Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 5 *** 445.3 (443.1, 447.5) N/A 32,662 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 451.0 (450.7, 451.4) N/A 1,419,027 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Kitsap County 7 *** 507.3 (495.4, 519.5) 1 (1, 7) 1,509 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Clallam County 7 *** 506.7 (486.9, 527.3) 2 (1, 10) 637 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3)
Grays Harbor County 7 *** 501.2 (480.4, 522.8) 3 (1, 11) 494 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.2)
Snohomish County 7 *** 500.0 (492.5, 507.5) 4 (1, 8) 3,672 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
Mason County 7 *** 499.7 (478.2, 522.2) 5 (1, 12) 464 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Pierce County 7 *** 491.4 (484.3, 498.6) 6 (2, 10) 3,820 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Jefferson County 7 *** 485.6 (456.6, 516.5) 7 (1, 15) 304 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Whatcom County 7 *** 482.3 (469.6, 495.4) 8 (3, 13) 1,168 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Thurston County 7 *** 481.5 (470.1, 493.2) 9 (4, 13) 1,455 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Skagit County 7 *** 478.5 (462.8, 494.6) 10 (3, 14) 781 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Island County 7 *** 476.2 (457.0, 496.2) 11 (2, 15) 557 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
King County 7 *** 462.3 (457.7, 466.9) 12 (10, 15) 8,193 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Chelan County 6 *** 453.3 (433.5, 473.7) 13 (8, 18) 435 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Columbia County 6 *** 449.1 (372.3, 539.9) 14 (1, 34) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Douglas County 6 *** 440.0 (413.6, 467.8) 15 (9, 23) 218 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Okanogan County 6 *** 435.6 (409.5, 463.1) 16 (10, 24) 240 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Cowlitz County 6 *** 423.7 (407.5, 440.4) 17 (13, 23) 566 falling falling trend -10.4 (-15.7, -4.9)
Benton County 6 *** 422.7 (409.7, 435.9) 18 (14, 23) 854 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
San Juan County 7 *** 409.5 (374.6, 447.8) 19 (13, 32) 134 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Grant County 6 *** 404.4 (386.0, 423.6) 20 (15, 29) 376 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Clark County 6 *** 401.5 (393.3, 409.8) 21 (18, 27) 1,958 falling falling trend -7.0 (-9.3, -4.5)
Walla Walla County 6 *** 401.3 (380.1, 423.4) 22 (15, 30) 292 falling falling trend -7.0 (-12.9, -0.6)
Klickitat County 6 *** 398.3 (365.6, 433.6) 23 (14, 33) 128 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Lewis County 6 *** 395.6 (378.2, 413.6) 24 (17, 30) 429 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Pacific County 6 *** 391.9 (361.1, 425.1) 25 (15, 33) 153 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Skamania County 6 *** 387.6 (342.6, 437.4) 26 (13, 36) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.3)
Yakima County 6 *** 381.8 (370.5, 393.2) 27 (22, 32) 908 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Wahkiakum County 6 *** 380.8 (305.1, 472.1) 28 (3, 38) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Spokane County 6 *** 376.2 (368.8, 383.7) 29 (24, 32) 2,101 falling falling trend -7.3 (-12.3, -2.1)
Franklin County 6 *** 372.7 (351.4, 394.9) 30 (21, 35) 246 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Adams County 6 *** 355.2 (314.8, 399.2) 31 (19, 37) 59 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Kittitas County 6 *** 350.1 (326.4, 375.1) 32 (26, 37) 176 stable stable trend 3.0 (-5.8, 12.5)
Stevens County 6 *** 347.6 (325.1, 371.3) 33 (26, 37) 217 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Pend Oreille County 6 *** 341.1 (302.9, 383.5) 34 (23, 38) 72 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.5)
Lincoln County 6 *** 330.4 (289.9, 375.9) 35 (23, 38) 57 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Asotin County 6 *** 314.8 (286.6, 345.2) 36 (31, 38) 105 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.4)
Garfield County 6 *** 312.5 (229.5, 420.7) 37 (14, 39) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Ferry County 6 *** 283.7 (235.8, 340.8) 38 (31, 39) 31 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Whitman County 6 *** 257.2 (233.7, 282.4) 39 (37, 39) 94 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2021 12:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top