Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Virginia by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Virginia 6 *** 98.0 (96.8, 99.3) N/A 4,783 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Lexington City 6 *** 209.8 (142.0, 301.8) 1 (1, 79) 6
*
*
Petersburg City 6 *** 206.2 (176.1, 240.1) 2 (1, 10) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Richmond County 6 *** 200.5 (154.4, 257.7) 3 (1, 38) 13 rising rising trend 31.4 (7.5, 60.7)
Franklin City 6 *** 183.6 (134.0, 247.5) 4 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.7)
Greensville County 6 *** 177.4 (135.9, 228.5) 5 (1, 53) 14 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.8)
Sussex County 6 *** 176.5 (135.8, 226.7) 6 (1, 57) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
Williamsburg City 6 *** 173.2 (133.3, 223.1) 7 (1, 57) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.1, 6.6)
Essex County 6 *** 149.1 (113.7, 194.3) 8 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.5)
Surry County 6 *** 146.1 (101.8, 207.2) 9 (1, 106) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.6)
Portsmouth City 6 *** 143.0 (127.9, 159.5) 10 (5, 38) 69 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Hopewell City 6 *** 140.4 (111.6, 174.5) 11 (2, 75) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 1.0)
Brunswick County 6 *** 138.8 (110.5, 173.2) 12 (3, 78) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
Waynesboro City 6 *** 137.8 (110.9, 169.8) 13 (3, 79) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Colonial Heights City 6 *** 134.3 (104.4, 170.7) 14 (3, 88) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.4)
Emporia City 6 *** 133.2 (82.0, 207.0) 15 (1, 119) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.2, -1.1)
Falls Church City 6 *** 130.5 (93.3, 177.6) 16 (2, 105) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.8)
Nottoway County 6 *** 130.4 (101.9, 165.3) 17 (4, 89) 15 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.5, -0.5)
Northampton County 6 *** 129.3 (99.4, 167.6) 18 (2, 98) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Halifax County with South Boston City 6 *** 128.7 (109.9, 150.3) 19 (6, 71) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.4)
Suffolk City 6 *** 126.9 (113.0, 142.1) 20 (8, 58) 65 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Hampton City 6 *** 126.9 (115.5, 139.1) 21 (9, 52) 97 stable stable trend 0.1 (-11.2, 12.9)
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 125.1 (106.4, 146.9) 22 (7, 76) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Newport News City 6 *** 124.4 (113.7, 135.8) 23 (10, 55) 106 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Galax City 6 *** 123.7 (79.5, 185.8) 24 (2, 117) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.1, 3.0)
Richmond City 6 *** 123.1 (113.6, 133.1) 25 (12, 54) 137 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.1, -3.4)
Prince George County 6 *** 122.4 (102.2, 145.7) 26 (7, 83) 27 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.7, -1.6)
Charles City County 6 *** 121.6 (84.5, 174.7) 27 (2, 114) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-6.9, 0.1)
Staunton City 6 *** 120.1 (97.3, 147.2) 28 (6, 94) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Mathews County 6 *** 118.8 (88.8, 160.7) 29 (4, 107) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.0, 4.8)
Nelson County 6 *** 118.0 (93.0, 149.9) 30 (6, 101) 17 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.3)
Rappahannock County 6 *** 117.9 (83.3, 166.8) 31 (4, 114) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 4.8)
New Kent County 6 *** 117.4 (94.5, 145.3) 32 (7, 96) 19 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.3, 0.1)
Roanoke City 6 *** 117.2 (104.4, 131.1) 33 (12, 72) 66 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.2)
Fauquier County 6 *** 117.1 (102.6, 133.2) 34 (12, 75) 51 stable stable trend 3.1 (-4.7, 11.6)
Southampton County 6 *** 117.1 (92.8, 146.9) 35 (6, 100) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.3)
Norfolk City 6 *** 116.8 (107.3, 126.9) 36 (15, 66) 122 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Henrico County 6 *** 116.5 (109.3, 124.0) 37 (17, 60) 209 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.4, 8.0)
Chesterfield County 6 *** 116.4 (109.5, 123.7) 38 (18, 57) 229 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.0, -4.6)
King William County 6 *** 114.5 (87.4, 148.3) 39 (6, 108) 13 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.1, -3.2)
Fluvanna County 6 *** 114.4 (93.3, 139.6) 40 (7, 98) 21 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.5)
Goochland County 6 *** 113.8 (92.8, 139.4) 41 (9, 98) 22 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.7, -4.0)
Harrisonburg City 6 *** 113.1 (91.7, 137.9) 42 (8, 99) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.2)
Accomack County 6 *** 113.1 (95.7, 133.5) 43 (10, 93) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Prince Edward County 6 *** 112.4 (87.3, 143.0) 44 (7, 105) 14 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.7)
Chesapeake City 6 *** 112.2 (103.8, 121.1) 45 (20, 69) 143 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Dinwiddie County 6 *** 111.8 (90.9, 136.5) 46 (8, 100) 21 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.0, -4.3)
Loudoun County 6 *** 110.7 (103.2, 118.7) 47 (24, 68) 178 stable stable trend 9.2 (-1.9, 21.6)
James City County 6 *** 110.3 (98.5, 123.4) 48 (17, 80) 66 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.3)
Gloucester County 6 *** 110.1 (93.0, 129.8) 49 (13, 93) 31 falling falling trend -9.9 (-16.0, -3.4)
Stafford County 6 *** 109.8 (98.1, 122.5) 50 (17, 82) 74 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.2)
Fredericksburg City 6 *** 107.8 (82.4, 138.6) 51 (8, 111) 13 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.6, -3.9)
Lynchburg City 6 *** 107.1 (92.6, 123.3) 52 (16, 90) 40 stable stable trend 8.0 (-4.2, 21.7)
York County 6 *** 107.0 (93.3, 122.3) 53 (18, 88) 46 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -2.7)
Northumberland County 6 *** 104.6 (80.4, 137.8) 54 (9, 113) 15 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.3, -3.4)
Caroline County 6 *** 104.5 (84.1, 128.6) 55 (11, 107) 20 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.4)
King George County 6 *** 104.4 (81.2, 132.3) 56 (9, 110) 15 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.3, -2.1)
Isle of Wight County 6 *** 104.2 (87.0, 124.2) 57 (15, 100) 28 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.6)
Danville City 6 *** 103.6 (86.7, 123.3) 58 (16, 101) 28 falling falling trend -8.1 (-13.3, -2.5)
Virginia Beach City 6 *** 103.5 (97.6, 109.7) 59 (39, 75) 242 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Charlottesville City 6 *** 101.8 (82.0, 124.9) 60 (12, 107) 20 rising rising trend 28.3 (6.1, 55.2)
Lunenburg County 6 *** 101.7 (75.6, 135.6) 61 (7, 115) 11 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.4, -1.1)
Culpeper County 6 *** 101.7 (86.0, 119.6) 62 (16, 103) 31 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.1, -2.5)
Poquoson City 6 *** 100.4 (72.5, 137.2) 63 (8, 117) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.3, -0.4)
Lancaster County 6 *** 100.0 (74.1, 136.5) 64 (9, 115) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.2, 0.2)
Martinsville City 6 *** 99.5 (69.0, 139.6) 65 (7, 119) 7 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.9, -2.0)
Hanover County 6 *** 99.3 (89.0, 110.6) 66 (34, 93) 71 falling falling trend -5.2 (-6.3, -4.2)
Spotsylvania County 6 *** 99.3 (88.9, 110.5) 67 (32, 93) 72 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.2, -4.5)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 98.8 (76.4, 127.0) 68 (12, 113) 15 stable stable trend -20.1 (-49.5, 26.5)
Powhatan County 6 *** 98.0 (80.2, 119.2) 69 (18, 108) 22 falling falling trend -8.9 (-12.4, -5.2)
Fairfax City 6 *** 97.9 (75.1, 125.7) 70 (12, 113) 13 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.2, 1.3)
King and Queen County 6 *** 97.4 (64.8, 144.8) 71 (7, 122) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.2, 2.2)
Rockbridge County 6 *** 97.1 (78.3, 120.1) 72 (16, 113) 19 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.1, 0.0)
Orange County 6 *** 95.5 (79.2, 114.6) 73 (23, 109) 25 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.9, -3.6)
Amherst County 6 *** 94.5 (77.7, 114.4) 74 (21, 109) 23 rising rising trend 15.4 (0.2, 32.8)
Alexandria City 6 *** 93.5 (83.0, 105.0) 75 (43, 102) 64 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.6, -3.2)
Bath County 6 *** 93.0 (54.8, 157.2) 76 (5, 125) 4
*
*
Prince William County 6 *** 92.7 (86.2, 99.5) 77 (55, 93) 178 stable stable trend 3.8 (-3.3, 11.3)
Augusta County 6 *** 92.0 (81.1, 104.1) 78 (46, 104) 54 falling falling trend -7.1 (-9.2, -5.0)
Amelia County 6 *** 91.9 (66.4, 125.6) 79 (13, 119) 9 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.5, -2.3)
Louisa County 6 *** 89.5 (73.8, 107.9) 80 (31, 112) 25 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -1.7)
Floyd County 6 *** 88.9 (66.5, 117.8) 81 (18, 119) 11 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.1, -2.1)
Cumberland County 6 *** 88.8 (60.4, 128.4) 82 (10, 122) 7 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.9, -0.3)
Clarke County 6 *** 87.6 (65.1, 117.2) 83 (16, 119) 11 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.7, 0.0)
Henry County 6 *** 87.4 (75.0, 101.8) 84 (45, 111) 36 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.5)
Pulaski County 6 *** 87.4 (72.0, 105.7) 85 (37, 113) 24 stable stable trend 5.5 (-3.4, 15.4)
Albemarle County 6 *** 87.3 (77.4, 98.2) 86 (54, 107) 59 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -2.5)
Middlesex County 6 *** 87.2 (63.2, 121.1) 87 (16, 120) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.6)
Charlotte County 6 *** 86.2 (61.1, 119.8) 88 (16, 121) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.5)
Warren County 6 *** 85.6 (69.3, 104.9) 89 (34, 116) 21 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.9)
Fairfax County 6 *** 85.1 (81.7, 88.6) 90 (74, 98) 519 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.6)
Manassas City 6 *** 85.0 (65.0, 109.0) 91 (24, 118) 15 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.6, -3.3)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City 6 *** 84.8 (63.5, 112.7) 92 (20, 118) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.9, 2.4)
Salem City 6 *** 83.9 (64.8, 107.4) 93 (30, 119) 14 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.1)
Arlington County 6 *** 83.7 (75.5, 92.6) 94 (65, 108) 82 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.3, -2.5)
Botetourt County 6 *** 81.4 (66.8, 99.0) 95 (50, 116) 23 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.6, -2.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 80.7 (68.9, 93.9) 96 (59, 114) 35 stable stable trend 11.7 (0.0, 24.9)
Roanoke County 6 *** 80.5 (71.1, 90.9) 97 (66, 112) 55 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.1, -4.4)
Rockingham County 6 *** 80.4 (70.0, 92.1) 98 (61, 114) 44 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.5, -3.2)
Shenandoah County 6 *** 79.4 (66.0, 95.0) 99 (57, 116) 26 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.6)
Campbell County 6 *** 78.7 (66.6, 92.6) 100 (58, 116) 31 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.0, -3.3)
Winchester City 6 *** 77.8 (59.2, 100.6) 101 (43, 120) 12 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.5, -2.0)
Greene County 6 *** 76.7 (56.2, 102.9) 102 (35, 121) 10 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.0, 1.5)
Radford City 6 *** 74.4 (46.0, 113.8) 103 (18, 126) 4 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.3, 1.2)
Bedford City and County 6 *** 73.9 (64.4, 84.6) 104 (76, 116) 46 stable stable trend 2.1 (-5.2, 9.9)
Craig County 6 *** 73.6 (42.2, 126.8) 105 (11, 127) 3
*
*
Grayson County 6 *** 73.6 (54.1, 99.4) 106 (40, 122) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -0.7)
Wythe County 6 *** 70.7 (55.9, 89.0) 107 (60, 120) 16 falling falling trend -7.7 (-12.0, -3.2)
Frederick County 6 *** 68.6 (59.0, 79.3) 108 (83, 118) 38 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.7, -1.5)
Franklin County 6 *** 68.1 (57.6, 80.3) 109 (83, 119) 32 falling falling trend -6.7 (-8.8, -4.5)
Carroll County 6 *** 67.2 (53.5, 84.2) 110 (74, 121) 17 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
Pittsylvania County 6 *** 66.6 (56.6, 78.1) 111 (85, 119) 33 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.2, -1.9)
Buckingham County 6 *** 65.3 (47.0, 89.4) 112 (61, 124) 9 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -0.7)
Patrick County 6 *** 63.1 (46.7, 85.1) 113 (70, 123) 10 falling falling trend -7.0 (-9.7, -4.2)
Madison County 6 *** 62.5 (42.9, 90.1) 114 (59, 125) 7 falling falling trend -12.6 (-18.2, -6.7)
Giles County 6 *** 61.8 (43.3, 86.7) 115 (59, 125) 8 stable stable trend 18.6 (-4.0, 46.6)
Appomattox County 6 *** 61.7 (42.9, 87.3) 116 (63, 125) 7 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.6, -3.3)
Bland County 6 *** 60.0 (34.5, 102.2) 117 (34, 127) 3 stable stable trend -5.1 (-12.2, 2.7)
Page County 6 *** 56.8 (42.3, 75.6) 118 (89, 125) 11 falling falling trend -6.7 (-10.8, -2.4)
Dickenson County 6 *** 49.6 (32.4, 74.1) 119 (82, 127) 6
*
*
Smyth County 6 *** 45.8 (34.2, 60.7) 120 (108, 126) 11 falling falling trend -35.1 (-55.5, -5.4)
Wise County 6 *** 45.7 (34.3, 60.0) 121 (107, 126) 12 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.2, -3.0)
Tazewell County 6 *** 40.2 (30.6, 52.3) 122 (114, 127) 13 falling falling trend -12.7 (-17.0, -8.2)
Lee County 6 *** 36.7 (24.9, 52.9) 123 (113, 127) 7 stable stable trend 8.2 (-8.7, 28.3)
Washington County 6 *** 35.2 (27.5, 44.7) 124 (118, 127) 15 falling falling trend -9.9 (-12.2, -7.5)
Buchanan County 6 *** 34.0 (22.3, 50.6) 125 (115, 127) 6 falling falling trend -7.9 (-11.4, -4.1)
Russell County 6 *** 24.4 (15.9, 36.8) 126 (121, 127) 5 falling falling trend -19.9 (-27.2, -11.9)
Scott County 6 *** 21.4 (12.8, 34.9) 127 (121, 127) 4 falling falling trend -20.2 (-25.4, -14.7)
Bristol City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2021 8:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top