Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 *** 469.2 (466.1, 472.4) N/A 18,570 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 487.4 (486.9, 487.8) N/A 859,984 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Clallam County 7 *** 557.1 (529.6, 585.9) 1 (1, 8) 363 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Mason County 7 *** 554.2 (523.5, 586.5) 2 (1, 10) 269 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Kitsap County 7 *** 548.5 (531.6, 565.7) 3 (1, 7) 873 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.2)
Pierce County 7 *** 529.5 (519.4, 539.7) 4 (2, 10) 2,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Grays Harbor County 7 *** 529.1 (500.5, 559.1) 5 (1, 14) 279 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Snohomish County 7 *** 522.1 (511.5, 532.9) 6 (3, 12) 2,046 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Jefferson County 7 *** 520.3 (480.8, 563.2) 7 (1, 16) 171 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Whatcom County 7 *** 513.7 (495.5, 532.4) 8 (3, 15) 641 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 5.9)
Island County 7 *** 510.1 (483.5, 538.0) 9 (2, 16) 310 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Thurston County 7 *** 509.7 (493.4, 526.4) 10 (4, 15) 789 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Chelan County 6 *** 505.4 (476.4, 535.7) 11 (2, 17) 245 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Douglas County 6 *** 500.4 (460.7, 542.7) 12 (1, 19) 123 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Skagit County 7 *** 493.8 (472.0, 516.5) 13 (6, 17) 410 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
King County 7 *** 481.9 (475.8, 488.1) 14 (11, 17) 5,073 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Columbia County 6 *** 481.9 (379.6, 609.9) 15 (1, 35) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Okanogan County 6 *** 478.9 (443.4, 516.9) 16 (4, 22) 149 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Grant County 6 *** 452.6 (425.4, 481.1) 17 (12, 25) 217 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Benton County 6 *** 441.1 (422.5, 460.3) 18 (15, 25) 454 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
San Juan County 7 *** 432.7 (385.1, 486.8) 19 (10, 32) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Walla Walla County 6 *** 427.2 (396.9, 459.1) 20 (15, 30) 156 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.7, -1.9)
Cowlitz County 6 *** 425.8 (403.3, 449.4) 21 (16, 28) 289 stable stable trend -9.3 (-17.8, 0.0)
Lewis County 6 *** 425.2 (400.2, 451.4) 22 (16, 29) 234 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Pacific County 6 *** 420.6 (379.3, 466.4) 23 (14, 33) 88 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Adams County 6 *** 419.2 (358.3, 487.2) 24 (8, 36) 35 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 0.9)
Yakima County 6 *** 416.9 (400.5, 433.8) 25 (18, 29) 507 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Clark County 6 *** 404.2 (392.7, 416.0) 26 (21, 30) 999 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 397.0 (365.8, 429.9) 27 (18, 34) 136 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Klickitat County 6 *** 395.7 (352.3, 443.7) 28 (16, 35) 69 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Spokane County 6 *** 377.9 (367.4, 388.6) 29 (26, 34) 1,044 falling falling trend -9.9 (-15.7, -3.6)
Kittitas County 6 *** 373.6 (340.0, 409.9) 30 (22, 36) 97 stable stable trend 3.9 (-4.7, 13.4)
Wahkiakum County 6 *** 364.4 (272.4, 484.7) 31 (4, 39) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Stevens County 6 *** 351.2 (320.8, 384.0) 32 (27, 37) 117 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.7)
Asotin County 6 *** 350.8 (309.6, 396.6) 33 (23, 37) 58 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.8)
Pend Oreille County 6 *** 346.4 (295.2, 405.3) 34 (22, 38) 40 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.3, -3.1)
Skamania County 6 *** 344.7 (288.6, 409.8) 35 (20, 38) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Lincoln County 6 *** 335.4 (281.1, 399.1) 36 (21, 38) 31 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.0, -2.1)
Garfield County 6 *** 269.7 (175.4, 412.3) 37 (18, 39) 6 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.3, -2.1)
Ferry County 6 *** 262.4 (206.9, 331.4) 38 (33, 39) 18 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.0, -3.3)
Whitman County 6 *** 244.1 (212.4, 279.3) 39 (36, 39) 45 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.5, -3.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/26/2021 8:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top