Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 1 441.3 (439.2, 443.3) N/A 37,988 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Whitman County 6 252.6 (230.3, 276.5) 39 (37, 39) 100 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.2, -2.4)
Ferry County 6 287.6 (243.9, 338.3) 38 (29, 39) 38 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.3)
Asotin County 6 290.9 (264.6, 319.3) 37 (32, 39) 103 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Pend Oreille County 6 318.5 (282.4, 358.6) 36 (26, 38) 72 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.8)
Lincoln County 6 321.8 (281.6, 366.9) 35 (24, 38) 56 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Stevens County 6 325.1 (304.6, 346.7) 34 (29, 37) 225 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Garfield County 6 326.1 (243.0, 433.2) 33 (12, 39) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.4)
Skamania County 6 347.6 (306.9, 392.8) 32 (19, 38) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Adams County 6 347.9 (308.9, 390.3) 31 (19, 37) 60 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Spokane County 6 354.2 (347.3, 361.1) 30 (27, 33) 2,147 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.3, -2.9)
Kittitas County 6 355.2 (332.3, 379.4) 29 (24, 35) 192 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Franklin County 6 362.4 (342.5, 383.1) 28 (23, 34) 266 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Wahkiakum County 6 367.7 (297.9, 451.5) 27 (7, 38) 28 stable stable trend -15.4 (-28.7, 0.4)
Walla Walla County 6 373.4 (353.6, 394.1) 26 (20, 32) 287 falling falling trend -10.3 (-17.0, -3.1)
Lewis County 6 384.1 (367.4, 401.4) 25 (19, 30) 439 falling falling trend -9.2 (-15.4, -2.5)
Clark County 6 388.8 (381.2, 396.5) 24 (21, 28) 2,120 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.5, -3.4)
Yakima County 6 397.1 (386.1, 408.3) 23 (18, 27) 1,029 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Klickitat County 6 402.5 (370.8, 436.5) 22 (15, 30) 139 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Benton County 6 404.4 (392.3, 416.8) 21 (16, 26) 891 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Pacific County 6 410.5 (380.4, 442.9) 20 (14, 28) 172 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Cowlitz County 6 410.7 (395.4, 426.5) 19 (16, 25) 587 falling falling trend -8.0 (-13.5, -2.2)
Grant County 6 419.9 (401.6, 438.7) 18 (15, 24) 417 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Columbia County 6 427.4 (352.7, 515.4) 17 (1, 35) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
San Juan County 7 429.1 (394.5, 466.9) 16 (8, 26) 147 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
King County 7 447.5 (443.5, 451.4) 15 (13, 17) 10,464 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Douglas County 6 452.2 (426.0, 479.6) 14 (4, 19) 236 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Okanogan County 6 469.1 (443.6, 495.7) 13 (1, 17) 289 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Chelan County 6 471.3 (451.7, 491.5) 12 (2, 16) 478 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Whatcom County 7 477.8 (465.8, 490.1) 11 (2, 15) 1,284 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Thurston County 7 480.0 (469.4, 490.8) 10 (2, 14) 1,662 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Skagit County 7 480.9 (465.8, 496.3) 9 (1, 15) 847 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Snohomish County 7 483.0 (476.3, 489.8) 8 (3, 13) 4,235 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Island County 7 483.3 (465.1, 502.1) 7 (1, 14) 626 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Grays Harbor County 7 484.0 (464.8, 503.9) 6 (1, 15) 531 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Jefferson County 7 485.6 (458.2, 514.6) 5 (1, 16) 334 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Pierce County 7 490.6 (484.2, 497.1) 4 (1, 9) 4,669 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Kitsap County 7 494.8 (483.8, 506.0) 3 (1, 10) 1,679 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.1)
Mason County 7 495.9 (475.5, 517.1) 2 (1, 13) 502 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Clallam County 7 504.9 (486.0, 524.4) 1 (1, 10) 688 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 12:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top