Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah 7 N/A 105.1 (103.1, 107.1) N/A 2,194 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Salt Lake County 7 Urban 102.1 (98.9, 105.3) 14 (9, 20) 818 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.2)
Utah County 7 Urban 110.3 (105.6, 115.2) 8 (3, 15) 441 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.6, 2.2)
Davis County 7 Urban 110.3 (104.4, 116.5) 9 (3, 15) 264 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.1, 2.1)
Weber County 7 Urban 100.9 (94.2, 108.0) 15 (7, 21) 170 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 1.5)
Washington County 7 Urban 113.3 (104.0, 123.2) 6 (2, 16) 111 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.9)
Cache County 7 Urban 112.5 (101.7, 123.9) 7 (2, 17) 87 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.4)
Tooele County 7 Urban 102.5 (90.2, 116.0) 11 (3, 23) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.4)
Summit County 7 Rural 130.0 (111.4, 150.7) 1 (1, 13) 36 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 3.1)
Box Elder County 7 Rural 100.7 (86.1, 116.8) 16 (3, 24) 35 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.5)
Iron County 7 Rural 87.5 (73.3, 103.4) 23 (9, 25) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.3)
Uintah County 7 Rural 102.3 (84.2, 123.0) 13 (2, 24) 23 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.8)
Wasatch County 7 Rural 92.3 (75.2, 112.1) 18 (4, 25) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.5)
Sanpete County 7 Rural 91.1 (72.0, 113.5) 21 (4, 25) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Duchesne County 7 Rural 114.5 (88.8, 145.0) 5 (1, 24) 14 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.9)
Carbon County 7 Rural 114.7 (88.9, 145.6) 4 (1, 24) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Sevier County 7 Rural 91.2 (69.1, 117.8) 20 (3, 25) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-17.4, 1.1)
Millard County 7 Rural 116.4 (83.5, 157.5) 3 (1, 25) 8 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.9)
San Juan County 7 Rural 99.9 (71.6, 135.2) 17 (1, 25) 8 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.6, 5.5)
Juab County 7 Urban 102.3 (71.7, 140.9) 12 (1, 25) 7 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 4.5)
Morgan County 7 Urban 90.6 (62.3, 127.0) 22 (1, 25) 7
*
*
Grand County 7 Rural 91.6 (60.2, 133.6) 19 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.4)
Emery County 7 Rural 86.4 (55.7, 127.7) 25 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.8)
Beaver County 7 Rural 106.2 (65.1, 162.1) 10 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Garfield County 7 Rural 124.5 (72.4, 198.9) 2 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Kane County 7 Rural 86.7 (50.4, 138.3) 24 (1, 25) 3 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.8)
Daggett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piute County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 2:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Daggett, Piute, Rich, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top