Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Virginia by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia 6 Yes 35.0 (34.4, 35.5) N/A 3,357 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 Yes 38.0 (37.9, 38.1) N/A 143,200 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Richmond County 6 No 84.4 (62.9, 111.9) 1 (1, 25) 11 rising rising trend 6.3 (0.2, 12.7)
Covington City 6 No 82.9 (55.9, 119.8) 2 (1, 74) 6 rising rising trend 6.2 (0.8, 11.8)
Bath County 6 No 79.1 (50.7, 120.7) 3 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 7.8)
Martinsville City 6 No 76.4 (58.9, 97.9) 4 (1, 26) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.0)
Franklin City 6 No 75.4 (51.9, 106.0) 5 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.8)
King William County 6 No 63.2 (48.1, 81.9) 6 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.0)
Greensville County 6 No 60.7 (43.2, 83.4) 7 (1, 103) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.8)
Hopewell City 6 No 59.3 (46.3, 74.8) 8 (1, 72) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.6)
Craig County 6 No 58.4 (35.5, 92.7) 9 (1, 127) 5
*
*
Waynesboro City 6 No 56.2 (44.3, 70.5) 10 (3, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.7)
Buena Vista City 6 No 55.7 (35.0, 85.1) 11 (1, 126) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.5, 2.2)
Galax City 6 No 53.1 (33.8, 80.5) 12 (1, 127) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.1)
Charlotte County 6 No 51.0 (36.7, 69.6) 13 (2, 115) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.8)
Charles City County 6 No 50.8 (30.5, 80.5) 14 (1, 128) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.9, 4.3)
Northumberland County 6 No 50.5 (38.0, 67.5) 15 (3, 106) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 3.9)
Colonial Heights City 6 No 50.2 (38.1, 65.3) 16 (3, 109) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.9)
Halifax County with South Boston City 6 No 49.9 (41.4, 59.9) 17 (6, 84) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Sussex County 6 No 49.7 (34.8, 69.7) 18 (2, 121) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.5)
Mathews County 6 No 49.1 (31.0, 74.9) 19 (2, 127) 7 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.4, 2.8)
Nottoway County 6 No 48.6 (35.8, 64.8) 20 (3, 115) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.5)
Madison County 6 No 48.5 (35.6, 65.4) 21 (3, 115) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
Staunton City 6 No 48.3 (38.0, 60.8) 22 (5, 106) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Fredericksburg City 6 No 48.1 (36.4, 62.2) 23 (4, 114) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.7)
Essex County 6 No 48.1 (34.3, 66.6) 24 (4, 124) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.1)
Danville City 6 No 47.9 (40.0, 57.0) 25 (7, 89) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Lynchburg City 6 No 46.9 (40.3, 54.3) 26 (8, 83) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Lexington City 6 No 46.7 (23.9, 82.8) 27 (1, 130) 3 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.9, 13.2)
Radford City 6 No 46.7 (30.9, 67.5) 28 (2, 127) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 4.0)
King and Queen County 6 No 46.6 (28.6, 73.0) 29 (2, 128) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.6)
Amherst County 6 No 46.2 (37.8, 56.2) 30 (7, 98) 22 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.6)
Page County 6 No 45.8 (35.9, 57.8) 31 (6, 110) 16 stable stable trend 10.8 (-3.6, 27.2)
Louisa County 6 No 45.1 (36.7, 55.0) 32 (8, 107) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.9)
Accomack County 6 No 44.7 (36.3, 54.7) 33 (8, 107) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.1)
Rappahannock County 6 No 44.5 (26.9, 70.7) 34 (2, 129) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.2, 1.5)
Petersburg City 6 No 44.5 (35.3, 55.4) 35 (7, 111) 18 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Roanoke City 6 No 44.4 (39.1, 50.4) 36 (12, 84) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Pulaski County 6 No 44.3 (36.4, 53.6) 37 (9, 103) 23 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.8)
Appomattox County 6 No 44.2 (32.1, 59.9) 38 (5, 124) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 2.1)
Franklin County 6 No 44.1 (37.6, 51.5) 39 (11, 96) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Shenandoah County 6 No 43.8 (36.5, 52.2) 40 (10, 102) 27 rising rising trend 8.2 (0.2, 16.8)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City 6 No 43.7 (32.5, 58.2) 41 (5, 123) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Southampton County 6 No 43.6 (32.8, 57.4) 42 (6, 117) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.1)
Charlottesville City 6 No 43.0 (34.3, 53.3) 43 (8, 114) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.3)
Salem City 6 No 42.5 (32.8, 54.4) 44 (8, 118) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.5)
New Kent County 6 No 42.2 (31.3, 55.9) 45 (6, 123) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.3, 4.3)
Mecklenburg County 6 No 42.1 (33.5, 52.4) 46 (9, 116) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.2)
Gloucester County 6 No 41.9 (34.0, 51.2) 47 (11, 114) 21 rising rising trend 7.9 (1.1, 15.1)
Caroline County 6 No 41.8 (32.6, 52.7) 48 (9, 118) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Pittsylvania County 6 No 41.6 (35.8, 48.4) 49 (15, 105) 39 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Cumberland County 6 No 41.3 (28.0, 60.0) 50 (5, 128) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.8, 2.7)
Rockingham County 6 No 41.0 (35.4, 47.3) 51 (16, 102) 41 stable stable trend -8.1 (-16.8, 1.5)
Isle of Wight County 6 No 41.0 (32.8, 50.7) 52 (11, 117) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 1.9)
Brunswick County 6 No 40.7 (29.9, 54.7) 53 (8, 125) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.5, -0.4)
Giles County 6 No 40.7 (29.9, 54.5) 54 (8, 125) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.2)
Manassas City 6 No 40.6 (31.4, 51.6) 55 (9, 120) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.8)
Clarke County 6 No 40.5 (28.3, 56.8) 56 (7, 127) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
Westmoreland County 6 No 40.4 (29.7, 54.2) 57 (8, 126) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.3)
Wythe County 6 No 40.4 (31.8, 50.8) 58 (11, 120) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.1)
Nelson County 6 No 39.9 (28.5, 55.2) 59 (7, 127) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.6)
Floyd County 6 Yes 39.8 (28.2, 54.9) 60 (7, 127) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.6, 2.5)
Suffolk City 6 Yes 39.6 (34.1, 45.8) 61 (20, 110) 38 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Prince Edward County 6 Yes 39.4 (28.8, 53.0) 62 (8, 127) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.9, 1.5)
Buckingham County 6 Yes 39.4 (28.8, 53.2) 63 (8, 126) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.2)
Williamsburg City 6 Yes 39.4 (24.9, 59.7) 64 (5, 129) 5
*
*
Rockbridge County 6 Yes 39.4 (31.0, 49.9) 65 (12, 122) 16 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.2)
Stafford County 6 Yes 39.2 (34.3, 44.7) 66 (23, 105) 50 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.5)
Henrico County 6 Yes 39.1 (36.2, 42.1) 67 (35, 90) 144 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Henry County 6 Yes 38.8 (32.8, 45.8) 68 (19, 113) 32 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.9)
Augusta County 6 Yes 38.8 (33.5, 44.8) 69 (23, 108) 42 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Powhatan County 6 Yes 38.6 (29.9, 49.2) 70 (12, 124) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.3)
Warren County 6 Yes 38.2 (30.5, 47.4) 71 (16, 122) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.2)
Orange County 6 Yes 38.2 (30.6, 47.2) 72 (14, 122) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Culpeper County 6 Yes 38.1 (31.2, 46.1) 73 (19, 121) 22 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.3)
Frederick County 6 Yes 38.1 (32.9, 43.9) 74 (24, 111) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
Norfolk City 6 Yes 38.1 (34.4, 42.0) 75 (34, 103) 84 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Portsmouth City 6 Yes 38.0 (32.8, 43.8) 76 (26, 111) 40 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Newport News City 6 Yes 37.6 (33.7, 41.9) 77 (36, 105) 69 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Middlesex County 6 Yes 37.4 (25.3, 55.0) 78 (8, 128) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Campbell County 6 Yes 37.3 (31.2, 44.4) 79 (24, 117) 28 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.6)
Winchester City 6 Yes 36.9 (28.0, 47.9) 80 (14, 125) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.8)
Dinwiddie County 6 Yes 36.9 (28.4, 47.4) 81 (16, 126) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.1)
Bedford City and County 6 Yes 36.8 (31.6, 42.6) 82 (29, 115) 40 stable stable trend -8.7 (-23.8, 9.3)
Spotsylvania County 6 Yes 36.6 (32.1, 41.5) 83 (36, 113) 52 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Botetourt County 6 Yes 36.5 (28.9, 45.8) 84 (17, 124) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 0.9)
Grayson County 6 Yes 36.5 (26.1, 50.3) 85 (11, 128) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.2, 2.4)
Goochland County 6 Yes 35.8 (26.9, 47.1) 86 (17, 126) 12 falling falling trend -6.0 (-11.2, -0.5)
Chesapeake City 6 Yes 35.5 (32.2, 39.1) 87 (48, 110) 89 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Wise County 6 Yes 34.9 (27.6, 43.5) 88 (20, 126) 17 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.3, -2.6)
Chesterfield County 6 Yes 34.7 (32.0, 37.6) 89 (60, 110) 130 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Lunenburg County 6 Yes 34.6 (23.1, 50.7) 90 (9, 129) 6 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.1, -0.6)
Richmond City 6 Yes 34.5 (31.1, 38.3) 91 (53, 113) 80 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.5)
King George County 6 Yes 34.5 (25.1, 46.4) 92 (16, 128) 9 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.9, -0.7)
Prince George County 6 Yes 34.2 (26.4, 43.7) 93 (23, 127) 14 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.5)
Fluvanna County 6 Yes 34.2 (26.0, 44.5) 94 (19, 127) 12 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.7, -1.8)
Falls Church City 6 Yes 34.1 (21.3, 51.8) 95 (7, 130) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.3, 2.6)
Roanoke County 6 Yes 34.0 (29.6, 38.9) 96 (47, 119) 46 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.6)
Lancaster County 6 Yes 33.9 (24.8, 48.1) 97 (15, 128) 10 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.6, -0.3)
Bland County 6 Yes 33.9 (19.3, 57.5) 98 (7, 130) 3 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.2, 1.8)
Virginia Beach City 6 Yes 33.8 (31.5, 36.3) 99 (67, 110) 161 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Hanover County 6 Yes 33.5 (29.1, 38.4) 100 (47, 120) 45 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.6)
Dickenson County 6 Yes 33.2 (22.9, 47.0) 101 (13, 129) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.0, -0.1)
Washington County 6 Yes 32.7 (27.0, 39.5) 102 (40, 125) 25 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.6)
Surry County 6 Yes 32.1 (18.4, 54.5) 103 (6, 130) 3 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.3, 0.8)
Harrisonburg City 6 Yes 32.0 (24.4, 41.1) 104 (26, 128) 13 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.6)
Hampton City 6 Yes 31.7 (27.8, 36.1) 105 (60, 122) 49 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.7, -3.9)
Northampton County 6 Yes 31.5 (21.1, 46.3) 106 (14, 130) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.3)
Buchanan County 6 Yes 31.3 (22.9, 42.2) 107 (27, 128) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.4)
Fairfax City 6 Yes 31.2 (22.3, 42.6) 108 (24, 129) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.9)
Carroll County 6 Yes 31.0 (23.5, 40.3) 109 (33, 129) 13 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.1)
James City County 6 Yes 30.5 (26.0, 35.7) 110 (64, 126) 36 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Fauquier County 6 Yes 30.2 (25.0, 36.2) 111 (60, 126) 25 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.7)
Manassas Park City 6 Yes 30.1 (16.9, 48.9) 112 (10, 130) 3 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.5, -0.6)
Greene County 6 Yes 30.0 (20.8, 42.1) 113 (24, 130) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.3)
Prince William County 6 Yes 30.0 (27.5, 32.6) 114 (88, 121) 119 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.9)
Albemarle County 6 Yes 29.8 (25.7, 34.5) 115 (70, 126) 40 stable stable trend 3.8 (-8.7, 18.1)
Montgomery County 6 Yes 29.4 (24.5, 35.1) 116 (65, 127) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.2)
Smyth County 6 Yes 28.2 (21.5, 36.6) 117 (51, 129) 13 stable stable trend -31.5 (-55.3, 5.1)
Patrick County 6 Yes 27.9 (19.1, 39.9) 118 (31, 130) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.2, 2.0)
Poquoson City 6 Yes 27.5 (17.3, 42.4) 119 (20, 130) 5 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.4, -2.9)
Loudoun County 6 Yes 27.1 (24.6, 29.9) 120 (99, 126) 90 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.2, -3.0)
Fairfax County 6 Yes 26.6 (25.3, 28.0) 121 (108, 125) 320 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.0, -2.7)
Amelia County 6 Yes 26.6 (16.8, 40.7) 122 (25, 130) 5 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.7, 0.4)
York County 6 Yes 26.4 (21.4, 32.3) 123 (78, 129) 20 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.8, -2.9)
Tazewell County 6 Yes 25.7 (19.9, 32.7) 124 (78, 129) 15 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.7, -0.4)
Alexandria City 6 Yes 24.0 (20.5, 28.0) 125 (103, 129) 36 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.2)
Russell County 6 Yes 23.6 (16.9, 32.4) 126 (68, 130) 9
*
*
Arlington County 6 Yes 22.9 (20.0, 26.2) 127 (111, 129) 47 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.0, -3.4)
Lee County 6 Yes 18.5 (12.5, 26.8) 128 (101, 130) 6 falling falling trend -7.5 (-10.2, -4.6)
Scott County 6 Yes 16.3 (10.4, 24.7) 129 (110, 130) 5 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -1.0)
Bristol City 6 Yes 14.8 (8.6, 24.3) 130 (110, 130) 4 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.3, -3.1)
Emporia City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2021 1:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top