Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Virginia by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia 6 *** 56.4 (55.7, 57.1) N/A 5,424 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 58.3 (58.2, 58.4) N/A 221,568 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Falls Church City 6 *** 31.5 (19.1, 48.7) 132 (89, 132) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.1, 2.6)
Fairfax City 6 *** 31.5 (22.7, 42.8) 131 (110, 132) 9 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.5, -2.3)
Fairfax County 6 *** 31.8 (30.3, 33.4) 130 (126, 132) 360 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.5, -2.9)
Alexandria City 6 *** 35.5 (30.9, 40.6) 129 (118, 132) 46 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.9)
Loudoun County 6 *** 35.9 (32.6, 39.4) 128 (120, 132) 96 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.0)
Arlington County 6 *** 36.6 (32.6, 40.9) 127 (118, 132) 65 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Bristol City 6 *** 38.9 (28.5, 52.4) 126 (79, 132) 10 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.8, -0.1)
Prince William County 6 *** 40.5 (37.3, 43.8) 125 (114, 130) 136 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.5, -3.5)
Buchanan County 6 *** 43.1 (33.6, 54.8) 124 (70, 132) 15 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -1.5)
Williamsburg City 6 *** 44.2 (30.3, 63.1) 123 (36, 132) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.2, 6.4)
James City County 6 *** 44.3 (39.0, 50.2) 122 (101, 129) 54 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Franklin City 6 *** 44.8 (29.3, 66.6) 121 (21, 132) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.8, 0.5)
Floyd County 6 *** 45.4 (34.1, 59.9) 120 (43, 132) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.9)
Clarke County 6 *** 47.3 (34.9, 63.5) 119 (39, 132) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.3)
Albemarle County 6 *** 47.9 (42.7, 53.5) 118 (88, 125) 65 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Patrick County 6 *** 49.1 (38.9, 62.0) 117 (51, 131) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Harrisonburg City 6 *** 49.5 (39.7, 60.9) 116 (50, 129) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.7)
York County 6 *** 49.5 (42.6, 57.1) 115 (71, 127) 39 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.2)
Powhatan County 6 *** 49.6 (39.7, 61.5) 114 (52, 129) 19 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.6, -1.1)
Rockbridge County 6 *** 50.1 (40.6, 61.7) 113 (50, 129) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Northumberland County 6 *** 50.5 (39.7, 65.7) 112 (44, 130) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Isle of Wight County 6 *** 50.9 (42.2, 61.1) 111 (57, 127) 25 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Russell County 6 *** 50.9 (41.6, 62.1) 110 (42, 128) 22 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.2, -1.5)
Manassas Park City 6 *** 51.5 (32.7, 76.3) 109 (9, 132) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.3, 5.2)
Scott County 6 *** 51.9 (41.8, 64.2) 108 (42, 128) 19 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.4)
Rappahannock County 6 *** 51.9 (35.2, 76.0) 107 (13, 132) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 1.8)
Montgomery County 6 *** 52.2 (45.6, 59.5) 106 (61, 123) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Fluvanna County 6 *** 52.7 (42.5, 64.8) 105 (40, 128) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 2.0)
Roanoke County 6 *** 52.7 (47.4, 58.4) 104 (68, 121) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Rockingham County 6 *** 53.9 (47.9, 60.7) 103 (58, 121) 59 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Charles City County 6 *** 54.0 (37.1, 78.5) 102 (7, 132) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.9)
Suffolk City 6 *** 54.7 (48.1, 61.8) 101 (54, 121) 54 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Augusta County 6 *** 54.8 (48.8, 61.5) 100 (57, 120) 61 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Radford City 6 *** 54.9 (37.7, 77.1) 99 (6, 132) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.7, 0.7)
Craig County 6 *** 55.1 (34.6, 86.2) 98 (4, 132) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.0, 5.2)
Fauquier County 6 *** 55.3 (48.3, 63.0) 97 (49, 121) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Chesterfield County 6 *** 57.5 (54.0, 61.2) 96 (64, 111) 211 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Botetourt County 6 *** 57.7 (48.7, 68.3) 95 (27, 122) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Poquoson City 6 *** 57.7 (42.7, 77.2) 94 (10, 130) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 58.2 (51.1, 66.1) 93 (35, 119) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Wythe County 6 *** 58.7 (49.0, 70.1) 92 (24, 121) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Henrico County 6 *** 58.7 (55.2, 62.4) 91 (60, 106) 217 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Pittsylvania County 6 *** 58.9 (52.2, 66.3) 90 (41, 116) 59 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Nottoway County 6 *** 59.1 (45.3, 76.1) 89 (8, 127) 13 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.7)
King William County 6 *** 59.1 (44.8, 77.0) 88 (12, 129) 12 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.2, 0.4)
Henry County 6 *** 59.2 (52.0, 67.2) 87 (37, 115) 51 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Frederick County 6 *** 59.3 (52.9, 66.4) 86 (39, 114) 64 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Bedford City and County 6 *** 59.8 (53.6, 66.5) 85 (42, 111) 72 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Carroll County 6 *** 60.0 (50.6, 71.1) 84 (21, 120) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
Grayson County 6 *** 60.3 (47.4, 76.4) 83 (9, 124) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.8)
Middlesex County 6 *** 60.3 (45.2, 80.6) 82 (7, 128) 13 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.3, -2.5)
Greene County 6 *** 60.9 (47.5, 77.3) 81 (11, 126) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Manassas City 6 *** 61.1 (48.8, 75.3) 80 (13, 125) 19 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.6)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City 6 *** 61.4 (48.1, 77.8) 79 (7, 124) 16 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
Caroline County 6 *** 61.5 (50.5, 74.3) 78 (15, 121) 23 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.7)
Amherst County 6 *** 61.8 (52.1, 73.0) 77 (20, 117) 30 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Tazewell County 6 *** 62.1 (53.5, 71.9) 76 (20, 114) 39 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Stafford County 6 *** 62.4 (55.9, 69.5) 75 (26, 108) 74 falling falling trend -8.4 (-12.7, -3.8)
Lee County 6 *** 62.5 (51.2, 75.9) 74 (12, 121) 22 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.7, -1.8)
Mathews County 6 *** 62.6 (45.6, 85.8) 73 (5, 129) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.6)
Chesapeake City 6 *** 62.9 (58.3, 67.7) 72 (39, 98) 150 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Winchester City 6 *** 63.1 (51.3, 76.8) 71 (11, 121) 21 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.4)
Bland County 6 *** 63.3 (42.9, 92.0) 70 (2, 131) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 5.1)
Dickenson County 6 *** 63.4 (49.3, 80.8) 69 (7, 124) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.4, 1.2)
Culpeper County 6 *** 63.4 (54.4, 73.5) 68 (19, 115) 37 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.2)
Hanover County 6 *** 63.4 (57.4, 70.0) 67 (28, 104) 84 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Buena Vista City 6 *** 63.8 (42.2, 93.9) 66 (2, 132) 6
*
*
Virginia Beach City 6 *** 64.5 (61.2, 67.9) 65 (40, 88) 299 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Charlottesville City 6 *** 64.7 (53.6, 77.5) 64 (13, 118) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.8)
Halifax County with South Boston City 6 *** 64.8 (55.8, 75.0) 63 (15, 111) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Buckingham County 6 *** 65.1 (51.5, 81.8) 62 (7, 122) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.1)
Hampton City 6 *** 65.4 (59.8, 71.4) 61 (28, 95) 103 stable stable trend -10.7 (-20.7, 0.5)
Lynchburg City 6 *** 66.3 (58.6, 74.7) 60 (16, 103) 56 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Campbell County 6 *** 66.6 (58.8, 75.3) 59 (16, 103) 53 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Richmond City 6 *** 67.3 (62.4, 72.4) 58 (25, 86) 153 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Lexington City 6 *** 67.3 (44.5, 102.0) 57 (1, 132) 6
*
*
Salem City 6 *** 67.6 (56.0, 81.2) 56 (8, 115) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.2)
Shenandoah County 6 *** 67.8 (59.0, 77.7) 55 (12, 107) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Appomattox County 6 *** 67.9 (53.2, 86.0) 54 (3, 121) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.3)
Goochland County 6 *** 67.9 (55.6, 82.6) 53 (6, 114) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3)
Newport News City 6 *** 68.0 (62.7, 73.7) 52 (23, 87) 122 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.0)
Brunswick County 6 *** 68.1 (54.5, 84.7) 51 (4, 118) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.4)
Page County 6 *** 68.1 (56.6, 81.6) 50 (7, 114) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Danville City 6 *** 68.3 (59.2, 78.4) 49 (11, 103) 43 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Surry County 6 *** 68.4 (47.2, 97.7) 48 (1, 130) 7 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.5, 0.4)
Staunton City 6 *** 68.6 (56.8, 82.3) 47 (7, 115) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Washington County 6 *** 68.7 (60.8, 77.4) 46 (15, 96) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Smyth County 6 *** 69.0 (58.6, 81.1) 45 (8, 106) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.9)
Essex County 6 *** 69.2 (52.2, 90.9) 44 (2, 123) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.5)
Bath County 6 *** 69.2 (46.2, 104.1) 43 (1, 131) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.3, 7.5)
Orange County 6 *** 69.4 (59.6, 80.6) 42 (9, 109) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Wise County 6 *** 69.8 (59.8, 81.2) 41 (10, 104) 36 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.1, -1.9)
Colonial Heights City 6 *** 69.9 (56.2, 86.4) 40 (4, 116) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Lancaster County 6 *** 70.0 (55.6, 89.2) 39 (3, 116) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Amelia County 6 *** 70.4 (54.4, 90.4) 38 (3, 120) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Nelson County 6 *** 70.8 (56.6, 88.5) 37 (3, 116) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.2)
Southampton County 6 *** 71.3 (57.2, 88.3) 36 (4, 114) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 2.9)
Warren County 6 *** 71.9 (61.4, 83.7) 35 (7, 101) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 72.6 (62.6, 84.1) 34 (6, 94) 40 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.2)
Accomack County 6 *** 73.1 (63.1, 84.5) 33 (6, 96) 40 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.6)
Spotsylvania County 6 *** 73.1 (66.6, 80.2) 32 (11, 75) 97 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Charlotte County 6 *** 73.6 (57.0, 94.2) 31 (2, 120) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.2)
Roanoke City 6 *** 74.3 (67.5, 81.6) 30 (10, 72) 92 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Pulaski County 6 *** 74.3 (64.1, 85.9) 29 (5, 94) 40 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Cumberland County 6 *** 74.3 (55.8, 98.1) 28 (2, 121) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.2)
New Kent County 6 *** 74.4 (59.2, 92.4) 27 (2, 111) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.1)
Norton City 6 *** 74.9 (45.4, 118.3) 26 (1, 132) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.5)
King George County 6 *** 75.4 (60.3, 93.2) 25 (2, 110) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.3)
Madison County 6 *** 75.6 (59.6, 95.3) 24 (2, 117) 16 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.2)
Portsmouth City 6 *** 75.9 (68.7, 83.7) 23 (7, 68) 84 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Martinsville City 6 *** 76.5 (59.9, 96.8) 22 (2, 115) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 5.9)
Norfolk City 6 *** 76.7 (71.4, 82.2) 21 (10, 52) 167 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Prince Edward County 6 *** 77.3 (62.8, 94.4) 20 (2, 105) 21 stable stable trend 13.9 (-1.0, 31.0)
Giles County 6 *** 79.7 (64.6, 97.7) 19 (2, 99) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Lunenburg County 6 *** 80.0 (63.0, 100.9) 18 (1, 104) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.0)
Louisa County 6 *** 80.2 (69.2, 92.6) 17 (2, 76) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Gloucester County 6 *** 81.6 (70.9, 93.7) 16 (2, 64) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.2)
Northampton County 6 *** 82.4 (64.2, 104.8) 15 (1, 107) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.7)
Waynesboro City 6 *** 82.4 (68.1, 99.0) 14 (2, 86) 24 stable stable trend 9.7 (-3.9, 25.2)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 82.5 (68.6, 99.1) 13 (1, 88) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
King and Queen County 6 *** 82.7 (60.2, 112.5) 12 (1, 119) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.5, 4.0)
Dinwiddie County 6 *** 82.7 (69.9, 97.3) 11 (1, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Hopewell City 6 *** 84.5 (69.6, 101.8) 10 (1, 86) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Richmond County 6 *** 85.3 (64.5, 111.9) 9 (1, 107) 12 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.3, 8.5)
Prince George County 6 *** 85.8 (73.1, 100.2) 8 (1, 67) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Covington City 6 *** 89.2 (62.2, 125.8) 7 (1, 120) 7 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.8, 11.5)
Fredericksburg City 6 *** 89.9 (73.4, 108.9) 6 (1, 73) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.7)
Petersburg City 6 *** 91.1 (78.2, 105.6) 5 (1, 49) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Emporia City 6 *** 95.0 (65.6, 134.4) 4 (1, 118) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.2)
Greensville County 6 *** 95.3 (73.7, 121.7) 3 (1, 84) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 5.9)
Sussex County 6 *** 96.0 (75.1, 121.7) 2 (1, 74) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 4.8)
Galax City 6 *** 122.3 (91.6, 160.9) 1 (1, 37) 11 rising rising trend 17.9 (8.3, 28.3)
Highland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2021 10:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top