Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah 7 442.8 (437.7, 448.0) N/A 5,998 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Salt Lake County 7 429.8 (421.3, 438.4) 19 (14, 23) 2,097 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Utah County 7 415.5 (402.4, 428.9) 21 (15, 25) 817 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.7)
Davis County 7 470.7 (454.4, 487.4) 10 (4, 17) 667 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 5.2)
Weber County 7 482.7 (464.5, 501.3) 7 (2, 15) 565 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Washington County 7 460.2 (442.1, 478.8) 13 (5, 19) 546 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Cache County 7 467.5 (439.6, 496.6) 12 (3, 20) 218 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.9, 10.6)
Tooele County 7 490.0 (450.9, 531.3) 3 (1, 18) 131 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Iron County 7 487.0 (447.8, 528.7) 4 (1, 19) 122 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.5)
Box Elder County 7 446.4 (410.8, 484.3) 15 (4, 24) 120 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Summit County 7 484.0 (441.4, 529.6) 5 (1, 20) 114 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 1.1)
Wasatch County 7 415.9 (370.2, 465.6) 20 (7, 27) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Uintah County 7 411.6 (366.3, 460.8) 22 (9, 27) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Sevier County 7 470.1 (416.8, 528.5) 11 (1, 24) 59 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Carbon County 7 477.4 (422.5, 537.9) 8 (1, 23) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Sanpete County 7 351.6 (311.0, 396.0) 28 (20, 29) 57 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Duchesne County 7 531.4 (467.2, 601.9) 2 (1, 17) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.9)
Grand County 7 471.9 (396.9, 557.9) 9 (1, 26) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
Millard County 7 370.6 (312.5, 437.1) 26 (13, 29) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Kane County 7 446.1 (366.2, 539.8) 16 (1, 27) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Morgan County 7 445.1 (369.3, 531.9) 17 (1, 27) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.8)
Juab County 7 483.5 (399.4, 579.4) 6 (1, 26) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.9)
Emery County 7 385.6 (317.6, 464.6) 25 (7, 29) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
San Juan County 7 283.9 (232.7, 343.1) 29 (25, 29) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.1)
Beaver County 7 537.8 (431.3, 662.6) 1 (1, 24) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.8)
Garfield County 7 391.6 (304.0, 499.4) 24 (2, 29) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.2)
Wayne County 7 365.8 (253.9, 517.3) 27 (1, 29) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Rich County 7 442.1 (307.5, 621.1) 18 (1, 29) 8
*
*
Piute County 7 399.4 (223.4, 667.7) 23 (1, 29) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Daggett County 7 448.0 (260.7, 743.5) 14 (1, 29) 4
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/12/2024 9:04 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top