.3, 469.1) 8 (2, 23) 102 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Salt Lake County 7 *** 417.2 (410.8, 423.6) 9 (6, 16) 3,384 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Emery County 7 *** 415.4 (361.9, 474.7) 10 (1, 26) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Uintah County 7 *** 414.1 (379.6, 450.8) 11 (3, 24) 111 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Carbon County 7 *** 412.8 (374.0, 454.7) 12 (3, 25) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Davis County 7 *** 412.3 (400.9, 423.9) 13 (7, 19) 1,027 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Morgan County 7 *** 409.1 (353.4, 471.0) 14 (2, 26) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Millard County 7 *** 402.7 (353.6, 457.1) 15 (2, 26) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Weber County 7 *** 398.4 (385.8, 411.3) 16 (10, 23) 784 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Washington County 7 *** 396.6 (383.1, 410.6) 17 (10, 23) 751 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.0, 0.4)
Garfield County 7 *** 394.9 (326.1, 475.5) 18 (2, 28) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Cache County 7 *** 393.4 (374.0, 413.5) 19 (9, 25) 319 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.9, 8.6)
Box Elder County 7 *** 391.1 (365.9, 417.7) 20 (8, 25) 184 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Sevier County 7 *** 387.9 (352.0, 426.6) 21 (7, 26) 90 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Utah County 7 *** 387.1 (377.6, 396.8) 22 (14, 24) 1,307 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Kane County 7 *** 382.9 (326.1, 447.8) 23 (3, 28) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Grand County 7 *** 367.4 (317.1, 424.3) 24 (6, 28) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Juab County 7 *** 350.5 (298.1, 409.3) 25 (8, 29) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
San Juan County 7 *** 324.8 (269.6, 388.4) 26 (13, 29) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Sanpete County 7 *** 301.8 (272.4, 333.6) 27 (24, 29) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Wayne County 7 *** 294.8 (217.1, 394.5) 28 (11, 29) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Rich County 7 *** 251.1 (173.7, 354.4) 29 (21, 29) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/20/2021 1:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top