Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Vermont by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50
Sorted by Rate
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Vermont6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 115.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 110.2 to 120.4 and 403 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 0.5.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 105.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 105.0 to 105.5 and 202,435 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 0.3.
Lamoille County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 98.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.6 to 123.5 and 15 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (4, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 3.6.
Addison County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 102.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.8 to 124.7 and 20 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (3, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to 3.2.
Washington County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 104.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.8 to 121.4 and 36 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (4, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.0 to 0.7.
Rutland County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 108.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.7 to 126.9 and 33 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (3, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.3.
Orange County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 110.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.8 to 136.8 and 18 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 2.2.
Essex County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 111.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.1 to 179.3 and 3 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Chittenden County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.1 to 123.7 and 109 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (4, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 0.5.
Franklin County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 116.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.6 to 134.9 and 35 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (2, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 4.3.
Bennington County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 116.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.3 to 141.0 and 22 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.8 to 1.3.
Caledonia County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 122.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.7 to 149.1 and 20 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 5.1.
Orleans County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 131.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.3 to 160.6 and 19 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 13)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 3.9.
Windsor County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 132.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 114.8 to 153.0 and 39 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 10)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 1.9.
Windham County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 133.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 112.4 to 156.5 and 30 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 11)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.2 to 2.8.
Grand Isle County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 134.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.9 to 199.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2016-2020.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 6.2.
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/29/2023 2:20 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.