Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Utah7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 206.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 203.8 to 208.8 and 5,413 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.0.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 225.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 224.8 to 225.3 and 726,500 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 0.0.
Cache County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 224.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 210.1 to 239.1 and 197 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 3.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.8 to 8.2.
San Juan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 156.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 126.5 to 190.6 and 21 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (13, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.9 to 3.5.
Juab County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 212.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 172.3 to 259.4 and 20 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.2 to 2.6.
Duchesne County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 252.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 218.6 to 290.0 and 42 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 2.1.
Uintah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 189.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 168.2 to 213.2 and 59 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (4, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 2.2.
Kane County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 188.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 144.5 to 241.6 and 15 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 2.5.
Millard County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 175.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 141.7 to 214.9 and 21 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (3, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 2.3.
Davis County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 214.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 206.9 to 222.1 and 628 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (3, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.5 to 1.1.
Iron County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 200.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 181.1 to 221.1 and 84 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (3, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.7.
Sevier County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 196.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 168.6 to 227.1 and 39 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (2, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 2.1.
Beaver County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 213.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 160.6 to 278.9 and 12 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 2.8.
Emery County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 165.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 129.2 to 208.2 and 16 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (5, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 2.3.
Washington County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 210.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 199.3 to 221.5 and 303 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (3, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 1.1.
Carbon County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 201.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 172.5 to 234.0 and 38 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 1.2.
Morgan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 203.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 165.3 to 247.9 and 21 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.1.
Weber County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 213.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 205.2 to 222.5 and 489 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (2, 15)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 0.9.
Tooele County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 205.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 189.4 to 222.5 and 123 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (2, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 0.7.
Box Elder County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 193.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 176.0 to 212.9 and 92 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (5, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 0.7.
Utah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 205.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 199.4 to 212.0 and 869 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (5, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 0.8.
Summit County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 226.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 206.5 to 247.6 and 105 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to 1.3.
Garfield County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 181.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 129.3 to 249.5 and 9 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to 2.4.
Sanpete County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 154.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 133.4 to 178.5 and 39 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (18, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 0.4.
Salt Lake County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 204.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 200.1 to 208.1 and 2,075 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (7, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to -0.4.
Wayne County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 161.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.8 to 252.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.3 to 1.2.
Grand County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 185.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 147.9 to 229.2 and 20 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (2, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.5 to 0.7.
Wasatch County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 192.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 170.7 to 215.9 and 60 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (3, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -6.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -13.3 to 0.6.
Rich County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 197.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 123.2 to 302.1 and 5 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2024 2:34 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Daggett, Piute
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.