Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50
Sorted by Name
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Utah7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 106.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.0 to 108.1 and 2,095 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 1.2.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 106.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.3 to 106.7 and 208,914 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to -0.2.
Beaver County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 119.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.2 to 180.6 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Box Elder County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 97.6 to 131.5 and 37 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (1, 20)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.7 to 2.6.
Cache County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 118.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.9 to 130.7 and 84 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.6 to 2.6.
Carbon County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 89.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.2 to 117.0 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (3, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 2.1.
Davis County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 114.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 108.1 to 120.8 and 258 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (2, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.2 to 2.1.
Duchesne County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 135.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.9 to 168.1 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.0 to 3.8.
Emery County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 114.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.5 to 161.4 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 4.9.
Grand County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 83.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 53.1 to 123.6 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (2, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 1.6.
Iron County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 103.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.4 to 121.9 and 30 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (2, 22)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 2.4.
Juab County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 63.3 to 131.3 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.5 to 4.1.
Kane County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 52.6 to 145.0 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 4.4.
Millard County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 95.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.3 to 134.1 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -10.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -26.6 to 9.2.
Morgan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.7 to 155.3 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Salt Lake County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 104.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 100.7 to 107.3 and 797 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (8, 18)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.7 to 1.2.
San Juan County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 91.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.1 to 124.9 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (2, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 3.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.6 to 5.4.
Sanpete County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 77.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.9 to 97.4 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (13, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 1.2.
Sevier County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 99.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 75.8 to 127.0 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 3.4.
Summit County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 115.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.3 to 135.3 and 32 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 20)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.6 to 3.0.
Tooele County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.0 to 115.6 and 47 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (4, 22)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 1.2.
Uintah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 83.5 to 121.4 and 24 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (2, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 3.2.
Utah County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 102.9 to 112.8 and 398 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (5, 17)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.6 to 2.1.
Wasatch County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.9 to 122.8 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (2, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -17.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -29.1 to -3.8.
Washington County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.6 to 119.2 and 98 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (2, 19)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.3 to 1.7.
Weber County7
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 94.0 to 108.3 and 161 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (7, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.0 to 2.4.
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 6:50 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2021 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.