Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah 7 403.0 (399.7, 406.4) N/A 11,449 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Daggett County 7 409.8 (273.0, 603.3) 12 (1, 29) 7
*
*
Piute County 7 362.7 (245.4, 522.2) 23 (1, 29) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Rich County 7 353.6 (263.5, 466.7) 25 (1, 29) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.7)
Wayne County 7 344.2 (263.0, 445.4) 26 (2, 29) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Garfield County 7 339.3 (277.5, 411.9) 27 (5, 29) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.3)
Beaver County 7 468.2 (396.0, 549.8) 2 (1, 22) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Emery County 7 354.2 (307.6, 406.2) 24 (7, 29) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Juab County 7 425.2 (370.5, 485.5) 6 (1, 25) 45 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 2.0)
Morgan County 7 403.7 (352.0, 460.9) 15 (1, 26) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.0)
San Juan County 7 298.6 (261.1, 340.0) 29 (23, 29) 48 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.5)
Kane County 7 416.8 (362.2, 478.3) 9 (1, 26) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Grand County 7 394.3 (345.3, 448.8) 19 (2, 27) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Millard County 7 367.8 (325.3, 414.5) 21 (5, 28) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Duchesne County 7 474.0 (430.4, 520.9) 1 (1, 13) 90 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Carbon County 7 410.4 (374.1, 449.5) 11 (2, 24) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Sanpete County 7 323.5 (295.4, 353.5) 28 (21, 29) 102 falling falling trend -2.7 (-11.0, -1.1)
Sevier County 7 405.3 (370.1, 443.1) 14 (2, 24) 103 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Uintah County 7 363.8 (334.4, 395.0) 22 (13, 28) 119 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Wasatch County 7 403.2 (371.1, 437.3) 16 (3, 25) 128 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.7)
Summit County 7 445.6 (416.8, 475.9) 3 (1, 15) 206 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.6)
Iron County 7 420.3 (394.8, 447.1) 7 (2, 21) 214 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.8)
Box Elder County 7 399.2 (375.5, 424.0) 18 (5, 24) 219 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Tooele County 7 428.5 (404.0, 454.0) 4 (2, 18) 244 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.5)
Cache County 7 425.5 (406.9, 444.6) 5 (2, 17) 411 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.4, 8.8)
Washington County 7 409.3 (397.0, 421.9) 13 (6, 20) 964 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.5)
Weber County 7 413.3 (401.8, 425.0) 10 (5, 18) 1,013 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 2.3)
Davis County 7 418.4 (408.0, 429.1) 8 (4, 17) 1,262 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.5)
Utah County 7 386.8 (378.2, 395.5) 20 (14, 24) 1,634 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.2)
Salt Lake County 7 399.8 (394.3, 405.4) 17 (11, 21) 4,201 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 5:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top