Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Count
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Utah7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 403.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 399.7 to 406.4 and 11,449 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to -0.2.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 442.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 442.0 to 442.6 and 1,698,328 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 0.1.
Salt Lake County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 399.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 394.3 to 405.4 and 4,201 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (11, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to -0.5.
Utah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 386.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 378.2 to 395.5 and 1,634 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (14, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.2.
Davis County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 418.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 408.0 to 429.1 and 1,262 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (4, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 0.5.
Weber County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 413.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 401.8 to 425.0 and 1,013 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (5, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 2.3.
Washington County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 409.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 397.0 to 421.9 and 964 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (6, 20)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 0.5.
Cache County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 425.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 406.9 to 444.6 and 411 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (2, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 4.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.4 to 8.8.
Tooele County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 428.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 404.0 to 454.0 and 244 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (2, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 0.5.
Box Elder County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 399.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 375.5 to 424.0 and 219 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (5, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 0.3.
Iron County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 420.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 394.8 to 447.1 and 214 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (2, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 0.8.
Summit County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 445.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 416.8 to 475.9 and 206 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 15)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 0.6.
Wasatch County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 403.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 371.1 to 437.3 and 128 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (3, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.7.
Uintah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 363.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 334.4 to 395.0 and 119 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (13, 28)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 0.7.
Sevier County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 405.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 370.1 to 443.1 and 103 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (2, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 1.1.
Sanpete County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 323.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 295.4 to 353.5 and 102 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 28 (21, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -11.0 to -1.1.
Carbon County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 410.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 374.1 to 449.5 and 101 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (2, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.6.
Duchesne County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 474.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 430.4 to 520.9 and 90 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.1.
Millard County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 367.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 325.3 to 414.5 and 59 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (5, 28)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 1.2.
Grand County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 394.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 345.3 to 448.8 and 52 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (2, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 0.8.
Kane County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 416.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 362.2 to 478.3 and 49 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 1.1.
San Juan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 298.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 261.1 to 340.0 and 48 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 29 (23, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 2.5.
Morgan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 403.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 352.0 to 460.9 and 45 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 1.0.
Emery County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 354.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 307.6 to 406.2 and 45 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (7, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 1.3.
Juab County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 425.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 370.5 to 485.5 and 45 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 2.0.
Beaver County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 468.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 396.0 to 549.8 and 32 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 22)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 2.0.
Garfield County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 339.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 277.5 to 411.9 and 24 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (5, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 1.3.
Wayne County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 344.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 263.0 to 445.4 and 14 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (2, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 1.3.
Rich County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 353.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 263.5 to 466.7 and 11 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (1, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 1.7.
Piute County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 362.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 245.4 to 522.2 and 8 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (1, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 2.4.
Daggett County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 409.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 273.0 to 603.3 and 7 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (1, 29)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/21/2023 6:25 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.