Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Virginia by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia 6 *** 25.4 (24.8, 26.1) N/A 1,378 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.0, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) N/A 56,559 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.3)
Fairfax County 6 *** 24.2 (22.6, 26.0) 70 (44, 78) 166 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Virginia Beach City 6 *** 22.8 (20.3, 25.6) 77 (44, 87) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Chesterfield County 6 *** 26.4 (23.4, 29.7) 59 (27, 77) 59 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Henrico County 6 *** 25.6 (22.6, 28.9) 62 (30, 80) 57 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.5)
Prince William County 6 *** 22.9 (20.2, 26.0) 76 (42, 87) 53 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Loudoun County 6 *** 22.8 (19.8, 26.2) 79 (40, 87) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Chesapeake City 6 *** 24.1 (20.6, 28.1) 71 (31, 87) 35 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 5.4)
Norfolk City 6 *** 27.5 (23.5, 32.1) 49 (20, 79) 35 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 4.9)
Richmond City 6 *** 24.0 (20.2, 28.2) 72 (31, 87) 31 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.4, 5.1)
Spotsylvania County 6 *** 28.8 (23.7, 34.7) 40 (11, 79) 24 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 3.9)
Arlington County 6 *** 20.4 (16.8, 24.6) 84 (49, 92) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.9)
Hampton City 6 *** 25.3 (20.7, 30.7) 65 (20, 87) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Roanoke City 6 *** 33.4 (27.2, 40.7) 20 (5, 67) 22 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.2, 7.5)
Newport News City 6 *** 20.6 (16.8, 24.9) 82 (46, 92) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.3)
Hanover County 6 *** 27.1 (21.9, 33.3) 55 (15, 85) 20 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 4.6)
Roanoke County 6 *** 29.3 (23.6, 36.1) 35 (10, 81) 20 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.9, 7.0)
Stafford County 6 *** 25.1 (20.3, 30.8) 66 (21, 88) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Albemarle County 6 *** 25.1 (20.0, 31.2) 67 (19, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 3.9)
Portsmouth City 6 *** 28.9 (22.9, 35.9) 39 (10, 84) 18 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 4.8)
Rockingham County 6 *** 32.2 (25.6, 40.1) 23 (6, 79) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Alexandria City 6 *** 20.5 (16.3, 25.5) 83 (38, 93) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Bedford City and County 6 *** 28.0 (22.1, 35.3) 43 (11, 86) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.2)
Frederick County 6 *** 28.9 (23.0, 36.2) 38 (9, 83) 17 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.9, 6.3)
Suffolk City 6 *** 25.8 (20.2, 32.5) 61 (15, 89) 15 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.3, 5.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 34.1 (26.1, 44.1) 17 (2, 79) 14 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.5, 8.5)
Lynchburg City 6 *** 31.2 (24.1, 39.7) 29 (5, 83) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.0)
Campbell County 6 *** 34.6 (26.6, 44.5) 15 (2, 81) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 6.2)
Augusta County 6 *** 23.9 (18.1, 31.1) 74 (18, 91) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 25.5 (19.6, 32.8) 63 (16, 90) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 5.6)
Fauquier County 6 *** 27.6 (21.0, 35.7) 48 (10, 88) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.1)
James City County 6 *** 19.6 (14.8, 25.7) 85 (41, 93) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.0, 5.3)
Accomack County 6 *** 41.3 (30.7, 54.9) 7 (1, 59) 12 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 8.0)
Henry County 6 *** 27.3 (19.8, 36.9) 53 (8, 92) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.0)
Amherst County 6 *** 41.6 (30.5, 55.9) 6 (1, 65) 10
*
*
Gloucester County 6 *** 41.7 (30.4, 56.2) 5 (1, 68) 10
*
*
Danville City 6 *** 29.7 (21.7, 39.9) 34 (5, 90) 10 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.1)
Wythe County 6 *** 43.0 (31.6, 57.7) 3 (1, 62) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.5, 6.5)
Harrisonburg City 6 *** 46.4 (34.1, 61.6) 2 (1, 49) 10 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.2, 10.6)
Pittsylvania County 6 *** 18.2 (13.3, 24.6) 89 (48, 93) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 0.9)
Culpeper County 6 *** 31.2 (22.6, 41.9) 30 (3, 88) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.2)
Orange County 6 *** 36.2 (26.1, 49.3) 14 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.2, 7.6)
Shenandoah County 6 *** 25.4 (18.3, 34.9) 64 (11, 91) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.8)
Charlottesville City 6 *** 32.0 (22.7, 44.1) 25 (2, 88) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 6.6)
Louisa County 6 *** 27.4 (19.4, 38.4) 51 (5, 92) 8 stable stable trend -19.1 (-37.1, 4.1)
Warren County 6 *** 30.8 (21.8, 42.5) 31 (3, 88) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.6, 6.0)
Halifax County with South Boston City 6 *** 26.9 (18.7, 38.2) 57 (6, 92) 8 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.8, 9.3)
Tazewell County 6 *** 23.9 (16.7, 33.6) 73 (12, 93) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.0, 6.6)
Isle of Wight County 6 *** 28.8 (20.2, 40.3) 41 (4, 91) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.4, 8.3)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 30.5 (20.6, 44.1) 33 (1, 92) 8 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.6, 10.3)
York County 6 *** 17.0 (12.0, 23.5) 92 (48, 93) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.4)
Botetourt County 6 *** 26.8 (18.4, 38.5) 58 (6, 93) 8 rising rising trend 7.1 (2.2, 12.1)
Pulaski County 6 *** 27.1 (18.5, 38.9) 56 (5, 92) 7 stable stable trend -10.4 (-67.6, 148.3)
Powhatan County 6 *** 31.3 (21.7, 44.6) 28 (2, 89) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.6, 5.5)
Carroll County 6 *** 26.0 (17.0, 39.0) 60 (5, 93) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 4.2)
Petersburg City 6 *** 24.6 (16.5, 36.0) 68 (8, 93) 6
*
*
Washington County 6 *** 14.0 (9.3, 20.6) 93 (70, 93) 6 stable stable trend -3.4 (-6.9, 0.1)
Waynesboro City 6 *** 40.5 (27.2, 58.7) 8 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Caroline County 6 *** 27.8 (18.3, 41.0) 44 (3, 93) 6
*
*
Page County 6 *** 32.3 (21.0, 48.2) 22 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.4, 7.7)
Salem City 6 *** 29.2 (19.0, 43.6) 36 (3, 93) 6 rising rising trend 38.1 (14.2, 67.1)
Staunton City 6 *** 27.4 (17.7, 41.1) 52 (4, 93) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.1, 7.6)
Fluvanna County 6 *** 27.5 (17.6, 41.2) 50 (4, 93) 5
*
*
Prince George County 6 *** 23.2 (14.9, 34.8) 75 (10, 93) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.5)
Wise County 6 *** 18.5 (11.9, 28.0) 88 (28, 93) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.4, 2.0)
Prince Edward County 6 *** 36.6 (23.1, 55.7) 13 (1, 90) 5 rising rising trend 7.3 (2.8, 12.1)
King George County 6 *** 32.1 (20.4, 48.5) 24 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.1, 4.1)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 30.8 (18.9, 48.9) 32 (1, 93) 5
*
*
Giles County 6 *** 39.5 (24.1, 61.8) 9 (1, 92) 5
*
*
New Kent County 6 *** 28.2 (17.4, 44.3) 42 (3, 93) 5
*
*
Northampton County 6 *** 39.2 (24.1, 63.2) 10 (1, 91) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.7, 7.3)
Winchester City 6 *** 24.4 (15.2, 37.6) 69 (6, 93) 4
*
*
Dinwiddie County 6 *** 21.6 (12.9, 34.4) 80 (10, 93) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.2)
Manassas City 6 *** 18.7 (11.4, 29.1) 87 (22, 93) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.3, 8.3)
Brunswick County 6 *** 27.8 (16.9, 45.5) 45 (3, 93) 4
*
*
Hopewell City 6 *** 27.7 (16.5, 43.8) 47 (2, 93) 4
*
*
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City 6 *** 32.4 (18.4, 54.1) 21 (1, 93) 4
*
*
Buchanan County 6 *** 21.1 (12.4, 35.1) 81 (11, 93) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.7, 4.7)
Lancaster County 6 *** 33.5 (17.6, 61.7) 19 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-3.6, 9.1)
Nottoway County 6 *** 31.3 (18.7, 51.1) 27 (1, 93) 4
*
*
Rockbridge County 6 *** 17.5 (10.4, 29.3) 91 (25, 93) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.2, 6.0)
Smyth County 6 *** 17.9 (10.4, 29.2) 90 (24, 93) 4
*
*
Fairfax City 6 *** 22.8 (13.5, 36.8) 78 (8, 93) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.4, 3.4)
Fredericksburg City 6 *** 27.2 (16.0, 43.2) 54 (2, 93) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.4)
Martinsville City 6 *** 37.2 (21.2, 61.3) 11 (1, 93) 4
*
*
Amelia County 6 *** 32.0 (18.4, 54.0) 26 (1, 93) 3
*
*
King William County 6 *** 33.6 (19.1, 55.3) 18 (1, 93) 3
*
*
Middlesex County 6 *** 29.2 (15.8, 54.3) 37 (1, 93) 3
*
*
Patrick County 6 *** 18.7 (10.8, 32.9) 86 (19, 93) 3 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.7, 0.7)
Buckingham County 6 *** 36.9 (19.8, 62.8) 12 (1, 93) 3
*
*
Colonial Heights City 6 *** 27.7 (15.4, 46.3) 46 (2, 93) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.4, 7.6)
Madison County 6 *** 34.3 (18.2, 59.6) 16 (1, 93) 3
*
*
Radford City 6 *** 42.0 (23.6, 69.8) 4 (1, 93) 3
*
*
Richmond County 6 *** 50.0 (27.6, 87.2) 1 (1, 92) 3
*
*
Appomattox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bath County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bristol City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charles City County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlotte County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickenson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emporia City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Essex County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls Church City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Galax City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goochland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grayson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greensville County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King and Queen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lexington City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lunenburg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mathews County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nelson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northumberland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poquoson City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rappahannock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Russell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Southampton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sussex County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williamsburg City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2022 4:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top