Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 *** 217.3 (215.8, 218.9) N/A 16,305 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Yakima County 6 *** 190.9 (182.7, 199.4) 31 (21, 34) 428 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Whitman County 6 *** 117.4 (101.0, 135.7) 39 (37, 39) 41 falling falling trend -10.5 (-15.8, -5.0)
Whatcom County 7 *** 225.4 (216.1, 235.1) 15 (6, 21) 481 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Walla Walla County 6 *** 202.1 (185.5, 219.7) 24 (12, 34) 122 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Wahkiakum County 6 *** 228.4 (156.3, 324.0) 11 (1, 38) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Thurston County 7 *** 234.1 (225.9, 242.5) 9 (3, 17) 674 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Stevens County 6 *** 209.6 (189.9, 230.9) 19 (6, 33) 105 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Spokane County 6 *** 195.0 (189.3, 200.7) 28 (21, 33) 990 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Snohomish County 7 *** 236.5 (231.7, 241.3) 6 (3, 14) 2,007 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Skamania County 6 *** 208.0 (173.0, 248.9) 21 (1, 37) 30 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Skagit County 7 *** 227.2 (215.1, 240.0) 13 (4, 22) 296 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
San Juan County 7 *** 197.0 (167.3, 231.6) 27 (4, 37) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Pierce County 7 *** 239.8 (235.1, 244.5) 5 (2, 12) 2,090 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Pend Oreille County 6 *** 181.8 (149.9, 219.3) 32 (8, 38) 30 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Pacific County 6 *** 208.6 (181.5, 239.1) 20 (2, 35) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Okanogan County 6 *** 240.3 (219.2, 263.0) 4 (1, 21) 114 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.9)
Mason County 7 *** 235.7 (218.9, 253.5) 7 (1, 20) 177 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Lincoln County 6 *** 159.7 (125.5, 201.2) 37 (17, 39) 19 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.3)
Lewis County 6 *** 193.8 (180.0, 208.6) 30 (17, 35) 166 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Klickitat County 6 *** 217.5 (190.0, 248.3) 17 (1, 34) 55 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.7)
Kittitas County 6 *** 167.2 (149.6, 186.5) 36 (27, 38) 74 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Kitsap County 7 *** 252.0 (243.3, 261.0) 1 (1, 7) 706 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
King County 7 *** 217.7 (214.9, 220.5) 16 (13, 22) 4,819 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Jefferson County 7 *** 217.5 (192.9, 244.9) 18 (1, 33) 85 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Island County 7 *** 227.3 (211.9, 243.6) 12 (2, 23) 196 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Grays Harbor County 7 *** 246.8 (230.7, 263.8) 3 (1, 15) 205 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Grant County 6 *** 198.1 (184.6, 212.2) 26 (16, 34) 171 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Garfield County 6 *** 171.1 (103.4, 273.1) 34 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Franklin County 6 *** 176.3 (163.0, 190.4) 33 (25, 37) 133 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Ferry County 6 *** 140.5 (106.1, 184.4) 38 (27, 39) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -0.9)
Douglas County 6 *** 207.8 (187.8, 229.4) 22 (7, 33) 85 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Cowlitz County 6 *** 226.3 (213.1, 240.0) 14 (3, 22) 249 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Columbia County 6 *** 233.6 (168.0, 319.1) 10 (1, 38) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.1)
Clark County 6 *** 198.6 (192.8, 204.5) 25 (19, 31) 946 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.2, -2.6)
Clallam County 7 *** 248.7 (231.7, 266.8) 2 (1, 15) 203 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.7)
Chelan County 6 *** 234.2 (218.4, 251.0) 8 (1, 21) 184 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Benton County 6 *** 207.7 (198.3, 217.4) 23 (14, 29) 395 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Asotin County 6 *** 169.4 (145.1, 196.9) 35 (20, 38) 41 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.6)
Adams County 6 *** 194.0 (164.2, 227.4) 29 (5, 38) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2021 4:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top