Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

All Cancer Sites, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Virginia 6,10 424.2 (422.3, 426.2) 36,890 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 448.4 (448.1, 448.7) 1,540,559 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Manassas Park City 6,10 230.9 (186.9, 281.4) 22 falling falling trend -27.4 (-44.1, -5.7)
Bristol City 6,10 247.3 (219.4, 278.0) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-46.7, 86.8)
Fairfax City 6,10 258.0 (231.2, 287.2) 70 stable stable trend -15.8 (-46.9, 33.6)
Alexandria City 6,10 285.4 (271.9, 299.4) 375 falling falling trend -11.5 (-20.4, -1.7)
Rockbridge County 6,10 297.1 (270.7, 325.8) 103 falling falling trend -14.3 (-26.4, -0.3)
Patrick County 6,10 298.1 (269.9, 328.9) 88 stable stable trend -16.1 (-30.4, 1.1)
Buchanan County 6,10 299.7 (272.4, 329.2) 96 falling falling trend -19.9 (-27.3, -11.6)
Lee County 6,10 300.9 (274.5, 329.3) 100 stable stable trend -13.8 (-29.7, 5.7)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City 6,10 316.5 (284.7, 351.3) 78 falling falling trend -19.0 (-28.6, -8.1)
Scott County 6,10 318.9 (291.7, 348.2) 107 stable stable trend -8.1 (-31.6, 23.4)
Grayson County 6,10 323.7 (290.9, 359.7) 78 falling falling trend -13.1 (-23.8, -1.0)
Albemarle County 6,10 323.8 (309.1, 339.0) 381 stable stable trend -11.7 (-26.9, 6.5)
Carroll County 6,10 332.9 (308.3, 359.1) 146 stable stable trend -17.8 (-41.3, 15.1)
Highland County 6,10 338.9 (251.2, 453.9) 13 stable stable trend 14.1 (-21.9, 66.6)
Campbell County 6,10 341.3 (321.9, 361.7) 241 falling falling trend -13.4 (-24.6, -0.5)
Tazewell County 6,10 344.2 (322.9, 366.7) 206 stable stable trend -2.4 (-21.3, 20.9)
Pittsylvania County 6,10 352.6 (334.7, 371.2) 310 falling falling trend -16.7 (-19.0, -14.4)
Russell County 6,10 357.8 (330.6, 386.9) 136 stable stable trend -9.7 (-20.2, 2.1)
York County 6,10 357.9 (338.1, 378.6) 257 stable stable trend -6.9 (-14.0, 0.6)
Prince William County 6,10 359.7 (349.7, 370.0) 1,163 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Floyd County 6,10 362.1 (325.5, 402.0) 77 stable stable trend -6.4 (-15.7, 3.9)
Loudoun County 6,10 364.3 (353.0, 375.8) 922 stable stable trend -2.9 (-11.4, 6.3)
Fauquier County 6,10 366.5 (346.9, 387.0) 279 stable stable trend -0.6 (-13.5, 14.2)
Pulaski County 6,10 366.8 (342.5, 392.6) 180 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.0, -2.7)
Craig County 6,10 367.3 (306.1, 438.8) 28 falling falling trend -13.9 (-22.1, -4.8)
Manassas City 6,10 368.7 (336.6, 403.0) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-14.0, 14.6)
Arlington County 6,10 369.0 (356.0, 382.3) 671 stable stable trend -2.5 (-10.3, 6.0)
Montgomery County 6,10 371.6 (352.6, 391.3) 297 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.0, -0.6)
Rockingham County 6,10 373.8 (356.4, 391.8) 362 stable stable trend -5.9 (-19.4, 9.8)
Wise County 6,10 374.9 (350.5, 400.6) 182 stable stable trend -6.7 (-24.2, 15.0)
Augusta County 6,10 377.4 (359.9, 395.5) 369 falling falling trend -11.8 (-21.8, -0.6)
Smyth County 6,10 380.8 (355.0, 408.1) 169 stable stable trend -6.5 (-16.1, 4.3)
Dickenson County 6,10 381.3 (343.3, 422.7) 78 stable stable trend -13.4 (-30.9, 8.4)
Fairfax County 6,10 384.4 (378.9, 389.9) 4,103 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.0, 3.9)
Greene County 6,10 386.9 (349.7, 427.0) 84 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.5, -1.4)
Dinwiddie County 6,10 387.0 (357.1, 418.7) 131 stable stable trend -2.1 (-17.7, 16.5)
James City County 6,10 387.2 (369.4, 405.8) 386 falling falling trend -10.9 (-19.7, -1.1)
Roanoke County 6,10 388.0 (372.3, 404.3) 486 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.5, -1.4)
Bedford City and County 6,10 390.7 (373.2, 408.9) 399 falling falling trend -8.0 (-14.5, -0.9)
Southampton County 6,10 394.6 (359.2, 432.7) 97 stable stable trend 4.4 (-9.2, 20.1)
Lunenburg County 6,10 394.6 (353.0, 440.2) 69 stable stable trend -4.2 (-18.0, 11.9)
Giles County 6,10 395.0 (358.5, 434.5) 92 stable stable trend -3.9 (-12.8, 6.0)
Franklin County 6,10 395.0 (374.5, 416.4) 303 falling falling trend -10.4 (-19.6, -0.1)
Cumberland County 6,10 397.7 (349.4, 451.2) 52 stable stable trend -14.3 (-38.9, 20.2)
Buckingham County 6,10 397.7 (359.8, 438.8) 85 stable stable trend -10.3 (-28.1, 11.9)
Winchester City 6,10 398.0 (366.0, 432.1) 118 stable stable trend -2.2 (-14.2, 11.4)
Halifax County with South Boston City 6,10 398.1 (372.9, 424.6) 205 stable stable trend -7.6 (-24.1, 12.6)
Botetourt County 6,10 399.0 (372.3, 427.4) 180 stable stable trend -5.0 (-13.6, 4.5)
Amherst County 6,10 403.2 (376.2, 431.8) 173 stable stable trend -1.5 (-12.7, 11.1)
King and Queen County 6,10 403.9 (347.6, 467.7) 40 stable stable trend 3.6 (-21.3, 36.4)
Warren County 6,10 405.9 (378.7, 434.5) 173 stable stable trend -5.4 (-13.3, 3.2)
Shenandoah County 6,10 405.9 (382.4, 430.6) 237 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.7, 2.9)
Emporia City 6,10 406.1 (340.9, 480.7) 29 stable stable trend 4.5 (-6.1, 16.3)
Clarke County 6,10 406.4 (365.3, 451.3) 76 stable stable trend -2.6 (-12.1, 7.9)
Prince George County 6,10 407.3 (377.6, 438.7) 151 stable stable trend -6.2 (-19.4, 9.1)
Culpeper County 6,10 408.0 (383.1, 434.2) 207 stable stable trend 3.4 (-6.3, 14.0)
Rappahannock County 6,10 415.6 (359.9, 478.6) 45 stable stable trend 5.7 (-11.5, 26.1)
Bath County 6,10 418.5 (353.3, 494.7) 32 stable stable trend 2.1 (-16.9, 25.4)
Washington County 6,10 419.3 (398.2, 441.3) 314 stable stable trend -12.5 (-25.8, 3.1)
Charles City County 6,10 420.4 (365.2, 482.9) 46 stable stable trend -24.3 (-47.9, 9.9)
Henry County 6,10 422.0 (401.0, 443.8) 326 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.3, 6.1)
Falls Church City 6,10 423.6 (372.0, 480.2) 53 stable stable trend -10.0 (-31.6, 18.5)
Page County 6,10 424.1 (392.0, 458.3) 137 stable stable trend -2.6 (-13.6, 9.9)
Poquoson City 6,10 427.3 (381.4, 477.7) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.7, 7.0)
Henrico County 6,10 428.0 (418.0, 438.2) 1,444 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.1, 1.5)
Surry County 6,10 428.5 (369.8, 494.9) 41 stable stable trend 3.2 (-9.5, 17.7)
Mathews County 6,10 431.3 (384.5, 483.5) 71 stable stable trend -6.1 (-30.2, 26.3)
Prince Edward County 6,10 432.9 (395.7, 472.8) 105 stable stable trend 9.9 (-2.0, 23.2)
Fluvanna County 6,10 436.5 (404.2, 470.9) 140 stable stable trend -2.2 (-11.4, 7.9)
Appomattox County 6,10 437.5 (396.3, 482.1) 88 stable stable trend -8.2 (-19.1, 4.1)
Louisa County 6,10 438.1 (409.1, 468.7) 184 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Spotsylvania County 6,10 439.1 (422.0, 456.8) 526 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.9, 5.8)
Westmoreland County 6,10 439.6 (403.4, 478.5) 120 stable stable trend 0.6 (-10.7, 13.4)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 440.2 (413.1, 468.8) 217 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.3, 8.0)
Virginia Beach City 6,10 440.8 (431.8, 450.0) 1,892 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.7)
Bland County 6,10 441.7 (381.4, 509.8) 41 stable stable trend -8.5 (-33.4, 25.8)
Madison County 6,10 442.9 (399.9, 489.9) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-15.5, 17.5)
Stafford County 6,10 443.3 (424.4, 462.8) 475 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.8)
Frederick County 6,10 444.4 (424.6, 464.9) 392 stable stable trend -3.1 (-10.6, 4.9)
Powhatan County 6,10 449.6 (416.2, 485.2) 148 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.5, 5.5)
Isle of Wight County 6,10 450.4 (422.4, 479.9) 206 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.2, 2.4)
Richmond County 6,10 450.9 (399.0, 508.4) 57 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.0, -1.2)
Chesapeake City 6,10 453.0 (440.3, 466.1) 1,008 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.3)
Northumberland County 6,10 453.3 (410.1, 500.7) 109 stable stable trend -0.7 (-18.8, 21.4)
Wythe County 6,10 453.4 (423.6, 484.9) 181 rising rising trend 10.9 (1.3, 21.6)
Newport News City 6,10 456.3 (441.9, 471.0) 782 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.1, 8.9)
Brunswick County 6,10 458.8 (419.5, 501.2) 105 stable stable trend -6.7 (-16.3, 3.9)
Goochland County 6,10 460.4 (424.4, 498.9) 134 stable stable trend -5.6 (-14.6, 4.4)
Lancaster County 6,10 461.8 (417.0, 511.4) 105 falling falling trend -7.8 (-12.5, -2.8)
Essex County 6,10 464.5 (415.9, 517.7) 71 stable stable trend 1.9 (-19.9, 29.7)
Charlotte County 6,10 465.1 (420.0, 514.1) 82 stable stable trend 3.4 (-12.0, 21.5)
Portsmouth City 6,10 466.7 (448.0, 486.0) 486 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Richmond City 6,10 468.8 (455.2, 482.7) 952 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.7, 3.4)
Suffolk City 6,10 469.5 (449.1, 490.7) 415 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -0.8)
Martinsville City 6,10 482.1 (437.2, 530.6) 92 stable stable trend -2.9 (-38.4, 53.1)
Norfolk City 6,10 482.8 (469.2, 496.6) 1,001 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Greensville County 6,10 485.4 (434.3, 541.2) 69 falling falling trend -10.3 (-16.7, -3.3)
New Kent County 6,10 486.0 (442.6, 532.7) 106 stable stable trend 5.4 (-8.6, 21.5)
Hampton City 6,10 486.5 (470.4, 503.1) 711 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.1, -0.9)
Norton City 6,10 487.9 (401.3, 588.4) 23 rising rising trend 23.9 (4.3, 47.2)
Chesterfield County 6,10 489.1 (478.0, 500.4) 1,592 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.7, -2.4)
Gloucester County 6,10 490.3 (461.6, 520.5) 230 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.7, 9.5)
Colonial Heights City 6,10 491.9 (451.0, 535.7) 115 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.7)
Orange County 6,10 493.5 (464.4, 524.1) 225 stable stable trend 3.2 (-7.9, 15.7)
Caroline County 6,10 494.7 (460.7, 530.6) 165 stable stable trend -2.2 (-9.1, 5.1)
Radford City 6,10 495.0 (437.3, 558.2) 55 stable stable trend 10.1 (-3.2, 25.2)
King George County 6,10 495.9 (454.0, 540.6) 111 stable stable trend -4.8 (-22.2, 16.6)
Lynchburg City 6,10 498.9 (476.4, 522.2) 393 stable stable trend 4.8 (-11.5, 24.2)
King William County 6,10 499.6 (453.2, 549.7) 89 stable stable trend -9.4 (-18.6, 0.9)
Sussex County 6,10 500.8 (450.2, 555.9) 74 stable stable trend 5.9 (-11.0, 25.9)
Northampton County 6,10 500.9 (455.3, 550.4) 100 stable stable trend -3.4 (-11.1, 5.0)
Accomack County 6,10 502.6 (473.0, 533.6) 235 stable stable trend -2.4 (-20.4, 19.7)
Amelia County 6,10 509.5 (460.4, 562.9) 84 stable stable trend -6.4 (-23.4, 14.4)
Hanover County 6,10 512.6 (494.0, 531.7) 605 stable stable trend 5.4 (-1.6, 12.9)
Nottoway County 6,10 516.0 (472.7, 562.5) 108 stable stable trend 0.4 (-13.4, 16.5)
Middlesex County 6,10 526.5 (477.3, 580.4) 101 stable stable trend -2.0 (-12.9, 10.3)
Nelson County 6,10 530.7 (486.8, 578.0) 122 rising rising trend 8.8 (3.3, 14.7)
Danville City 6,10 543.1 (515.7, 571.6) 319 stable stable trend 6.2 (-11.0, 26.8)
Salem City 6,10 547.1 (510.4, 585.9) 174 stable stable trend 14.1 (-6.2, 38.8)
Galax City 6,10 555.3 (487.5, 630.5) 53 stable stable trend 29.0 (-3.1, 71.6)
Franklin City 6,10 556.3 (492.9, 625.9) 60 rising rising trend 11.6 (2.5, 21.5)
Hopewell City 6,10 556.8 (516.0, 600.1) 142 stable stable trend -1.5 (-11.0, 9.1)
Roanoke City 6,10 558.9 (539.2, 579.3) 634 stable stable trend 11.2 (-1.5, 25.6)
Buena Vista City 6,10 583.9 (509.0, 667.2) 46 stable stable trend 6.0 (-7.8, 21.8)
Staunton City 6,10 597.0 (559.2, 637.0) 200 stable stable trend 11.9 (-3.7, 30.0)
Fredericksburg City 6,10 599.9 (553.9, 648.6) 130 stable stable trend 5.5 (-4.3, 16.4)
Harrisonburg City 6,10 636.2 (597.0, 677.3) 207 stable stable trend 7.3 (-8.9, 26.2)
Waynesboro City 6,10 640.3 (597.0, 686.1) 169 rising rising trend 12.8 (0.7, 26.4)
Petersburg City 6,10 685.0 (647.7, 724.0) 266 stable stable trend 5.7 (-17.4, 35.3)
Covington City 6,10 782.1 (693.8, 879.3) 60 stable stable trend 34.5 (-16.2, 115.8)
Charlottesville City 6,10 829.1 (786.1, 873.9) 291 stable stable trend 11.5 (-9.6, 37.6)
Lexington City 6,10 966.0 (850.6, 1,093.5) 62 stable stable trend 28.3 (-19.9, 105.4)
Williamsburg City 6,10 1,249.4 (1,160.8, 1,343.3) 168 stable stable trend 25.2 (-29.7, 122.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/24/2016 2:44 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top